Sorry.. the question was, will the EVO lose its energy state if it hits an object? vs let it unload to a water vapor capacitor ?
Asleep again..
Sorry.. the question was, will the EVO lose its energy state if it hits an object? vs let it unload to a water vapor capacitor ?
Asleep again..
is it better for an EVO to transfer to a state of moisture from its creation then merge to a plate or metal ?
The EVO functions on the level of subatomic particles that follow quantum mechanical rules. Some of its behavior is unlike what can be expected to happen in our everyday experience.
But the typical life cycle of the EVO that is not catalyzed by a superconductor is as follows. The EVO becomes a superconductor on its own. The EVO can start out as a collection of polaritons on the surface of metal as light an/or electrons when these particles hits that surface. Then over time, the polaritons naturally aggregate into concentrations. When these concentrations get big enough, these concentrations become superconductive. This is the Bose condensate stage of the polariton life cycle. Now the EVO superconductor absorbs more electrons and photons and the EVO grows. It grows as long as electrons and photons are available to feed it. These subatomic particles can come from any form of matter.
If no electrons and photons are available to the EVO, the EVO lies dormant for an indeterminate time frame until it is once again exposed to its food source. When more subatomic food is available, the EVO keeps growing until it gets big enough to become unstable, then it explodes.
The math and throry of how the EVO can form a torus
Winding up superfluid in a torus via Bose Einstein condensation
Abstract
Phase transitions are usually treated as equilibrium phenomena, which yields telltale universality classes with scaling behavior of relaxation time and healing length. However, in second-order phase transitions relaxation time diverges near the critical point (“critical slowing down”). Therefore, every such transition traversed at a finite rate is a non-equilibrium process. Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM) captures this basic physics, predicting sizes of domains – fragments of broken symmetry – and the density of topological defects, long-lived relics of symmetry breaking that can survive long after the transition. To test KZM we simulate Bose-Einstein condensation in a ring using stochastic Gross-Pitaevskii equation and show that BEC formation can spontaneously generate quantized circulation of the newborn condensate. The magnitude of the resulting winding numbers and the time-lag of BEC density growth – both experimentally measurable – follow scalings predicted by KZM. Our results may also facilitate measuring the dynamical critical exponent for the BEC transition.
The Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM) is the causative operator in the torus formation process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…tion%20at%20finite%20rate.
Sorry.. the question was, will the EVO lose its energy state if it hits an object? vs let it unload to a water vapor capacitor ?
Asleep again..
If an EVO hits an object, it will relocate most ofthat object to some other location in spacetime or transmute some of the material into other elements. The EVO only grows larger. You don't want to breath in the EVO.
I know that answer is hard to beleive but luckily Bob Greenyer has produced a video that shows a summation of many experimental results from both the LION and VEGA experiments. He theorizes the detailed nature of the EVO from the forms that the EVO imposes into transmuted matter. The video is very long but exceedingly interesting and informative. It will tell you more than you may ever want to know.
Perpetual Motion From Negative Mass?
The EVO becomes a superconductor on its own.
This sounds like old Grimm's Brothers magic!
How and what should an EVO conduct ???
I guess an EVO is like an UFO. We daily see it but can't understand...
Super conduction is a magnetic spin current effect, easily to see as the magnetic field lines seal the "conductor"...
So no charge is transported only magnetic flux that at the end can induce charge,
ok most of it is still over my head.. but
As a welder... A rod with glass flux and high voltage -EVO capable? assuming rust will mix with the glass and hold the charge from the welder as seen slag spinning and bouncing ect? or not the same?
Display MoreThis sounds like old Grimm's Brothers magic!
How and what should an EVO conduct ???
I guess an EVO is like an UFO. We daily see it but can't understand...
Super conduction is a magnetic spin current effect, easily to see as the magnetic field lines seal the "conductor"...
So no charge is transported only magnetic flux that at the end can induce charge,
Why Bose-Einstein condensate is superconducting
ok most of it is still over my head.. but
As a welder... A rod with glass flux and high voltage -EVO capable? assuming rust will mix with the glass and hold the charge from the welder as seen slag spinning and bouncing ect? or not the same?
A welder is able to produce EVOs. The SunCell system started out using a welder to produce the effect.
just to dumb it down.. can you can build an EVO with the mix of rust and glass in a ball using the out-gassing of the welding to create a surface area on the shell of glass to stack electrons =ball lightning?
just to dumb it down.. can you can build an EVO with the mix of rust and glass in a ball using the out-gassing of the welding to create a surface area on the shell of glass to stack electrons =ball lightning?
