Have you considered at any time your "theories" may be possibly be wrong (or more correctly "not even wrong")
Axil is the appendix of the standard model church. The standard model is the freak of a famously failing collective of self claimed brilliant minds that cheat the world since at least 70 years.
Ohhh I wish I could swim in a see of quarks or Bifidus or honey....
This is where the SM of physics falls apart-imaginary maths and magic numbers are a ridiculous concoction of the human imagination. Can't we just accept relativity as it stands, E=mc^n? Where n can vary simplistically from very close to 0 to very close to +infinity? Do we really need all the weird complexity of string theory where theorists seem to just tie themselves up in Gordian knots?
Complex numbers are often used to represent wavefunctions. All such representations depend ultimately on a fundamental mathematical identity, known as Euler’s theorem , that takes the form
eiϕ≡cosϕ+isinϕ
In other words, a general one-dimensional real wavefunction,, can be represented as the real part of a complex wavefunction. For ease of notation, the “take the real part” aspect of the previous expression is usually omitted,
The main advantage of the complex representation, , over the more straightforward real representation, is that the former enables us to combine the amplitude, A, and the phase angle, φ, of the wavefunction into a single complex amplitude,.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcScE-4JOBdOc6sZGkqL3TJ9EpkKE7oqN52kjg&usqp=CAU
Complex numbers are often used to represent wavefunctions.
The main advantage of the complex representation, , over the more straightforward real representation, is that the former enables us to combine the amplitude, A, and the phase angle, φ, of the wavefunction into a single complex amplitude,.
Correct. Wave functions seem like nonsense because they have imaginary parts, but these imaginary parts have real effects like tunneling. Negative mass seems like non-sense, so do virtual photons. Yet, virtual particles exchange force. Further, particles are detected in some places and are forbidden (undetectable) in other places. In fact, one of the dimensions in the standard model, isospin is taught as non having a real existence. It is also taught that the only difference between a neutron and a proton within the nucleus is the one or zero state of its isospin.
Correct. Wave functions seem like nonsense because they have imaginary parts, but these imaginary parts have real effects like tunneling. Negative mass seems like non-sense, so do virtual photons. Yet, virtual particles exchange force. Further, particles are detected in some places and are forbidden (undetectable) in other places. In fact, one of the dimensions in the standard model, isospin is taught as non having a real existence. It is also taught that the only difference between a neutron and a proton within the nucleus is the one or zero state of its isospin.
There is a great deal of confusion in science and in my own mind about negative and imaginary mass since the discovery of non real mass coming from the Polariton condensate.
Science has assumed that the polariton condensate is demonstrating negative mass. I have accepted this assumption in the remarks that I have made above. The polariton condensate acts as expected for negative mass and behaves like the predictions about what science says negative mass should behave. The tachyon does not demonstrate speed greater than the speed of light.
But the polariton condensate has imaginary mass. In terms of the polariton condensate, it is not yet clear to me what differences there are between both the behaviors and the natures of imaginary mass and negative mass.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CravensDcoldfusiona.pdf
The LENR active element in the Craven's golden ball experiment is the ground samarium cobalt (Sm2Co7) magnet,
One of the LENR active agents in the overunity energy production is anisotropic magnetics, because these types magnets generate the Higgs mode.
Here is some background about the Higgs mode in condensed matter systems.
The posit of this post is that anisotropic magnets produce the LENR reaction because that this type of magnet create the Higgs mode
As a set up for this post here is info About Neodymium Magnets(NIB)
Overview of the operating properties of Neodymium magnets.
Neodymium magnets (also known as rare earth, Neo, NIB or NdFeB magnets) were invented in 1982 and are the strongest type of magnets.
There are two basic ways that NIB magnets are made: sintered and bonded.
Sintered NIB magnets have the highest strength but are limited to relatively simple geometries and can be brittle. They are made by pressure forming the raw materials into blocks, which then go through a complex heating process. The block is then cut to shape and coated to prevent corrosion. Sintered magnets are typically anisotropic, which means they have a preference for the direction of their magnetic field. Rare earths align the spin of the magnetic metal in a preferred direction or "grain" Magnetizing a magnet against the “grain” will reduce the strength of the magnet by up to 50%. So commercially available magnets are always magnetized in the preferred direction of magnetization.
Bonded NIB magnets are typically about half as strong as sintered magnets but are less expensive and can be made into almost any size and shape. Raw materials are mixed with epoxy as a binder, pressed into a die cavity and heat cured. Bonded magnets are isotropic, which means they don’t have a “grain” or a natural preference for the direction of their magnetic field.
