The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

  • One quote from

    A.L. Shishkin, V.A. Baranov, A.V. Vinogradova, V.M. Dubovik, V.Yu. TaturInvestigation of the Characteristics of MagnetoToroElectrical Radiations Using Photographic Film Detectors


    Indeed, at first glance they refer to different systems: Bohrovsky - to a system consisting of two "elementary" particles, and the last two - to the characteristics of the electron per se, which is usually considered as the most elementary POINT particle. It would seem that the elastic scattering of various particles by an electron confirms, judging by the form factor, that the electron is pointlike up to distances of the order of 10 -17 ! But this is the purest geometrical delusion, since the simplest considerations, such as those expressed by Ya.B. Zeldovich back in 1957. and the specific studies carried out, presented in [13] (see also the numerous works of A.V. Burinsky, V.V. Kassandrov, etc.), convince us that the electronin its stationary state (i.e., not, for example, in an atom, where its "volume" is polarized in accordance with, say, the nonlinear Euler-Heisenberg interaction) has the topology of a torus. And therefore, at distances smaller than the above, there is not an electron body, but, so to speak, a “donut hole”, which is fixed by measurements of the elastic form factor of an electron at medium energies! M.A. Markov is still in the 60s.


    By the way, massive neutrinos have the same topology of a torus, which, except for the remarkable specialist in spinor calculus R. Jehle, were also seriously foreseen by other theorists. Of the largest: J. Clauder and J. Wheeler, simultaneously with Zeldovich, all in the same 1957. The figure of the torus simply follows as a result of the choice of certain spinor representations!


    The torus-forming effect was discovered recently by recalculations (ie, in a model-dependent manner) for a proton propagating at a speed approaching the speed of light. In this case, the proton gradually turns into a "doubly concave lens" with thinning to zero in the center. In other words, the time-switching charge dipole is no longer present in this “leaky pancake” (V. L. Ginzburg called this process “blowing out”).


    And now look here

  • Maybe the Egely stick reactor can be done in a better way. The design goal is to produce a self amplifying electrostatic field that can induce a plasma discharge (sparks) between the electrostatic field production elements on the surface of the rotating disks of a modified Wimshurst Generator. The more sparks that can be produced the more overunity power that is generated. Rather than discharge the power in a high voltage demonstration arc, the increase in the electrostatic field needs to be fed back into the rotating wheels of the Wimshurst Generator by electrostatic induction. The E field is amplified to the point that high voltage sparks are produced between the metal pads on the rotating wheel across the insolation space between the metal pads. This EVO producing spark discharge is seen on the Egely stick generator and produces a COP of 2.


    The method used to produce a self amplifying field is to feed the field seperation back into the field generation process. This might be done by adding field plates to the sides of the rotating charge wheels. The Wimshurst Generator would now have four wheels, The field plates would be the outermost plates. If the rotating Wimshurst Generator wheel is negatively charged, then the the adjacent outermost field plate would be positively charged and visa versa for the positively charged Wimshurst Generator wheel.


    The field plates would receive their charge via a wire connected to the Wimshurst Generator wheel that produces that charge polarity similar to how charge is transferred to a leyden jar.


    The rotating Wimshurst Generator wheels would be within a increasing electrostatic field. The field would be controlled using a circuit that regulated the flow of charge to the field plates. Excess energy would be extracted from this circuit,


    This is how I beleive the Testatika Generator works.


    Paul Baumann: Testatika Generator (Methernitha Group)


    The power extraction generator includes power for a small DC motor that rotates the field extraction wheels.


    Rather than field plates, the Testatika Generator uses field pads to induce amplified fields before field extraction is done. Also in the Testatika Generator, the metal field pads are very small and more numerous that they are in the Wimshurst Generator and the insolation spaces are smaller. The Testatika Generator uses high capacity capacitors to produce a very large field inductance to the metal pads before field extraction is done. This process produces the overunity EVO generating sparks across the insolation spaces between the metal pads.


    The LENR lesson drawn from the Testatika Generator is no hydrogen is involved. The production of EVOs is done in air. There is no basis to beleive that overunity energy comes from fusion.


