Covid-19 News

    NIH Lists Ivermectin as Targeted Antiviral of Interest for COVID-19



    NIH Lists Ivermectin as Targeted Antiviral of Interest for COVID-19
    While mass media article after article attacks ivermectin as horse medication of anti-vaxxers, in the meantime, the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
    trialsitenews.com


    While mass media article after article attacks ivermectin as horse medication of anti-vaxxers, in the meantime, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have more formally embraced the drug, including in the government-funded ACTIV-6 clinical trial. Many naysayers in the media declare that the drug is dangerous or not fit for human consumption, yet nearly 4 billion doses of the drug have been donated via the Mectizan program alone—one that has eradicated river blindness. Of the 64 studies completed involving ivermectin, a couple dozen randomized controlled trials evidence some real promise.


    Now the NIH offers the world even more evidence as to the seriousness of this potential treatment. Under a table titled “Table 2e Characteristics of Antiviral Agents that Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19,” the NIH includes Remdesivir, Ivermectin, and Nitazoxanide.


    The COVID-OUT trial is another major ivermectin study ongoing led by the University of Minnesota. Funded with over $100 million by the National Institutes of Health, ACTIV-6 is led by Duke University’s Clinical Research Institute.


    In the meantime, Merck’s recent Molnupiravir announcement has led to global deal-making as various nations take their first orders of the drug—even though there have been no peer review results yet nor emergency authorization or approval.

    Quote from Fm1

    While Singapore is one of the most vaccinated nations in the nation—with most jabs associated with what’s considered the high efficacy mRNA BNT162b2, the cases of Delta have exploded in the past month.

    Only fools believe in papers claiming fake medical facts. For Pfizer high antibodies = high protection, what is nonsense because these decay exponentially. So all Pfizer fake papers I know have been constructed within days to max 3 months post jab with pre-selected blood samples....


    Today we know. Pfizer, after 4 months, gives 0 protection for a delta infection and also almost no protection from death for age 70+. Pfizer is a pure cancer gene therapy and not a vaccine at all.

    So people like THHuxleynew will enjoy a live long chemo! And after each chemo the will promote it...in teh hope to share the damage with others....


    In my view people that be greedy for a booster and at the same time claim their "vaccine" does a perfect protection are severely brain damaged already and are no longer able to judge what is good or bad...


    Lets look at Singapore in two months. May be they in the mean time can clear the Israel world record for most infections/million in a day that stays well above 2000 far upfront USA/UK with a peek around 1000...

    Quote from Fm1

    In the meantime, Merck’s recent Molnupiravir announcement has led to global deal-making as various nations take their first orders of the drug—even though there have been no peer review results yet nor emergency authorization or approval.

    It's Frankensteins Time!!!


    Merck currently is a 100'000% disgusting "company" or better a bunch of greedy criminals.

    Jesus Thomas, talk about spin, that just made me dizzy. The fact of the matter is the narrative is changing. More and more as the studies come out, the media is now starting to pay attention. These vaccines are not what was promised or promoted by vaccine warriors. People still get infected still pass it on still are hospitalized and still die. Spin it all you want, those are what the data indicates, period!

    Quote from Alan Smith

    We (UK) still have high infection and death rates. But people are acting like 'it's all over' - I've just been into my local shopping area - 2 Malls, street market etc, Packed with people and hardly a mask in sight.

    Same here in the US. Went to Denver, Breckenridge and Vail in the Rocky Mountains few weeks ago. Very liberal areas. Every store and restaurant had sign "Facemasks required". Very, very few people though wore masks, and the owners ignored those not complying. The employees for the most part had their masks down under their nose.


    Guess everyone is following the lead of our leaders, and celebrities with their "do as I say, not as I do" mandates.

    Quote from Fm1

    These vaccines are not what was promised or promoted by vaccine warriors.

    Yes, they are far better than predicted last year. When 70 to 90% of people take them, the pandemic stops abruptly, as you see in Japan.

    Quote from Fm1

    People still get infected still pass it on still are hospitalized and still die.

