The experiments of Lipinski brothers thus clearly demonstrate, that cold fusion depends on collinear arrangement of surface atoms, because this arrangement is the only phase which appears within temperature range observed.
In CF magnetic flux must align to be able to join a new orbit = bond. So you need a strong ordering force either by using a strong magnet, a directed electric flux (Lipinski) or a surface catalyst. Not much else left...
The magnet link to cold fusion I discuss elsewhere in connection with thin heterostructures. Arrangement of Lipinski fusion is very simplistic and clean: nothing but protons and molten lithium in vacuum, no other secondary metals, ad hoced structures etc.. The protons are supposed to impact perpendicularly to surface of lithium along the lines of surface atoms, and Lipinsky already reports fusion yield ~ 60%, so I don't see the way, how magnetic field could substantially improve this already excellent yield.
The thing is, Lipinski fusion requires 5000 Volts, but it runs smoothly and reproducibly, can be started and shut down immediately without any risk of runaway and it consumes 60% of material input. One can eliminate remaining 5.000 Volts by some intriguing solid state system relying on lattice Mossbaer effects and similar esoteric phenomena - but why exactly, when we can improve energy yield by only less than 0.1% and material yield would be much worse? Not to say, that this arrangement generates electricity directly: large portion of energy comes in form of accelerated alpha particles.
The experiments of Lipinski brothers thus clearly demonstrate, that cold fusion depends on collinear arrangement of surface atoms, because this arrangement is the only phase which appears within temperature range observed. And it's absolutely dominant condition, because once this ordered structure disappears, then the cold fusion doesn't run even in much higher energies and voltage gradients.
Which plays well with both observations both with many other theories of cold fusion, which for example require spiral dislocations within nickel whiskers (Piantelli) or palladium nanocracks (Ed Storms), i.e special mechanical treatment (Ennea lab). Once palladium quenches itself, then its dislocations heal itself and it never passes through spontaneous cold fusion again (Fleischman & Pons). This is because metal atoms within dislocations are constrained with mechanical stress and they get arranged more orderly there than atoms within bulk crystal, where they wiggle more freely. It also explains why fusion at cold temperatures in palladium runs better than at room temperatures (Storms), because the atoms wiggle less there.
My opinion (as related mathematically to theory in my prior post) is that the dislocations are required to form waveguides to collect specific energies of light required to form UDH clusters.
A waveguide is not required to form UDH. UDH can form without a material matrix. The light combines with the electrons and hydrogen anions in a multibody interaction. That interaction repeatedly combines several low energy exchange photons into one higher energy exchange photon. The Mev energy is preferable transferred to both the target and projectile via weak isospin. The exchange of energy within the target via weak isospin causes an energy based rather than mass based form of gravity, fusion follows. LENR can produce elements previously thought to be produced only in supernova because the gravity is that intense. An electric arc in a hydrogen containing liquid or gas can form UDH clusters.
There are many reports of this kind of transmutation of elements: see MFMP or sonication/cavitation studies of water. Thin film electrolysis produces new elements above and below that of metal coating. Typical yields produce elements in mass bands A = 22-23, 50-80, 103-120 and 200-210. Mass bands occur in an order fashion based on a magic number sequence identified by Hora. Little high-energy radiation is produced but lower energy (around 20 keV) X-ray and/or beta emission is present. See ICCF-7.
The experiments of Lipinski brothers thus clearly demonstrate, that cold fusion depends on collinear arrangement of surface atoms, because this arrangement is the only phase which appears within temperature range observed. And it's absolutely dominant condition, because once this ordered structure disappears, then the cold fusion doesn't run even in much higher energies and voltage gradients.
Which plays well with both observations both with many other theories of cold fusion, which for example require spiral dislocations within nickel whiskers (Piantelli) or palladium nanocracks (Ed Storms), i.e special mechanical treatment (Ennea lab). Once palladium quenches itself, then its dislocations heal itself and it never passes through spontaneous cold fusion again (Fleischman & Pons). This is because metal atoms within dislocations are constrained with mechanical stress and they get arranged more orderly there than atoms within bulk crystal, where they wiggle more freely. It also explains why fusion at cold temperatures in palladium runs better than at room temperatures (Storms), because the atoms wiggle less there.
It's time to recall the Coulomb barrier in the approximation of three nuclei, which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the Coulomb barrier of paired collisions of nuclei.
QuoteMy opinion (as related mathematically to theory in my prior post) is that the dislocations are required to form waveguides to collect specific energies of light required to form UDH clusters.
Coulomb barrier for fusion is 8 MeV. Lipinsky fusion runs with 5 keV within molten lithium, it means linear arrangement of atoms itself is capable to cut 99,9% of Coulomb barrier with no dislocations. In addition it runs with 60% efficiency, which means it runs proton by proton, without any intermediate dense hydrogen phase. Maybe these effects are capable to cut the remaining 5 keV of Coulomb barrier, so that cold fusion can occasionally run at comfortable room temperatures - but apparently this isn't the main contributory effect here.
Other than that, I'm aware of Widom-Larsen theory and dense neutron/heavy electron mechanism, and these effects are all relevant to Lipinski fusion, but there isn't too much space for some dense hydrogen phase.
QuoteIt's time to recall the Coulomb barrier in the approximation of three nuclei, which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the Coulomb barrier of paired collisions of nuclei.
Yep - now it's time to ask, what makes linear arrangement of atoms so spectacular in overcoming of Coulomb barrier? This simple arrangement leads to plethora of derived anomalous effects, many of which weren't considered for cold fusion at all. Astroblaster, i.e. 1D lattice Mossbauer effect is just one of them.