    How does the Wimshurst Generator work

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • In debugging the Testatika Generator implementation/replication, the electrostatic field amplification process might be accomplished in a stepwise development process by using a high voltage spark generator to generate multiple sparks across many metal field pads. First producing the rotating disks could be done by using a 3d printer to format the small metal pads using metal paint on a plastic disk. Next a charge induction debug pad could feed high DC voltage to the metal pads using the output of a high voltage spark generator. Overunity power gain should be seen at this developmental point in Testatika Generator development.


    There is a good deal of the Testatika Generator system dedicated to the production of high charge density in the charge transfer pads. This high charge density could be provided by a high voltage charge source as is done in the Egely system's method of producing the reaction activation spark. This segment of the system is directed to making the Testatika Generator self sustaining through a gainful electrostatic charge transfer feedback system.


    As was done in the Hyde generator, the Testatika Generator could be scaled up by using multiple disks where each set of disks can produce a few kilowatts of power.

  • Polariton production is the physical principle that the Testatika Generator depends on. The polaritons will produce a bose condensate when the polariton density is sufficiently high. These polaritons are most likely "Charge transfer polaritons" and/or "Charged Polaritons".

    The Testatika Generator may be using optical cavities instead of metal charge pads to produce the polaritons.

    Quote
    Charge transfer polaritons. The formation of plasmon polaritons in graphene or semiconductors relies on the high carrier density that can be introduced by electrostatic gating [63], [64], ferroelectric polarization [65], chemical doping [66], or photoexcitation [67]. Alternatively, the requisite carrier density can be introduced by charge transfer across the interface between proximal materials with dissimilar work functions. Such charge transfer plasmon polaritons have been demonstrated for graphene residing on another van der Waals material RuCl3 [68]. Experiments on metallic nanoparticles show that charge transmitted between the pair of nanoparticles through a conducting pathway leads to a characteristic plasmonic response [69] termed charge transfer plasmons. Interlayer exciton in transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) heterostructures (e.g., MoSe2/WSe2) also involves charge transfer from one layer to another; the relevant microcavity polaritons [70] are classified as charge transfer exciton polaritons.
    Quote
    Charged polariton. Charged polaritons posess a nonvanishing electric charge. This interesting concept was introduced in the context of the cavity exciton polaritons in GaAs/AlAs quantum wells that also hosted two-dimensional electron gas with the density ne. Spectroscopic experiments in a study by Forg et al. [71] have identified several distinct properties of charged exciton polaritons, including the scaling of the coupling strength analogous to the properties of atomic QED system [72]. The effective mass of charged polaritons exceeds the band mass of a GaAs quantum well by a factor of 200. Tiene et al. [73] have theoretically demonstrated the unique utility of charged microcavity polaritons for exploring the physics of electron–hole systems with charge imbalance, which are difficult to access with alternative experimental methods. They demonstrated how the Fermi sea of excess charges modifies both the exciton properties and the dielectric constant of the cavity medium, which in turn affects the photon component of the many-body polariton ground state (Figure 2). See also the closely related entries of Fermi-edge exciton polaritons and trion polaritons.

    Reference:

    Polariton panorama

    https://www.degruyter.com/d...

  • What is a Domain Wall of the EVO and how does it form


    The concept of a Domain wall comes from cosmology. It delineates topological defects that can form at a cosmological phase transition. This was first pointed out by Kibble and, in a cosmological context; the defect formation process is known as the Kibble mechanism.


    A domain wall is a type of topological soliton that occurs whenever a discrete symmetry is spontaneously broken. Domain walls are also sometimes called kinks in analogy with closely related kink solution of the sine-Gordon model or models with polynomial potentials. Unstable domain walls can also appear if spontaneously broken discrete symmetry is approximate and there is a false vacuum.


    A domain (hyper volume) is extended in three spatial dimensions and one time dimension. A domain wall is the boundary between two neighboring domains. Thus a domain wall is extended in two spatial dimensions and one time dimension.


    The Kibble–Zurek mechanism (KZM) describes the non-equilibrium dynamics and the formation of topological defects in a system which is driven through a continuous phase transition at a finite rate. It is named after Tom W. B. Kibble, who pioneered the study of domain structure formation in the early universe, and Wojciech H. Zurek, who related the number of defects it creates to the critical exponents of the transition and to its rate—to how quickly the critical point is traversed.


