under your belt for now,
https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/…man-lawyers-class-action/
Right now, a second Nuremberg tribunal that is in preparation, with a class action lawsuit being set up under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide behind the American-German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who is prosecuting those responsible for the Covid-19 scandal manipulated by the Davos Forum.
In this respect, it is worth recalling that Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who succeeded in condemning the automobile giant Volkswagen in the case of the tampered catalytic converters. And it is this same lawyer who succeeded in condemning Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise.
According to Reiner Fuellmich, all the frauds committed by German companies are derisory compared to the damage that the Covid-19 crisis has caused and continues to cause. This Covid-19 crisis should be renamed the “Covid-19 Scandal” and all those responsible should be prosecuted for civil damages due to manipulations and falsified test protocols. Therefore, an international network of business lawyers will plead the biggest tort case of all time, the Covid-19 fraud scandal, which has meanwhile turned into the biggest crime against humanity ever committed.
A Covid-19 commission of enquiry has been set up on the initiative of a group of German lawyers with the aim of bringing an international class action lawsuit using Anglo-Saxon law. Here is the summarized translation of the last communication of Dr. Fuellmich of 15/02/2021
“The hearings of around 100 internationally renowned scientists, doctors, economists and lawyers, which have been conducted by the Berlin Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 affair since 10.07.2020, have in the meantime shown with a probability close to certainty that the Covid- 19 scandal was at no time a health issue. Rather, it was about solidifying the illegitimate power (illegitimate because it was obtained by criminal methods) of the corrupt “Davos clique” by transferring the wealth of the people to the members of the Davos clique, destroying, among other things, small and medium-sized enterprises in particular. Platforms such as Amazon, Google, Uber, etc. could thus appropriate their market share and wealth.”
Crazy attempts back in the day, door parts, baby collider not a collider, testla coil feeders. no sound ...
ocd at its best~
Just a quick note to say that I received the newsletter for the first time in my inbox.
Display MoreI have been thinking about this idea that the electric charge does not exist, and I came to a startling conclusion.
The diameter of a circle is not 2 Pi r.
This was a mistake by Pythagoras.
Pythagoras did not have access to modern physics and was unaware of recent advances.
The concept of Pi is nonphysical, as is any "irrational" number as the name suggests.
This mistake by Pythagoras has caused math and science to wander off track for several millennia.
Yes, the ratio is approximately 3.14 but it has never been measured with sufficient precision to find the last digit.
Now don't get me started on e. As a statement of fact, both common uses of "e" (electric charge and Euler's number) are both bogus.
The only thing transcendental is meditation.
Now about Pythagoras ... You need to see a doctor ... or go back to school and sit at your desk ... Why do you need to do this? This must be done in order to gain knowledge for you.
Who is Pythagoras? Pythagoras of Samos (ancient Greek Πυθαγόρας ὁ Σάμιος, lat. Pythagoras; about 570-490 BC) - ancient Greek philosopher, mathematician ...
Pythagoras was not a physicist ...
Who Calculated Pi? The mathematician who calculated pi was Archimedes!
Archimedes (ancient Greek Ἀρχιμήδης; 287-212 BC) is an ancient Greek scientist and engineer. Born and spent most of his life in the city of Syracuse, Sicily.
He made many discoveries in the field of geometry, anticipated many ideas of mathematical analysis.
It is not difficult to understand that Pythagoras lived more than 200 years earlier than Archimedes ...
A video in which the lecturer clearly explains how Archimedes calculated the area of a circle using pi - Amazing examples of logic -
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
An earlier calculation of pi - The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (RMP; also designated as papyrus British Museum 10057 and pBM 10058) is one of the best known examples of ancient Egyptian mathematics. It is named after Alexander Henry Rhind, a Scottish antiquarian, who purchased the papyrus in 1858 in Luxor, Egypt; it was apparently found during illegal excavations in or near the Ramesseum. It dates to around 1550 BC. [1] The British Museum, where the majority of the papyrus is now kept, acquired it in 1865 along with the Egyptian Mathematical Leather Roll, also owned by Henry Rhind; [2] there are a few small fragments held by the Brooklyn Museum in New York City [3] [4] and an 18 cm central section is missing. It is one of the two well-known Mathematical Papyri along with the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus. The Rhind Papyrus is larger than the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, while the latter is older. [3]
The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus dates to the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt. It was copied by the scribe Ahmes (i.e., Ahmose; Ahmes is an older transcription favored by historians of mathematics), from a now-lost text from the reign of king Amenemhat III (12th dynasty). Written in the hieratic script, this Egyptian manuscript is 33 cm (13 in) tall and consists of multiple parts which in total make it over 5 m (16 ft) long. The papyrus began to be transliterated and mathematically translated in the late 19th century.
