A computer program that simulates the structure of atomic nuclei of all known and also possible nuclides.

  • The computer zip file does not open on Chromebook.

    Do you have WinZip installed ?

    You need a screen resolution of 1440*900

    The help remains from the previous version of the program, I do not have time to redo it,because I constantly make changes to the program. Now I'm changing it to a smaller screen.

  • To understand what the program shows, read the two files that I specified above. There are the patterns I saw and an example of dividing U235 into fragments. An understanding of how the core is built is given by: 1-the Number of nuclear and electronic shells coincide. I left them with a single designation. If in the electron cloud an electron is attached to the shell" L "position " p3", then in the nucleus a proton-netron pair is attached to the same spatial position - to the shell" L "position"p3". The algorithm for filling shells with nucleon pairs (proton+neutron) can be seen if you click the ALGORITHM button. Neutrons in an amount greater than Z*2 are added using the same algorithm.

    Only first the places where the neutron will get a bond with three protons are filled, then the places where it will get two bonds, and then the rest with one bond. I called these places "Vacancies" and designated them as W1 W2 W3 W4. the Latter occur in neutron-deficient nuclei.

    I completely forgot - all graphs and images and data samples that they are built on can be saved. Images in the PICTURE folder. Drawnings - in the CHART folder, data in the DATA folder . Except for the centrifugal forces, which are not yet clear, they are inaccurate.

    Sorry my English-this is how Yandex translates

  • Do you have WinZip installed ?

    ALPHABET doesn't like WinZip:)

    Sorry I can't help you with centrifugal force in three dimensions

    Randell Mills has some formulas for proton and neutron magnetic moment.. but they won't help you.

    If you are retired... then you have plenty of time to go through Wyttenbach's proton magnetic moment calculation

    and other calculations.. but they are not in (3d,t) framework.

    The (3d,t ) framework doesn't provide the wraparound electromagnetic interaction necessary for stability of magnetic mass flux

    via the Biot-Savart law.

    Faraday , two hundred years later would be surprised to find that magnetic flux can be the basis of mass and gravity.

    A centrifugal force calculation by Wyttenbach is Pg 20.

    280. ^ Newtons doesn't sound much for a human.... the same 'mass' as my dog...

    Dogs and humans exist in (3d,t) but I have never talked protonese to a proton to ask them what 4D is like.

    However I am only mortal , whereas protons are timeless.

  • You complicate the topic of mass very much. If we assume that the mass and volume of elementary particles depend only on the size, then everything becomes simple. (If you forget about the stupid Compton wavelength). The simplest explanation of the essence of elementary particles - They all consist of some one matter with the same density (i.e., filling the volume with mass), which allows them to turn into each other in cosmology, is an axiom that gravity (the generation of mass) bends space. Let's look at this question in a different way - the Volume of mass bends space, and gravity-the appearance of forces acting on a material body located on the "slope" of the funnel of space distortion.

    By the way, the inertial mass essentially has the same nature - if the body is trying to "push" out of the funnel of its own gravitational distortion, it will try to roll back along its slope. And if space distortion is an established fact for planets, stars, and black holes, why is it denied to nuclei and elementary particles ?

    Compare the beginning of the table of elementary particles and the list of Plato's bodies-regular polyhedra. Proper rotations of a 3-dimensional space are exhausted by a list of Cn,Dn,C,and O. Y. the First two are sporadic groups, and the last three are groups of Plato bodies. And here you can consider this option: a photon is a tetrahedron (dual to itself) and an antiparticle to itself. Electron-cube, electron-neutrino-octahedron. The mu-meson is a dodecahedron, and the mu-neutrino is an icosahedron.

    The last two pairs are connected by duality, common symmetry (lepton charge), and polyhedra with a triangle face move at the speed of light. And if the volume of a cube (electron) with edge a=1 is V=1, then the volume of a dodecahedron with edge =3 is V=206.9. Almost exact hit to the Muon mass. The error is about 0.06%.

    When forced high motion of an elementary particle, it does not shrink, but rather "smears" across space along the trajectory of movement. This gives a total volume in discrete time greater than that of the particle at rest. This is what is called relativistic mass increase. The constancy of the speed of light is a consequence, first of all, of the discreteness of continuous space (this is no worse than the wave-particle duality) and of the constant transmission of the excited space as a particle with triangular faces to the neighboring discrete space.

    Breaking away from the electron (and carrying away part of its mass smeared in an orbit around the nucleus), the photon obeys only the space through which it propagates. If on the way there is a substance (consisting of atoms) that the photon does not have a straight path, but in places moves along the slopes of gravitational pits formed by the masses of atomic nuclei. Naturally, this path will be longer and we will notice a decrease in the speed of light in the substance. After leaving the substance, the photon again moves in a straight line, restoring the speed of light.

    And diffraction with interference-phenomena obtained by the passage of a photon near the edges of matter, falling in places into gravitational pits that bend its path and give a spread of further trajectories and their directions.

    A photo well from a distant star does not matter in which inertial system the object is considered to fall into. If stationary, then directly into it, and if moving, then into some part of it "smeared" along the trajectory.

  • The cube and dodecahedron have a vertex-edge ratio =2/3. Apparently, this causes the transformation of 0-dimensional disks of the surrounding space into 1-dimensional vectors representing an electric field. The sum of these vectors (the electric field) at any radius (the area of the sphere) is a constant. Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. When a charged particle moves in space, these vectors unfold in an effort to maintain the direction to it. This rotation is the essence of the magnetic field. It is impossible to detect the carrier of the magnetic field, since the rotation of the vector cannot have one.

    The interaction of the charged particle creating these vectors (or rotating them) with the particle itself and other charged particles gives the entire spectrum of observed electric and magnetic phenomena and effects. It is enough to understand that a region of space that is under the influence of rotating effects from different moving charges will experience either a joint effect or a counter effect. And, accordingly, influence back on the speed of these charges. A simple example - in a coil with a current, there is a magnetic field in the form of rotating electric field vectors caused by the movement of charges along the winding.The termination current. And already rotating vectors transmit the energy of rotation to the charges in the winding causing induction.