Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

Quote from Aleksandr Nikitin

so “bombard” the nucleus of an atom with neutrinos and everything will work out!

at least Huang has some exptal results..

BTW when is the ETA for neutrino bombardment in a terrestrial laboratory?

Quote from RobertBryant

at least Huang has some exptal results..

BTW when is the ETA for neutrino bombardment in a terrestrial laboratory?

It is now. We are all being bombarded with neutrinos by the billions every moment. Just put a neutrino-sensitive reactor on a table and it should go, if it will.

Quote from Paradigmnoia

It is now. We are all being bombarded with neutrinos by the billions every moment. Just put a neutrino-sensitive reactor on a table and it should go, if it will.

The fact that we, the Earth, are “bombarded” by billions of neutrinos and these neutrinos can trigger a cold nuclear fusion reaction is the mechanical approach of the modern Standard Model.

Compare with electromagnetic waves: in order for a radio receiver to work, appropriate radio waves and an appropriate radio receiver are needed.

I consider cold nuclear fusion, by formal analogy with electromagnetism, as the movement of matter in the process of material-neutrino-energy induction.

And the material part of our united World must move according to laws similar to the electromagnetic field!

Details in my comments and articles. Thank you.

Quote from RobertBryant

at least Huang has some exptal results..

Akito Takahashi's explanation for 'outrageous' Neon 22

"

Therefore, O-16 + 4H/TSC fusion, namely 4 protons capture has rather small cross section (or very small astrophysical S-value).

In contrast, O-18 nucleus is modeled by 4 alpha-clusters + 2 neutrons.

When 4H/TSC-min (4 proton-cluster) approaches to O-18 nucleus, strong isospin exchange (p-n binding) happens to enhance very much 4p capture cross section (or large astrophysical S-value) in O-18 + 4p (4H/TSC-min) fusion reaction. (We can say, like “resonance fusion”.)

The above nuclear fusion process can explain why Ne-22 atoms were selectively detected without Ne-20 and Ne-21, by Huang et al.

This scenario is of course speculation at the moment, but it looks rational.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377187913_Explanation_to_Huang_et_al_water_bubble_induced_reaction_to_produce_Ne-22_selectively_observed_by_mass_spectrometry

Quote from RobertBryant

Akito Takahashi's explanation for 'outrageous' Neon 22

"

Therefore, O-16 + 4H/TSC fusion, namely 4 protons capture has rather small cross section (or very small astrophysical S-value).

In contrast, O-18 nucleus is modeled by 4 alpha-clusters + 2 neutrons.

When 4H/TSC-min (4 proton-cluster) approaches to O-18 nucleus, strong isospin exchange (p-n binding) happens to enhance very much 4p capture cross section (or large astrophysical S-value) in O-18 + 4p (4H/TSC-min) fusion reaction. (We can say, like “resonance fusion”.)

The above nuclear fusion process can explain why Ne-22 atoms were selectively detected without Ne-20 and Ne-21, by Huang et al.

This scenario is of course speculation at the moment, but it looks rational.

https://www.researchgate.net/p…rved_by_mass_spectrometry

Display More

Well, all proposals of the reactions to explain the observations are speculation at the moment.

Even The use of the nanosoft.nz database based on Parkhomov's table is also to a certain degree a speculation, but a speculation that has allowed to verify that at least this is plausibly a nuclear reaction.

I do not know how to interpret the use of the word "outrageous" by Takahashi san, is he really outraged or he just implying that this is the reaction from most people to such a claim?

Just a note, that Yashuhiro Iwamura observed transmutations that match 2/4/6D fusion on heavy elements in thin film experiments, and Edmund Storms explains this finding with Hydroton too.
https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf

https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/04/0628.pdf

https://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e524/e524106.pdf

Maybe Pr Akito Takahashi is thinking in this framework.

Quote from RobertBryant

The above nuclear fusion process can explain why Ne-22 atoms were selectively detected without Ne-20 and Ne-21, by Huang et al.

No. It simply is missing knowledge of atomic physics! Only 22-Ne can adsorb more than 25 MeV without decaying. 22-Ne is the first nucleus with a stable so called alpha wave that has a very high binding energy.

Many people are obsessed by ideas that in some specific cases make sense but are not of general use.

Alain, Iwamura highlighted in his paper you shared that:

These results shed light on the role of the CaO layer in the Pd complex.

in this way, my poor understanding of physic should link probably CaO with a very low electron emitter ( work function) ?