256/81 = 3,16049382716
Now about Pythagoras ... You need to see a doctor
Re: pi.. P.f.d =t.i.c.
translation. the pi revisionism was tongue-in-cheek.
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
There certainly seems to be a two dimensional surface charge on any conductor.
In fact this surface charge is used for many applications.
These are practical applications with a well tested theory. (Maxwell's Equations, you know, that idiot Maxwell.)
Perhaps you have replacement equations that have falsifiable experiments, let alone practical applications?
It is inconvenient to scratch your left ear with your right hand ... Agree .... We can generally argue paradoxically - for example - "When the United States recognizes that" Crimea is ours ", that is, Russian, then we will reveal to you alternative equations, or even better -. ..then ... when the US destroys all of its yacht warheads ... "Do you like that? I answer without a trick - the specialists who test antennas for military use did not notice that Maxwell's equations "work" and are applicable in the design ... They do not see THIS ... Strange ...
We can generally argue paradoxically - for example - "When the United States recognizes that" Crimea is ours ", that is, Russian, then we will reveal to you alternative equations, or even better -. ..then ... when the US destroys all of its yacht warheads ... "Do you like that?
I could think of a better analogy to make a point. Those are sensitive topics for many of our members, and they may be bothered when reading.
and have no idea what they are ...standing on.
back at ya.
please delete, im just in a moood..
Ivermectin for the World
Ivermectin for the World
And all the money for the Gates-Club. Then they will allow it.
It looks like big Pharma owns a license to kill!
Display MoreВзаимодействие с другими людьми
Boys! Physicists! Maybe it's enough to draw "plus signs" - "+" over "H"? Franklin, who invented this for you, of course, applauds, but he was forgiven - THEY did not know PHYSICS then ... And you are not forgiven! There is NO "positive charge" in nature! Have the courage to prove it!
The other side of the question - if a proton, during its rotation, generates only a magnetic field, then the question arises - "why is there no such substance in nature in which three protons are connected by magnetic forces at once?" What hinders this process ??? Have you ever thought about it ??? Another question - a very unpleasant question - Why does a free neutron decay, and a neutron that "sits" in a stable element - or in a stable nucleus, does not decay for any length of time ??? The third question - Why is the electron so far from its proton in the atom ??? The distance from an electron to a proton is a million times greater than the size of a proton ... And the other side of the question - "What FORCE does not allow an electron to come closer to a proton?" This FORCE is opposed to the convergence of a proton and an electron! I answer ... This FORCE with the code name "secondary magnetic field" - it is this force that tears the neutron apart during its decay, and it is this force that keeps the electron away from the proton ...
If the protons had a "Maxwellian electric charge", then there would be no nuclei in nature, since there would be repulsive forces ... But there is NO "Maxwellian electric charge" in nature, and therefore the nuclei are collected due to the magnetic forces that generate rotating protons.
I have great respect for Benjamin Franklin, who visited my small town when he was United States Ambassador to France. I made this drawing of the small castle he lived in during his trip. (officially he had a love affair there.)
He met Cassini who lived in the same village.
In the garden of the Castle, was the crypt of which Dan Brown speaks in "The Da Vinci Code".
But the real discoverer of positive and negative charges was Charles François Dufay de Cisternay. He was director of the "Jardin Du Roy" (now the "National Museum of Natural History", a famous research institute)
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
Display MoreI have great respect for Benjamin Franklin, who visited my small town when he was United States Ambassador to France. I made this drawing of the small castle he lived in during his trip. (officially he had a love affair there.)
He met Cassini who lived in the same village.
In the garden of the Castle, was the crypt of which Dan Brown speaks in "The Da Vinci Code".
But the real discoverer of positive and negative charges was Charles François Dufay de Cisternay. He was director of the "Jardin Du Roy" (now the "National Museum of Natural History", a famous research institute)
Just repeating my answer in a parallel branch -
"
QuoteQuote from PhysicsForDummies I don't think I understand the point of this post. If you can explain it in a less creepy, condescending way, that would be nice. Plus all I am asking for is for your theory and equations which replace the stupid Maxwell's Equations. It is not useful to say Maxwell was wrong but offer no alternative.
Why did you decide that I owe you? Why did you decide that I have to present alternative equations for you? In my opinion, it is already good that I opened your eyes to Maxwell's mistakes ... Then think with your own head! In order to think on your own, you don't need much - you just want to do it ... Re-read my article again ... Re-read Maxwell's treatise and see for yourself that Maxwell was mistaken, that Maxwell was unauthorized to make his assumptions ... Re-read Thomson's treatise from 1872 and compare Thomson's reasoning with Maxwell's reasoning ... Convince yourself of the erroneousness of Maxwell's reasoning ... And start thinking on your own how you should live with it ... Nobody owes you anything! All in your hands ! If you are not able to reform physics on your own, then ask your friends or numerous Nobel laureates to do it ... But then you just have to wait ... And understand the main thing - you need to understand - "how are nuclear reactions going at LENR", and "Maxwell's electric charge" closes this secret for you and leads you away from the truth!
