Maybe time to find a 'mine canary'.
Possibly some small animal that is relatively active would show a change in activity.
We do not need a repeat of Madame Curie.
Maybe time to find a 'mine canary'.
Possibly some small animal that is relatively active would show a change in activity.
We do not need a repeat of Madame Curie.
Maybe time to find a 'mine canary'.
Possibly some small animal that is relatively active would show a change in activity.
We do not need a repeat of Madame Curie.
Not a bad idea.
A mouse would seem like the obvious choice.
Maybe Bob Greenyer should be using this with his reactors.
Maybe time to find a 'mine canary'.
Possibly some small animal that is relatively active would show a change in activity.
We do not need a repeat of Madame Curie.
A Russian team already published a series of biological tests on widely used biological models for damage, paper was in December 2020, will post the link here ASAP.
Would you agree that very tiny particle sizes is another correlation?
Not really (unless you refer to molecules, atomic or subatomic particles): many gas phase experiments and many electrolitic experiments do not has "particles" at all. One interesting thing that is related to "particle size" is the De Broglie wavelenght of the thermal neutrinos, that can exceed several micrometers (so embedding and possibly "cohering" many atoms).
Do you have any knowledge of the conditions in LION or Vega, are the conditions covered by your list or is there anything else?
I cannot figure out how LION was working (the is D adsorbed into Ni and high temperature, but the key/trigger factor is unknown). Vega has more predictable characteristics: low pressure H, adsorbing metals, high electric field, lot of free electrons and ions.
A hydrodynamic turbulence of space-time or something in the vacuum (virtual particle flux, dirac space) that can change all the rules!
Hey, hey, slow down please!
Stick to experimental evidences! We already have tons of fancy and completely useless theories il LENR, but very few reproducible and understanded experimental results. This is one of the reasons LENR has not progressed so much in the last 30 years. We need good experiments and reproducible results more than anything (IMO).
Maybe time to find a 'mine canary'.
Possibly some small animal that is relatively active would show a change in activity.
As Curbina said there are a number of interesting russian papers on this topic, but biological detection of SR is very ineffective: it is too slow and too complex to be useful (unless you are studiyng the effect of SR on biological systems)
As I wrote, currently we are in a kind of vicious circle: we don't exacly know how to generate SR, and we don't exacly know how to detect it. But in order to improve generators we need good detectors, and to design good detectors we need good generators. Doh!
I would like to throw in my 2 cent when I'm comfortable with the materials suitable to attempt the reaction but you can see most the the attempt in the playground thread.
This is an Article I just found about, must have been uploaded recently:
Neutron Flux and Soft X-Radiation Created by Heterogeneous Plasmoid
A I Klimov et al 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.1698 012034
Abstract:
Experimental results on registration of different radiations from a heterogeneous plasmoid(HP) created by pulsed-repetitive discharge in the experimental set up PVR are considered in this work. Intensive cold neutron flux, optical radiation and soft X-radiation (E<10 KeV) were measuredin the HP. It was revealed that there is a high voltage threshold Ud>3.8 kVin the electric dischargefor stable generation of intensive cold neutron flux.
https://iopscience.iop.org/art…42-6596/1698/1/012034/pdf
This other article was published a bit later but I had already mentioned in the other thread, might as well post it here as it also shows evidence for SR.
https://sci-hub.se/https://www…abs/pii/S1364682620303242
“Strange” particles and micro-sized ball lightning in some electric discharges (Anatoly I. Nikitin, Vadim A. Nikitin, Alexander M. Velichko, Tamara F. Nikitina)
And finally the also recently published paper on the biological effects of SR.
https://sci-hub.se/https://lin…10.3103/S1062873820110222
Biological Detection of Physical Factors Related to the High-Current Electric Explosion of Conductors in a Vacuum (E. A. Priakhin, *, L. I. Urutskoev, E. V. Stiazhkina, c, G. A. Tryapitsyna, c, A. E. Aldibekova ,A. A. Peretykin, E. E. Priakhin, K. A. Alabin, N. D. Pilia, N. Z. Chikovani,D. A. Voitenko, and R. M. Arshba)