Modern tiny water fuelled nuclear energy reactor

  • Modern tiny water fuelled nuclear energy reactor:


    After a discussion with the inventor / discoverer of MWCNT fusion method ( James F. Loan ) here is the conclusion:


    a proof of concept has been made using water, regular tap water, but D2O is recommended, there are various methods to achieve nuclear fusion, some of them are violent and cause harmful radiation ( but can be useful when handled correctly ) and others don't have any bad byproduct, just clean fusion.


    this one can replace conventional nuclear reactors / plants, by only pushing D2O or H2O molecules against each other to the extent of fusing them, using intense magnetic fields of multi walled carbon nano-tubes ( MWCNTs ), other types of nano-tubes don't work obviously.


    the liquid molecules are trapped between carbon nano walls ( rinsing nanotubes in water ) with a push force from carbon atoms electrons up to 10^5-6 tesla, which is more than enough to achieve fusion resulting on hydrogen as a byproduct in addition to non ionizing byproducts like alphas and soft Xrays, the tested MWCNT's were 7nm OD and 5nm ID, if stimulated by exposing water to ultraviolet C (UVC) radiation ( or sun ), the lab used UV 2537 angstroms, then ( for still unknown reason ) we will have neutrons with 23.77MeV in addition to gamma photons.


    researchers are advised to be very cautious as this is LETHAL, DO NOT USE more than 1 milligram of nanotubes...


    tests done with 10mg resulted in failure of computers and electronic devices on a 15 meter radius, and death of all mice and flies on the lab, the researcher had mild radiation poisoning symptoms for several days.


    to achieve maximum efficiency nanotubes HAVE to be ultra pure, with no Hydrogen contamination, meaning commercial nanotubes are not very efficient as pure ones created using suitable methods.

    the reactor ( water container ) could be made with SiO2 and polypropylene to allow transparency.


    when using lead as a shield with 7 inches thickness to shield radiation it has been observed that it become by time radioactive by itself and start turning to white and yellow dust, researchers can use boron solution or boron plates to contain radiation, since it transmutate to carbon after neutron emissions.


    the prototype model of a 1.5 meters diameter nuclear water reactor has been able to generate 10KW of power constantly without stopping or maintenance.

    we hope researchers / institutions around the world replicate the work, and improve it to achieve the goal of cheap energy.


    patent :


    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2012088472A1/en


    Again, researchers are advised to conduct the experiment even with commercial MWCNT's and inspect the radiation levels and byproducts... At least you'll have a proof of concept.


    math and standardization are the last things we should think of currently, our physics concepts need an upgrade to explain the phenomena we are witnessing, this upgrade is something new and we should not try to explain anything with the current modules.


    some patents exploring other methods for further research from my drive :

    LENR – Google Drive

  • goldinium How stable are the carbon nanotubes once the reactions have started, have you looked at them under electron microscope to detect structural breakdown over time? Any evidence for transmutation of elements?:)

    MWCNT's will loss it's nano structure over time in case of continuous neutron emission and turn to a carbon mush..


    evidence for transmutation? well..we have neutrons what do you expect..


    this has been verified on labs like LLNL, Los Alamos (those were interested only on neutrons) , MIT, ...


    try it for yourself and see.

  • Another contributor James F Loan is mentioned in several prior patent applications for the same process, all assigned to Seldon Technologies LLC. That company is now part of Carbon Block Technologies, who specialize in water filtration systems.


    A casual search found no academic papers from the inventors, possibly due to the pending patent applications.

    The discovery was accidental, not a result of academic research, James was part of the development of water filtration system that have the ability to make water free of viruses and bacteria, he noticed that the system is often get clogged with gases, he inspected the nature of gas and found it's Hydrogen, which is strange since there is no electrolysis or any kind of energy stimulation, then he inspected different combination then found it's the reaction between water and MWCNT's that cause it, (maybe it's the cause of killing viruses with gamma photons and not a filtration).....

  • I think you would need to supply the nanotubes. Is that possible?

    Multi Walled Carbon Nano Tubes - MWCNT's are dirt cheap, the experiment as i said used the 7nm type,

    you can use commercial ones but the reactions are too low for a production reactor.


    James patent on how to manufacture pure MWCNT's with no H contamination is in the process, it will be published in a few months.

  • How are you generating such powerful magnetic fields?

    we are not generating anything here, the water molecules are trapped between carbon atoms, the magnetic field of carbon's electron shell push the molecules from many sides resulting in high probability of fusing them ( they have no option except fusing )

  • So the magnetic fields result from coordinated electron spin alignment (which is quite similar to Wyttenbach and Holmlid's models of nuclear fusion. The latter uses YAG (IR) or 495nm lasers to stimulate proton breakdown into Kaons etc from ultra dense D or H). Does your work have any similar underlying principles? :)

  • Another contributor James F Loan is mentioned in several prior patent applications for the same process, all assigned to Seldon Technologies LLC. That company is now part of Carbon Block Technologies, who specialize in water filtration systems.


    A casual search found no academic papers from the inventors, possibly due to the pending patent applications.

    See also my post in the "Deuterium Energetics Limited" thread.

  • we are not generating anything here, the water molecules are trapped between carbon atoms, the magnetic field of carbon's electron shell push the molecules from many sides resulting in high probability of fusing them ( they have no option except fusing )

    The fusion inside regular cavities has been predicted almost 4 years ago and I always wondered why nobody tried it with nano tubes or conventional molecular sieves.

    The use of water to achieve fusion is a very bad idea. You in fact must use pure H/D else the symmetry is broken.

    Arrata once had an asymmetric LENR process that produce 3-He with the same neutron problem but only at LENR reaction level.

    23.7 MeV is the Deuterium fusion net energy. Nice to get it immediately but of course deadly as all other hot fusion approaches like the nonsensical ITER. The problem is Oxigen that only has high level gammas and just ejects the absorbed energy as the outer gamma band is 26MeV!


    The art of LENR is to down scale the energy without causing radiation.

  • I think that for demonstrating the effect, radiation is not bad as it is an easy mark that we have a nuclear effect. But yes as a practical device one would head for non radioactive one. The thing is that demonstrating that we have an effect will open the floodgates of human exploration power as companies and people all over the world would start to try to find the best solution, something that LENR is missing badly. Perhaps the inventor is a real economic genius as well as he get's to collect a percentage of an existing multi trillion market compared to people hiding in the dark and want everything by them self not finding the practical solution and gets a percentage of nothing.

    • Official Post

    Perhaps the inventor is a real economic genius as well as he get's to collect a percentage of an existing multi trillion market compared to people hiding in the dark and want everything by them self not finding the practical solution and gets a percentage of nothing.

    I sense some ECW mood in these words. Rossi was called genius many times there for doing unexplainable.

  • So the magnetic fields result from coordinated electron spin alignment (which is quite similar to Wyttenbach and Holmlid's models of nuclear fusion. The latter uses YAG (IR) or 495nm lasers to stimulate proton breakdown into Kaons etc from ultra dense D or H). Does your work have any similar underlying principles? :)

    No i don't think so, this is just basic repulsion from carbon atoms electron magnetic fields.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.