Clean Planet Ltd (Japan) updates

  • September 9, 2016

    Let's indeed not forget the important role of Mizuno.
    Mizuno has been focussing on the combination of Deuterium, Palladium and Nickel for many years.

    I remember personal discussions with Mizuno whether it would be more efficient to use Argon as a means to sputter a Nickel layer on the Palladium target. Unfortunately Mizuno's lab budget and facilities did not allow to expand and enhance these experiments based on D, Pd and Ni.


    In parallel Iwamura and other Japanese researchers at various universities also looked at this D, Pd and Ni combination.

    In fact they found that both combinations of Hydrogen, Copper, Nickel and Deuterium, Palladium, Nickel had similar excess heat effects. More recently Iwamura and others made a clear choice to go for H, Ni and Cu where it comes to development of commercially viable prototypes. This choice seems logical. When successful, the market demand will be so large that the use of palladium could be problematic due to its limited availability (and price).

  • Rob Woudenberg you said: More recently Iwamura and others made a clear choice to go for H, Ni and Cu where it comes to development of commercially viable prototypes. This choice seems logical.


    My question is : why it seems to be more logical ? My understanding is that iwamura stopped using Deuterium because his works demonstrated it wasn't useful finally.

    Unlike your friend Mizuno has persisted in this obsolete path again he took the whole community to this wrong path with his R20.

    I tended to make an analogy between the D2 worshipers and useless people, sorry.


    Now i'm agree about the argon relevance. You have to know that argon atoms could be trapped inside a lattice if used as carrying gaz for sputtering process.

    About the LEC topic, it should be a relevant way to see strange things.

    It was the case in a former experiment by which nickel ( both with hydrogen) were deposited by chemical way after a first layer of nickel+argon sputtered.



    Let's indeed not forget the important role of Mizuno.
    Mizuno has been focussing on the combination of Deuterium, Palladium and Nickel for many years.

    I remember personal discussions with Mizuno whether it would be more efficient to use Argon as a means to sputter a Nickel layer on the Palladium target. Unfortunately Mizuno's lab budget and facilities did not allow to expand and enhance these experiments based on D, Pd and Ni.


    In parallel Iwamura and other Japanese researchers at various universities also looked at this D, Pd and Ni combination.

    In fact they found that both combinations of Hydrogen, Copper, Nickel and Deuterium, Palladium, Nickel had similar excess heat effects. More recently Iwamura and others made a clear choice to go for H, Ni and Cu where it comes to development of commercially viable prototypes. This choice seems logical. When successful, the market demand will be so large that the use of palladium could be problematic due to its limited availability (and price).

  • My question is : why it seems to be more logical ?

    The answer might be: because Deuterium and Palladium are rare elements. Even if the combination of D/Pd/Ni is a bit more effective in producing excess heat than H/Cu/Ni the choice for widely available elements seems the better choice.


    You might want to take a look at Iwamura's patent applications or research papers where he showed some examples of excess heat results from both combinations. These results are not very different with respect to producing excess heat.


    Regarding the use of Argon for sputtering, the main reason I suggested this is that Argon ions are far heavier than Deuterium ions and therefore much more effective in releasing nickel atoms from their target electrodes by their impacts (much higher kinetic energy).

  • i think that last US results are so disastrous to leave definitively the Pd/D way.

    Martin Fleishmann has been dead a long time, let's leave him in peace.

    Now, yes, i'm agree the Iwamura work is probably the more promising, currently.

  • A closer look at the recently published patent application reveals that the excess heat generation can be as high as 5 W / cm2 at a stack temperature of 800 ºC in a described example setup.



    The set temperature was changed about every half day and gradually increased within the range of 300 ° C. to 900 ° C. It was confirmed that excess heat was generated in the range of 300 ° C to 900 ° C. It was confirmed that the excess heat was about 10 W at around 800 ° C. The excess heat per unit area near 800 ° C. was about 5 W / cm2. It was confirmed that the heat generation continues for a predetermined period even if the heater is turned off after the heating element 14 generates excess heat.

    For a single multilayer metal stack sheet of 10 x 10 cm this would therefore result in 500 Watt.


    This is a remarkable high value that therefore confirms that their technology has reached a level that supports readiness to take a next step towards industrialisation (Miura).

  • Thanks to Gregory Byron Goble who found this:

    US20210285634A1 *2020-03-162021-09-16 Miura Co., Ltd.Boiler

    Above patent application was filed by Miura and cite (refer to) following Iwamura's patents:

    JP6548102B2 (granted in Japan)

    BR112019005909B1


    There are two more boiler related patent applications filed by Miura that also refer to JP6548102B2.

    WO2021187285A1

    WO2021187286A1


    This shows that cooperation is already ongoing for a longer period before the formal press announcement mentioning the cooperation between Clean Planet Inc and Miura (looking to the filing dates).

  • For a single multilayer metal stack sheet of 10 x 10 cm this would therefore result in 500 Watt.

    In many parts of (for example) rural France 500 watt water heaters based around a well insulated tank of at least 50 litres and preferably 75-100 are common. Left on continuously they might take 24-36 hours to produce hot water, but once hot they seem to cope very well.

  • Iwamura proposal could be interesting however we all know that people are basic, they first are looking for a good balance between device price vs efficiency.