    Obviously. That is true of all vaccines. No one ever said otherwise. However, when the vaccine stops transmission, even people with weak immune systems will not be infected.

    Thailand’s Herbal Remedy Beating Mild COVID-19—90.02% Success Rate in Study with 11,800 Prison Inmates


    Thailand’s Herbal Remedy Beating Mild COVID-19—90.02% Success Rate in Study with 11,800 Prison Inmates
    Thailand was hit hard with the Delta variant surge, and vaccination experienced a slow start as the manufacturer granted the license to produce the
    trialsitenews.com


    Thailand was hit hard with the Delta variant surge, and vaccination experienced a slow start as the manufacturer granted the license to produce the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine had no real experience in vaccine production. Now reports indicate that a cheap, herbal medicine might just be working to treat SARS-Cov-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Just a couple months ago, Thailand’s national cabinet actually approved green chiretta for use in people with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infections following a successful study in the prison system here. Most of the nation’s jails now use the herbal remedy with a remarkable track record to the study—90.02% that took the drug got better. These are better results than Molnupiravir, ivermectin, favipiravir, and remdesivir (the latter in a hospital setting). While the drug isn’t a silver bullet nor cure, it may be just what the doctor ordered to treat the 90% of COVID-19 cases that are simply asymptomatic or mild in nature. While the data must still be substantiated, this could be game-changing, bombshell information.


    An Answer to Crisis?

    Often packed, overcrowded jails were infection-rich environments for the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen. With the virus rapidly spreading across the jails, in the six months since April 2021, nearly 25% of the nation’s prisoners were found positive for COVID-19.


    While the standard of care here still remains antivirals (favipiravir, etc.) or hospital care, the economical and plentiful green chiretta offers the nation an alternative for the vast majority of COVID-19 patients. That is the 90% or so of COVID-19 cases that turn out to be asymptomatic or mild in nature. Now momentum builds for a pandemic killer—green chiretta to be used at early COVID-19 onset. A critically important time to care for the disease as this can limit the number of cases that progress on to the need for hospitalization.


    A rush is now on to produce green chiretta in the prisons and across 24,000 villages while the Thai government continues to monitor clinical trials. Thailand’s ministry of justice Somsak Thepsuthin shared with Sky News’ Asia correspondent Siobhan Robbins at a recent event on the topic, “If we use modern medicines, the cost is 20 times, 30 times, 50 times higher…and in the prisons, it’s very crowded.”


    Either way, the secret’s getting out as last month Japan’s Asia Nikkei reported that demand for the herb has absolutely surged.


    The Treatment

    The herb is known as chiretta (Andrographis paniculate), also known here as Fah talai jone. TrialSite’s Indonesian correspondent suggested a highlight today for the audience in North America and beyond. A number of jails here are using herbal medicine, including Chainat jail.


    Used as a herbal medicine commonly in these parts to treat colds, now the herb features front and center in the war against COVID-19. According to one prisoner, one of the prisoners working to grow the crop told a Sky News SE Asia correspondent Siobhan Robbins that “Its properties help reduce fever and coughing,” according to one prisoner. This particular inmate locked up for narcotics must tend to the harvest, which has been used to treat 69,000 other inmates with COVID-19—talk about a real-world study.


    What is Green Chiretta?

    Called Andrographis paniculate (creat), the annual herbaceous plant falls in the Ancanthaceae family native to India and Sri Lanka. Widely cultivated in south and southeastern parts of Asia, the plant is traditionally used as a treatment for bacterial infections and select diseases.


    Real-World Data

    Sky News reports that the government is now claiming that the recovery rate blows away Molnupiravir and even ivermectin! Out of 11,800 inmates who took the drug to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection, 99.02% recovered.


    The Thai sources report that over 700 prisoners took a regimen of 15 pills a day for five days during an August Delta variant variant-driven outbreak of COVID-19 in August. Ms. Robbins reports that the staff declared “all of them recovered.”


