Quote from Wyttenbach

I'm not a child. I look at formulas!

Of course the Higgs field also must give the proton its mass. Or do you propose an other (one more..) source for mass????

The proton mass come from four sources known as the quark condensate ( ∼∼9%), the quark energy ( ∼∼32%), the gluonic field strength energy ( ∼∼37%), and the anomalous gluonic contribution ( ∼∼23%).

https://physics.aps.org/assets/095fbad1-e29e-4bac-abca-a6ca2fd27c16/e118_2_medium.png

The proton is comprised of two up quarks and one down quark, but the sum of these quark masses is a mere 1% of the proton mass. Lattice QCD can determined the relative contributions of the four sources of the proton mass. (The cumulative contributions in MeV/c² are shown on the dark green rectangles.

The smallest contribution, the quark condensate, is a mixture of the up and down quarks and a “sea” of virtual strange quarks, and it is the only one that would vanish if the quark masses were zero. The other three terms are all related to the dynamics of the quarks and gluons and their confinement within the proton. The quark energy and gluonic field strength equate to the kinetic energy of the confined quarks and confined gluons, respectively. The anomalous term is a purely quantum effect. It is associated with the QCD mass scale and consists of contributions from condensates of all quark flavors, including the strange, charm, bottom, and top quarks. Calculations shows that, if the up, down, and strange quark masses were all zero, the proton would still have more than 90% of its experimental mass. In other words, nearly all the known mass in the Universe comes from the dynamics of quarks and gluons.

The math is shown in this paper

Proton Mass Decomposition from the QCD Energy Momentum Tensor

https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.212001

ABSTRACT

We report results on the proton mass decomposition and also on related quark and glue momentum fractions. The results are based on overlap valence fermions on four ensembles of Nf=2+1 domain wall fermion configurations with three lattice spacings and three volumes, and several pion masses including the physical pion mass. With fully nonperturbative renormalization (and universal normalization on both quark and gluon), we find that the quark energy and glue field energy contribute 32(4)(4)% and 36(5)(4)% respectively in the ¯¯¯¯¯¯MS (modified minimal substraction) scheme at μ=2  GeV. A quarter of the trace anomaly gives a 23(1)(1)% contribution to the proton mass based on the sum rule, given 9(2)(1)% contribution from the u, d, and s quark scalar condensates. The u, d, s, and glue momentum fractions in the ¯¯¯¯¯¯MS scheme are in good agreement with global analyses at μ=2  GeV.

One of the interesting and useful attributes of the behavior of the EVO is its production of transmuted matter. Transmutation in the EVO is produced by the interaction of its inherent magnetism with matter. This interaction informs how these various EVO fields and structures instantiate by mirroring these fields and structures in reflective transmuted matter structuring.

For example, in the VEGA experiment, a pure copper pipe has undergone massive transmutation. One initial EVO transmutation instance has produced a large field of rope like structures that has taken the form of a large field of magnetic vortex flux tubes. These ropes of transmuted iron actually show the rotation and twisting of the flux tubes reflected in the structure of the iron ropes.

At a later time, the micrograph of the SEM shows that another EVO impacts the field of iron ropes and leaves its own unique impression. This subsequent imprint of the second EVO is delineated by a boundary of pure iron that is about 1 micron in thickness between the field of iron ropes and the structure of the second EVO. This shows that the EVO has a containment field that encloses the EVOs internal field structuring.

The transmuted elements that make up these two overlapping EVO impressions differ in zones of transmutation that vary as the EDX probe moves across the EVO.

See the analysis micrograph below

I have come across a video that contains most of the physics that I am interested in as a theoretical foundation for the EVO. I will study this subject in detail shorty and I leave this material here in this post for your convenience and benefit.

Dr Ettore Vitali The Higgs Boson in Superfluids and Superconductors

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Quote from Gregory Byron Goble

Article

Published: 08 June 2022

"Axial Higgs Mode Detected by Quantum Pathway Interference in RTe3"

Wang, Y., Petrides, I., McNamara, G. et

Nature (2022)

Abstract

The observation of the Higgs boson solidified the standard model of particle physics. However, explanations of anomalies (for example, dark matter) rely on further symmetry breaking, calling for an undiscovered axial Higgs mode1. The Higgs mode was also seen in magnetic, superconducting and charge density wave (CDW) systems2,3. Uncovering the vector properties of a low-energy mode is challenging, and requires going beyond typical spectroscopic or scattering techniques. Here we discover an axial Higgs mode in the CDW system RTe3 using the interference of quantum pathways. In RTe3 (R = La, Gd), the electronic ordering couples bands of equal or different angular momenta4,5,6. As such, the Raman scattering tensor associated with the Higgs mode contains both symmetric and antisymmetric components, which are excited via two distinct but degenerate pathways. This leads to constructive or destructive interference of these pathways, depending on the choice of the incident and Raman-scattered light polarization. The qualitative behaviour of the Raman spectra is well captured by an appropriate tight-binding model, including an axial Higgs mode. Elucidation of the antisymmetric component is direct evidence that the Higgs mode contains an axial vector representation (that is, a pseudo-angular momentum) and hints that the CDW is unconventional. Thus, we provide a means for measuring quantum properties of collective modes without resorting to extreme experimental conditions.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04746-6

Display More

This article can be referenced at this link at no cost:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02454

Rare earths have been used to catalyze the reaction by some experimenters from the early times of LENR research. For example, Physicist Dr. Dennis Cravens uses rare earths in his experiments with positive results.

Dennis Cravens – COLD FUSION NOW!

