Testing the Rossi Ecat SKLed - Technical Discussions Only

10 orders of magnitude error is so far off that even I barely dared to believe it.

That’s the difference in scale of grain of sand compared to a planet.

Paradigmnoia - I have shown my physical reasoning and shown my work. Please consider doing the same and show me your use of an online calculator. Exactly which statement I made is incorrect?

This statement you had made "However 1 lux = 0.000001 lumen/cm^2" is incorrect.

What we see in this online calculator is more consistent with what I've been suggesting:

Convert lx to Lumen/cm² (Lux to Lumen/cm²)

Quote from Steve Albers

Paradigmnoia - I have shown my physical reasoning and shown my work. Please consider doing the same and show me your use of an online calculator. Exactly which statement I made is incorrect?

This statement you had made "However 1 lux = 0.000001 lumen/cm^2" is incorrect.

What we see in this online calculator is more consistent with what I've been suggesting:

https://www.convert-measuremen…vert+Lux+to+Lumen+cm2.php

Display More

Sorry, you are correct.
Probably I didn’t refresh the calculator and the erroneous result confirmed my bias.

0.0001 lumen/cm² is 1 lux

I have no idea what Rossi will show this time, so generally I have been avoiding presuppositions about what he may do, but he does usually hint a little bit in advance what he might do, so focussing I thought might be something, but not too likely, based on above.

I appreciate that some are developing test plans and getting equipment ready to test out whatever Rossi has to show. I was looking forward to some more 50 W calorimeter designs.. but really most of Rossi’s demos have featured something awkward for viewers at home to try to test that was surprising at first appearance. That’s what I am hoping to see. What will it be this time? Maybe a new StellarNet spectrometer, maybe some other cool new stuff, maybe even a 1 m test square, or a 1 cm test square? But something hard to prepare for, most likely.