    According to the jail medic Chitsanuphong Saublaongiw, the traditional medicine is absolutely working to ease mild symptoms.


    According to the medic, the herb consists of a substance known as andrographolide, which the Thai prison medical representative believes helps inhibit the viral spread. For example, he suggested, “After taking green chiretta, the prisoners had better chest x-ray results, fewer symptoms, the disease was less severe, and they returned to normal quickly.” He continued, “Asymptomatic patients didn’t develop any symptoms.”


    Of course, even if it alleviates symptoms, this herbal medicine isn’t a cure to COVID-19. But remember, neither is Molnupiravir or, for that matter, Ivermectin. Authorities here acknowledge that they need more data such as what is “the suitable amount of andropgrapholide [substance in the plant that triggers the inhibitory effects].” Two ongoing studies involving 1,400 COVID-19 patients investigate the use of green chiretta—results are projected for the spring.


    Some have declared this news is overblown. For example, Dr. Amporn Benjaponpitak shared reservations in an interview. The Department of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine director-general shared that “Fah Talai Jone can’t provide any real protection against the virus.” His point is that it can be used to treat COVID-19 symptoms, but if the herb doesn’t work in the first couple of days, one cannot depend on it to stop COVID.


    But the data coming out of Thailand should not (and will not) be ignored.


    The Harvesting

    The plant is grown and then harvested by the prisoners. They must cut and collect the mature stems then organize and move the plant parts to the ground to be dried by a separate group. A dark green powder is the final ingredient, which is then packed into capsules, reports Ms. Robbins before distribution to other prisons in the area.


    Now 141 jails all over Thailand will produce 38 million green chiretta tablets by November—sort of a pharmacy store for prison inmates moving forward.


    Moreover, the Thai government continues to study clinical trials ongoing while suggesting that up to 24,000 villages grow the crop to ensure supplies are ready for additional outbreaks.


    Call to Action: TrialSite will continue to monitor the progress with green chiretta. Follow Ms. Robbins at Sky News as well.


    COVID-19: Thailand's prisons trial traditional herbal remedy to treat coronavirus
    The traditional green pill has been given to over 69,000 offenders with COVID-19, but is only used in mild or asymptomatic cases
    news.sky.com


    Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity of Andrographis paniculata Extract and Its Major Component Andrographolide in Human Lung Epithelial Cells and Cytotoxicity Evaluation in Major Organ Cell Representatives
    The coronaviruses disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has become a major health problem, affecting more than 50 million people…
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    Black Congressional Candidate Makes a Provocative Point—Anyone Listening?


    Black Congressional Candidate Makes a Provocative Point—Anyone Listening?
    While TrialSite generally avoids overtly political spaces and places we were sent an interesting video from an African American group concerned about
    trialsitenews.com


    Anyone Listening?


    TrialSite Staff

    October 10, 2021

    1 Comment




    While TrialSite generally avoids overtly political spaces and places we were sent an interesting video from an African American group concerned about vaccine mandates. Specifically, an up-and-coming Black Republican, Billy Prempeh shared what was a proactive and some would say eye-opening message to White Liberals about Black lives during the pandemic. Do “Black Lives Matter” asks Prempeh? Then why not consider the vaccine mandate-related concerns of a large group of Americans that have a shared history involving horrific illicit and illegal human experimentation?


    Mr. Prempeh first shares some interesting facts for fellow Americans to consider and digest. A U.S. An Air Force veteran originally from Patterson, New Jersey, Prempeh ran for the U.S. House to represent the New Jersey 9th Congressional District, losing November 3, 2020. While Prempeh undoubtedly has his political biases, nonetheless his point of view merits consideration.


    He explains in a message to “White Liberals that only 28% of Blacks aged 18 to 44 years of age are vaccinated in New York. This means that the vaccine passports so appreciated in liberal enclaves such as New York and Los Angeles deny life-important services to 72% of the Black population. Prempeh emphasizes that White liberals should view this as racist—much like some of the voter ID laws now unfolding—but they don’t. Rather those that are not vaccinated are vilified and often aligned with anti-vax, right-wing types.