    Based on the formalism of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Tom Kibble developed the idea for the primordial fluctuations of a two-component scalar field like the Higgs field. If a two-component scalar field switches from the isotropic and homogeneous high-temperature phase to the symmetry-broken stage during cooling and expansion of the very early universe (shortly after Big Bang), the order parameter necessarily cannot be the same in regions which are not connected by causality. Regions are not connected by causality if they are separated far enough (at the given age of the universe) that they cannot "communicate" even with the speed of light. This implies that the symmetry cannot be broken globally. The order parameter will take different values in causally disconnected regions and the domains will be separated by domain walls after further evolution of the universe.


    In the EVO, there is a phase transition between de-Sutter space (the vacuum) and anti-de-Sutter space (the false vacuum of the EVO) as the sign of the scalar curvature of the vacuums is reversed between the two respective Higgs fields. This phase transition forms a domain wall that separates the false vacuum of the EVO from contract with the universe.

  • OK.... Anyone else not able to even grasp what is written here?


  • OK.... Anyone else not able to even grasp what is written here?

    I will explain. Chukanov stated in his patent this experimental observation about the EVO as follows:


    Note: Chukanov call the EVO a quantum macro object


    US6936971B2 - Methods and systems for generating high energy photons or quantum energy - Google Patents


    Methods and systems for generating high energy photons or quantum energy



    Quote

    Another unique characteristic of the quantum macro object is its nucleus. It is believed by the inventor that the nucleus is a two-dimensional object because a quantum material object can only be in a “closed two-dimensional formation.” The proton (nucleon) component of the quantum macro object is “open to the outside.” It has a sharp line of demarcation separating this two-dimensional object from the surrounding environment.


    During some experiments, the quantum macro object was touched with a metal stick. In this experiment, the metal stick could not penetrate into the nucleus because the nucleus possessed no volume. Instead, the nucleus was deformed by the metal stick. Thus, the quantum macro object behaved like a solid. During these experiments, the dimensions of the surface of the nucleus did not change either. The quantum macro object nucleus is “closed to the inside,” therefore, no macro-material formation can penetrate through the quantum surface.

    Because Chukanov could produce an EVO 20 cm in size, he was able to show experimentally that the EVO cannot interact with probes from our universe. The Domain wall is what separates and protects the EVO from intrusion of anything from our universe from accessing the interworking of the EVO.

  • How to make me 20 centimeters of ball lightning, what is needed for this, the main thing is plasma gives electricity to the stator, one winding gives voltage, we need to find the best stator with all three windings, then we will need a ball lightning!!!


    Пропан идет наверное M2U00643
    Электричество с реактора идет на статор, все очень просто, когда поймешь как образовались шаровые конкреции...
    www.youtube.com

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKImgd72zpEWe need to check the reactor, it gives only one wire, we need to find a good stator...

    Нефть - это кровь планеты, надо сделать модель планеты и мы получим генератор Тарасенко, эта энергия покорит вселенную! :lenr:

  • In our 3-dimensional world, there are almost 2-dimensional objects. In this case, most likely, we are talking about electric two-layer plasma shells.

    There may be "flat" things such as the earth surface or a mirror, but everything is in reality 3D, even the flat surfaces. Also, the nucleus I am convinced is very much 3D.
    p.s. Am very much biased there since the whole SAM model is based on that and shows how the 3D structure is very nicely correlating to physical properties of the elements and isotopes.
    How can you ignore 1 of the 3 dimensions? sounds very unrealistic to me and therefore purely theoretical, meaning not rooted in reality.

  • There may be "flat" things such as the earth surface or a mirror, but everything is in reality 3D, even the flat surfaces. Also, the nucleus I am convinced is very much 3D.

    And it seemed to me that we are talking about macro objects. I must have misunderstood something.

  • A quantum macro-object (QMO) does have a domain wall. Chukanov found inserting a metal rod seemed to encounter a wall. It like slamming one hand on a desk. There is big difference in density between the air and the desk. One proposes that the "nucleus" of the QMO has organized particle to particle interaction which resembles a solid.


    I have shown the math that governs that organization is electronuclear gravity. It is not 2D.

