Garret Moddel’s ZPE Tapping Technology

Prof. emeritus Garret Moddel from University of Colorado at Boulder: A ZPE Overunity Device Generating Optical-Cavity-Induced Current

Device schematic , working principle See also:

• Unlocking Zero-Point Energy a video-presentation of prof. Garret Moddel himself
• Casimir-cavity-induced conductance change
• Extraction of Zero-Point Energy from the Vacuum
• CU Boulder study shows microscopic antennas can harvest energy
• Quantum Mechanics Does Not Explain Psi… So Far
• Preliminary studies in his classroom allegedly suggest that students can accurately predict stock market changes...
• What if We Could Program Robots using Psi?. Prof. Garrett Moddel is apparently maverick researcher safely out of mainstream. Both his ZPE research page, both personal profile page at UCB seem to be already deleted...

Quote

The Steorn Orbo was not a self-charging capacitor, but instead a proven scam.

The inventor, instead of being rich from this miraculous invention, is now a busy Bitcoin trader in Ireland.

This is how this story really may look like for laymen..

Quote from Drgenek

Are you saying there is a dissymmetry of charge across this axis.? i.e. matter but not antimatter?

In fact there is. The particle visible charge orbits are 2,3 out of 5. 2 electron 3 proton. Depending how the 5 rotation flux flows in/out (given by visible "hole") you get + or - charge. In the proton case with 3 rotation the + path is more stable. In the electron case the paths are symmetric!

In the past I've been in contact with a German professor on his ZPE activities:

Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Claus W. Turtur, Ostfalia, University of applied sciences.

Ostfalia has several ZPE programs running. It may be worth having a look.

I dunno but Turtur Zero Point Energy Rotor apparently is electrostatic energy consuming device.. He allegedly demonstrated vacuum version of it though...It also raises question, whether Garret Moddel's device couldn't also work as a reactionless drive...?

read alot how it cant be done by the same people telling us about other science... I'm going to be really mad if it works. After reading I gave up thinking it was pointless.

we will see

To me, i think that charges are only space charges ( not punctual) of nucleons depending of the place they take.

The blue circle at right is a circular center of rotation of these nucleon space charges.

Again, as you can see at right side, this sketch shows in fact a Fourier transform from only a single original wave.

That means particles sciences doesn't exist, what we can see if only different expressions from this Fourier transformation....

Quote from Cydonia

To me, i think that charges are only space charges ( not punctual) of nucleons depending of the place they take.

The blue circle at right is a circular center of rotation of these nucleon space charges.

Again, as you can see at right side, this sketch shows in fact a Fourier transform from only a single original wave.

That means particles sciences doesn't exist, what we can see if only different expressions from this Fourier transformation....

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Display More

I think what you say could be viewed as a 2D partial visualization of what Wyttenbach model proposes, only that his model incorporates 4 dimensions and the visualization of that “Fourier” is not easy to grasp because of that.

interesting coincidence ~

Well, thank you guys for your interest

In fact i think that "universe" before the "big bang" was isotropic then became anisotropic after that.

That implies a preferential direction for our universe represented by this 4th dimension.

However, this extra dimension does not represent time, the notion of passing time, I mean.

Physical objects such as atoms have a different number of dimensions, near the center, they obey a 3D + 1 law while by reaching electronic orbitals, the law is becomes 2D, like galaxies ...

The Famous void ( our void i say) obeys a 2D law even if it appears in 3D because this is a 2D + 1 (the additional dimension of Wyttenbach ).

Why all of this ?

In fact, the form, the logic of form of all objects which appear "solid" to us is the same whatever their size.

It's pretty incredible, but it's the same between atoms and galaxies !

I had a lot of trouble understanding this notion of "passing time". In fact, time is simply the fact that an object changes in size ... whether it grows or vice versa, this is very much linked to our own human body existence, in fact.

Why are atoms very stable?

Like its dimensions, its energy is in fact constantly turning on itself ( Wyttenbach understanding) , this "size" does not vary this is why its own time being equal to zero involving its stability !