    Mr. Prempeh goes on to educate White Liberals because Blacks have fears about becoming human guinea pigs yet again, a common theme in history. What follows are some examples given by Mr. Prempeh:


    The Tuskegee Experiments—an ethically abusive study conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the United States Public Health Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on a group of almost 400 African Americans with syphilis. Their goal of this study was to observe the effects of the disease when untreated, even though by the end of the study the disease was completely treatable. These African American men were not informed as to the nature of the experiment—over 100 of them died as a result.

    Agent Orange Studies—between 1965 and 1966 the government conducted experimental research on a group predominantly made up of Blacks. The study centered on the effects of Agent Orange however the subjects were told the study was concerned with dermatology.

    During the Cold War Prempeh raised the specter of research conducted between 1960 and 1971 involving many poor Black patients. According to this account subjects were told that this research could cure cancer but actually the investigators were only concerned with determining how much radiation their bodies could take.

    Undoubtedly Mr. Prempeh has a copy of “Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present” an award winning book chronicling the history of Black America’s “shocking mistreatment as unwilling and unwitting experimental subjects at the hands of the medical establishment.”


    Another noteworthy unethical human research included:


    Project MKUltra—actually a CIA “mind control” study involving an illegal initiative to conduct experiments on human subjects designed, and led by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. These particular studies were meant to help identify and develop drugs that could be used to force confessions via mind control.

    Beecher Paper—Harvard anesthesiologist Henry K. Beecher wrote about 22 published medical studies in which patients were subjected to experiments with no expected benefit to the patient.

    Many studies overseas, especially in Africa , India and other developing economies have raised more than eyebrows.


    In September 2013, the Supreme Court of India (SC) put more pressure on the pharmaceutical industry to ensure clinical trials were conducted in the world’s second most populous nation ethically and legally. This case was prompted by a range of highly questionable studies where participants in studies, often poor villagers, were subjected to irregular and unethical practices. Whether due to lack of informed consent or inadequate compensation for the death of subjects, the clinical trials industry took a big hit by the end of 2012 due to the SC decision.

    Zimbabwe ultimately banned Depo-Provera as in the late 20th century the drug was tested on unsuspecting Zimbabwean women. Once approved the drug was used for population control in the 1970s.

    Kano Nigeria was the site for a 1996 clinical trial involving the Pfizer drug Trovan to treat meningitis resulting in 200 children being disabled and the deaths of 11. The Nigerian government sued Pfizer of whether proper use of informed consent was in fact used. Pfizer argued it had met the threshold for an ethical study. By 2006 a report surfaced that Pfizer was at fault. As a consequence of these studies many Nigerians as a result do not trust Pharma and clinical trials.

    In the early to mid-1990s U.S. drug companies in partnership in some cases with Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) led clinical trials investigating the use of AZT on HIV-positive African subjects with the goal of developing treatments to reduce the transmission of the disease during childbirth. NIH and CDC-funded studies led to the study of the drug on over 17,000 Zimbabwean women for the efficacy of AZT in preventing the transmission of the disease during childbirth. Peter Lamptey, head of the AIDS Control and Prevention program was quoted “If you interviewed the people in the study, most wouldn’t understand what they had actually consented.” Although the study sponsors knew they could have stopped the transmission of HIV/AIDS children they handed out placebos leading to an estimated newborn child HIV/AIDS cases. The testing of this study finally stopped by 1998 when the CDC declared it has sufficient data from the ongoing study in Thailand.

    Dengue Fever–most recently in the Philippines an inoculation program went bad leading to dozens of child deaths. Called the “Dengvaxia controversy”, a vaccination program run by the Department of Health in the Philippines and administered by Sanofi-Pasteur’s Dengvaxia to school children led to deaths. The French company disclosed to the Philippines government that the vaccine could place previously uninfected people at higher risk of a severe case of dengue fever. The DOH suspended the school-based vaccination program and subsequently the Philippines government banned the sale and use of the vaccine product in the country. The incidence led to vaccine hesitancy and what some health care researchers declared was a rise in infectious disease with lower vaccine and immunization rates.

