Safire eyes commercialization within 5 years, with launch of new company Aureon Energy!

    The Gross-Pitaevskii theory is certainly food for thought - but can we use it to distinguish between electron clustering in BEC condensates or, for example negative muon formation within the plasma double layers? We have the same problem arising in Leif Holmlid's work (or again distinguishing between cold neutron clustering vs negative muons)? Again more questions arise than clear answers to any of these scientific problems! Whatever the mechanism, Aureon Energy are making clear strides towards commercialisation.

    Quote from We have the same problem arising in Leif Holmlid's work (or again distinguishing between cold neutron clustering vs negative muons)?

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    This interview tells us that Holmlid has not detected any of the particles that he has claimed. What he sees in his cloud chamber are Exotic vacuum objects (EVO) as observed by magicsound.


    Creation of EVOs when Ultra dense hydogen a superconductor is exposed to light is shown to occur when those EVOs are detected in the cloud chamber.

    Spotted by Edo


    Support the scientific revolution: https://bit.ly/3lcAasB

    Dr. Michael Clarage of the Safire project takes us on a walk through the very edges of science to see if we can figure out what will change about the models that we hold so dear today. What is the Safire project working on, and how will it change our understanding of the stars, the galaxies, and everything else? What if we're living in a conscious universe? How would that force us to see the world differently? What's the role of light in biology? It's a wild ride, so buckle up!!

    #safireproject #electricuniverse #plasma
    00:01:44 What's the latest news on the Safire project?
    00:11:44 What is the electric model for star formation?
    00:18:37 Living universe cosmology
    00:21:09 A source of electricity from beyond the stars?
    00:25:13 The difficulty of detecting coaxial currents on the galactic scale
    00:32:12 What is a plasma?
    00:42:35 The crazy thing life does with light
    00:46:39 Supernovas as a sign of life transforming
    00:48:39 All bodies emit light - but what is it for?
    00:50:21 Experimental evidence for morphogenic fields
    00:53:58 The light basis for disease?
    00:58:38 Electromagnetic modes of DNA repair
    01:00:07 Is Rupert Sheldrake onto something?
    01:01:54 What biophotonics can tell us about the fundamental principles of life
    01:05:44 What does this mean for astrology?
    01:08:33 Audience question lightning round!
    01:08:51 What is Energy?
    01:12:53 Is the Universe an open or closed system?
    01:14:21 How does our understanding of entropy need to evolve?
    01:24:02 Does science have a moral compass?
    01:32:30 Will it be possible to repair the human genome's environmental damage before extinction?
    01:33:31 What will be the effect of a Carrington-level event on modern civilization?
    01:37:37 What are the biggest problems with the contemporary model of the atom?

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Now that was a wide ranging discussion. Fun listening before bedtime.

    Quote from ZenoOfElea

    I wonder if this would make people more or less likely to invest in the Safire Project.

    Science is home for many people with unconventional ideas about life, the universe and everything. They used to be kept on a short leash by colleagues, but now the internet has given them a voice. But we need them, sensible and conventional is not always correct.

    Then there is John Hutchison and

    the Hutchison effect.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    I received that as an e-mail a couple of days ago but did not thought much of it and forgot later to share it, thanks for posting it!

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

    Mark Pinnell


    I have no skin in the Aureon game, but FWIW I think they have a very real and very interesting technology. Right now they are following the available money, as life and a payroll force them to, but I think there is more to come in terms of using the system for energy generation. I wish them every success. And maybe I should ask Monty if he's up for another interview.

    The focus on nuclear remediation is profoundly silly. If this technology exists, then likely so does the energy generation technology. And if we have the latter, then why would we need nuclear power generation, and consequently why would we need nuclear remediation? So if they are successful, then they will fail.


    great business plan (not).

    funkydunky


    If you need the money, and it helps to keep a team (put together over quite a few years) together and it does not prevent you gathering data and greater understanding of how something works then it is very sensible to take it. It is probably much easier to obtain funding for remediation work than it is for energy generation per se, since the storage of nuclear waste is already a huge and expensive problem that nobody wants to take full responsibility for, and such funding doesn't threaten the existing energy business, but helps support it.


    The fact that while working on this Aureon will inevitably discover other things is a bonus.

    Quote from Alan Smith

    Mark Pinnell


    I have no skin in the Aureon game, but FWIW I think they have a very real and very interesting technology. Right now they are following the available money, as life and a payroll force them to, but I think there is more to come in terms of using the system for energy generation. I wish them every success. And maybe I should ask Monty if he's up for another interview.

    Yes! Please try to have another interview with Monty, Alan

    Quote from funkydunky

    The focus on nuclear remediation is profoundly silly. If this technology exists, then likely so does the energy generation technology. And if we have the latter, then why would we need nuclear power generation, and consequently why would we need nuclear remediation? So if they are successful, then they will fail.


    great business plan (not).

    The way I see it is that it's is near on impossible for a startup company to break into government regulated grid power generation market as this break through should ultimately be explored. Going grass roots into small scale CHP is also extremely hard as large scale tooling and manufacturing would be needed and is a huge funding hurdle. I see the niche market of mid size system in a well established wealthy market and simple design as a perfect starting point. Energy production on a small scale for home use requires many systems (heat to electricity conversion, storage, inversion, balancing, monitoring) where as focusing on Radium nutralization maybe fairly strait forward if it can do what they think it does and can be applied to a large flow. Even power generation at the fracking site I think will be something explored well after remediation is proven but will be much easier on a larger than home scale operation. Maybe I'm wrong... I do see other possible options but I think THIS IS THE WAY for now. lol