  • The function that the domain wall serves in the EVO is to protect the coherence of the Bose condensate from decoherence due to any deleterious environmental effects like existence within extreme temperatures in plasma. Once the domain wall forms, the only force that will destroy the EVO is its own instability. The EVO is metastable. If it grows too large, then it will explode in a Bosenova. Depending on the type of polaritons involved, if the EVO is not fed electrons and/or bosons (i.e. photons) then the EVO will become dormant for an indefinite period of time.


    For example, Ohmasa gas carries EVOs seeded by ultra-dense water produced using cavitation. If Ohmasa gas is placed in a gas storage tank, the gas will remain inactive. Such gas has been stored for 10 years and it still can be activated. If the stored gas is activated by photons (heat and light) it will easily burn through tungsten but at a low temperature of 220C.


    A video has been published by the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project in which Bob Greenyer and George Egely show testing done in Japan with ‘OHMASA Gas’ which has been developed by Japanese inventor Mr. Ryushin Omasa.


    At one point in this video, a flame produced with this gas vaporizes a tungsten rod at a temperature of around 220 C which is well below its melting point of 3422 C.


    See the video below at about the 17 minute mark. This is another proof that transmutation does not produce energy.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • One characteristic of Brown's Gas is that (even if you don't accept them as EVOs) it contains extra electrons. According to George Wiseman and others, Brown's Gas contains what's called Electrically Expanded Water that has became gaseous due to electrical charge rather than heating. If this is true then the ignited Brown's Gas flame could be also considered as something similar to an electron beam. If the electron beam collides with let's say a piece of Tungsten, it could induce charge bunching or compression on the surface, inducing self organization and a double layer of coherent matter. This coherent matter could then induce transmutations or other processes that lead to the destruction of the Tungsten. Or, even if a macro-layer of coherent matter doesn't form, it could induce smaller scale surface plasmon polaritons that could start damaging the sample.

  • I have extensively studied Chukanov's presentations, and in some of them he softens his stance on the interior of the plasma ball being a total void. I do think that being surrounded by a coherent matter structure, which can probably reflect vacuum fluctuations with far better efficiency than ordinary matter, alters the properties of that region. I have multiple reasons to believe this. However, I'm also not convinced that there are only two states for the interior, nothingness or some exotic kind of space and normal space. Depending on the density of the coherent matter layer, there may be intermediate phases.

    A quantum macro-object (QMO) does have a domain wall. Chukanov found inserting a metal rod seemed to encounter a wall. It like slamming one hand on a desk. There is big difference in density between the air and the desk. One proposes that the "nucleus" of the QMO has organized particle to particle interaction which resembles a solid.


    I have shown the math that governs that organization is electronuclear gravity. It is not 2D.

  • One characteristic of Brown's Gas is that (even if you don't accept them as EVOs) it contains extra electrons. According to George Wiseman and others, Brown's Gas contains what's called Electrically Expanded Water that has became gaseous due to electrical charge rather than heating. If this is true then the ignited Brown's Gas flame could be also considered as something similar to an electron beam. If the electron beam collides with let's say a piece of Tungsten, it could induce charge bunching or compression on the surface, inducing self organization and a double layer of coherent matter. This coherent matter could then induce transmutations or other processes that lead to the destruction of the Tungsten. Or, even if a macro-layer of coherent matter doesn't form, it could induce smaller scale surface plasmon polaritons that could start damaging the sample.

    The 10 yen coin experiment shows the action of EVOs in the disappearance and transmutation of matter.


    The 10 yen coin reaction was produced when a sheet of teflon was pressed into the 10 yen coin that had been excited with Ohmasa gas. The coin was deformed in the teflon contact point but not melted with areas of disappeared matter effident. The EVO reaction seems to be amplified when the EVOs are exposed to a insulator like teflon. Far more activity is seen on the coin then on the teflon.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    SEM inspection of the ten yen coin shows tracks of multiple EVOs eating away at the coin and leaving transmuted material periodically as the EVOs ate into the coin. A faction of matter is rendered as transmuted material that takes the form of micro spheres as is universally seen to form in transmuted material throughout the LENR reaction experience. Carbon shows up in the transmuted material mix which is usually seen in transmutation.



    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.