In the meantime, there is no need to know about it. "
We only need to study the octopus cautiously In the meantime, there is no need to know about it. ”
you all know more then most, it made a good start.
Lenr works without knowing all the details and the site is not ready for the inrush
enjoy
Display MoreWhat you mention are just fantasies: A valid theory must be able to exactly calculate measured data. From this point Higgs idea is the worst and most fringe idea ever accepted as theory.
This happened because SM - the second biggest fantasy - had no clue how to explain the gluons mass. Not to talk about the brain tearing nonsense of the gluons invention ...
Such things like Higgs happen when people never stop to develop a model that provably is wrong for describing dense mass.
So you should replace the word theory usually just simple with idea ?! Or sample model.
What I'm saying is what DnG calls the octopus, or high energy picoscale EM/weak phenomina can describe LENR effects in full (outside of what they predict from fusion) without infinite energy theories, describable through the st.ndard model, and yours. I don't fully comprehend the most complex math but agree with you it can very much all be electromsgnetic. In the general sense I do agree with you! Was expressing great doubt in the Higgs and virtual particle interpretation as the energy source. We want light, heat, magnetism and electrons!
In the meantime, there is no need to know about it. "
We only need to study the octopus cautiously In the meantime, there is no need to know about it. ”
you all know more then most, it made a good start.
Lenr works without knowing all the details and the site is not ready for the inrush
enjoy
I agree that practical energy can be produced without fully understanding, but companies to advertise false explanations when we know the truth sounds relatively safe though spooky is sad to me. The hole is open already and knowing how it works allpws us to fine tune the results we want. And those are light, thermal control, and electricity with novel products produced. What scientist's who know better are doing ticks me off, it's like selling wood in plastic baggies when there's a forest in the backyard that just needs caring and falsely saying you need an internet connection to extract "vacuum energy" from wood safely. The real question is do we keep quite because it is "too freeing"? Some have insinuated it can draw unwanted attention or influences? Call it a "living fire" if that's what it is. That maKes it more beautiful to me, be safe all.
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
Display MoreWhat you mention are just fantasies: A valid theory must be able to exactly calculate measured data. From this point Higgs idea is the worst and most fringe idea ever accepted as theory.
This happened because because SM - the second biggest fantasy - had no clue how to explain the gluons mass. Not to talk about the brain tearing nonsense of the gluons invention...
Such things like Higgs happen when people never stop to develop a model that provably is wrong for describing dense mass.
So you should replace the word theory usually just simple with idea?! Or sample model.
The Conference "Physical vacuum - a paradigm of science of the XXI century" is underway -
