Seeking design suggestions for SAFIRE analog experiment

It is necessary to supply the temperature above 200-300 atmospheres, this will not work, you will get a ball lightning at the end ... While it is spinning, we will get a lot of energy!

Henk Jurrien's "simple" VEGA experiments are based on the SAFIRE system. The various systems produce prolific transmutation and has come to the attention of MFMP who has analyzed scores of these various experiments that have advanced the study of the EVO and its associated transmutation effects to a great extent.

Jurrien has conducted a series of experiments inspired by "Sacred Geometry".

In one experiment, he investigates whether particles on the cathode and anode of his VEGA ALUM experiment are magnetic.

Here are a few of Jurrien's many VEGA experiments:

VEGA Valley - 3D test section 001 - HENK/MFMP - YouTube
Jun 9, 2021

YouTube

VEGA - ALUM - Magnetic? - YouTube
Nov 11, 2022

YouTube

VEGA - Exploding the Valley - YouTube
Jul 31, 2022

YouTube

VEGA - Henk Jurrien's 'Sacred Geometry' inspired experiments
May 12, 2023

YouTube

axil

• You should study this very interesting and very readable paper . A couple of our members are part of the team who wrote this, and you might be forgiven for thinking that it is reminiscent of the work of Ken Shoulders on EVO's. There are clues here as to the mechanism that George Egely's device and others exploit

  
  

  ShieldSquare Captcha

  
  

  Abstract

  The aim of this research was the study of the transition between high and low electrical resistivity states of two overlapped graphene layers when subjected to short electromagnetic pulses (soliton waves). These transitions have already been previously observed by the authors in experiments carried out with different conductors, separated by a tiny insulating layer. The choice of a highly ordered material, such as graphene, was justified by the attempt to achieve greater stability and reproducibility of these transitions. What has been observed is an instantaneous reversible transition of the graphene overlapped layers to/from a state of insulator with resistance in the order of Mohms from/to a state of resistance of few ohms or, in some cases, of zero ohms. The transition from a high resistance state to a lower one requires EM pulses of different polarity than the transition from a low resistivity state to a higher one. Some intermediate relatively stable states have also been observed.

Chirality affects current flow in graphene transistors – Physics World

Novel findings could lead to new field of "chiraltronics"

physicsworld.com

Electrons will segregate themselves in graphene by handedness. Once the chiral configuration of the electron population is establish in a layer of graphene, that chiral condition will be maintained with little leakage of the other chiral state of the electrons.

Electron chirality is central to the generation of superconductivity in magic angle moiré based graphene systems.

There is a great deal of theory that has been developed in chiral superconductivity in magic angle moiré based graphene systems that the referenced paper is either not familiar with or has been ignored.

See as an example of chiral superconductivity:

Topological chiral superconductivity with spontaneous vortices and supercurrent in twisted bilayer graphene

And? How is that relevant?

Quote from Alan Smith

And? How is that relevant?

In a few words, the theory is wrong.

Re: A preliminary conjecture that hypothesizes the formation of coherent electron structures between the graphene layers has been presented.

The conjecture that has been presented is not conformant with the present state of the art research and theory on moiré topological chiral superconductivity. There is no mention of electron chirality which is the baseline cause of the superconductive mechanism. The mechanisms that were offered are irrelevant.

Furthermore, the statement:

Quote

It is reasonable to hypothesize that this force balance explains not only the lack of repulsion in the electron coherent phase seen by Prins but also the dense exotic charge clusters seen by Kenneth Shoulders.

Is invalid IMHO.

I also don't think that Zitterbewegung is a valid process based on my understanding of QFT and quantum mechanics as follows:

The original perspective on zitterbewegung interprets the x in the Dirac equation as the position observable of a particle. But that modern perspective is that that interpretation is a mistake. Zitterbewegung is just one of the consequences of that mistake.

The modern perspective is that Quantum Field theory (QFT) is the proper foundation for relativistic quantum physics. In QFT, the variable "x" in the Dirac equations isn't an observable at all. It's a parameter, basically a continuous "index" that is used together with the spinor index "k" to parameterize the field operators ψk(t,x). Observables are constructed from the field operators, and they are operators that act on a Hilbert space.

