I am not interested in rhetorical argument which has a "recipe for cheating"
THH ... I cannot follow your contorted and inaccurate logic... which reply.. to who ... and where
where did I state "I do not accept the CFR comparison does not work?"
RB - do you do this stuff on purpose? It annoys the hell out of me, not sure about anyone else here.
1. You posted rubbish.
2. I said why it was rubbish, politer than I am now , with exact reasons.
3. You made a snide comment about my post without retracting your apparent support for the rubbish.
You did not state, anywhere, that you now agree you posted rubbish. Or, perhaps, that you knew it was rubbish all along but were just testing us. Posting it as something obviously and laughably wrong. In fact you implied, by objecting to my post, that you still thought your post was not rubbish. Maybe this is just an advanced "what does RB mean" test for all of us? If so I obviously failed it.
Now you come back and demand I tell you where you said you did not accept the CFR comparison is rubbish?
Just saying, you are up to a triple negative now, but you have still not agreed with me that the CFR comparison you posted in support of HCQ was misleading rubbish. Was it or wasn't it?