I stop there, I lost everyone ..

Lots of aberrations in current physics.

For example Einstein postulated that mass and energy are the same thing, either, but how would he have interpreted the universal mechanism of action/reaction which implies minimum 2 objects ?? His thing is incomplete ...

Quote from Seatrout

interesting coincidence ~

No.

I realize most can't read the OS on the front of them. Operating system, frequencies, but you will in time.

self generating water type capacitors above ground to the ball.. bla bla bla.

A patent application by Garret Moddel which was filed by the University of Colorado in May 2020 describes how, by means of Casimir cavities, energy in the form of electricity and electrolysis of water to form H₂ and O₂ could be produced:

WO2020231874: Systems for driving the generation of products using quantum vacuum fluctuations.

Abstract:

Described herein are systems incorporating a Casimir cavity, such as an optical Casimir cavity or a plasmon Casimir cavity. The Casimir cavity modifies the zero-point energy density therein as compared to outside of the Casimir cavity. The Casimir cavities are paired in the disclosed systems with product generating devices and the difference in zero-point energy densities is used to directly drive the generation of products, such as chemical reaction products or emitted light.

Some more (granted) patent(applications) with inventor Garret Moddel and university of Colorado as assignee can be found here.

Dark energy may yet turn out to be a fallacy.

Sabine Hossenfelder discusses the possibility that the dark energy models are based on a flawed application of the concordance model.

New evidence against the standard model of cosmology.

There are lots of papers on Dark Energy that contribute to the topic. Mainly based on models and observations.

Casimir effect is however proven by experiments and accepted. So in my mind deserves further investigation when it comes to the possible relation with LENR.

Just some coincidental observations so far:

The patent application of Garret I referred to earlier describes various constructions with nanometers thick stacks of different metals to obtain (plasmon) Casimir cavities. If Garret's claims are valid they resemble with e.g. similar stacks that Iwamura applies to obtain excess heat in combination with Hydrogen. They also resemble with what is observed in the LEC constructions discussed elsewhere.

A brief summary of the Becker & Bhatt capacitor thrust experiments The electrons accelerate to the right over an inter-plate distance of 10 microns and a potential difference of 5000V, so their acceleration is huge (10¹⁹ m/s²⁾ so they see a Rindler horizon only about 2 cm to their left (the black line). Normally when an object accelerates rightwards the Rindler horizon on its left damps the quantum vacuum on that side pulling it back against the acceleration. But, here, this is reversed since the two plates damp the vacuum to the right (a Casimir effect) more than the horizon does. The yellow shading here denotes less vacuum energy than the orange shading. So, here there is an extra push to the right and the electrons accelerate more than you'd expect, pushing the anode more when they get there.

The most crucial component of this experiment is that Becker and Bhatt also played around with putting metal plates in various positions around the setup (Edmund Blackadder - "It's not what you've got, but where you stick it!") and found that when they placed a metal plate to the right of the horizon it reduced the force (it's like a closer horizon) but when they put the plate behind the horizon (to the left) the effect of it vanished. This may be the first direct observation of a Rindler horizon and backs quantised inertia theory strongly. See also:

Electrostatic accelerated electrons within symmetric capacitors during field emission condition events exert bidirectional propellant-less thrust.

Characterization of Anomalous Forces in Dielectric Rotors

I was looking for the proper thread to put this post in, regarding Dirac and topology and spin, and the word 'spin' yielded a lot of posts from the Covid thread. But it's more appropriate in a thread like this hehe.

I've watched only a small portion of the video so far myself and plan to watch more, hopefully so I can better grasp some of Jurg W's ideas.

Some here might really like the first two minutes of the video, demonstrating what is called Dirac's belt trick.

1-spin (neutral) and 1/2-spin (positively/negatively charged) particles. Their analogy exist within sunspots

Quote from Zephir_AWT

1-spin (neutral) and 1/2-spin (positively/negatively charged) particles. Their analogy exist within sunspots

Where did you get these animations? Adam & Eve.com?