What about mercury vapour plasma lamps? I think Rossi is hot on this trail with his 'ballerina' SKL demo, possibly forming amalgams with the Hg and other dissolved metals (Pd, Ag, Sn) prior to firing up the e-cat with deuterium gas. We will have to wait and see what the trickster comes up with next, 'warm regards' etc, etc! 
Strong evidence for a new kind of radiation.
-
-
I think it is far more likely that Parkhomov has now sufficient evidence, with inert lamps for standards, to solve what his measurement problem is.
AFAIK He does inert runs as calibration,
If one reads his papers it’s in the methodology, just does not report those in the presentation because it’s obvious, He just reports the beef of what’s interesting.
-
Here is the gist of the first lamp test. About 30 hours continuous, readings every two seconds, without opening the calorimeter.
(I did make that spike by accidentally cutting the fan power instead of the heater power for a moment.)
.
.Edit: Actual long period averages from the steps..
“100 W” tungsten filament lamp, (98.2 W measured) ——————————- delta T 7.164 C
200 W heater (198.5 W measured) ——————————————————- delta T 14.418 C
200 W heater plus “100 W “ tungsten filament lamp (295.5 W measured) — delta T 22.174 C
Outlet diameter 0.065 mm, 3.18 m/s air velocity (normal, 3.0 @ STP)
-
I think Rossi is hot on this trail with his 'ballerina' SKL demo
For the sake of accuracy, there was no SKL demo and none is planned at this point.
In fact there is no evidence at all that the SKL exists.
There was an SK demo almost 2 years ago, at the time of it's "industrialization" to happy customers, taking orders, ads on E-Cat world, etc. but no customers have surfaced, nor employees.
Were you thinking of the SK? Then I'm not sure what trail Rossi is hot on with the SK. The Pacific Coast Trail? Or perhaps the Earth-Mars Interplanetary Trail?
-
AFAIK He does inert runs as calibration,
If one reads his papers it’s in the methodology
Which particular paper (he has written many) do you have the title?
Is there an english translation?
i've lost his email address.
Pete
-
Which particular paper (he has written many) do you have the title?
Is there an english translation?
i've lost his email address.
Pete
The last one made available and presented by Bob Greenyer At ICCF 22 is here.
https://drive.google.com/file/…YQeOoePUftdByo7BVnvg/view
It’s the 7 month run of a nickel powder reactor. From this one Parkhomov seems to have gained a lot of insight that has allowed him to come with his latest concepts. -
Thanks Curbina Pete
-
The last one made available and presented by Bob Greenyer At ICCF 22 is here.
https://drive.google.com/file/…YQeOoePUftdByo7BVnvg/view
It’s the 7 month run of a nickel powder reactor. From this one Parkhomov seems to have gained a lot of insight that has allowed him to come with his latest concepts."We express our deep gratitude to I.N. Stepanov for help with
materials and equipment, V.A.Karabanov, employees of
SINTEZTEH Research Center and AMTERTEK LLC for
high-quality analysis, Во Hoistad for the constructive
attention to our work and assistance in conducting analyses
at University of Uppsala, and to all those interested in cold
nuclear transmutation, without whose support our work
would not have been possible."
It looks like this is the same Bo Hoistad (retired from Uppsala University) who is participating in CleanHME: new EU-funded LENR research project.
-
Bo is a smart, well-spoken guy, but would rather stick his head in the sand than admit giant measurement errors, which makes him a liability in public funded science, IMO.
-
Display More
"We express our deep gratitude to I.N. Stepanov for help with
materials and equipment, V.A.Karabanov, employees of
SINTEZTEH Research Center and AMTERTEK LLC for
high-quality analysis, Во Hoistad for the constructive
attention to our work and assistance in conducting analyses
at University of Uppsala, and to all those interested in cold
nuclear transmutation, without whose support our work
would not have been possible."
It looks like this is the same Bo Hoistad who is participating in the CleanHME: new EU-funded LENR research project.
Bo Hoistad became interested in LENR since the affair between Uppsala and il dottore. He was one of the authors of the so called Lugano report. I assumed this was general knowledge by now, I often forget that not everyone follows the topic so closely as some of us LENR-geeks do.
