Chernobyl and nuclear resonance.

  • I have been analyzing the issue of Chernobyl for the past several years. Russians have not found an adequate explanation for this tragic event to the nuclear industry. Every nation was horrified when it occurred due to public outcry about nuclear power and it's distancing from practical applications in the public sphere. I have even read rumors, at the time, that the Soviet Union had no adequate explanation and thought Chernobyl was sabotaged.


    Here I present a hypothesis as to what may have happened.


    The conclusion I keep on arriving at is that when the moderators got lowered in an already critical state of the reactor, that some kind of negative neutron influx occurred due to the composition of the moderators. If this happened, this doesn't quite explain the uniform explosion of the top parts of the fuel rods in the reactor. What I hypothesize is going to sound outlandish; but, to the best of my knowledge a resonance occurred within the nuclear fuel rods. Supposedly an electromagnetic field formed due to this resonance. I can only extrapolate that the fuel rods might have self-enriched for a brief while, which may or may not be explained by analysis of the debris of the explosion.


    I have even gone as far as surmised that time might have ticked a little faster for a brief moment leading to the explosion.


    Now, the implications are really vast for such a physical phenomenon, ranging from nuclear reactors that can be directly used to generate electricity, to multistage nuclear bombs. I hope someone can look past this far-fetched hypothesis, and consider that nuclear self-enrichment from a resonance is actually possible.


    Thanks.

  • Leonid Urutskoev arrived at a similar conclusion as you have that a LENR reaction produced a enrichment of U235 and he proved that this reaction can happen in an exploding foil experiment recorded in this paper:


    Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole

    Georges Lochak*, Leonid Urutskoev**


    http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf


    This has led to a movement in the Russian LENR movement supported by many similar experiments and as documented in many papers.


    See post


    Chernobyl disaster was caused by a nuclear explosion


    Chernobyl disaster was caused by a nuclear explosion

  • My considered understanding of what this electromagnetic field resonance is as follows (The Dense Higgs Field LENR theory):


    An electron is comprised of a set of quantum properties. These properties direct the behavior of the electron. Unlike free electrons in a vacuum, these quantum properties can be isolated from other quantum properties when the electron is a member of an aggregation as part of a solid.


    The coming thing in condensed matter physics and quantum engineering is the ability in general to select these quantum properties of both fermions (electrons) and/or bosons (photons) that are useful and discard the others.


    It is now possible to build a material that hosts electron based quasiparticles that mix and match the quantum properties selected from one or more of its fundamental particle quantum properties that are useful and to ignore or restrict the other less advantageous ones. The selected quantum properties can be strengthened and protected while other properties can be ignored.


    For example, condensed matter Scientists can now see their way in creating Majorana particles from electrons and photons because of their potential to store quantum information in a special computation space where quantum information is protected from the environment noise. These quasiparticles have no mass or charge and can travel at the speed of light.


    In the LION experiments, what LION has done without knowing how he did it is create another quasiparticle that is composed of a pair of electron properties called isospin and weak hypercharge and concentrated these quantum properties into a condensate which greatly amplifies the strength of both these quantum properties.


    Isospin gives the electron its magnetic nature and weak hypercharge gives the electron its ability to make electrons spin in either the right or left handed direction. Weak Hypercharge also gives the electron the property of mass and its ability to interact with the weak force. It is the Higgs field property.


    The exitic vacuum obect (EVO) as researched by Ken Shoulders is comprised of two counter rotating magnetic currents of isospin and weak hypercharge. Let’s call the combination of isospin and hypercharge the spinon quasiparticle.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinon


    The EVO does not have charge or other electron quantum properties. These properties reside in other places in a solid but the EVO can move around unaffected and unconfined by its other electron quantum properties. The EVO can extract and concentrate without limit the spinon property of the electron. The EVO can start out small but grow to just about any size as it accumulates more spinons. The spinon gives the EVO the ability to activate the weak force, to produce and broadcast magnetically greatly increased mass in fermions (quarks) that makeup protons and neutrons. This is how Holmlid can breakup protons and neutrons turn them into mesons.