For example, Dennis Cravens Golden balls
infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
"To assure a strong magnetic field in the active material the spheres contain a ground samarium cobalt (Sm2Co7) magnet, which stays magnetized at higher temperatures. This was powdered and the powder is mostly random but it should provide a strong magnetic field within the sample. "The Sm2Co7 magnet produces the required anisotropic magnetic field lines(monopole like magnetic field).
Deuterium is used as the gas envelope
Here is a visualization that demonstrates that rare earth magnets produce vortex twisting of their magnetic field lines whereas dipole magnets do not produce magnetic vortex spinning field lines.
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Magnetic vortex electromagnet test
Whatever happened to "The Director"? He belongs in this discussion. He knew how easy it is to generate LENR, as it is simply the "negative resistance regime", and a simple matter of "tuning". We need more experts like him who know so much.
What the hell, I'll put in my 2 sense
I see an evo a bit differently as the spin or the magnetism's but a change in the vibration state of the matter if it changes the frequency, shorter or longer orbits "of the clock" vibration spacing.
likely can grab 'things" within its clock state .- molecules
but I'm nuts so what the hell.
Light slows down in ANYTHING not a vaccuum. That's the index of refraction. Are you not aware of this?
Negative mass seems like non-sense, so do virtual photons. Yet, virtual particles exchange force.
All these fantasies are a sign of incomplete models.
The standard model has no clue of the mass/charge structure and thus invents fairy tales to fill missing gaps.
Photons are pure EM energy and as a such can be absorbed by all matter that offers a resonance frequency. It looks like an atom condensate offers a broad spectrum of resonances.
The same has been seen many years ago with thin layers of 100% hydrogen loaded Pd sheet that can even block gamma radiation.
So key is to have broad band resonators.
There is no Higgs field as nobody knows any sources for the Higgs field.
Fields without any source are children fantasies.
There is no Higgs field as nobody knows any sources for the Higgs field.
Gravity is a fundamental force, and the Higgs mechanism is also. This is true whether they are related or not. The Higgs mechanism is certainly the source of the inertial mass that inspired Newton to quantify what a force is, and how it behaves.
Gravity, like the Higgs mechanism, can add mass/energy to matter in bulk (like constant acceleration), bend or even confine other force carrying bosons (photons) in space. This happens in the event horizon of black holes.
Not only is the Higgs mechanism a fundamental force, but the way it interacts is unquestionably unique among the fundamental forces. It slows down and limits the range of electroweak force carriers (W,Z) by breaking local symmetry, giving them mass without violating conservation of mass/energy.
PhysicsForDummies - I only made the conjecture as a simple modification of the Einstein equation to avoid all the complexities subsequent to my last post - which as you can see is a convoluted mess. We need experimentation, experimentation, experimentation to finally determine the veracity of cold fusion and practically ie empirically how it may be used to further the aims of the human race. Otherwise keep on smokin' whatever you like!
Not only is the Higgs mechanism a fundamental force, but the way it interacts is unquestionably unique among the fundamental forces.
The Higgs mechanism is the most outraging nonsense ever invented by mankind. Its is based on the non existing Yukawa force - a force nobody ever measured.
Higgs mass only occurs on action but real mass also exists without action. Further Maxwell equations show how mass is generated from energy.
It would be very nice you once could show us the equation for the exact proton mass based on the Higgs mechanism....
The Higgs mechanism is the most outraging nonsense ever invented by mankind. Its is based on the non existing Yukawa force - a force nobody ever measured.
Higgs mass only occurs on action but real mass also exists without action. Further Maxwell equations show how mass is generated from energy.
It would be very nice you once could show us the equation for the exact proton mass based on the Higgs mechanism....
When you are against something you should make an effort to understand in detail what you are against.
When you are against something you should make an effort to understand in detail what you are against.
It's the other way round: Just believing something - like you do - does not make it true.
Just show us a closed form equation of how you derive the exact proton mass based on the Higgs particle...
It's the other way round: Just believing something - like you do - does not make it true.
Just show us a closed form equation of how you derive the exact proton mass based on the Higgs particle...
You must have not watched the video, or if you did you didn't understand it.
The mass of the proton has nothing to do with the Higgs field.
Yes, exactly-and you can short-circuit all their rubbish about quarks and gluons by the equation E=mcn !
you must have not watched the video
I'm not a child. I look at formulas!
Of course the Higgs field also must give the proton its mass. Or do you propose an other (one more..) source for mass????