Lipinsky fusion runs with 5 keV
No. It did run best with 100eV only. 5 keV is the cut off....To much energy perturbs the spins.
Relevance to 'hot and cold fusion' reference at NASA Lattice Confinement Fusion...
Thermoelectric phenomena create hot and cold as I remember.
In the lattice?
fusion at cold temperatures in palladium runs better than at room temperatures (Storms), because the atoms wiggle less there
No. It did run best with 100eV only. 5 keV is the cut off....To much energy perturbs the spins.
Negative.
Not Lipinski,, not tested in the 100 -1000 eV range ,
only > ~5keV
The same fusion? Also similar graphs from this source. Wyttenbach is sometimes pushing his SO(2) theories too hardly..
SO(2)
The same fusion? Also similar graphs from this source. Wyttenbach is sometimes pushing his SO(2)
SO(4)???? is there a reading problem with 2 and 4 and k?
100 ev is very difficult to get down to in 'similar' experiments'
100 ev is very difficult to get down to in 'similar' experiments'
Schenkel et al 2019 working for Google got down to 2000 Ev
yielding unexpected enhancement
however LENR is thought not produce neutrons
but certainly something unexpected is going on...
Thomas Schenkel expressed interest in going further down. than 2KeV
. but the Berkeley Lab instruments cost a bit to run,,, technicians etc
and there is the standard SM MeV,,,GeV work to do
"
Berlinguette et al. [36] reported failure in some
experiment’s replication but the same team (funded by Google)
found that neutron yields in deuterated Palladium for ions with
less than 2 keV are two orders of magnitude larger than current
models predict :
note the purple emphasis to assist reading 2=2,k=1000, 2k =2000 
robert bryant At Assisi this is what i understood from Czerski's work ( Clean HME Project)
He targeted to fall as low as possible to define the triggering Lenr limit.
We should read again his work if available.
He concluded DD way possible and LIH more "comfortable".
Solid State Energy Summit
Anthropocene are still big supporters and proponents of LENR of course, and make many mention of it in the newsletter,
In the newsletter:
The Anthropocene team
Quote
The field of Solid State Energy (aka Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) or cold fusion)
Also
...we are the host and organizer of the ICCF24 conference, which is co-located with the Solid State Energy Summit. - end quotes
SOLID STATE ENERGY SUMMIT
Never heard of it so I looked.
Seems to be the first summit.
No results found for "solid state energy summit" in quotes.
Results for solid state energy summit (without quotes)
gbgoblenote- all the rest are battery technology conferences.
My hunch this new 'Solid State Energy Summit' will bring us exciting developments and announcements...
The name is evocative of ??????
Note
Solid State has a long history in this art of science and describes lattice, thin film and other contemporary 'solid' CMNS energy tech systems.
1989 Chubb
Distributed bosonic states and condensed-matter fusion. Final report, April-September 1989
Introduction
This paper discusses a concept of solid state fusion based on the formation of a D3 boson Bloch condensate (BBC) within a palladium deuteride host lattice. Evidence for such solid state fusion has been presented by Fleischmann and Pons, who have described episodic generation of anomalous heat in Pd cathodes following extended overvoltage electrolysis of Li OD solutions. Other evidence for solid state nuclear interactions in Pd DJ
includes the observations of surface hydrogen isotopic anomalies in Pd cathodes subsequent to such electrolysis" and the possible observation of a small number of 20+ Mev energy release events in a Si charged-particle detector adjacent to a Pd electrode charged with D+ ions by ion implantation.
1990
https://www.technology.matthey.com › ...
“Solid-State Fusion” Effects - Johnson Matthey Technology ...
The “Solid-State Fusion” or “Cold Fusion” phenomenon, including excess heat generation and the production of nuclear particles...
Summit
English
Noun
(en noun)
(countable) A peak; the top of a mountain.
In summer, it is possible to hike to the summit of Mt. Shasta.
(countable) A gathering or assembly of leaders.
They met for an international summit on environmental issues.
Conference
English
Noun
(en noun)
The act of consulting together formally; serious conversation or discussion; interchange of views.
* Shakespeare
Nor with such free and friendly conference / As he hath used of old.
(politics) A multilateral diplomatic negotiation.
(science) A formalized event where scientists present their research results in speeches, workshops, posters or by other means.
Gregory Byron Goble Hello. How to send abstracts to 24 ICCF, while it is not clear how to do them, can you tell me.
Negative.
You seem once out of memory...
The highest Q factor is seen with 100eV. Q factor = energy out/in...!
QuoteThe highest Q factor is seen with 100eV. Q factor = energy in/out!
This has nothing to do with magnetic field and spin of course - but simply with fact, that lower energy input always brings higher yield.
Anyway, the intriguing question is, why the output energy should change, when we change the input energy? The energy of nuclear reaction should be independent on energy which triggers it. I guess, it would have something to do with unidimensional mechanism - again. If we strike line of billiard balls stronger, then more balls will collide along single line and they will create environment, which would allow release of fusion alpha particles with higher speed..
At any case, there is no apparent saturation of this effect for 100 eV energy and the particle count looks pretty uniform all across whole voltage range.
BTW If Lipinski fusion runs at 100 eV, then it's already cold fusion. At low proton energies resulting alpha particles get absorbed absorbed with lithium more and less electricity will be generated into account of heat. Wyttenbach's data show, how reproducible this experiment actually is. It demonstration cold fusion experiment for textbooks so to say.