I don't feel comfortable giving you advice about EVO creation. EVOs are dangerous. I suggest that you join MFMP to get a feel for the field and make some connections.
Negative mass opens the door to the weirdness of the dark sector of the universe. A famous negative mass gateway particle is a tachyon.
Let's assume for a second that tachyons exist (extremely speculative).
A tachyon does not have negative mass. It has imaginary mass. The square of it's mass is negative. If a tachyon had just negative mass, it would have positive square mass.
Have you studied imaginary/complex numbers?
Tachyonic fields have negative mass. But this is not the tachyon particle.
This is one example of why I believe you don't know what you are talking about, yet talk with such utter certainty about everything.
Display MoreLet's assume for a second that tachyons exist (extremely speculative).
A tachyon does not have negative mass. It has imaginary mass. The square of it's mass is negative. If a tachyon had just negative mass, it would have positive square mass.
Have you studied imaginary/complex numbers?
Tachyonic fields have negative mass. But this is not the tachyon particle.
This is one example of why I believe you don't know what you are talking about, yet talk with such utter certainty about everything.
From the Tachyon - Wikipedia reference as follows:
in modern physics the term tachyon often refers to imaginary mass fields rather than to faster-than-light particles. Such fields play a significant role in modern physics.
also
Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the Higgs boson of the Standard Model of particle physics, which has an imaginary mass in its uncondensed phase.
The EVO comes from a polariton that is generated in the optical cavity of a superconductor. The superconductor has a property called the Higgs mode.
QuoteThe order parameter and its variations in space and time in many different states in condensed matter physics at low temperatures are described by the complex function Ψ(r,t). These states include superfluids, superconductors, and a subclass of antiferromagnets and charge-density waves. The collective fluctuations in the ordered state may then be categorized as oscillations of phase and amplitude of Ψ(r,t). The phase oscillations are the {\it Goldstone} modes of the broken continuous symmetry. The amplitude modes, even at long wavelengths, are well defined and decoupled from the phase oscillations only near particle-hole symmetry, where the equations of motion have an effective Lorentz symmetry as in particle physics, and if there are no significant avenues for decay into other excitations. They bear close correspondence with the so-called {\it Higgs} modes in particle physics, whose prediction and discovery is very important for the standard model of particle physics. In this review, we discuss the theory and the possible observation of the amplitude or Higgs modes in condensed matter physics -- in superconductors, cold-atoms in periodic lattices, and in uniaxial antiferromagnets. We discuss the necessity for at least approximate particle-hole symmetry as well as the special conditions required to couple to such modes because, being scalars, they do not couple linearly to the usual condensed matter probes.
This property conveys to the polariton the the superconductive properties of the Higgs field. This type of polariton is called a Anderson Higgs polariton. Like the Higgs field, this polariton has imaginary mass.
I contend that the tachyon that is so important in the formulation of string theory is actually the Anderson Higgs polariton. This polariton condensate is actually the basis for all the theoretical work done by Ashoke Sen which includes Sen's conjecture. This conjecture explains how an Anderson Higgs polariton condensate upon unstable distruction can convert a segment of the vacuum into energy.
How tachyon that is defined in string theory.
You are subterfuging the truth axil. You have directly said that the tachyon particle has negative mass. This is false. It has imaginary mass. Until I mentioned tachyon fields, then you cut and paste about what I told you.
You are subterfuging the truth axil. You have directly said that the tachyon particle has negative mass. This is false. It has imaginary mass. Until I mentioned tachyon fields, then you cut and paste about what I told you.
Thanks for the help
You have directly said that the tachyon particle has negative mass.
This is good news for the over fatty US population. Eat tachions to reduce your weight..
This is where the SM of physics falls apart-imaginary maths and magic numbers are a ridiculous concoction of the human imagination. Can't we just accept relativity as it stands, E=mc^n? Where n can vary simplistically from very close to 0 to very close to +infinity? Do we really need all the weird complexity of string theory where theorists seem to just tie themselves up in Gordian knots?
E=mc^n? Where n can vary
Can we rename this thread the Crackpot/Crackhead discussion thread?
This is good news for the over fatty US population. Eat tachions to reduce your weight..
If only people could catch them to eat them. Fat people can barely walk over 1 m/sec, try getting above 3×10^8.
If an EVO hits an object, it will relocate most ofthat object to some other location in spacetime
You sound so self-assured at this ridiculous statement. Have you considered at any time your "theories" may be possibly be wrong (or more correctly "not even wrong")