    There are many, many more examples of unethical or illegal research that has spooked societies around the world. And then there are absolute health-related scandals such as the opioid crisis. Just a result of recent history the medical establishment allowed a flood of high-powered opioids to be regularly prescribed to American society. Current litigation continues due to the wreckage of that ongoing crisis—the opioid crisis is an epidemic by itself.


    Back to Mr. Prempeh—he most certainly has a point. From POTUS on down the current administration has absolutely been reckless in their use of divide and conquer tactics to politicize the pandemic for their political gain. TrialSite is a pro-vaccine, pro-pharma platform but this has nothing to do with the points Prempeh raises. The use of government authority to direct social media to block scientific debate and dissention is disgusting–the current POTUS’s press secretary is on the record that this administration is doing just that. The administration behind the scenes pushed for an accelerated FDA approval to justify mandates–that’s exactly what they did. Don’t sign up for a mandate even if one has legitimate concerns–for whatever reason–lose your job, livelihood and in the cases of Blacks in New York they are most definitely disproportionately impacted.


    We often hear from the highest medical authority, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, that we all need to be vaccinated to stop viral spread. But that’s an absolute half-truth if not a bold face lie. Data from around the world indicate that the current vaccines, novel and less than a year old, wane in effectiveness within a few months. Consequently, stronger variants such as Delta SARS-CoV-2 become highly transmissible regardless of one’s vaccinated or not. These vaccines are still new, were rushed through regulator bodies, and must still be studied for longer term impacts.


    Safe and effective vaccination targeting dangerous viruses and pathogens is critically important. Politicizing and using the pandemic to force mandates as well as discriminate against whole classes of people, essentially creating a two-tier society is corrupt and unacceptable practice in democracies. And given the history African Americans have endured in terms of unethical research they have an absolute right to be suspicious.

    Quote from Fm1

    Most of the nation’s jails now use the herbal remedy with a remarkable track record to the study—90.02% that took the drug got better.

    Remember the US jail with Ivermectin? 100% success no casualty...


    ?key=79d9df41104dd557dd0d1fde13a0e5b25eaee8facd28012c9ea70ddf6585f3e9-aHR0cHM6Ly9zd3Bycy5vcmcvd3AtY29udGVudC91cGxvYWRzLzIwMjAvMTAvcGNyLWN1bHR1cmUtYW5hbHlzaXMtcmFvdWx0LnBuZw%3D%3D

    The Trouble With PCR Tests
    Already in mid-March, SPR explained that the highly sensitive PCR tests are prone to producing false-positive results and their predictive value may easily…

    swprs.org


    at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive


    A good summary about the significance of PCR tests.

    We here stop at 35 cycles what is a guaranteed "0" result. But even at 30 cycles 4 out of 5 are false positives...

    Even more astonishing is that also at very low cycle numbers there is a fairly large number of false positives. This should not happen at all!



    from same site::

    In Madagascar, the first country to apply artemisia annua extract against covid, covid mortality and excess mortality have remained very low, even for African standards.

    Let me just reply:

    Quote from Fm1

    Jesus Thomas, talk about spin, that just made me dizzy. The fact of the matter is the narrative is changing. More and more as the studies come out, the media is now starting to pay attention. These vaccines are not what was promised or promoted by vaccine warriors. People still get infected still pass it on still are hospitalized and still die. Spin it all you want, those are what the data indicates, period!


    Sheesh, FM1. You must have some inner censor that makes you skip my posts and inserts what you think I've said. You call me a vaccine warrior and I've never said anything that contradicts data changing, nor have i been definite.


    I don't know about vaccine warriors. If you mean politicians, well they are politicians. if you mean US medical authorities - they were doling out info correct for origibal COVID for a long time.


    But, the reason is just that there is almost no definite info about COVID (untill very recently).


