ITER the criminal history of todays physics

  • Very eloquent and clever defense of Sakharov’s initial inspiration for developing hot fusion in Tokamak style reactors, fabrice DAVID ! But now even Holmlid entered the “ITER bashing crew” and says that muon catalyzed fusion can also and more safely power spacecrafts, as you can read here:

    RE: New Patent Filed by Leif Holmlid

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Взаимодействие с другими людьми

    Очередной проект "Большой науки"


    https://www.amazon.it/Higgs-Fa…0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=


    Синдром «слишком велик, чтобы ошибаться»


    К сказанному хочу добавить - «Еще один проект« Большой науки »


    https://www.amazon.it/Higgs-Fa...0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr =Взаимодействие с другими людьми


    Я цитирую Иванова Михаила Яковлевича из его выступления 26 апреля 2018 года - 2 часа 7 минут 35 секунд -


    20180426 семинар в РУДН полностью - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFEDyv1Gpe8


    «Я хочу сказать, что теория, с помощью которой был получен бозон Хиггса, основана на формализме Лагранжа. Она неправда! Бозона Хиггса нет! И, к сожалению, ЦЕРН не обманули! Построив этот пик на 126 ГэВ ... Когда я был в ЦЕРН в последний раз, я катался с ними на лыжах, они, специалисты ЦЕРНа, дали графики, на которых этого пика нет! "


    Квантовая физика - это «сказочная наука», созданная «физиками-сказочниками» ...


    Об этом я пишу в этом материале -


    Использование гидроволнового метода для очистки водных растворов и термоядерных реакций, 7 декабря 2017 г. - https://drive.google.com/file/…12BxqdNU/view?usp=sharing



    Использование гидроволнового метода очистки водных растворов и термоядерных реакций, 7 декабря 2017 г. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/27Ad/4bDGJ92rHВзаимодействие с другими людьми


    Это величайший обман физиков за последние 100 лет ... Я получил пятерку в НИЯУ МИФИ на экзамене по квантовой физике ... Но прошло 40 лет, и сегодня я с уверенностью говорю - КВАНТОВОЙ ФИЗИКИ нет в природе - это заблуждение физиков, не заметивших ошибку, которую допустил Нильс Бор при анализе спектров атомов ... Эту ошибку обнаружил Канарев Филипп Михайлович и оказалось, что если ошибка Бора исправлена, то электрон не будет иметь орбитального движения вокруг ядра атома ... На самом деле происходящее в современной физике иначе как обскурантизмом назвать нельзя! Идиотизм школьников с помощью такой информации, которая звучит с экрана, продолжается и никто не противостоит этому ... Простите всех!

  • Krivit's finds a Physicist to help him make ITER suffer even more:


    https://news.newenergytimes.ne…iter-organization-claims/

    Is good to read it coming from one apparently inside the project. This is basically a complaint from the technical department to the marketing department to “keep it real”. The only problem is that it reveals that the whole promise of sustainable hot fusion is decades and billions away, if ever.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • AlainCo don't be sad. I think a much better approach exists for Hot Fusion, that could be developped at a fraction of the research cost of ITER. The fact that is not being actively pursued speaks volumes, and I speculate that the reasons behind this disparity of favoring a much complex approach instead of a much simpler and relatively easier to engineer one, comes from the general idea that an easy and non multi billion expensive approach to hot fusion is within the reach of many, and that's a deterrent factor for the hegemonic powers to don't pursue this other approach.


    Attached I am enclosing a 1998 Scientific American Paper that touted this approach, and a 2006 paper that basically confirms that all expectances of the 1998 paper are met or even exceeded. And we are 14 years later still wondering why billions are spent on ITER instead of Z pinch ICF approach.

  • I agree with Alain, this paper of Haines is very important. The analysis of it made by Pr. Jean-Pierre Petit twelve years ago. (he worked briefly with Yonas) I had a dispute (scientific dispute) with him at this time: he think (like Haines himself), that the iron plasma fly after the wire like a comet tail, and I think that the iron plasma fly forward, making a very fast shell of plasma. (I joint my sketch)


    I wanted to proove it with my small Marx-Arkhadeev generator, with a better design, and a pre-shaped argon plasma cylinder but I'm still looking for a lab to do it.


    https://www.jp-petit.org/scien…_Haines/papier_Haines.htm


  • http://newenergytimes.com/v2/s…Side-of-ITER-20200615.pdf


    We have to thank Krivit for debunking the ITER establishment as he tells us how they fooled everybody from politics, press to public by asking for money just to have a five minutes working lab!!


    Thank you Wyttenbach and LENR fans for reading my ITER investigation. I regret that I am unable to participate in the online discussion here. However, I would like to extend an invitation to you. I am working on a new project regarding ITER. For those of you who have been following my ITER investigation, particularly in the last few months, are there any questions you have that my investigation has not yet answered? I will do my best to ensure they are answered in the forthcoming project. You can contact me through my contact page at NET.


    Thank you, Steven


    P.S. In the end, only honest science will succeed. LENR will eventually be recognized and such and come through.

  • Thank you Wyttenbach and LENR fans for reading my ITER investigation. I regret that I am unable to participate in the online discussion here. However, I would like to extend an invitation to you. I am working on a new project regarding ITER. For those of you who have been following my ITER investigation, particularly in the last few months, are there any questions you have that my investigation has not yet answered? I will do my best to ensure they are answered in the forthcoming project. You can contact me through my contact page at NET.


    Thank you, Steven


    P.S. In the end, only honest science will succeed. LENR will eventually be recognized and such and come through.

    Dear StevenBKrivit , Thanks for your comment, many here have read your publications for years.


    Perhaps I would ask you to read a preprint from Leif Holmlid currently under open review available here:


    https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-97208/v1


    I think Holmlid’s approach to nuclear energy reactions needs to be more widely known to highlight the lunacy of ITER.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • ITER situation looks like a "Margin Call" plot, at the stage when people involved just have realised big lie and coming Big Crash. The final scene is not far away :).


    Thank you Steven Krivit for good investigative science journalism !


    IMHO, in addition to well explained technical problems with ITER, from h-space theory there is no energy gain in thermonuclear fusion in principal (transmutation of course there). The only nuclear energy gain is fission, including proton.