A team decision triggered by complaints from within and without the forum membership.
This - foreign complaints - really is dangerous stuff. We all expect that you fully lay open the foreign complaints. For these no privacy protection exists.
We know that a few of you are exposed to the MF/R/B mafia fear mongering and may be also budget threats. Google will also delist you.
Importantly, vaccination still provided protection against death in infected persons, and this benefit was observed for the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen vaccines during the Delta surge, although the benefit was greater for Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech compared to Janssen vaccines. Our findings support the conclusion that COVID-19 vaccines remain the most important tool to prevent infection and death. Vaccines should be accompanied by additional measures for both vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, including masking, hand washing, and physical distancing.
Such papers are children bullshit to divert the public. By looking at a 6 months period you can hide everything behind an average. We know that all parameters of CoV-19 show a highly exponential dependency. Thus only the endpoints are of interest and not the averages.
Take a machine gun fire it into a bunch of people. 17 Dead -- oh 17 out of 80'000. This proves machine gun shots are nor really deadly the risk is just 17/80'000 ....
Be aware of the FM/R/B mafia cheating tricks.
Facts about CoV-19::
- Vaccines give you absolute no protection from an infection. The first 2 months post jab this might look that way because the 1.2 % that got CoV-19 1..7 days post jab count as regular infections....
- Vaccinated are infected by CoV-19 at a much higher rate than unvaxxinated:: See: https://assets.publishing.serv…llance-report-week-44.pdf
- Vaccines after 6 months give you only a marginal protection from death in the range 2..3x depending on age class.
- Anti virals taken early give you >99% protection
- RNA vaccines (in fact monoclonal antibody cancer treatment) do not proliferate an immune memory. So these therapies are not vaccines they just mimic a vaccine effect.
- Only a natural infection can give you a long time (> 10 years) protection
- The S1 spike protein in a healthy cell may induce cancer. This only happens with RNA vaccines not with CoV-19 as a virus kills the cell!
India:: Still no COV-19 wave in sight. 90% of India is CoV-19 free thanks to the "Ziverdo kit"!
Only the two vaccine terror states of Kerala, Mizoram still are under high load pressure. Mizoram (1 mio people) is among the worst states on the planet, where as Kerala still dumps 200 hidden deaths/day from the 6000 in did not report. https://www.mygov.in/covid-19
All western states can learn from Kerala, Mizoram how badly a vaccine strategy works. > 1 billion India people enjoy the full freedom, where as 1 billion western citizens live in a big pharma concentration camp and are subject to Dr. Mengle medical experiments.
The full length spike (S1) protein can cause cancer. Please be aware of this if you did undergo monoclonal RNA S1 therapy. One strategy is to promote apoptosis of defect cells is by supplementing e.g. plum/apricot kernels (1-3/ day) that contain bio active cyanides. Also apple kernels work the same.
(Guess what big pharma did ban in USA...)
How US big pharma organizes the killing of children by its (ex-) employees working for FDA/CDC.
So far in most countries on the planet not a single child died of CoV-19 alone. Most that died had leukemia or simply have been far to fat.
Up to to now > 100 children already have been killed by Pfizer. Here we talk about healthy children that at least in 50% of all cases already had a natural protection from an CoV-19 infection.
Here we clearly talk of organized mass murder for share holder profit. This is beyond fascism. We have to find a new definition for this man slaughtering behavior. May be these folks are Zombies!
Display MoreHow US big pharma organizes the killing of children by its (ex-) employees working for FDA/CDC.
https://childrenshealthdefense…ids-pharma/?itm_term=home
So far in most countries on the planet not a single child died of CoV-19 alone. Most that died had leukemia or simple have been far to fat.
Up to to now > 100 children already have been killed by Pfizer. Here we talks about healthy children that at least in 50% of all cases already had a natural protection from an CoV-19 infection.
Here we clearly talk of organized mass murder for share holder profit. This is beyond fascism. We have to find a new definition for this man slaughtering behavior. May be these folks are Zombies!
These complaints mainly revolved around the tone and content favoured by particular posters
Wow, just learned that masks can reduce your chance of Covid by more than 80%!!!
So masks are better than the vaccines, guess I shouldn't have bothered to get the Vax!!
Someone needs to fact check the CDC
Display MoreWow, just learned that masks can reduce your chance of Covid by more than 80%!!!
So masks are better than the vaccines, guess I shouldn't have bothered to get the Vax!!
https://twitter.com/CDCDirecto…amp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Someone needs to fact check the CDC
The same CDC that in May was going to ease mask wearing recommendations for school children, then changed their mind after the union complained. All about the science...yeah right.
Almost everything about COVID now (at least here in the US) is about politics, control, corruption/money. Very little of the science we are better equipped to discuss here. When we first started the thread it was mostly about the health science, so fun to dig into.