-
Thanks Curbina Pete
The description of the methodology for measuring excess heat in this paper probably won’t satisfy anyone that thinks that excess heat is impossible, but I find it straight forward and the reported excess is well beyond any reasonable doubt, specially if one considers it along with the changes in composition of the material (Transmutation) after the experiment finished. Parkhomov's approach has been to not loose much time trying to build better calorimetry to satisfy the skeptics, just one good enough for ease of work and reasonable accuracy for comparative purposes, but incorporating the search for transmutation as an additional check box. Skeptics probably will never accept that as a valid approach, tho. I think Parkhomov has decided is not worth the effort to try to convince anyone. He just wants to get things done.
-
Bo Hoistad became interested in LENR since the affair between Uppsala and il dottore. He was one of the authors of the so called Lugano report. I assumed this was general knowledge by now, I often forget that not everyone follows the topic so closely as some of us LENR-geeks do.
You are entitled to your opinion. I think Bo has moved light years away since that affair, but this is not the thread for that.
-
Bo is a smart, well-spoken guy, but would rather stick his head in the sand than admit giant measurement errors, which makes him a liability in public funded science, IMO.
You've never met him have you? Very smart, specialist in forensic chemistry, on which topic he is the inventor of many analytical techniques, he is also top science adviser for the Swedish Police. He's about as safe a pair of hands as you could find.
-
You've never met him have you? Very smart, specialist in forensic chemistry, on which topic he is the inventor of many analytical techniques, he is also top science adviser for the Swedish Police. He's about as safe a pair of hands as you could find.
Then his avoidance of the emissivity error is even more egregious.
He is not confused by it. Of that I am certain.He simply wants it swept under the rug, it seems.
That is both a poor example and unscientific behaviour, IMO.
Science isn’t about worrying about the wrong turns taken.Science is about marking the right and the wrong turns on the map, so the correct way can be discerned by the next traveller.
-
Why is strange radiation important? Because hot fusion produces hot radiation and cold fusion produces cold radiation. Cold radiation is a better term but you may call it strange radiation or one of the other terms. The key point of cold radiation is that it is cold because it has mass.
Bob Greenyer posted a video where he analyzes a paper from Russian authors that performed an experiment to confirm and detect the so called “strange radiation”.
The paper (translated from Russian by Bob himself) is here:
In the above paper we find the rest mass of individual quanta is in the range of 2.9 to 3.9 ev. These quanta can be brought to rest in water and condense in a magnetic field in water and can be launched from water by interaction with light. These quanta condense to form microdroplets and these droplets can assemble other forms. That's what the images are about. Just as water can capture these quanta, the microdroplet can also be captured by some kind of electromagnetic resonance capture to a film emulsion. In the process of capture and resonance the quanta's mass converts to energy which light create the images on the film. Microdroplet are creating energies between 1 MeV and 300 MeV to create the images. There is transmutation in film emulsion.
It seems that all cold fusion involves an electrical arc (used in the broadest possible sense). Cold fusion happens in the arc and produces cold radiation. I have done the mass balance and stoichiometry for an arc in deuterium contaminated with atmospheric gas. Cold fusion is very fast and very productive. A two minute arc with an input of 4533 BTU causes much transmutation. Based on the mass lost during transmutation and mass to energy conversion, the predicted (hot fusion) yield would be about 95.6 million BTU. If you convert that to a bomb, its about a tenth the size of the one dropped on Hiroshima. The actual heat yield above heat input is 2871 BTU. So unless you don't believe in matter and energy conservation, the difference between the hot fusion expectation and the cold fusion actual yield become cold radiation, a form of mass that can be converted to energy.
Do you see why cold radiation is important?
-
So do you think this is how Randal Mills achieves fusion with his electrical arcs? Reminiscent of neutron formation during thunderstorms?
-
BLP makes energy from water, not hydrogen. If they didn't have some expectation that the oxygen plays a role why are they now looking to control it? Thunderstorms arc are so energetic that they make neutrons like Santilli has made neutrons from electric arcs. If the arc is not quite so hot one gets fusion but with fewer neutrons released. There is an escape velocity thing going on because the fusion is actually due to a sort of gravity that increases as the quantum number of the energy level increases. Of course the fusion also increase as the number of quantum energy levels with a high quantum number increases.