    Yes, LION has produced ultra-dense deuterium which will form the superconductor core of the EVO.


    Electrons come it two varieties right handed electrons and left handed electrons. These electron properties are defined and produced by the weak hypercharge quantum property. A quantum of Hypercharge can change the way electrons spin. This is what gives fermions mass. When a fermion changes its spin direction, it absorbs energy from the Higgs field and this results in their increased mass. The more Hypercharge that the fermion is exposed to, the more massive that it gets because of all the spin flipping that it is doing. When a proton is exposed to a dense hypercharge field (dense Higgs field) it will blow apart and decay into a new higher generation of heavy quarks. These quarks will stay deconfined until the dense Higgs field is removed. But when the dense Higgs field is removed, the deconfined quarks will get back to normal and reform new protons, neutrons and mesons which lead to the formation of new elements as in transmutation.


    When the density of spinons is extreme, it forms a supersolid. The spinons arrange themselves in a lattice that takes the form of a geometric shape.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersolid


    A supersolid is a spatially ordered material with superfluid properties. Superfluidity is a special quantum state of matter in which a substance flows with zero viscosity.


    This is why LENR researchers see various geometric shapes in the scars that were produced by the EVOs. The counter rotating spinon currents produce right and left handed rotating scars in the quartz as the projecting magnetic beams disrupt matter using their dense counter rotating magnetically born Higgs fields. These beams have various geometric shaped boundaries but rotate internal to that boundary. The spinons also form and move as a superfluid.



    To end, the EVO can be a monopole when it forms and projects just a single straight on Higgs beam. The dipole scars can be matched though equal diameters sizes of the scars that these paired dipole beams produce.


    The development of the LENR reactor is now underway... this is called SAFIRE.


    Does this look familiar?


    64-0.jpg


    It is a vortex/anti-vortex Spinor Bose-Einstein petal condensate.



    safire_sun_798.jpg


    It is also what an EVO looks like.


    F5.medium.gif

    Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose-Einstein Condensates


    Actually, so many of these Vortexes can form inside and EVO that a supersolid lattice could form. It is these vortices that have produced scrub marks that we saw in the LION reactor meltdown ash.


    Also, the holes that were produced by the EVOs were hexagonal or square in profile which comes from the shape of the supersolid lattice that these ultra dense vortexes take on when the EVOs get to be huge


    Here is a EVO that came out of ECCO LENR reactor fuel


    f319759a8c6cd7f20278c45cbeaaacc22c927e7f24e4d1c89ddfedc9458a3436.gif


    Study unveils a new supersolid phase in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates


    https://phys.org/news/2019-07-…ipolar-bose-einstein.html


    5-studyunveils.jpg



    Quote

    Starting from 2017, a definitive proof for the existence of this state was provided by several experiments using atomic Bose-Einstein condensates.[2] The general conditions required for supersolidity to emerge in a certain substance are a topic of ongoing research.

  • https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14901



    Observation of the reversed Cherenkov radiation

    Abstract

    Reversed Cherenkov radiation is the exotic electromagnetic radiation that is emitted in the opposite direction of moving charged particles in a left-handed material. Reversed Cherenkov radiation has not previously been observed, mainly due to the absence of both suitable all-metal left-handed materials for beam transport and suitable couplers for extracting the reversed Cherenkov radiation signal. In this paper, we develop an all-metal metamaterial, consisting of a square waveguide loaded with complementary electric split ring resonators. We demonstrate that this metamaterial exhibits a left-handed behaviour, and we directly observe the Cherenkov radiation emitted predominantly near the opposite direction to the movement of a single sheet electron beam bunch in the experiment. These observations confirm the reversed behaviour of Cherenkov radiation. The reversed Cherenkov radiation has many possible applications, such as novel vacuum electronic devices, particle detectors, accelerators and new types of plasmonic couplers.

  • Leonid Urutskoev states that large electrical discharges occurred before the reactor explosion. Urutskoev assumes that these dischanges produce mesons that create a fission reaction.


