Here is a recent photo Frank sent me for my presentation.
Caption: A LEC producing 109.8 mV measured with a DVM with an internal impedance of 10 MΩ. This device has operated since September 2020.
ICCF-24 updates and other Anthropocene/ARPA-E news
-
-
If it were 5 or 10 microwatts it could light an LED
Watch out Rossi...
-
Excellent! I will bring my last LEC replication device.
I hope I won't have any trouble at customs. On X-rays, it looks like a detonator or an IED.
-
If those are dissimilar metals then you could just have a thermocouple. Also why doesn’t he show the current simultaneously as voltage alone means nothing?
-
Excellent! I will bring my last LEC replication device.
I hope I won't have any trouble at customs. On X-rays, it looks like a detonator or an IED.
You are not the only one worrying about that. You can, and probably should ship it. Contact Alan in "Conversations", and he can give the details.
-
If those are dissimilar metals then you could just have a thermocouple. Also why doesn’t he show the current simultaneously as voltage alone means nothing?
« La Critique Est Aisée, Mais l’Art Est Difficile » (in french in the text)
Thermocouples are not Harry Potter's wand. To obtain usable energy, you need a very hot hot source and a fairly cold cold source. Where do you see them in “LEC” type devices?
These devices are the best proof of the existence of exciting phenomena that are still unknown. Nothing has been presented more convincingly for years. I look forward to discussing it with Frank Gordon and Alan Smith in front of the bay shore.
-
If those are dissimilar metals then you could just have a thermocouple.
If this was just a thermocouple it would not require a co-deposition process to make it work, and it would work even in high-vacuum conditions, which the LEC (in my tests) does not. There is also no direct contact between dissimilar metals at the heart of the device.
LECs do exhibit some odd behaviours, and some of them I don't understand at all, but that makes the puzzle even more compelling to me.
Actually at some point soon I am planning to test a system not using co-deposition but simple hydrogen implantation of a 'home-brewed' alloy plate using electrolysis. Another step in laying the Peltier effect hypothesis to rest.
-
I was wondering that also.
Shane D. Should I send an inquiry to Antropocene Institute for the slides to be posted here, or should it be more official thru LF staff?
-
On this topic all people are passionate and therefore...impatient.
Let's wait a few more weeks, we'll remake the world afterwards.
-
I think we will have to wait for ICCF.24 and CarlP's presentation to see the slides etc mentioned in his talk..
Maybe misunderstanding... I meant the slides of the presentation of Carl Page from above what he gave for Nuclear Energy Institute on 20.06.
-
Maybe misunderstanding... I meant the slides of the presentation of Carl Page from above what he gave for Nuclear Energy Institute on 20.06.
I checked the NEI site and did not see anything. Maybe after hearing him promote LENR at their very own conference, they washed any mention of him and his presentation off their site.
Anthropocene right now is very busy with the ICCF, so Frank might not have enough time to respond if you try to contact him. Maybe Alan or Ruby can ask about during the conference. Possible he may use the same slides there as at the NEI anyway.
-
Possible he may use the same slides there as at the NEI anyway.
Very likely he will.
-
I checked the NEI site and did not see anything. Maybe after hearing him promote LENR at their very own conference, they washed any mention of him and his presentation off their site.
Anthropocene right now is very busy with the ICCF....
I checked as well, no info available....
Maybe they ("the water pressurized fission club") also realized that they will soon see more competition from "outsiders" and the fission regulatory obstacles for LENR will not apply.
I would have liked to see their faces
So we then wait and give him our support, if we can help!
-
Also why doesn’t he show the current simultaneously as voltage alone means nothing?
Power = V^2/R
In this case:
0.1098^2 / 10,000,000 = 1.205E-09 W
-
Display More
Power = V^2/R
In this case:
0.1098^2 / 10,000,000 = 1.205E-09 W
Correct, but that is not the maximum power transfer condition: you can lower the resistance down to about 1 kOhm and still getting a meaningful voltage. In many experiments, the maximimum power transfer is obtained with a load in the order of 100 kOhm or lower. So the power output is typically more in the order of microWatts than nanoWatts, i.e. similar to those of betavoltaic (nuclear) batteries.
