The Long Awaited Dec 9th 2021 Ecat SKLed and SKLep Presentation Thread

  • Rossi if his eager fans cannot get their hands on the promised goodies.

    Even more the end of the game if fans can get their hands on the promised goodies.


    I think though even most ECW readers in their heart know that a battery-powered LED flashlight is not a great way to prove over-unity new science.


    OTOH - anyone not used to modern high efficiency LEDs will be very impressed with how well such a flashlight works!


    Perhaps he is hoping to keep the elder segment of his followers?


    THH

  • Or more simply he could have just connected his e-cat to the 224 V AC mains and achieved precisely the same heating effect and made exactly the same exaggerated claims! But that would not have been so sensational which is all he wanted ie like the Daily Mail you keep the public guessing by making it all sexy, artistic, and utterly confusing like his entries in JONP. Clarity from obscurity. :) :) :)

  • OK, it actually makes a lot of sense: the 1,000,000 pre-order means that no-one can get anything until Rossi is been given at least $25,000,000.


    And the length of time for production is not specified, so if he did get his money there would still be a long wait.


    A shame he will not give the EKLep to a decent tester because running it from 12v it would be quick to show that it is not over-unity.


    Equally - pretty difficult for him to have an excuse for NOT doing that. It is easily black boxable, easily testable.


    I guess though all he needs is a tame Levi or equivalent to say they can't find anything wrong with a Rossi-devised bogus test.


    THH

  • Even more the end of the game if fans can get their hands on the promised goodies.

    Then by this logic no goodies will ever be delivered.

    Some excuse of "faults with the production process", "quality control with the first batch", or not enough pre-orders received, or back to the drawing board for an even better product at some future date (unspecified). ;)



    Rossi is like the anti-Santa Claus, maybe his fans might have more luck getting energy out of a lump of coal. :(

    Festive humour.

  • The anti Santa Claus that shits in your stockings

  • Levi makes no mention of AI services provided by Hella KGaA Heuck & Co.

    The fixation here on Rossi's AI statements is pointless. Yes, AI is a term that usually incorporates the use of large neural networks. But the term is used rather loosely by most software and other tech companies, and Rossi's use of the term is no different. Do you have a microprocessor that is executing a set of instructions that automates various aspects of your device? Marketeers of all stripes will call that AI.

  • The fixation here on Rossi's AI statements is pointless. Yes, AI is a term that usually incorporates the use of large neural networks. But the term is used rather loosely by most software and other tech companies, and Rossi's use of the term is no different. Do you have a microprocessor that is executing a set of instructions that automates various aspects of your device? Marketeers of all stripes will call that AI.

    No, it’s the usual pattern of painting bullshit with a broad brush.

    Coattail riding, vicarious associating, self-aggrandizing, superficially engaging, supercilious bullshit.

    We are but ants to his greatness. Some are useful ants, but ants to him nevertheless.


    Good day.

  • Do you have a microprocessor that is executing a set of instructions that automates various aspects of your device? Marketeers of all stripes will call that AI.

    I use smart PID thermostats in the lab. The manufacturers describe those as AI because they adapt their switching behaviour to suit the hysteresis/thermal mass of whatever they are heating.

  • Still the charlatan spreads his bullshit even more ignorant.


    Quote
    • Andrea Rossi December 10, 2021 at 12:21 PM

      Steve Albers:

      To measure the luminous flux of a light source you have to consider the surface of the light source, and the measurements of UNIBO has indicated it. Besides, 1 LX = 1 LM/ m^2, therefore the same flux focused on 1 cm^2 is 10000 LM

      Remake the math.

      Warm Regards,

      A.R.

  • Rossi pointed to the DC boost converter with the heat sink covering the display and called it the AI.

    AI that he programmed, BTW.

    AI that he went on and on about on JoNP

    AI that a hundred questions were asked of.

    AI that was just another line of baloney so his adoring crowds could more completely supplicate at his greatness.

  • I started working on computer vision algorithms in mid 80's, and some called that "AI" back then.

    Me and my coworkers joked about that buzzword back then. Nothing changes with buzzword spewers.

    For neural nets, a newer buzzword is "Deep Learning". Rossi hasn't learned that buzzword yet apparently.

  • Still the charlatan spreads his bullshit even more ignorant.

    I'd suggest (In less personal terms) he is misunderstanding the terminology as he's learning from his lighting engineer. This still doesn't explain what is going on and why the relative comparison (albeit in the non-standard LX/W context) was better of SKLed vs LED.

  • Yes - he is misunderstanding the terminology as he's learning from his lighting engineer. This still doesn't explain what is going on and why the relative comparison (albeit in the non-standard LX/W context) was better of SKLed vs LED.

    If you focus the luminous flux on a reduced area you can read an Illuminance value (Lux) greater than another emitting the same luminous flux but covering a largest area, even if the input power is less.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.