Curbina

even the carbon nanotubes comes from another previous granted patent that we discussed months ago

I looked at that again...yes I agree.

Though, here is an earlier example.

This is from a nuclear power nano physicist/engineer, now in Los Alamos finishing a plasma DoE contract, it seems so at least from his most recent patents. I think we will see more of his CMNS efforts... perhaps even in others' works.

Also

Aquarius looks like they hope to position themselves to provide reactor core catalytic meta-materials for all methods listed in their patent.

Anyways

This patent is still one of my favorites. There is so much to be gleaned from it. Sometimes in fission jargon. CMNS energy tech is nano fission nano fusion and beyond just nuclear IMHO.

2011-11-15

Application filed by Liviu Popa-Simil

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130121449A1

Method and device for direct nuclear energy conversion in electricity in fusion and transmutation processes

Abstract

A method and device to generate electric energy on demand by fusion or transmutation nuclear reactions produced inside a super-capacitor that uses inter-atomic field's particularities obtained inside nano-structures, by using temperature, density and electric fields in order to modify nuclear entanglement and quantum non-localities particularities in order to control nuclear reaction rate of an inserted material, called nuclear fuel, facilitated by the nano-structure nuclear composition, called burner, that controls the non-local nuclear reaction. Fusion or transmutation generated nuclear particles' energy is converted using a super-capacitor made of a micro-nano-hetero structure meta-material that loads from the nuclear energy and discharges by electric current. The device contains the nuclear burner module that produces the nuclear particles surrounded by the direct nuclear energy conversion into electricity super-capacitor modules comprising several functional sub-modules, and the utilities that provide the nuclear fuel and byproducts management and process control systems.

Images (36)

Classifications

G21B3/002 Fusion by absorption in a matrix View 1 more classifications

US20130121449A1

True, you say this group creared this patent as a scam in order to bilke money from these three investors. I disagree, strongly..

Why do you? Explain.

No, what you request is not an explanation. Worthless in that regard. Circular arguements go round and round... The purpose of this patent is not what you claim. The point you argue is made. I strongly disagree with your hasty conclusions. Keep your opinion. I have no interest in taking it, yet.

I expect òther patents will soon be published.

Perhaps

Aquarius manufactured catalysts, custom engineered nano structures , serving the CMNS energy tech industries.

Stanford is a hotbed of emergent CMNS energy tech, akin to the most advanced meta material semiconductor and catalyst industrial manufacturing processes.

The valuable patent stream was not found in the light bulb. Longer lasting and more important and valuable were the never ending stream of patents for continually improved light bulb manufacturing machines.

The path to remain a leader in serving an industry, and maintaining market share.

Same with Velcro.

Sorta the same with silicon disks.

Curbina

Not a patentologist... thanks though.

Patent citation analysis is an interesting subject to research.

Forward thinking citation analysis tries to value a portfolio... not very good.

Historical patent analysis looks at old patents, even some failed/abandoned, that are cited by many later patents as a measure of an ideas' influence and contribution to a field. Considered a valid measurement.

I have a list of abandoned patents of interest. Once or twice a year I find new patents from new players in the field when they appear in the cited by field of a patent on my list. It's also how I find new iterations.

Filing incomplete, vague or misleading patents are used as strategy in a competitive field. Iterations improve dramatically as market entry approaches.