The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

Quote from CoherentMembrane

My tentative understanding is that EVOs, especially in their highly excited white state, continually produce energy - not only when their double layers collapse and the fall apart. However, there is a huge surge of output when they are destroyed. So the choice becomes whether to design a system that constantly creates and destroys them OR a system that utilizes a steady state EVO.

IMHO, the EVO is a polariton condensate. I have seen much experimental evidence to justify this opinion. There is over 100 types of these polariton condensates now discovered but the common factor in all of them is that they all become superconductors. This means that they are coherent. This also means that they all exist under a state of quantum mechanical superposition. A system in a state of superposition cannot emit energy because of the measurement problem.

As experimtalist justification of this observation, in the LION experiment, the EVO eats out a hexagonal profiled tunnel in diamond that is completely enclosed, is also totally empty, with a tiny bit of transmitted material at the end of the tunnel.

The EVOs begins life as a small inclusion of ultra dense deuterium superconductor inside the imperfections within the diamond lattice.

This means that the EVO produces particles and energy but that output is not realized (does not really exist (show up) in our reality).

The other quantum mechanical based wonder is that all the thousands of independent EVOs inside the diamond all produce the same transmutation product. These thousands of EVOs are all connected (entangled) and all work together as one unit.

See this video below for the demonstration of this quantum mechanical based EVO behavior. This means that we can only extract energy from the EVO at the end of its life... when it becomes decoherent... as Egely does in his reactor.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

It should be easy to test Axil's Law that all LENR plasmas are superconducting. Rossi should be able to do this.

Rossi has indirectly. When asked is the light produced by the plasma produced by his system was polarized he said yes. This is a good indicator that his plasma may be coherent. But a more detailed analysis of the light is required to determine that the polarized light has come from a coherent source.

2021-04-02 17:11 KeithT

Dear Andrea,

Is the light emitted by the Ecat SKLed polarized?

Regards,

Keith Thomson.

2021-04-03 08:34 Andrea Rossi

KeithT:

Yes,

Warm Regards,

A.R.

Quote from Alan Smith

The LEC work is a case in point, I can test and do basic measurements on a huge range of materials and methods for less than (perhaps) $1000. To expand this work to find out what exactly is happening inside a working LEC device could cost as much as $1M.

One test that you might run inexpensively is to test the resistance of the LEC to see if the electrical resistance decreases when the voltage production of the LEC increases. This decreased electrical resistance might indicate the development of pockets of superconductivity on the surface of the internal tube.

Quote from Alan Smith

Bless you axil, but just because you have Maxwell's hammer, everything is not a nail.

The mechanism of action of a LEC is beyond doubt, The voltage developed by the cell is a result of charge transport by ionised gas molecules, this ionisation being caused by some process in the cathode we don't understand. Since cell resistance is also related to the number of charge carriers moving between working electrode and passive electrode they will move in the same direction together. There is at the moment no need to invoke surface superconductivity- which would at any rate not be detectable by the method you suggest.

There are good reasons for my opinions about the LEC as follows. I have posted that a superconductor will produce charge separation via the meissner effect. This effect pushes away magnetic fields from the superconductor. This effect also pushes electrons away from the superconductor thus producing charge separation. When charge separation exists, you will have a potential developed between the electrons and the holes in the plasma.

Palladium is the best pure metal catalyst for the production of ultra dense hydrogen as described in Holmlid's papers. Palladium is a better hydrogen catalyst than nickel, platinum, and iridium. Holmlid uses a hydrogen atom transfer catalyst for ethylene and Hydroxycarbonylation of styrene to form ultra dense hydrogen.

The assumptions about the causes of the charge separation in the gas of the LEC could be invalid. I am touched by your benediction and I will try my best to see that you succeed. Along these lines I have other ideas about amplifying the charge separation inside the gas of the LEC if you have an open mind.

lenr-forum.com/attachment/21722/

Quote from Alan Smith

It's so open there's a terrible draught between my ears.

Good to hear, Here is such an idea. Try to use a highly rusty hollow iron electrode coated with potassium carbide. This should produce a ultra dens hydrogen catalyst similar to the catalyst that Holmlid uses to produce ultra dense hydrogen. This replaces the palladium electrode and will be far less expensive.

If any increase in voltage is observed, then use a glass tube enclosure to let in light to interact with the ultra dense hydrogen and energize it. Even try a low powered laser chip (cost $10) as per holmlid.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.540.4160&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ultrahigh-density deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial confinement fusion targets

Here is an old but excellent article about the production of ultra dense hydrogen in rusty iron when Dr, George Miley and Holmlid were working together. It was found that during ethylene processing at a number of oil refineries, that the ethylene reactors overheated when rust particles were found to have dropped into the ethylene.

Quote

Clusters of condensed deuterium of densities up to 1029 cm-3 in pores in solid oxide crystals were confirmed from time-of-flight mass spectrometry measurements. Based on these facts, a schematic outline and possible conclusions of expectable generalizations are presented which may lead to a simplification of laser driven fusion energy including new techniques for preparation of targets for application in experiments of the NIF type but also for modified fast igniter experiments using hydrogen or electron beams or side-on ignition of low compressed solid fusion fuel.

Introduction

Rydberg matter was predicted and measured in gases where a static clustering of protons or

deuterons to comparably high densities is generated with number densities up to 1023 cm-3

(Badiei et al. 2006). In contrast to gases, the appearance of ultra-high density clusters in crystal

defects in solids were observed in several experiments where such configurations of very high

density hydrogen states could be detected from SQUID measurements of magnetic response and

conductivity (Lipson et al. 2005) indicating as special state with superconducting properties.

These high density clusters have a long life time and with deuterons and – in contrast to protons

– as being bosons which should be in a state of Bose-Einstein-Condensation (BEC) at room

temperature (Miley et al. 2009,2009a).

While these clusters were measured in metals at the interface against covering oxides (Lipson

et al 2005), the generation of these states within the whole volume of a metal (palladium, lithium

etc.) at crystal defects, Fig. 1, (Miley et al 2007, 2008) is important. For surface states on metal

oxides, the measurement of the ultra high ion densities of 1029 cm-3 was directly evident from the ion and neutral emission by laser probing. These surface states were produced involving catalytic

techniques (Badiei et al 2009). The distance d between the deuterons was measured to be

d = 2.3 ±.1 pm (1) compared with the theoretical value of 2.5 pm derived from the properties of inverted Rydberg matter. The energy release of the deuterons from the surface layer was measured as 630±30 eV.

The difference between protons and deuterons was directly observed and the deuteron state

called D(-1) is well indicating the bosonic property against the fermionic protons.

The material used in the experiments (Badiei et al 2009) as a catalyst for producing the ultradense

deuterium is a highly porous iron oxide material similar to Fe2O3 doped with K, Ca and

other atoms. Thus, the number of defects or adsorption sites is very high relative to a metal and

the open pore volume in the material is large, of course varying with the method used to measure

it. Initially the D(1) phase is formed in the pores, and it is then inverted to the ultra-dense deuterium D(-1). When probing the porous surface with the grazing incidence laser

beam, fragments of the D(1) and D(-1) materials are removed from the sample surface.

Rydberg Matter is a long-lived form of matter, and the lowest possible excitation level

D(1) or H(1) exists more or less permanently in the experiments (Badiei et al 2009). The clusters

are not formed transiently. There is no indication that the phase D(-1) is not formed almost

permanently. In the experiments both forms D(1) and D(-1) were observed simultaneously. The

experiments indicate that the material changes rapidly with almost no energy difference states

D(1) and D(-1).

Display More

Quote from Curbina

This paper has been quoted in the thread devoted to Holmlid’s work. I know you are trying to bridge many concepts, just wanted to point out the fact this work is very well known to many of us, and this paper still is of the mindset that what causes fusion is smashing things together. In a sense, this is what EVOs are thought to do, but achieving the coherent status is the key part.

I think that the issue lies in the beleive that most people have that fusion and fission are the only possible reactions that can explain transmutation. This assumption may not be correct. There might be another candidate that is little known to most non science lay people, that option is vacuum decay.

Vacuum decay is a theory that describes a situation where the structure of the vacuum provides the laws of nature that define how matter and mass behaves. It is likely that a universe with another vacuum different than the one that currently exists here will result in a different configuration of matter, mass, and energy that exists in our current universe.

If we can change the nature of the vacuum by a small amount, then we can change the way the laws of nature work. This issue is a major factor in the experiments that are currently running at CERN.

We are in the true vacuum and the EVO is a false vacuum. When matter enters the EVO, it is ripped apart and goes away. But some small percent of matter absorbed by the EVO reappears back under our true vacuum and reforms into elements that are different from how those elements entered the EVO. This is transmutation.