-
One key ingredient of Parkhomov's approach is rising the temperatures above 1000° C, in the paper attached, one gets an idea of why.
-
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
Последний из них, представленный Бобом Гриньером на ICCF 22, находится здесь.
https://drive.google.com/file/…YQeOoePUftdByo7BVnvg/view
Это 7-месячная работа реактора на никелевом порошке. Из этого Пархомов, кажется, многое понял, что позволило ему представить свои последние концепции.Я не согласен с Пархомовым в той части, в которой он даёт объяснения своим результатам. Своё несогласие я выражаю в своих статьях - моя парадигма основывается на "физхимии микромира" созданной Канарёвым Филиппом Михайловичем -
По следам записок Алексея Ивановича Лаптухова. 28 января 2020 г. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/5icV/59Li8u4k8
По следам записок Алексея Ивановича Лаптухова. 28 января 2020 г. - https://drive.google.com/file/…OdOEc5Or/view?usp=sharing
Рентген с магнитофонной ленты, 17 февраля 2019 г. -
https://drive.google.com/file/…-HwU1m0r/view?usp=sharing
Рентген с магнитофонной ленты, 17 февраля 2019 г. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4vTP/2mTFtWQ7c
Об опасностях работы над установками LENR, 4 апреля 2019 г. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4UBV/KFx4GNVwU
Об опасностях работы над установками LENR, 4 апреля 2019 г. - https://drive.google.com/file/…1GGSFHK9/view?usp=sharing
Ответ Пархомову на его -Анализ- от 30 января 2020 года - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/33wD/584AGV156
Ответ Пархомову на его -Анализ- от 30 января 2020 года - https://drive.google.com/file/…uB5N6niv/view?usp=sharing
Физик Чарльз Кулон и Кавендиш, 15 сентября 2020 г. - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4MUd/Ao4WCYyFq
Физик Чарльз Кулон и Кавендиш, 15 сентября 2020 г. - https://drive.google.com/file/…65DWsrpu/view?usp=sharing
АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ФИЗИКИ, 1993-2020 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/43mg/5i64hswxz
АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ФИЗИКИ, 1993-2020 - https://drive.google.com/file/…krPt51mE/view?usp=sharing
Чтобы лучше понимать меня читайте и эти статьи -
Использование гидроволнового метода для очистки водных растворов и термоядерные реакции - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/KvFi/BUqctQDTW.
Использование гидроволнового метода для очистки водных растворов и термоядерные реакции - https://drive.google.com/file/…wHLFcwK7/view?usp=sharing
По следам отчета - Экспериментальная проверка происходящих процессов в никель-водородной системе при использовании двух катализаторов 1. Ni-NaBH4 2. Ni-LiAlH4 -
https://drive.google.com/file/…2KI2OXaa/view?usp=sharing
По следам отчета - Экспериментальная проверка происходящих процессов в никель-водородной системе при использовании двух катализаторов 1. Ni-NaBH4 2. Ni-LiAlH4 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/2oQK/2W1huSfmM
По следам выступления Н.В. Самсоненко на семинаре в РУДН 31 октября 2019 года ..., 6.11.2019 русс. - https://drive.google.com/file/…38RBCMMl/view?usp=sharing
«УРОК-21. ОТВЕТЫ НА ВОПРОСЫ ТРАНСМУТАЦИОННОГО ЭЛЕКТРОЛИЗА ВОДЫ.doc », 13 января 2019 года.doc» - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/GsTU/54eMyxJ6F
«РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ ВЫСОКОЭНЕРГЕТИЧЕСКОГО ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ.doc» - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/EAv2/HWR4ZTFXk
Разбор отчета «ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ НИКЕЛЬ - ВОДОРОДНЫХ РЕАКЦИЙ С АНОМАЛЬНО ВЫСОКИМ ТЕПЛОВЫДЕЛЕНИЕМ» - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Drnt/qehbdVSHx
Разбираем доклад С.М. Година, 1.11.2017 года.doc - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/JtUM/9Nuq6KBE2
Изучайте русский язык и будете счастливы !
-
Has nobody else put a standard lamp in a calorimeter?
(besides UL, ASA, CSA, ETL, NEMA etc.)