So maybe we could speculate that supernumerary electrons should play here a role to screen the border between several D ?

Quote from AlainCo

Just a note, that Yashuhiro Iwamura observed transmutations that match 2/4/6D fusion on heavy elements in thin film experiments, and Edmund Storms explains this finding with Hydroton too.
https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf

https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/04/0628.pdf

https://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e524/e524106.pdf

Maybe Pr Akito Takahashi is thinking in this framework.

This is the correct audio synched video of a SEM session devoted to analyzing the scale like residue samples, specifically the portion that reacts to magnetism, produced within bjhuang ’s reactor. It shows a range of the oxygen rich iron crenelated spheres, once again. It shows spheres of a range of sizes, and one in particular with the “shell” broken and allowing to see the content within. This was tantalizing and fascinating to watch.

This is a detailed analysis of the partially crack opened crenelated iron sphere. Highly recommended to watch it as is analyzed in real time.

Quote from Curbina

In the process of finding more reactions to the paper on the web, I found an interesting one from a Researcher Named Reginald Little, from Florida, who was really happy to see his research, published in 2006, being, in his opinion vindicated by bjhuang and team.

LinkedIn comment by Reginald Little:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts…-7148188345322414080-V6Ju

2006 Article:

https://academicjournals.org/j…ull-text-pdf/4C2970811602

This is a really long and detailed article, and albeit it has not anything to do with cavitation, the research took place by analyzing both the deionized cooling water and the metals of high powered CuAg alloy coiled electromagnets (45 Tesla), and found isotopic changes both in the metals and in the water. I am really baffled that it took so long to me to become aware of this research, as I have been actively looking for research like this for many years now.

Display More

Hi Curbina, thank you very very much. Sincerely Reginald B. Little

Quote from Shane D.

I remember RBL. He wrote a few posts on ECW during my Ecat News days:

Search Results – (e-catworld.com)

Hi Shane, thanks very much. Respectfully, Reginald B. Little

Quote from RBLittle

Hi Shane, thanks very much. Respectfully, Reginald B. Little

Anything new involving LENR going on with you?

Yes, we would be interested to hear your news.

Welcome RBLittle , it's wonderful to have you on the forum good sir.

Warm regards,

Diadon Acs

Some new videos from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project while in Taipei visiting bjhuang . I think is very interesting a boiler with a single tube reactor uses 23% less energy to achieve the same heating than the control tube.

There are also some really interesting SIMS results from the damaged pipes. Denying that there's some of nuclear process at play here is becoming impossible.

(pH of tap water (slightly alcaline) versus pH of water that has been processed through Reverse Osmosis and used as boiler water (more alcaline than the tap water) in the experimental reactor, this is the video that prompted me to ask for the pH of the Reverse Osmosis treated water before being used as boiler water).

(pH of Reverse Osmosis treated water before being used in the experimental boiler, is mildly acidic).

(discussion of the results of the easy to build but no much high yield reactor and experimental setup that has allowed to measure a 23% less energy consumption in the experimental reactor to achieve the same heating).

(Acquisition of copper tube sample for analytical purposes)

(Acquisition of sample from the solder used to build the reactors for analytical purposes)

(Discussion of SIMS results from analysing damaged copper pipes of previous reactors)

From ECat World.

Article: “Water can trigger nuclear reactions to produce energy and isotope gases” (Bin-Juine Huang) –

A new article from Taiwan about Huang, with a few things we didn't know:

Public Affairs Center, Secretarial Office, National Taiwan Normal University (ntnu.edu.tw)

Are these results revolutionary ? No.. in fact, because they weren't the first in this oxygen's transmutation way.

Now, yes, for the common nuclear society they should appear unprovable, unbelieviable..

Mizuno already experimented in the water way, but the more great work was the one from Rayleigh in plasma by which he demonstrated some reactions between hydrogen molecule alone, nitrogen molecule alone or oxygen molecule alone.

I well studied this paper deeply.. and concluded that these species reacted with themselves by transmutations.

A proton shift between the 2 nuclei of the considered molecule.

These Hang results sticks well with that.

Good work, congratulations to him.

Now, on engineering side, i consider more usefull, simple the use of cold plasmas rather than the complex cavitation way.

Quote from Shane D.

A new article from Taiwan about Huang, with a few things we didn't know:

Public Affairs Center, Secretarial Office, National Taiwan Normal University (ntnu.edu.tw)

Quote from Cydonia

Are these results revolutionary ? No.

In academical terms, they are.