Because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the location of the electron cannot be precisely known. In QFT the spacetime location of the electron is properly conceptualized as a indistinct cloud where its position can only be approximated. As such ZBW cannot be determined. The x in the math is therefore undetermined.

Zitterbewegung is an artifact of mistaking the parameter x as a position observable.

Relativistic QFT doesn't have a strict position observable.

In relativistic QFT because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, particle-detection observables can't be both perfectly noise-free and perfectly sharply localized in a finite region of spacetime. We can know one or the other, but we can't have both, and nothing about this statement contradicts anything we know from real experiments.

In the case of ZBW, theory is mislead by the math and is not real. In addition, ZBW would have been replaced as a physical mechanism by the Higgs mechanism which is a chiral theory, that is, ZBW and the Higgs mechanism are incomparable.

Zitterbewegung in Quantum Mechanics – a research program

"Spacetime Algebra (STA) provides unified, matrix-free spinor methods for rotational dynamics

in classical theory as well as quantum mechanics. That makes it an ideal tool for studying particle

models of zitterbewegung and using them to study zitterbewegung in the Dirac theory. This paper

develops a self-contained dynamical model of the electron as a lightlike particle with helical zitter-

bewegung and electromagnetic interactions. It attributes to the electron an electric dipole moment

oscillating with ultrahigh frequency, and the possibility of observing this directly as a resonance in

electron channeling is analyzed in detail. A modification of the Dirac equation is suggested to incor-

porate the oscillating dipole moment. That enables extension of the Dirac equation to incorporate

electroweak interactions in a new way."

I like Roger Penrose chiral based concept for Zitterbewegung.

Zitterbewegung is a local circulatory motion of an electron that is thought to be the basis of the electron's spin and magnetic moment. Roger Penrose has considered the electron's chirality as "zitterbewegung".

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), zitterbewegung is understood as the result of the electron interacting with spontaneously forming and annihilating electron-positron pairs. In a reformulation of the Dirac theory, zitterbewegung does not need to be attributed to interference between positive and negative energy states.

Penrose has also explained the well-known electron "zitterbewegung" with his zigzag model of Higgs-electron interaction.

Quote

Roger Penrose in Chapter 25 of his book The Road to Reality describes a "zigzag" model of the electron that consists of a pair of massless components one with a left-handed spin (the zig) and the other with a right-handed spin (the zag). He says that the Dirac equation can be written as a pair of equations which describe each component being continually transformed into the other. The strength of the coupling between these equations depends on the electron mass. Thus the electron is continually jittering between a massless zig and a zag particle. The energy in this vibrating motion provides the electron with its rest mass. (This is Penrose's explanation of the well-known electron "zitterbewegung") Penrose then goes on to say that one can think of the Higgs field as taking over the role of the electron mass. One imagines that it is the continual interaction with the Higgs field that causes the electron zig to be converted to the electron zag and vice-versa. Again it is the energy in this vibrating motion that gives rise to the electron's rest mass. I think this picture is better than the particle-in-molasses picture that one often hears. In my view the Higgs interaction explains the origin of the rest mass/energy of a particle (and therefore its gravitational mass) but not its inertia defined as its resistance to being accelerated. I think inertia might have a "Machian" gravitational cause as outlined in Dennis Sciama's "On the origin of inertia" Reference: https://www.physicsforums.com/…ctron-interaction.622441/

Chapter 25. Standard Model: zitterbewegung, weak force, CPT theorem

Penross' entire book is found here

" In a reformulation of the Dirac theory, zitterbewegung does not need to be attributed to interference between positive and negative energy states."

Interpretations of Zitterbewegung such as those of Hestenes are quite clear and realistic

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225849683_Quantum_mechanics_from_self-interaction

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326835988_Helical_Solenoid_Model_of_the_Electron

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330619569_Electron_Structure_Ultra-Dense_Hydrogen_and_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions