What is the current state of LENR?

  • Why a perovskite crystal could help which is often used for the piezo field ?

  • The poinnt is that under strong stress, chemistry is different and new material can be created by this chemical methods.

    It seems to be true for the chemistry but it is NOT OK for nuclear physics bercause this is the experiment of nuclear physics.

    Compress of covalernt bond in the meterial(Perovskite crystal of PB-BR2 can contain covalent bond and can be smaller element to be fused.

    So this can be nuclear physics experiment and fusion usually cause radioactive element witf a-ray or b-ray emission or fission.

    So this kind of experiment must be regullated by the law for the safity. but currently no nuclear physics reasearcher has not understood this theory, thus no regulation by the law and no specialist of nuclear physics which can run this experiment safely, so the risk to the human body is so high.

    PB-BR2 can create Mc superheavy element every miclear physics researchre has strong interest, but this researchy is not for such purpose, no nuclear physics researchers are involved.

    Current LENR has huge potential to change the world by this nuclear physics phenomena. transmutation to super heavy element in the stability island can be possible with this techniques and it can create element-115 which is told to be related to anti-gravity.If this is real, element-115 is a key to build the space-ship with anti-gravity(spaceship owned by alien use element-115). so LENR will be a key for the space era of human beimgs.

  • Michael Clarage of SAFIRE team, Aureon Energy, published in his personal blog some interesting results of transmutation of an AlMg alloy into Iron and Carbon in “explosion domes” during electrolysis experiments. I was really surprised to see this flashback to the early 1990’s with KCl electrolyte and findings of transmutation. You don’t find what you don’t look for:


    Article can be read here:


    Making Iron in 10kV Electrolysis
    27Al + 27Al > 54Fe + 21.8426 MeV ?
    michaelclarage.substack.com


    He is also the first person ever to quote Parkhomov tables besides Bob Greenyer.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Quote

    i think we should not underestimate too that some kind of crystal structures seem to facilitate the electron screening effect.in the same way

    The atoms must impact in collinear fashion, but in normal crystals the atoms wiggle around their average position, this effect can be suppressed with cooling and-or for atoms at the dislocation or nanocrack boundaries (or both). When atom nuclei collide along single line, then their electron orbitals may be shaken off their normal position toward common axis, thus facilitating electron screening effect.

  • There are another, more esoteric effects in the game: collinear atoms will form orbital tubes, which serve like waveguides for neutrons and X-rays and prohibit them in escape, electrons get entangled into heavy electrons and finally scalar wave effects analogous to Allais effect may apply: the collinear atoms get bind by Cassimir field. Note that during thermal runaways of cold fusion neutrons often escape: this is just the result of fact that neutrons aren't released exactly along connection line of hot atoms which wiggle too much so that they can leave crystal lattice. Apparently there is smooth transition from aneutronic cold fusion to hot fusion releasing neutrons.

  • . Note that during thermal runaways of cold fusion neutrons often escape: this is just the result of fact that neutrons aren't released exactly along connection line of hot atoms which wiggle too much so that they can leave crystal lattice. Apparently there is smooth transition from aneutronic cold fusion to hot fusion releasing neutrons

    Thanks Understanding and sequencies of energetic events require engineering with such data and insight.


    My layman's view of advanced solid state LENR today...


    Engineering and constructing a specific lattice structure and then building it atom by atom, molecule by molecule, brick by brick...


    Creating a structure(s) wherein specific sequencies of energy engineered events optimizes performance of various CMNS energy reactor cores.

  • Piantelli utilized nickel whiskers grafted by evaporation of nickel from Knudsen cells in vacuum. The whiskers consist of axial screw dislocations along which atoms remain constrained in lateral motion and they cannot wiggle. As such whiskers thus represent special material maximizing concentration of active LENR sites. During electrolytic codeposition metal whiskers are often formed, which may explain Spak's success with this type of fusion. Note that he used mesh rather than plate electrode, which increases current density and enforces formation of whiskers.


    There is lotta hidden know-how in classical cold fusion publications which gradually fall into oblivion. LENR researchers are as unwilling to replications as these mainstream ones and they're lazy to pursue and optimize old experiments which actually worked. Instead of it they're trying new LENR systems randomly and the progress stalls.

  • I'm familiar with (and a huge fan of) your work! I don't have your book yet but I plan to order it soon - I'm also already a fan of Gareth's approach to things, and have seen his videos on the structured atomic model. Given that unification of the weak nuclear force and electromagnetic force is possible even under the mainstream "structureless jiggly sphere" nucleus model as the "electroweak" force (though Wikipedia apparently thinks the energy level the unification of the two forces requires is both 100GeV and 246GeV), I find the way your model sees a path to describing the strong nuclear force in electromagnetic terms (by replacing neutrons with a closely bound proton/electron pair, which is basically what free neutrons decay into anyway - neutrinos notwithstanding) to be extremely compelling. The electromagnetic and both nuclear forces joined into a single, "electromagnetonuclear" force would be an incredible step forward in physics, I think, regardless of what nuclear/particle model it uses.


    A little while ago I started work on building a map of decay chains of all isotopes (using proton count as my y axis and neutron count as my x axis, so all isotopes of an element would be a row and each atomic weight a column) because I've never been able to find such a "nuclear alchemy map" so to speak, and it struck me just how completely unstructured and weird the map started to look as I added to it (I'm only up to magnesium so far - I get distracted easily lol) - when I learned that your model predicted the weird "pillars of instability" at atomic weights 5 and 8 that I was seeing, and had been unaware of before trying to map decay chains together, I was hooked.

  • Exactly there is so many things in thousands and thousands of papers available.

    Most of the work is to cross-check these datas then finding money and encouragement.

    Piantelli utilized nickel whiskers grafted by evaporation of nickel from Knudsen cells in vacuum. The whiskers consist of axial screw dislocations along which atoms remain constrained in lateral motion and they cannot wiggle. As such whiskers thus represent special material maximizing concentration of active LENR sites. During electrolytic codeposition metal whiskers are often formed, which may explain Spak's success with this type of fusion. Note that he used mesh rather than plate electrode, which increases current density and enforces formation of whiskers.


    There is lotta hidden know-how in classical cold fusion publications which gradually fall into oblivion. LENR researchers are as unwilling to replications as these mainstream ones and they're lazy to pursue and optimize old experiments which actually worked. Instead of it they're trying new LENR systems randomly and the progress stalls.

  • Edo I'm told there is a review of your book in 'Nexus' magazine, and also some comments about cold fusion.


    extract from an email...


    "We poped into WHSmiths to pick up a paper before going for a coffee and seeing NEXUS magazine bought it too. Under science news page 42-48 there is an article on the structured atom model, 2 pictures from SAFIRE and mentions LENR."

  • Compress of the compound can create small element whoch can fuse together.

    This is nuclear physics experiment, so the risk is so large.

    It may be releted to the hazardous incident to kill researcher in the worst case.

    Opponents of LENR say we should not do it. If we can release energy of predicted by E=mc2 by some chemical process such as chemical range compression, then we will blow ourselves up. In reality, I done the mass and energy balance on the most common LENR which uses water to make Nitrogen and oxygen. About 4/10,000 of the predicted energy appears. However, the measured amount of transmutation in that experiment by Santilli should have produced in about 2 minutes the energy of a bomb about 1/10 the size of the one used on Hiroshima.


    I see the point about the risk, but for reasons that I am not completely comfortable with the real energy yield is low and therefore the risk is not real.

  • I see the point about the risk, but for reasons that I am not completely comfortable with the real energy yield is low and therefore the risk is not real.

    Do always act as the risk would be real. We did see some 10W/ccm If you go for larger reactors or just by chance make it 100W/ccm then good night...


    I do not even talk here about some real dangerous setups that must be run in special labs...