The proof of this reality is to be found in that LION video I posted upstream. The EVOs start their life cycle totally inside the diamond. Then the EVOs begin to move and rip apart diamond as they moves through the diamond. This produces a empty tunnel totally inside the diamond that the EVO excavates until the EVO becomes unstable and terminates. At this end point the EVO leaves some small amount of transmuted matter at the end of the excavated tunnel.

Here again is the LION video post

Post

RE: The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

[…]

IMHO, the EVO is a polariton condensate. I have seen much experimental evidence to justify this opinion. There is over 100 types of these polariton condensates now discovered but the common factor in all of them is that they all become superconductors. This means that they are coherent. This also means that they all exist under a state of quantum mechanical superposition. A system in a state of superposition cannot emit energy because of the measurement problem.

As experimtalist…

axil

Aug 30th 2022

This presentation is a discription of the Higgs mode in superconductors. The Higgs mode enables a condensed matter system to form a vacuum state within the EVO that is the anti field of the cosmological Higgs field.

Higgs mode in superconductors.pdf

0911.5495.pdf

Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the aqueous solution of Uranium salt

A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev

This paper shows that nuclear reactions can occur when a laser excites gold nanoparticles in solution with uranium salts. This experiment supports the notion that the LENR reaction is a optical process involving superconductivity. No particles, reaction induced gamma or neutron radiation is produced even though the proportions of uranium isotopes were affected by laser radiation induced fission when active.

Quote

Abstract

Laser exposure of suspension of either gold or palladium nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of UO2Cl2 of natural isotope abundance was experimentally studied. Picosecond Nd:YAG lasers at peak power of 1011 -1013 W/cm2 at the wavelength of 1.06 – 0.355 nm were used as well as a visible-range Cu vapor laser at peak power of 1010 W/cm2. The composition of colloidal solutions before and after laser exposure was analyzed using atomic absorption and gamma spectroscopy in 0.06 – 1 MeV range of photon energy. A real-time gamma-spectroscopy was used to characterize the kinetics of nuclear reactions during laser exposure. It was found that laser exposure initiated nuclear reactions involving both 238U and 235U nuclei via different channels in H2O and D2O. The influence of saturation of both the liquid and nanoparticles by gaseous H2 and D2 on the kinetics of nuclear transformations was found. Possible mechanisms of observed processes are discussed.

Conclusion

Further interpretation of the observed results on laser initiation of nuclear reactions cannot be performed on the basis of known phenomena. It seems that the gases dissolved in Au NPs provide the particles that further induce the nuclear reactions. The mechanism of the formation of these particles, most probably neutrons, remains unknown so far. However, the present results allow the conclusion that the energy spectrum of these neutrons depends on the number of experimental parameters, such as the nature of the aqueous environment, laser wavelength, peak power of laser radiation, etc. The mechanism of the initiation of nuclear reactions at relatively weak laser intensities of 1013 W/cm2 requires further multi-parametric studies.

Display More

The generation of a supersolid.

As the EVO grows larger, it eventually takes on the shape of a supersolid. In condensed matter physics, a supersolid is a spatially ordered material with superfluid properties. During 2017, a definitive proof for the existence of this supersolid state was demonstrated by several experiments using atomic Bose–Einstein condensates.

A supersolid is a special quantum state of matter where particles form a rigid, spatially ordered lattice structure, but also flows super-fluidically. This behavior contradicts common sense since superfluid flow with zero viscosity is a property exclusive to the fluid state.

The lattice structure of a supersolid will assume the shape of a polygon, usually a hexagon. This is due to the influence of quantum fluxuations in the superfluid.

In LENR experiments, EVOs usually produce polygonal shapes associated with supersolidity. EVOs dig hexagonal, square, or polygonal sealed tunnels or produce spheres of transmuted material. EVOs also produce hexagonal shaped areas of polarized matter on metal surfaces surrounding their impact impressions.

Observation of vortex lattices in Bose-Einstein Condensates which generate a supersolid vortex lattice.

Actually, so many of these vortexes can form inside an EVO that a supersolid lattice will form. It is these vortexes that have produced hexagonal scrub marks that appear in the LION reactor meltdown ash.

Also, the holes that were produced by the EVOs were hexagonal or square in profile which comes from the shape of the supersolid lattice that these ultra-dense vortexes take on when the EVOs get to be huge.

Here is a picture of an EVO that has come out of ECCO reactor fuel. This picture shows the supersolid vortex lattice that most likely produces a strange radiation track that corresponds to the outline of the hexagonal format of the vortex lattice.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f319759a8c6cd7f20278c45cbeaaacc22c927e7f24e4d1c89ddfedc9458a3436.gif