"
Display MoreThe LENR energy amounts to ~20 Mev.
if one assumes that fusion is the reaction..
Other possiblities with 7.54 ,7.35 eV
The ionisation energy of H is measured as 13.6 eV...
In this millionfold downconversion
is there any ideas on the nature of the intermediate steps ?
The key - the initial reaction is the reaction of "e-capture", the one who understands how to initiate it will receive controlled LENR ... Afanasyev mastered it ... Rossi and Parkhomov got it empirically, not understanding the essence ... The same I see the most with Mills - there is an experiment, but the interpretation is wrong ... Anatoly Ivanovich Klimov, Sergei Godin, Mizuno and many others have the same problem ... But views change and many understand that a paradigm shift in physics is required. I have revealed the main mistakes in physics that Muskwell made ... I present to you the article by Alexei Ivanovich Laptukhov, which he wrote in 2012 and which he revised under the pressure of my publications, but at the same time he did not have the heart to remove the "Maxwellian electric charge" -
HTYa and ShM website - article by Alexey Ivanovich Laptukhov -
"On the possibility of the formation of a dielectron near the nucleus of a heavy atom" -
The key - the initial reaction is the reaction of "e-capture", the one who understands how to initiate it will receive controlled LENR ... Afanasyev mastered it ... Rossi and Parkhomov got it empirically, not understanding the essence ... The same I see the most with Mills - there is an experiment, but the interpretation is wrong ... Anatoly Ivanovich Klimov, Sergei Godin, Mizuno and many others have the same problem ... But views change and many understand that a paradigm shift in physics is required. I have revealed the main mistakes in physics that Muskwell made ... I present to you the article by Alexei Ivanovich Laptukhov, which he wrote in 2012 and which he revised under the pressure of my publications, but at the same time he did not have the heart to remove the "Maxwellian electric charge" -
HTYa and ShM website - article by Alexey Ivanovich Laptukhov -
"On the possibility of the formation of a dielectron near the nucleus of a heavy atom" -
Laptukhov is mistaken and this error is promoted by his erroneous adherence to Maxwell's physics - this is his belief that there is a "Maxwellian electric charge" in nature ... But this does not exist in nature ... Laptukhov took a decisive step and invented a "dielectron" ... This is stupidity from my point of view! There are clusters of electrons connected by magnetic interactions ... These clusters of electrons are pumped by "mass" - the mass of photons, and thus a powerful temporary magnet is formed, which is able to "stretch", for example, the lead nucleus to such an extent that it allows photons. " push the "neutron, which is in the center of the" dumbbell "on the axis of the nucleus (see on the right), to the proton, which is in the lower part of the" dumbbell "in the figure, and helium-4 leaves the lead nucleus - this is the separation of helium-4 ( alpha particle) and the birth of mercury - 200.
Взаимодействие с другими людьми
Posts having little or nothing to do with the LEC replication will be moved elsewhere.
You should be either more attentive or more consistent. The fact is that I replied to this post - "The LENR energy amounts to ~ 20 Mev.
if one assumes that fusion is the reaction ..
Other possiblities with 7.54, 7.35 eV
The ionization energy of H is measured as 13.6 eV ...
In this millionfold downconversion
is there any ideas on the nature of the intermediate steps? "The question is - Why didn't you move this post, but did you move my answer to HIM? Why are you behaving like that? This is the first remark ... And the second remark will be as follows - here is a screenshot from articles -
And what do we see? Again, the "plus" - "+", which do not allow you to understand physics correctly ... And third ... In my commentary just explains what happens between the cathode and the anode ... Unfortunately, you have old knowledge on this account and you, as a moderator with old knowledge, do not understand WHAT I am writing about ...
I don't even know - whether I should be glad that you are not so careful, or be upset that you do not understand me ... With this approach, you will be poking around with LENR for a long time, not understanding what is happening in your installations ... Hee-hee ... Ha-ha ...
I don't even know - whether I should be glad that you are not so careful, or be upset that you do not understand me ... With this approach, you will be poking around with LENR for a long time, not understanding what is happening in your installations ... Hee-hee ... Ha-ha ..
I have only so much time in the day to study each and every post to see if it is on topic. Especially when it is about complex theory.
Another problem is that you flood many threads with what appears to be the same posts, so we Mods tend to see it all as clutter and not take as much time as we should to sort it all out. Keep it to a minimum and we will be more careful.
Tell me which posts I moved that you think will help Gordon, and Stevenson, and I will take a look at them. I will move them back here as long as they are "fully" on topic, and not about your battle against Maxwell.