  • There are safe and reproducible arrangement of cold fusion, which even don't enable piling up active matter within reactor, I already talked about Lipinski fusion above in this matter. There is no need to experiment with dangerous cold fusion systems for to move forward. But its necessary to start with replications. When struggling to develop nuclear bomb for Russian in shortest possible time, Lavrentii Berija ordered his scientists to exactly replicate all details of what already has been done with Americans first. He understood his business, cold fusion researchers not.

  • The Current State of LENR?


    "Anything can be weaponized"


    The question put before the Joint Chiefs of Staff, by Dennis Bushnell NASA is... with emergent advanced technologies and the energetics of LENR...

    How might we create a world where no one wants to, and no one feels the need to ever create war again?


    IMAGINE

    This is what the heads of US defence agencies are trying to do. Out of the box thinking.

    Well worth doing.


    Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] Dennis Bushnell – NASA – LENR

  • These ones are just who is responsible for present energetic and environmental crisis by boycotting cold fusion research.

    By chance I got to know one key supporter of LENR research at Airbus in Germany. (now retired!) He is also mentioned in some Airbus LENR patents.

    He told me that the "... political decision makers are (currently) opposing this type of research in Germany, since it could question too many status quo's, if successful. ..."

    Politicians don't like "black swans"

  • I don't have a more incisive opinion than that at the moment. However, I have excellent intuition. I saw the COVID coming 6 months before everyone else for example.. Not difficult I had been to Wuhan 15 years before the Covid.. Also when the Chinese started blocking all the highways around such a big city whether London or Paris, I said to myself, something is going on.

    Also, I tell you, Putin will leave a place in history and like a shaker all truths next should be different.

    He (S*) is a free mason grand master not Zar... And a top finance mafia guy that did help to steal 30 billion of tax payers money and covered up wirecard and did help a related mafia banc with a tax release of about 200 million....


    As Auto and Energy is also part of the mafia they (German state ruling mafia) will deny LENR for 10 more years....

  • "Anything can be weaponized"

    the USArmy via Ciara/Carroll is still working on nuclear isomers.. apparently for nuclear batteries now

    all those expensive resources at Argonne to investigate Mo93 .NEEC


    but perhaps nuclear isomers can be made more easily by LENR..

    I'll run it by Walker et al in Surrey..

    Celebrating a century of nuclear isomers – Physics World
    A century after “nuclear isomers” were discovered, Philip Walker and Zsolt Podolyák explore these long-lived, excited nuclear states
    physicsworld.com


    Isomer depletion as experimental evidence of nuclear excitation by electron capture | Nature

  • Making Iron in 10kV Electrolysis
    27Al + 27Al > 54Fe + 21.8426 MeV ?
    michaelclarage.substack.com


    He is also the first person ever to quote Parkhomov tables besides Bob Greenyer.


    Discussed here RE: Safire eyes commercialization within 5 years, with launch of new company Aureon Energy!

    The fusion of Al27 to Al27 to produce Fe54 . Is suggested by Clarage. That reaction apparently occurs in as one step in a side reaction that happens when an arc is applied to a mixture deuterium contaminated with atmospheric gas. The prior step is Mg25 + D = Al27 in the side reaction in the above deuterium- based system. This fusion occurs because of great amount of energy absorbed in weak isospin that effectively causes protons to have a higher neutronness. The greater neutronness effectively drops positive charges; therefore, the coulomb barrier is effectively reduced. In the case where the energy in weak-isospin is very high as with deuterium fuel above, Fe54 is not stable but beta decays to cobalt and then cobalt disintegrates to 27 atoms of deuterium. The production of deuterium is necessary to account for the mass balance of elements on reaction side of the mass balance.


    In "Anomalous element production induced by carbon arcing under water" Jiang el al found that all isotopes of iron were found but mostly Fe58. The elements Cr, Co, and Zn where in detritus of reaction at 1130,1.03, 500 ppm respectively. What is interesting to note is what elements in the periodic table between Cr and Zn did not appear in the detritus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.