    I or you can guess - it is pretty obvious - that the vaccines are much less effective against delta. And Fauci or whoever would agree with that but say they are still highly effetcive at preventing serious disease or death.


    I can be sure that the vaccines are highly effective, now, against serious disease or death. that is a big deal for everyone and more than we might have got from them.


    It is not as much as we would like, but then we were told at the start that variants would likely reduce efficacy of vaccines and we now have a variant far away from original COVID.


    The one figure - which is what you might old against US medics in particular - that has "changed" is the efficacy against getting covid. I agree - when the US people were all saying breakthrough infections were very rare they were using non-delta data. And it was unrealistic, because delta is the porblem. In the UK we know that because delta hit is 2 months before you. But it still helps prevent you getting COVID - more if you are young. So I agree that was spin, but otherwise they would have had to see, it helps prevent infection - we don't know exactly how much, nor how much the protection will reduce over time.


    Scientists will not give you an exact figure for this which is very difficult to calculate with so many variables:

    age

    length of time from vaccination

    variant


    And data just not available for what you want to know which is risk now. Many different papers will calculate answer in different cases and come up with different numbers.


    COVID has been - and will continue - to throw up surprises. The world's biggest bet - vaccines - has turned out not as good as we'd like, but better than mots expected originally.


    That is life. Suck it up.

    it's not me or w or anyone but the warriors that need to suck it up as you say. Over a year ago w and I saw what could happen with a new vaccine and a mutating virus. You and the warriors told us we were wrong and starting conspiracy theories. Your narrative of delta being more lethal has disappeared as more studies come out. You concerns for long covid is extremely overblown, and your concern for mis-c is again overblown as it would seem that most diagnosed with mis-c is again an activation of latent kawasaki disease bacteria and it's easily treated with an aspirin. The narrative is changing, it might be time for you my friend to join the light

    it's not me or w or anyone but the warriors that need to suck it up as you say. Over a year ago w and I saw what could happen with a new vaccine and a mutating virus. You and the warriors told us we were wrong and starting conspiracy theories. Your narrative of delta being more lethal has disappeared as more studies come out. You concerns for long covid is extremely overblown, and your concern for mis-c is again overblown as it would seem that most diagnosed with mis-c is again an activation of latent kawasaki disease bacteria and it's easily treated with an aspirin. The narrative is changing, it might be time for you my friend to join the light

    it's not me or w or anyone but the warriors that need to suck it up as you say. Over a year ago w and I saw what could happen with a new vaccine and a mutating virus. You and the warriors told us we were wrong and starting conspiracy theories. Your narrative of delta being more lethal has disappeared as more studies come out. You concerns for long covid is extremely overblown, and your concern for mis-c is again overblown as it would seem that most diagnosed with mis-c is again an activation of latent kawasaki disease bacteria and it's easily treated with an aspirin. The narrative is changing, it might be time for you my friend to join the light

    Worldwide the same false narrative is promoted::

    Can Japan actually achieve COVID herd immunity and prevent a 6th infection wave? - The Mainichi
    TOKYO -- Over 60% of people in Japan have had two COVID-19 vaccine shots, and new positive cases numbers are rapidly decreasing. But infections are sp
    mainichi.jp


    >80% inoculation = herd immunity...

    This is FUD of the worst kind. We know that vaccines do not give you any immunity for promoting the disease or stop the pandemic as there is no sterile immunity produced!


    Only natural infection will stop the pandemic even if we have 100% vaccination!!!

    The pandemic is over Covid is endemic, it's time to live with it. Big pharma knows the vaccine gig is over and now pushing anti viral early treatment. Something that would have stopped this pandemic as soon as it started but instead ...........

    As I said the narrative is changing!


