The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

  • Hole superconductivity xOr hot hydride superconductivity
    Under the spell of BCS-electron–phonon theory [M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 1996)], during the last 6 years…
    aip.scitation.org

    Hole superconductivity xOr hot hydride superconductivity


    From misperceptions in your comments, y'all need information on charge expulsion from a hole superconductor.


    Quote

    It follows from Fig. 15 that the superconductor is characterized by having two different “chemical potentials.” The chemical potential 𝜇μ corresponds to the condensate, and 𝜇=𝜇+𝜈μ′=μ+ν to the quasiparticle excitations. In a hole representation, 𝜇>𝜇μ′>μ. In an electron representation, 𝜇>𝜇μ>μ′. The pairs forming the condensate also have a smaller effective mass than the normal state carriers since the hopping amplitude increases from 𝑡t to 𝑡+Δ𝑡t+Δt upon pairing. The negatively charged condensate, by virtue of being a superfluid as well as because of its smaller effective mass is highly mobile, in contrast to the quasiparticles which experience normal scattering and have the higher effective mass characteristic of the normal state carriers. As a consequence, the condensate will have a tendency to move out of the bulk of the superconductor, so as to tend to equate the chemical potentials 𝜇μ and 𝜇μ′ in the bulk.150 Because of overall charge neutrality, the negative charge will accumulate near the surface of the superconductor, giving rise to the qualitative charge distribution shown in Fig. 16. It looks like a “giant atom.”151

    figureFIG. 16. Schematic picture of a spherical superconducting body. Negative charge is expelled from the bulk to the surface.

  • An exterior of altered "fluidized" negatively charged particles and an interior of positively charged particles seems to be the general model at all scales for natures ultimate engine. Whenever ions and electrons are induced to self organize this structure seems to form. From many observations, it's becoming clear that they all have similar capabilities too. Although it can be thrilling to speculate about the smallest details of the physical processes involved, at this point I think providing info on how to better feed, grow, and maximize these critters is more important.

  • I am surprised by the number of cold fusion acolytes that have invented their own science. At least Dr. Mills attempts to explain issues in his own terms that come up in standard science. But it is difficult to have a conversation with alternative scientists. It is a lot of work to understand so many different modes of thought. It may be that it is a lot of work to stay current in accepted science so it is just easier and less work to invent your own world. It may be best to just leave them all alone and let them succeed or fail on their own terms. Just like Rothwell, he believes in the old guard cold fusion meme, Bob Greenyer who believes in electronuclear gravity and the neutrino catalyst, and Rossi who believes in the Zitterbewegung electron model. Without a common worldview, communication is difficult so let us just have fun and see who turns out to be correct in the long run if ever.

    My opinion is that these structures are capable of so much that probably there isn't one theory to explain everything that it observed. I tend to agree that they are extracting energy from elsewhere (vacuum? Higgs?), but I also think they can produce hydrogen allotropes in an exothermic reaction. Then, perhaps, this altered unique form of hydrogen can undergo additional processes. Regardless of these details, I think finding practical methods to ease or enhance the formation of these structures is important. The addition of atomic hydrogen is a method used by Mills, SAFIRE, and I believe even Chukanov (he has an attachment on one of his devices similar to Mills that I think produces atomic hydrogen). I would also like to see systems with combined inputs - both electrical currents and microwaves, although Kiril Chukanov has also already done this.

  • There is no proton inside of H/D?

    Charge is a topological effect of nested EM flux. If all flux is SO(4) symmetric then no external visible charge is produced.


    Real physics is a bit more complex than the standard model pictures make you claim.

    So in the ground state the electron is not bound by the charge. Its EM flux joins the proton flux.


    If the old guard ever would have used their brain then they would clearly see that mass must at least do 3 local rotations else there would be a distinguished axis ...

  • The SAFIRE project is a system in which polariton Bose condensation is at play. This system converts what is generally microscopic into the macroscopic. The inches wide anode serves to support a inches wide polariton Bose condensate. Bose condensation is mathematically described by Gross-Pitaevskii theory.



    This system can inform us a great deal about the theory that underlies the LENR reaction. For example, SAFIRE's operating temperature is in excess of 80,000 K. This raises the question about coherence of a polariton BEC at that extreme temperature.

    The Higgs vacuum theory of the reaction is predicated on the observation that the anti Higgs field cannot interact in any way with the Cosmological Higgs field. This implies that the LENR BEC can exist at any temperature imposed on the LENR BEC by the universe. This also proves that the two types of vacuum are incompatible and do not interact.

    Next, the formation of vortexes on the surface of the SAFIRE anode shows how a supersolid lattice can form based on a polyhedral pattern.


    Next, SAFIRE reports that an explosion of millions of watts occurs in which the anode loses all vortex based processes and also shows the development of transmutation on the surface of the anode. This verifies the posit that energy is only produced when the EVO is destroyed by instability and transmutation appears during the Bosenova explosion.


    No nuclear radiation or particles is produced by the SAFIRE system indicating an electroweak nature of the vacuum reaction. The developers of the SAFIRE system also state that one of their business objectives is to use the SAFIRE system as a nuclear waste remediation process. This indicates that the SAFIRE system produces weak force bosons that act at a distance.


    In general, the behavior and nature of the EVO can be studied on the macroscopic level using the SAFIRE technology.

  • Do you have a source for that figure?

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The experimenters talk about voltage drops in the plasma. The rule of thumb is about 11,000 degrees per electron volt. Volts to electron volts divide by 10. For 300V, the EV is about 30.


    https://www.translatorscafe.com/unit-converter/en-US/energy/70-12/kelvin-electron-volt/

    How to convert volts to electron-volts (eV)



    The temperature that I gave might be low.