Another good reason to slowly wind it down.
This may be a scam, or maybe not -but it may be of interest to somebody here.
Hi
Our client needs to speak with multiple decision-makers who have significant involvement in purchasing COVID-19 molecular diagnostic testing-related products and systems. They would like to better understand the interest of using pre-filled sample prep plates.
This is for a 60-minute paid online interview and an incentive of $250 will be paid (via gift card, PayPal or similar) to each participant. If you're open to participating, please select your best answer to the screener below:
"What is your Covid-19 molecular diagnostic test volume that your lab has performed, on average, over the last 2 months?"
Quotea. 1-499 samples per week
b. 500-999 samples per week
c. 1000-1500 samples per week
d. 1500+ samples per week
e. Not sure
Once I hear from you, we will update the project manager and request the client’s feedback. Either way, feel free to reach out in case you have any questions.
Thank you,
.Ruzzel Ocampo | Senior Recruiter
|
Pfizer vs ivermectin.
The same CDC that in May was going to ease mask wearing recommendations for school children,
According to science surgical masks do not stop CoV-19. At best an effect of 15..30% can be seen what is below the confidence interval. 80% is laughable unless you don't use at least FP95!
All studies done the last 10 years show masks have no effect on virus. No means do not slow down the pandemic. Surgical mask only stop droplets !
Here children did never wear masks. This happens only in fascist states. We also did never shut down school.
Australia may not be the country for extensive Covid experiences, but latest data show significant higher death and ICU rate for unvaccinated…
Covid induced diabetes is an interesting side thing to consider. DrBeen has a video about it with a guest doctor. The long haul symptoms are showing along with proven inexpensive medical treatments lifestyle is key to improving quality of management even post covid!
Covid induced diabetes is an interesting side thing to consider.
Diabetes I is caused by a viral infection and a genetic precondition as the base. So which diabetes should be induced?
Australia may not be the country for extensive Covid experiences, but latest data show significant higher death and ICU rate for unvaccinated…
Why should we believe business commercials? This is children matter. We have exact figures from most European countries. May be you should once do some minimal reading into the UK/Sweden vaccination report.
Pfizer/Astra offer only minimal protection after 6 months to the most vulnerable groups age > 70. Will you say Australia did only use Moderna??
Have only watched two or three of these. Share what you find interesting, amazing connections and parallels.
Peter Doshi Raises Questions about Vaccine Mandates at Senator Johnson Hearing
Peter Doshi, Ph. D. an associate professor of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, spoke out against vaccine mandates during a five-minute testimony he gave at a panel held by Senator Ron Johnson R-WIS., chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, on Capitol Hill last week.
Doshi is a senior editor at The BMJ and is on the News & Views team. Based in Baltimore, his research focuses on the drug approval process, how the risks and benefits of medical products are assessed and communicated, and improving the credibility and accuracy of evidence synthesis and biomedical publications.
He campaigns for greater transparency of clinical trial data and leads the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative to ensure clinical trial publications are accurate, complete, and publicly available data. Doshi also has strong interests in journalism to encourage better practice and improve the research enterprise.
He completed a fellowship in comparative effectiveness research at Johns Hopkins. He received his Ph.D. in history, anthropology, science, technology, and society from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
According to Doshi, clinical trials of the vaccine by Pfizer and Moderna did not show a reduction in death even for Covid deaths as opposed to other causes. He called the evidence flimsy, with just two deaths in the placebo group versus one in the vaccine group.
“My point is not that I know the truth about what the vaccine can and cannot do; my point is that those who claimed the trials showed the vaccines were highly effective in saving lives were wrong. The trials did not demonstrate this,” he said.
Everybody knows that covid vaccines save lives; in fact, we’ve known this early since 2021. The clinical trials proved that to be the case, as you can see here in the quote of a February article in the Journal of American Medical Association, referring to a slide quoting Walenski, Walke, and Fauci.
But is it true when that statement by prominent public officials was penned, there had been just one death across the 70,000 Pfizer and Moderna trial participants, he asked?
His slides provided links to articles on the trials that he referred to. Moderna. page 68 (Table S.26) of supplemental file and Pfizer. page 12 (Table S.4) supplemental file.
He continued by stating the definition of anti-vaxxer according to the Miriam Webster dictionary: a person who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccinations. “I would wager that a majority of the world’s population meets the definition here of an anti-vaxxer,” he added.
The mRNA products are qualitatively different than standard vaccines, he said. He stated, “And so, I found it fascinating to learn that Miriam Webster changed its definition of vaccine early in the year. The mRNA products did not meet the definition of vaccine that has been in place for 15 years at Miriam Webster. The definition was expanded so that now mRNA products are vaccines.”