    BOMBSHELL! 661 Maine VAERS deaths in 28 days exposes Problems in State’s Narrative


    BOMBSHELL! 661 Maine VAERS deaths in 28 days exposes Problems in State's Narrative
    During courtroom legal testimony, TrialSite advisory committee member Dr. Peter McCullough reports that the adverse event death rate in the state of Maine
    trialsitenews.com




    During courtroom legal testimony, TrialSite advisory committee member Dr. Peter McCullough reports that the adverse event death rate in the state of Maine indicates considerable cause for concern. An inordinate amount of deaths, 661 within 28 days after vaccination, suggests a distinct possible link, although, of course, this isn’t prima facie proof that the deaths are caused by the COVIID-19 vaccines. The VAERS death rate is 7 times the rate of Maine’s average monthly Covid death rate. During the entire year of 2020, Maine reported 1,070 Covid deaths. The lawsuit centers on a call for injunctive relief bought by the Alliance Against Healthcare Mandates. This plaintiff seeks to stop the State of Maine’s emergency rulemaking order mandating all healthcare workers to get the jab for COVID-19. On the plaintiff’s side was counsel Ron Jenkins while on the state was represented by Attorney General Thomas Knowlton. Apparently, the entire court proceeding is blacked out from mainstream media, which by itself is quite troubling.


    The Lawsuit

    Early in September, the Alliance Against Healthcare Mandates filed a lawsuit against the State of Maine seeking to block SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandates targeting health care workers. The key legal claim centered on the lack of legislative input or public hearings supporting the mandates. The plaintiffs argue that severe staffing shortages and stress on first responders would ensure. The target deadline for all affected workers is October 29, 2021.


    Dr. Peter McCullough: Expert Witness

    Published on YouTube, Dr. McCullough’s court testimony occurred Friday, Oct. 8, for a court audience in Augusta, Maine. The testimony revealed that 661 Mainers died within 28 days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, which places those deaths within the CDC’s window of investigatory concern as significant events. Dr. McCullough cautions all that the nature and timing of the deaths is highly suspect and needs to be investigated.


    On the Defensive

    The State of Maine’s CDC Director, Dr. Nirav Shah, shared his point of view. First, it should be noted that this office only investigated 31 of the 661 deaths—that is, those deaths that involved Myocarditis or inflammation of the heart often triggered by viral infection. Second, Dr. Shah minimizes the 661 deaths by comparing this count to the 400 million doses administered nationwide. Of course, that’s really just a real cheap trick as the State of Main only has about 1.4 million. So, the fact that this educated professional even tried such a comparison as a means of deflection only raises suspicion even further.


    Moreover, Shah attempted to persuade the judge that the actual number of COVID-19 vaccines exceeded all previous vaccines for the last three decades. Finally, his personal analysis of breakthrough cases and what’s actually happening out in the world are two very distinct realities.


    The Deaths

    The CDC director reported that the following death categories were not investigated whatsoever:


    Heart Attacks (391)

    Strokes (260)

    Embolisms (216)

    Low platelet counts (201) or others

    Rather these often-overlapping diagnoses were given to the CDC purportedly to investigate.


    Call to Action—check out the video. Follow Dr. McCullough’s on the McCullough Report. See a Facebook site associated with the Alliance Against Healthcare Mandates.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Anonymous Doctors: Alberta Failing on COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatment


    Anonymous Doctors: Alberta Failing on COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatment
    On October 4, attorneys Rath & Company sent a stinging letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) regarding letters from
    trialsitenews.com


    On October 4, attorneys Rath & Company sent a stinging letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) regarding letters from CPSA’s Council to both doctors and the public in Alberta province. The lawyers note that they represent both vaccinated and unvaccinated doctors who are anonymous based on veiled threats from CPSA. Key issues in the letter include interference with patient autonomy and “colluding in the coercion” of patients into taking experimental vaccines. The other concern raised is discouragement of doctors using their own judgement for “alternative treatments” like ivermectin. Rath & Company also raises concern about an Open Letter from CPSA’s panel of experts from October 1. Misinformation in the Open Letter includes the claim that “there is 1 in 20 risk of hospitalization with documented COVID-19 infections in Alberta,” while ignoring the government’s own position that at any given time, there are four times as many folks infected as the number of reported cases. Thus, the correct ratio would be one in 80. And a problem with scaremongering is that we can lose sight of key facts; the bulk of hospitalizations and death are in folks over 70, and “the average age of death of someone from COVID-19 is higher than the average age of provincial life expectancy.” So, to mandate vaccination upon young and healthy doctors, nurses, etc., violates their rights under generally accepted medical ethics. CPSA’s Open Letter also suggests that 12-year-olds should be able to consent on their own to vaccination.


