Hang Zhang sent me this message a short time ago, at 2 o'clock in the morning his time. I messaged back: 'Are you awake?!?' He said yes, he is working. That's the kind of dedication people bring to cold fusion, by golly.
I am forwarding it here with permission.
In this test, the calorimetry is confirmed with three different methods at the same time. I like that kind of redundancy.
I haven't been in touch for a long time. How are you.
The epidemic situation in the world is very serious recently. What's the situation there? Pay attention to health protection.
My experiment is still going on normally.
Some excess thermal power can be observed these days
I found a phenomenon that the excess thermal power in vacuumizing is greater than that in the case of 2 kPa deuterium pressure.
As shown below:
Is this excess thermal power measurement error or real,
I analyzed and calculated the data
There are three calorimetric methods for calorimeters
1. Seebeck voltage calorimetry
2. Calorimeter cooling water temperature difference calorimetry
3. Differential calorimetry of air temperature and cooling water inlet temperature in calorimeter
I calculated the measured data in three ways
See the figure below
As can be seen from the above analysis,
The trend of three calorimetric curves is basically the same
It can be confirmed that the observed excess thermal power is true.
High excess thermal power at low air pressure
The experiment is continuing,
I'm trying to increase the excess heat power.