    For 30 EV that 11000X 30 = 330,000K


    But at 1:10:00, the temperature mentions was 81,000K. I knew I got that temperature from somewhere.

  • A few thoughts.


    Although SAFIRE uses a physical anode, it is not required because Chukanov and others have produced similar double layered structures with the same characteristics in free space, free floating.


    Chukanov, SAFIRE, BLP, and others have reported extreme UV light and even gamma from their systems, continually produced by the plasma ball. Some parties have suggested syncrotron radiation could be the source due to the vacuum imparting energy to non-coherent particles which are spun up and accelerated to high speeds. This is according to Chukanov one source of anomalous output exceeding input. To achieve such a condition, the structure must be highly excited.


    SAFIRE has discovered that the double layered structure stores energy like a capacitor. When the structure is disturbed and collapses the energy is released producing huge back spikes. I think this is yet another process that releases energy. N. Tesla, E.V. Gray, Shoulders, and others have captured energy from the collapse with Shoulders measuring many of the emissions.

  • Chukanov, SAFIRE, BLP, and others have reported extreme UV light and even gamma from their systems, continually produced by the plasma ball.

    To address the issue of XUV/EUV light production in LENR phasma systems, I would like to draw comparisons and similarities between Superconductivity, Bose condensation, and gravitational black holes. This subject is hard to understand and shows how LENR theory is a hard row to hoe.


    In this post


    I referenced a pair of two hour videos that present the theory of Sean Hartnoll that superconductivity and gravitational black holes are duels having many characteristics in common.


    Also Polariton Bose condensates are used to simulate black holes by cosmologists in the study of gravitational black holes.


    The similarity between polariton condensates and gravitational black holes in the generation of an event horizon.


    Quote

    https://royalsocietypublishing…oi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0225

    Polariton fluids for analogue gravity physics

    Analogue gravity enables the study of fields on curved space–times in the laboratory. There are numerous experimental platforms in which amplification at the event horizon or the ergoregion has been observed. Here, we demonstrate how optically generating a defect in a polariton microcavity enables the creation of one- and two-dimensional, transsonic fluid flows. We show that this highly tuneable method permits the creation of horizons. Furthermore, we present a rotating geometry akin to the water-wave bathtub vortex. These experiments usher in the possibility of observing stimulated as well as spontaneous amplification by the Hawking, Penrose and Zeld’ovich effects in fluids of light.

    The punch line is that Polariton condensates produce an optical event horizon from which photons cannot escape. This Horizon produces hawking radiation. Unlike a gravitational Black Hole, the Polariton condensate will absorb both the photon and its negative frequency virtual particle partner of the virtual photon which usually is a photon in the EUV range.


    Hawking radiation produces a real particle and its antiparticle partner. When these two particles combine, the photon is canceled as per virtual particle doctrine.


    https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-92b0febc00f496dc8918b028e7f3336c-pjlq


    These negative frequency photons combine with the electron cloud of the polariton condensate and form high energy polaritons. At the end of its life cycle when the EVO explodes in a bosenova, the Polariton condensate quasiparticle breaks up into its more fundamental components which are electrons and visible and EUV photons (virtual particle partners).


    For example, when Rossi's quark reactor was demoed, the spectrum that the quark reactor produced had a maximum wavelength of 300 nm. I think that Rossi is now using Xenon in the SKLEP reactor's plasma to downshift his light spectrum down to visible light frequencies.


    The relativistic electrons that come out of the Bosenova produce breaking radiation (up to 1.5 MeV) when these electrons interact with plasma and/or reactor structure.


    Bremsstrahlung - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org

  • SAFIRE has discovered that the double layered structure stores energy like a capacitor.

    SAFIRE reports energy is produced in bursts of energy that range in energy from 2 to 10 million watts. I doubt that such high energy production can be stored in a plasma ball that is so limited in size.


    The same huge power density is claimed for the the SunCell. Mills claims that the plasma ball produces 5 megawatts of power.


    Chukanov also claims that his big chinese systems produced megawatts of power.

  • Да, подключенный конденсатор даёт напряжение, но где взять его на 10 миллиона вольт, он у меня стрелял...

    Нефть - это кровь планеты, надо сделать модель планеты и мы получим генератор Тарасенко, эта энергия покорит вселенную! :lenr:

  • Kiril Chukanov mentions how his system produces intense EUV light.

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Chukanov said he measured x-rays, UV, and some gamma rays. These are all high energy photonics.

  • BLP mentions how the Suncell produces powerful EUV light.

    BrLP specifies power densities of the various reactors here.


    Plasma Videos | Brilliant Light Power


    Quote

    The visible light was less than 1% of that emitted with over 99% being high-energy ultraviolet light that the human eye cannot see, but was captured by the ultraviolet spectrometer as shown in this spectrum above. Visible light is at 400 nm and longer wavelengths. The cell was stopped since it blew through the molybdenum refractory metal liner with a melting point of 4,753 °F as shown in the photo above.

    The destruction of the molybdenum refractory metal liner and the tungsten electrodes in a few seconds were not due to heat but to intense transmutation. When they replaced the solid electrodes with liquid gallium, the gallium stayed liquid and did not boil due to high heat.

  • SAFIRE mentions how the Suncell produces EUV light.

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The slow speed of light in SAFIRE is due to the application of mass to the UV photon in a superconductor.


    What the SAFIRE experimental crew needs now is not a solar physicist, but a condensed matter scientist. These LENR systems are replete with invalid assumptions.


    What the SAFIRE experimenters should do is run a photon speed test using a gas envelope that is NOT hydrogen ( say helium) and see if the EUV light runs slow.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.