This development of a lab prototype water arc nautical propulsion system is another example of putting possibly exotic phenomena to use, without concerning oneself with the controversy.

Production of fuel with COP above 1 (electric energy input/heat energy output) patent about to expire in 2021
-
-
-
I pasted the above comment on this thread as it pertains to it.
Today, I just came back to my keyboard from receiving a copy of "It's not electrolysis" the book published in 2020 by William Richardson, about whom Santilli wrote an article in 1998 in Arxiv as being an example of the applications of his Hadronic Chemistry. This man has been working on this for 50 years and got a patent in 2001. He also drove cars, generators, and many other devices with this gas.
-
This a mass balance based on the two nuclear reactions: the fusion of hydrogen to produce oxygen and fusion of oxygen with hydrogen to produce nitrogen. The assay data is the NASA data in the article by Santilli which by comparison matches the data in first column. The next two columns account for the hydrogen and oxygen produced from hydrolysis. Under the row missing hydrogen, one sees that some of the hydrogen from hydrolysis is missing. Missing hydrogen to oxygen is the hydrogen that fuses to produce oxygen: that oxygen is in the column oxygen from hydrogen. The hydrogen that fuses to oxygen to produce nitrogen is the column labeled Kidman reaction. Some of this oxygen come from atmospheric gas which is in the column oxygen from atmosphere. The column total oxygen for Kidman reaction is to account for all the oxygen, this number is approximately the same as the number for the oxygen consumed for the Kidman reaction in the column labeled Kidman reaction. There are two sources of nitrogen in Aquafuel: the nitrogen produced by nuclear reaction in the column Kidman reaction and nitrogen from atmosphere in the column by that name.
Richardson is right in that it's not just electrolysis.
The Kidman reaction is an irrefutable reference experiment for a new type of fusion reaction.
ARPA-E LENR funded projects news and updates - Page 17 - Players - LENR Forum (lenr-forum.com)
-
-
-
One of the things that Richardson states in his book is that he sent samples of the same batch of gas to 4 different laboratories and got back 4 different results. This is interesting because it tells that the gas produced is not conventional at all and the composition results can be confusing, to put it mildly.
What has surprised me more about how Richardson approached this technology is how simple his proof of concept tests were. He literally created the gas “by hand”, holding the electrodes and controlling the arc gap with his own hands in a bucket of water and collecting the gas with an inverted funnel and lighting it to show people how it worked.
Later he used more equipment but it was still off the shelf compressors, he first used air compressors to take it to 150 PSI and the a second high pressure one as He stored the gas at 1800 PSI on scuba diving bottles. The most sophisticated part of his industrial production system was the carbon rod continuous feeding system, that also mantained the arc gap within a narrow band to make the process continuous.
He stated to be able to run a 2.2 KW generator at full load for 40 minutes out of one scuba bottle.
-
I did the energy balance on Aquafuel using data in Santilli report. Based on the chemical composition from NASA the expectation is 13.24 kj/gm. However, the torque/horsepower yield was 90% compared to gasoline. Gasoline is 44.54 kj/gm, so Aquafuel is 40.09kj per gm. Therefore 40.09/13.24 is 3.02 times what is expected based on chemical composition.
The nuclear reactions produce something that has potential energy or fuel value. The fuel was not detected by chemical composition. I have been trying for years to figure out what that non-chemical fuel is.
-
I have been trying for years to figure out what that non-chemical fuel is.
Thanks. It is indeed a mistery. Some propose the creation of charge clusters but that’s not easy to prove.
-
Reading the story of William Richardson has been really interesting. He developed a system for making this gas out of mostly standard equipment skillfully assembled and demonstrated many of its curious features, but above all, that it was perfectly usable for practical purposes.
Running a 2.2 genset at full load out of a scuba bottle of arc water gas.
External Content m.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.Custom made arc water gas production system
External Content m.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
Something that I did not know and is sad to find out, is that Richardson collaborated with Santilli in a company called Toups Technology, and Richardson claims the IP attorney of this company sold the IP rights to Santilli. Very dirty move. He seems to blame the lawyer tho, not Santilli.
-
-
Another thing I never heard before, the gas has a smell said to be similar to ozone. This is interesting, as ozone is not reported as constituent from the gas analysis.