    It has been shown experimentally that electrical discharge produces EVOs. These EVOs are the mechanisms that produce transmutation. They are long lived, highly penetrating and mobile.


    Here is a video that shows EVOs in action producing transmutation.


  • Yes, well that would explain the fact that the moderator was unable to stop this resonance phenomenon leading to a phase change or a hyper elevated QM state. As a side question, how much (percentage wise) does nuclear fuel enrich itself during a atomic explosion, respectively being a thermonuclear explosion and a atomic one? I still think that the physics of LENR doesn't really seem to apply here. Please correct me if wrong.


    Looking forward to more info on the topic.


    Regards.

  • LENR transmuts even atomic number elements in preference to odd numbered elements. U238 will be removed from the fuel in preference to U235.


    Here is another experiment that shows this


    Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6276


    Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation


    A.V. Simakin, G.A. Shafeev


    "Experimental results are presented on laser-induced accelerated alpha-decay of Uranium-232 nuclei under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of its salt. It is demonstrated that the decrease of alpha-activity strongly depends on the peak intensity of the laser radiation in the liquid and is highest at several terawatt per square centimeter. The decrease of alpha-activity of the exposed solutions is accompanied by the deviation of gamma-activities of daughter nuclides of Uranium-232 from their equilibrium values. Possible mechanisms of the laser influence on the alpha-activity are discussed on the basis of the amplification of the electric field of laser wave on metallic nanoparticles."


    The mechanism of polariton Bose condensation causation involves the generation of plasma and associated intense EMF fields around a nanoparticle that generates a critical density of surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) which acts as a micro analog black hole in which relativistic time dilation occurs in and round its vortex flux tubes. The SPP and Its vortex tube are pictured below along with associated theory.


    https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/11/e1500807.full

    Vortex and half-vortex dynamics in a nonlinear spinor quantum fluid



    Both the power of the laser pulse and its duration are important factors in producing optimum half-life decay acceleration. The nanosecond laser pulse length is too short to optimize radioactive decay acceleration as well of the 350 ps laser source. The 150 ps laser source seems to be a better fit to match the 50 ps life span of the polariton which is the resonance value for optimization of decay.


    Another insight gleaned for this experiment is that the length of the laser pulse does not produce continuing radioactive decay acceleration. The LENR activity is constrained by the lifetime of the polariton and is active only as long as the polariton is active.


    https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1541308X13010068


    Accelerated alpha-decay of uranium isotopes induced by exposure of aqueous solution of uranium salt with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation


    Quote

    Laser-induced accelerated alpha-decay of 232U nuclei under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of uranium salt has been experimentally studied. It is demonstrated that the decrease in the alpha-activity depends strongly on the peak intensity of laser radiation in the liquid and reaches a maximum at 1012–1013Wcm−2. The decrease in the alpha-activity of the exposed solutions is accompanied by deviation of gamma-activities of daughter nuclides of 232U from their equilibrium values. Experimental data on the accelerated alpha-decay of 238U under similar experimental conditions are also presented. Possible mechanisms of laser effect on the alpha-activity are discussed in terms of the amplification of the electric field of laser wave on metallic nanoparticles.


    Leonid Urutskoev shows the same even atomic number preference behavior in his exploding foil experiment

  • Yeah man, think of the possibilities of utilizing Thorium in a resonance reactor, or even accelerating the decay of nuclear waste or even its implementation in a resonance travelling wave reactor.


    Sorry, kinda amazed at doing away with the heat energy exchange of turbines through miniaturized reactors utilizing magnetic fields generated through a nuclear resonance mechanism.


    OK, now I need to calm down. Sorry.

  • After the LION reactor melted down, the experimenter connected the reactor to a 12 volt light bulb and connected it to ground. The light bulb produced light for 1/2 hours. It produce 37 kilowatts of power. LENR can produce electric power directly without the need for a heat conversion step.


    Here is one of the many such direct to electricity LENR systems that have been invented over the years.


  • After the LION reactor melted down, the experimenter connected the reactor to a 12 volt light bulb and connected it to ground. The light bulb produced light for 1/2 hours. It produce 37 kilowatts of power. LENR can produce electric power directly without the need for a heat conversion step.


    Here is one of the many such direct to electricity LENR systems that have been invented over the years.


    Yes, well, and here we are 19 years later and nothing came out of it. Theoretically, what I understand the purpose of a resonance reactor is to do away with breeder reactors, along with having a VERY long life-span. Furthermore, it seems to me that you get 4 birds killed with one stone. 1) Direct production of electricity, 2) Heat, 3) Production of high grade fuel, 4) Effective dealing with existing nuclear waste.


    Do I sound "high", sorry if so(?)

  • The decision to field a technology is made by the capitalist and not the inventor.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…tors_streetcar_conspiracy


    The people who control the means of production must be forced into fielding the LENR technology. You have shown that you understand that such a technology would have effects on society beyond imagining. This presents a situation that is full of risks for the people who make decisions about such things.

  • Heres my theory. Its tantamount to a version of not so LENR to highly energetic materials.


    Technically in some theoretic scenario mass can get converted to energy at much higher rates or speed than what is thought as the baseline. All through eliciting these highly resonant nuclear states.

  • Technically you could create a cloud of VERY high density plasmonics through inducing a state change of some nuclear fuel through resonating the nuclear fuel by inducing a magnetic field of monopole nature.


    Sounds like gibberish but it ain't. I mean we all do know that transmutations are accepted as common nowadays in the LENR field.

  • Keith Fredericks


    http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/


    has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT.


    It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV.


    According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in the present day to support LENR transmutation.


    First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field.


    The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact.


    For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 to show the Higgs field spacifics.


    This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field"


    Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their mass redefinition.


    In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science that supports it.


    What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange radiation) where matter loss occurs.



    In the pursuit of the development of LENR theory and the process of connecting its many dots, one needs to be a jack of all trades but in my case, master of none. However, LENR dot connecting has recently lead me to the suspicion that the LENR reaction is seated firmly in the nature and behavior of the vacuum. Over the years, the dots have lead us to examine particle physics, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, black hole theory, nanoplasmonics, solid state physics, nanooptics, nuclear physics, material science, among other fields of study. Now the nature and behavior of the vacuum leads to an interest in cosmology, for in cosmology, its practitioners recognize how the vacuum is the structure upon which the universe is built.


    https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201907.0181/v1/download


    Keith Fredericks shows experimentally that "strange radiation" is a monopole by analyzing the elliptical tracks that this particle excavates on surfaces. The particle makes matter disappear without a trace as it proceeds along it track as a form of transmutation. It is my contention that strange radiation is a topological defects in the Higgs field as defined above in the last post.


    There is a new principle in development in cosmology called the “Multiple Point Principle” (MPP) that postulate the existence of topological Higgs field defects that produces the dense Higgs field (10^18 GeV...approximately 0.02 milligrams...the Planck mass). This defect will be enclosed in a micro black hole called an electromagnetic "Hedgehog"


    https://www.groundai.com/proje…yond-the-standard-model/2


    Quote

    Abstract


    We present a new cosmological model of the Universe based on the two discoveries: 1. cosmological constant is very small, and 2. Nature shows a new law in physics called “Multiple Point Principle” (MPP). The MPP predicts the two degenerate vacua of the Universe with VEV

    v1≈246 Gev and v2∼10^18 GeV, which provide masses of the Higgs boson and top-quark. A new cosmological model assumes the formation of two universal bubbles. The Universe at first stage of its existing is a bubble with a de-Sitter spacetime inside, having black-holes-hedgehogs as topological defects of the vacuum. Such a bubble has a “false vacuum” with VEV v2, which decays very quickly. Cooling Universe has a new phase transition, transforming the “false” vacuum to the “true” (Electroweak) vacuum. Hedgehogs confined, and the universal bubble is transformed into the bubble having spacetime with FLRW-metric and the vacuum with new topological defects of U(1)(el−mag) group: magnetic vortices and Sidharth’s pointlike defects. The problem of stability/metastability of the EW-vacuum is investigated. Noncommutativity of the vacua spacetime manifold is discussed. The prediction of a new physics is given by the future observations at LHC of the triplet SU(2) Higgs bosons (at energies E∼10 TeV), and/or of the new bound states 6t+6¯t formed by top-antitop quarks (at E∼1 TeV). The problem “What comes beyond the Standard Model” is discussed at the end of this paper.