“I highlight this to ask the question, how would you feel about mandating covid vaccines if we didn’t call them vaccines. What if these injections were called drugs instead?” he asked.
“So, here’s the scenario; we have this drug, and we have evidence that it doesn’t prevent infection, nor does it stop viral transmission. But the drug is understood to reduce your risk of becoming very sick and dying of covid. Would you take a dose of this drug every six months for possibly the rest of your life? If that’s what it took for the drug to stay effective? Would you not just take this drug yourself but support regulations mandating that everyone else around you take this drug? Or would you say, hold on a sec. Maybe you would say if that’s all the drug does, why not use a normal medicine instead. The kind we take when we are sick and want to get better? And why would you mandate it?”
Doshi concluded by saying, “the point is just because we call it a vaccine doesn’t mean we should assume these new products are just like all other childhood vaccines which get mandated. Each product is different. If people are okay with mandating something simply because it’s a vaccine and we mandate other vaccines, why shouldn’t we mandate this?”
“I think it’s time to inject some critical thinking into that conversation, and that is what I hope we’re doing today,” he said, ending his testimony.
Time for a Change at CDC? The Mainstream Growing Tired of Director Walensky
Can Dr. Rochelle Walensky save the CDC from a continuous downward spiral? The odds don’t look so good, suggests STAT’s Lev Facher in a critical view of the steep mountain the CDC must climb to turn around what was once a highly respected American public health agency.
The preeminent mainstream media targeting the world of life sciences, STAT was founded by the billionaire owner of the Boston Globe, John Henry. While Facher writes Newton, MA-based Walensky came in with a “bold plan to resurrect the once-revered public health agency” the STAT writer reminds all the CDC was “sidelined by the Trump administration” earlier in the pandemic.
The STAT piece declared that Walensky has “faltered” as long-term supporters such as Glen Nowak, University of Georgia professor and ex-CDC employee declared “It’s been disappointing. A lot more was expected in terms of centralizing messaging and policies and turning things over to government agencies and the leaders of those agencies.”
High Expectations
Many had high expectations with Biden taking reins over the country. At first things looked promising but they have since “experienced numerous setbacks” since then. But what’s the cause of the onward downward spiral: an in-over-her-head Walensky or an erratic, haphazard Presidential leadership including numerous mixed messages?
While many will undoubtedly point to the White House as a primary culprit Walensky talked a big game coming into the position. Previously the MD, MPH was the chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital as well as a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. Walensky is purportedly one of the top HIV/AIDS experts in the nation.
The expectations were high as one esteemed academic medical center professor after another praised Walensky as reported in science.
Under Fauci Shadow
As apparent during the pandemic Dr. Anthony Fauci has dominated the discourse representing the government to the people of America and beyond. The STAT piece suggests that the ubiquitous presence of the nation’s top doctor on cable network shows to interviews with some of the top celebs and sports stars “posed an unexpected challenge to her struggle for credibility” suggested by many academics and bureaucrats.
Direct Evidence of Walensky Failure
Lev Facher points out a handful of key Walensky mistakes from making statements that just aren’t true—such as “vaccinated people cannot transmit the virus” to the CDC’s shifting positions on mask guidance under her leadership.
For example, in May the CDC declared that vaccinated Americans could remove their masks yet at the same time emerging evidence revealed vaccine durability challenges, particularly associated with the Delta variant which was emerging then.
STATs Facher writes that “in hindsight, many epidemiologists blame the summers’ devastating Delta variant surge, after the ensuing wave of deaths, on the CDC’s mask-guidance reveal.”
Moreover, she hasn’t come through on a number of promises from initiating regular briefings again to not focusing enough to properly staffing the agency. Even the Boston Globe declared “Rochelle Walensky has a credibility problem.”
What about POTUS?
But many could point to horrific leadership in Washington. STAT reminded all that POTUS “…and his White House have done plenty to undermine Walensky’s authority.” STAT raises examples of ongoing contradictory statements, where the White House corrected or spoke on behalf of Walensky when the two diverged in position.
Call to action: Check out Facher’s piece in STAT
Here's the tip of a very large iceberg.
Heart injuries in athletes with the jab.
Here's the tip of a very large iceberg.
Heart injuries in athletes with the jab.
Please do not forget that a Corona infection seems more critical when it comes to Myocarditis....so how many of those may have gone through a Covid-19 infection and recovered, and didn't get a jab?
Here's the tip of a very large iceberg.
Heart injuries in athletes with the jab.
Not however a mystery to those who have been discussing the adverse effects of even mild COVID:
https://www.nature.com/article…20comparison%2C%20however.
Since almost everyone has had the jab now you need more care than antivaxxers usually take to show adverse effects are jab 9no evidence) rather than long-term effect of possibly never diagnosed because mild COVID (lots of evidence).
THH