Dr. Cravens golden ball experiment contained rare earth which may be the catalyst for the Higgs mode activity that is identified in the aforementioned article.

Here is a post that makes a connection between Cravens, LENR activity, and the use of rare earths.

Post

RE: Industrial Heat Peter Hagelstein, Dennis Letts LENR Patents 2020 Vision and Hindsight

[…]

Dennis
Respect for your LENR research /effort ..not for the faint of heart
Anyone who talks about their results on LF is braven and not craven..
judging by the arrows directed Mizuno' and others' way

Btw, as is well known Cravens spheres used Samarium/cobalt..
Samarium dates back to Chukanov..

Wyttenbach reported interesting low Kev gamma emissions form Samarium during LENR reactions
The new players from Bangalore... indicated improved xs heat …

RobertBryant

Jun 21st 2021

In these cases making a connection to the referenced article, the active agent in the LENR reaction may be rare earths that are catalyzing the Higgs mode.

Physicists discover never-before seen particle sitting on a tabletop

This newly-discovered particle could account for dark matter.

www.livescience.com

Physicists discover never-before seen particle sitting on a tabletop

The LENR secret might be getting out.

This newly-discovered particle could account for dark matter.

Researchers have discovered a new particle that is a magnetic relative of the Higgs boson. Whereas the discovery of the Higgs boson required the tremendous particle-accelerating power of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), this never-before-seen particle  —  dubbed the axial Higgs boson — was found using an experiment that would fit on a small kitchen countertop.

As well as being a first in its own right, this magnetic cousin of the Higgs boson  —  the particle responsible for granting other particles their mass  —  could be a candidate for dark matter, which accounts for 85%t of the total mass of the universe but only reveals itself through gravity.

"When my student showed me the data I thought she must be wrong," Kenneth Burch, a professor of physics at Boston College and lead researcher of the team that made the discovery, told Live Science. "It’s not every day you find a new particle sitting on your tabletop."

The mode of discovery of the axial Higgs boson is the same mode that Holmlid uses to generate strange radiation; a laser is used to generate polaritons in the optical cavity of a superconductor. It seem like rare earths can produce the same effect.

The connection between the axial Higgs boson with dark matter is close to the posit about polariton shrouding of interstellar dust as low temperature superconductors. It will only be a decade or two before Science reaches the same experimental levels that are common in LENR experimentation.

The root of the overunity effect is superconductivity and the associated Higgs mode which changes the nature and behavior of the electron and the photons in a condensed matter system. The Higgs particle has been found to exist in a number of systems that are known to produce the reaction. This particle allows a false vacuum to be created in a condensed matter system.

The new particle is called "the axial Higgs boson". This condensed matter particle is a magnetic version of the Higgs Boson that has been found to exist in particle physics.

The discovery of the Axial Higgs mode means in simple words that we can build new universes by created bubbles of vacuum energy and new Higgs fields in a micro region that takes the form of new micro universes. If the energy content of the vacuum is changed just a little, then that universe would be empty consisting of jest energy. It is the Higgs field that creates matter by generating the mass of particles. When we create a new Higgs field, we change the laws of nature so that the particles we know now are transformed into something else.

We now can increase the strength of the Higgs field and or the vacuum via the Axial Higgs mode in a condensed matter system. The amount of this increase can effect a new micro universe that we can create. If we increase or decrease the vacuum energy, we will create a universe that is empty, just energy. But if we increase the Higgs field by just a factor of two or three, then the nature of protons and neutrons would change so that complex atoms are not able to form.

By manipulating the vacuum using the Axial Higgs mode we can manipulate the nature of the vacuum and the Higgs field. The lecture below on the nature of the vacuum is important to understand how vacuum engineering can change the nature of the universe at least in a small microbubble such as the EVO.

Lisson at 115:00 for the consequence of changing the vacuum energy

then Lesson to a few more minutes of this lecture about changes to the energy content of the Higgs field

In my opinion as it reflects my view, as the EVO grows from a nascent infantile state to its final full blown unstable form, the nature of the vacuum and the Higgs field inside the EVO constantly grows in energy. This changing state of the vacuum/Higgs field strength results in a constantly changing transmutation environment driven by ever changing energy production within the EVO.

In experimentation we have physically seen the collapsed containment structures and their shadows reflected in matter changes and how EVOs apparently consume matter and getting supporting evidence to the claims of "hollow Spheres / tubes" (Solin 1992), "hollow spheres and tori" (Matsumoto 1996), "hollow Spheres" (Klimov 2018) in the form of hollow spheres, hollow capped tubes and hollow tori in VEGA Valley and VEGA Cu pipe Ball Burn helps comprehend and to realise the "the very small box" in which some matter changing reactions must be occurring.

The EVO as coherent containment, will iconsumes matter without a trace, pushing it inside the structures, it prevents observations of ordinary radiation types during nuclei synthesis/transmutation through quantum superposition.

Failure of the containment is caught on many VEGA videos and we get EMP, light, synthesised atoms, instantaneous cooling and Coherent Matter Travelling Waves (Strange Radiation) which are fragments of the Coherent Matter containment.

The basic fractal substructure that I believe build the larger structures as hinted at in part as early as the 1950s by Bostick, has closed Poynting vectors that can be progressively energised with minimal relative loss. This leads ultimately to "a snowball down a mountain" effect, where by the structures re-organise or vanquish any ordinary matter.

What is going on in the transmutation process is far more complicated than any nuclear energy based process could accomplish. This process is far more delicate and is more like crystallization than nuclear fusion or fission.