    fig2.jpg

    universe-05-00078-g001.png


    The nature of the defects that form depends on the symmetries of the Higgs field itself. For example, the Higgs field may have a choice of two possible states to fall into. In this case, when regions that have taken opposite choices run up against each other, the boundary is marked by a structure called a domain wall, in which the Higgs field is obliged to pass through zero, creating a localized region where the vacuum state is one of unbroken symmetry .The domain wall is a microscopically narrow region trapping what physicists call a false vacuum, as distinct from the true vacuum on either side. The false vacuum ought not to exist, but does so because the geometry of the Higgs field does not allow it to disperse.The polariton condensate as a condensate of hyper-change causes the Higgs field to form this false vacuum state as a perturbation.


    Why did Ken Shoulders name the EVO an exotic vacuum object...because that is exactly what it is.

    The LHC found that the Higgs field (aka vacuum) is set on the finest of points.

    Calculations show that if the mass of the Higgs boson were just a few times heavier and everything else stayed the same, protons could no longer assemble into atoms, and there would be no complex structures—no stars or living beings. So, what if our universe really is as accidentally fine-tuned as a pencil balanced on its tip, singled out as our cosmic address from an inconceivably vast array of bubble universes inside an eternally frothing “multiverse” sea simply because life requires such an outrageous accident to exist?

    The Higgs field is set exactly on its tipping point, just like if water was set at its triple point

    If the strength of the Higgs field is increased or decreased by the slightest amount then there would be a change of state that would occur in the vacuum. For example, if water is moved off its triple point in the slightest way, it would begin to transform into a vapor, or a liquid, or ice.

    In like manner to what happens in a change in state of water, If the strength of the vacuum changes in the slightest, then atoms would not exist, neither would electrons or protons; all matter would resolve down to pure energy.

    There are processes that exist in nature in electromagnetic and particle interactions and in chemistry that create a tightly confined bubble of the Higgs field whose strength is different from that finely tuned value that keeps our universe from falling apart. This is what an EVO is, a rouge perturbative bubble of the vacuum.

    The EVO can begin its existence as an nanoscopic object, but its effect on matter is still potent. As it grows in size into the microscopic, its vacuum state may change, but its effect on matter remains the same, when the EVO reaches a macroscopic size, its effects on matter remain constant throughout its lifecycle. What matters is that the vacuum state confined inside the EVO is different than the value of the vacuum throughout the rest of the universe.

    Whatever matter that this bubble of the vacuum contacts will dissociate and dissolve into energy. When the true Higgs field is restored, then matter will assemble into its usual state of protons, electrons, and atoms just like this formation of matter happened soon after the big bang occured when the Higgs field weakened and assumed its current strength.

    This is how and why transmutation occurs in LENR...matter to energy and then back to matter.

    Inside that EVO with its own vacuum state, there exists another universe where life and matter cannot survive. Does space-time even exist inside the EVO? Where does matter go when it comes in contact with the EVO? Can energy leak out of the EVO? Who will run the experiments to answer these questions?

  • PhysicsForDummies

    you don't believe in Rossi, you don't support Axil anymore who doesn't make controversy, which remains positive in all circumstances, you speak now also about the director.

    In fact, you always talk about others but never about yourself.

    You are only the spectator from existence of others.

    If you are really an actor, what are your ideas, your contributions?

    Share them, please, Darling :)


    You ask for Alan Smith and Wyttenbach to chime in. And instead all you get is a heavy dose of Axil. 🤔 Hopefully Director can add to this thread. I actually do wish he posts sometimes, not just always the same things about the "negative resistance regime"