    Still more when you switch ON a classic power supply the power will come immediately then for all Lenr devices we well know that is a point still to improve.

    In many parts of (for example) rural France 500 watt water heaters based around a well insulated tank of at least 50 litres and preferably 75-100 are common. Left on continuously they might take 24-36 hours to produce hot water, but once hot they seem to cope very well.

  • Clean Planet Inc.
    Clean Planet is determined to develop a clean, safe and abundant form of energy for our global... 丸の内1−5-1 新丸の内ビル10階, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan 100-6510
    www.facebook.com


    "Happy New Year! I hope this greeting finds you and your loved ones safe and healthy.

    2021 was a fruitful year for Clean Planet; we took major important steps in R&D towards the completion of the Quantum Hydrogen Energy working closely with our academic partner, Tohoku University, and one of our industrial partners, Miura Co., Ltd. During the past year, we were successful in filing 17 additional new patents to our patent portfolio.

    Our biggest challenge which lies in front of us is to control the generated heat so we can provide this safe and economic energy in an efficient and stable manner. Thanks to our extraordinary R&D team members and partners, we are engineering a bridge to connect this advanced science to commercial applications. I expect 2022 to be an even more dynamic year with many exciting stories to be shared with you.

    On behalf of all of us from Team Clean Planet, I truly thank you for your continued support.

    New Energy, New Future.

    Hideki Yoshino, CEO
    CLEAN PLANET Inc."

  • and one of our industrial partners, Miura Co., Ltd. During the past year, we were successful in filing 17 additional new patents to our patent portfolio.

    In one year... impressive. One year till patent publication after filing.

    ... and the other industrial partners are? Likely of the caliber of Miura Co. which is impressive.


    I look forward to further developments, announcements and scheduled patent disclosures.

    😊💥🌎💥😊

  • Quote

    The most important and socially profitable cold fusion technology will be those that transmute dangerous nuclear waste to benign elements. gbgoble2012


    Radioactive Cesium Processing System and Radioactive Cesium Processing Method


    JP6636478B2 - Radioactive cesium processing system and radioactive cesium processing method - Google Patents

    2017-05-31

    Application filed by 三菱重工業株式会社

    2017-05-31

    Priority to JP2017108287A

    2017-09-21

    Publication of JP2017167161A

    2017-11-16

    Publication of JP2017167161A5

    2020-01-29

    Application granted

    2020-01-29

    Publication of JP6636478B2

    Status

    Active

    2033-10-11

    Anticipated expiration


    Quote Alan Smith

    I see our friend Iwamura is involved - altogether we have Kenji Muta Yasuhiro Iwamura Takehiko Ito Tsuruga Kaoru Kaorori Tsuru Ito

  • refer to my post

    lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6737/

    this is a practical transmutation of Pu.

    the number of added protopn is one by one, so it is not impossible to transmutte the stable island which has very longer half-life of decay.

    The practical approach is to transmute to Am because the other larger mass of minor actinoides decay to Am which half life is longer than a hundred years. stabler than other minor actinoides.

  • Stop repeating your point over and over again nkodama.

    There is nothing wrong with our memory.

    BUt no-one do not understand the mistake of nuclear physics.

    YOU MUST READ THIS AND IF you are RESEARCHER on NUCLEAR PHYSICS YOU ARE OBLIGED TO CHANGE THE NUCLEUS MODEL TO BO CORRECT MODEL. EVERY RESEARCHERS IGNORE THIS FINDING!!!!

    I AM REALLY ANGRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons.pdf

  • BUt no-one do not understand the mistake of nuclear physics.

    YOU MUST READ THIS AND IF you are RESEARCHER on NUCLEAR PHYSICS YOU ARE OBLIGED TO CHANGE THE NUCLEUS MODEL TO BO CORRECT MODEL. EVERY RESEARCHERS IGNORE THIS FINDING!!!!

    I AM REALLY ANGRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons.pdf

    nkodama


    While I understand your frustration with the failure of Nuclear Physics (and physicists) to adopt your theory, and also it's importance to you, you must realise that the theoretical space is full of competing ideas. Even this space has sen the enthusiastic promotion of theories from Cherepanov2020, Wyttenbach, and several others, plus advocacy for the theories of Randall Mills and Widom Larsen from third parties. Most of these are supported in some aspects at least by experimental work. The lack of experimental data to prove a theory means that it forever remains merely what I think of as a 'conversation' - something destined to be forgotten, so my advice is to calm down and be patient until you found someone with the time, money, and space to help you with experimentation. Remember, nobody wants to collaborate with an angry man!

  • I just want every research’s to read my papers on the nucleus model and if they read the paper they must find the correct nucleus model.

    I always based on the experiments and theory of other researchers. And I interpret the meaning and correlation by myself and I found the correct theory. I am frustrated by the fact that all of researchers believe what everyone believes and Rutherford Fermi insisted.

    But now transmutation experiment show that d is two protons not proton and neutron by Iwamura’d experiment but Iwamura has not found the cause of this because he is the traditional student of traditional physics.

    What I want you is to read my paper on the nucleus model.

    Nucleus is to be constituted by proton and internal electron and neutron is to be proton-electron pair in the tight bound states.