    Recommended Consent Language

    Government of Ontario data shows that the Moderna vaccine leads to myocarditis in about 1-in-5,000 of 18–24-year old’s; the comparable figure for Pfizer is 1 in 28,000. And Canada’s vaccine rollout was experimental from the outset; Astra-Zeneca’s product was pulled when it was shown to corollate with thrombosis in 1 out of 58,000 persons over 80. Then that same product was “mixed and matched with Pfizer and Moderna injections without adequate research having been done as to possible adverse effects.” There is also evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 are at an increased risk from the mRNA products. And especially as to young folks, the “government of Ontario’s data demonstrates that this is likely more harmful to that group than AstraZeneca[‘s product] was to people over 80.” Citing Canada’s definition of assault along with the voluntary consent requirements of the Nuremburg principles, the lawyers argue that the threat of losing one’s livelihood vitiates any consent thereby obtained. The Rath law firm goes on to list items that should be included in advising potential vaccinees:


    • That this mRNA therapy program does not provide immunity for COVID-19 and only provides an unknown amount of protection from the virus for a limited time;


    • that people who receive injections can, in fact, get infected with COVID themselves and pass the virus on to other members of their family, including their aging parents;


    • that there is insufficient data over a multi-year period to advise that the injection is safe and that serious life-threatening conditions, including permanent damage to the heart muscle (myocarditis) and DEATH, may occur in healthy people under the age of 50 as a result of taking the injection;


    • that if you are under the age of 50, with no comorbidities, you are at a greater risk of a serious illness or adverse event, including COVID-like sickness, including fever, and DEATH from the vaccine than you are in actually suffering permanent harm from COVID itself;


    • that the incidence of COVID-19 “vaccines” causing death or seriously adverse outcomes in children is greater than the potential for children to have any serious outcome from actually contracting COVID-19; and


    • that pregnant women should be advised that the effects of the Pfizer and Moderna injections on fetal health are in fact unknown and that vaccine side effects may, in fact, include spontaneous miscarriage and fetal abnormalities.


    New Mutation, Old Vaccine

    Next, the Rath letter notes that the CPSA has effectively threatened doctors about granting vaccine exemptions while at the same time denying the science from Israel, showing that natural immunity is over 10 times as effective as an mRNA product. And at this point, the vaccinated are now dying at a higher rate than the unvaccinated in the UK. The attorneys note that their “clients are extremely concerned that we have now reached a stage in the course of the mutation of the virus that using a vaccine developed for an extinct pathogen in regard to viruses that have mutated is dangerous. It now appears that the virus has mutated specifically to avoid the original ‘vaccine’ in a manner that will cause further widespread transmission of the virus and death amongst those fully-vaccinated.” And the clients think that the vaccinated need to be more fully aware that they can spread this disease.


    Ivermectin Saves Lives

    Rath’s clients also fault CPSA for its position on ivermectin. Having banned this drug’s use for COVID-19 patients, the group is ignoring the fact that, “Physicians of good conscience in the Province of Alberta, having read studies indicating that Ivermectin is effective in the earliest stages of COVID in lessening viral replication within the patient, have properly prescribed Ivermectin to their patients in this province. Numerous studies and clinical observation of thousands of patients has indicated that Ivermectin is highly effective in this regard. Even low dose studies that were designed to reach the conclusion that ivermectin was not effective found a signal that indicated that Ivermectin effectively interacted with the COVID virus molecule to prevent or lessen replication of the virus.” And even poorer nations have used this drug to achieve dramatic reductions in morbidity.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.