The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

Domain wall constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models with Z2 symmetry

I got a few things from this reference that addresses a false vacuum that has developed inside the universe. This false vacuum is what the EVO is.

A two-Higgs-doublet model is the story of a spacetime where two Higgs fields exist. This happens when a false vacuum develops. When this two vacuum state occurs, a domain wall forms.

Quote

Domain walls are topological defects that emerge from

the breaking of discrete symmetries [1], resulting in a

vacuum manifold containing topologically disconnected

points. These disconnected points correspond to degenerate

vacua. Phase transitions producing domain walls occur at a

finite rate, and as such, the field can select different vacua in

causally disconnected regions of space. This divides the

Universe into so-called domains; the interfaces between

which are domain walls

Display More

This says that when a EVO forms, so does a domain wall that keeps the two Higgs field separated. Each Higgs field as a different vacuum expectation value... these vacuums a different. Being causally disconnected means that what happens inside the EVO is not observable or causes any reactions in spacetime. "This divides the Universe into so-called domains" this means that there are now two universes formed. This is the so-called two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) is what we call the EVO.

Quote

THE TWO HIGGS DOUBLET MODEL WITH

SOFTLY BROKEN Z2 SYMMETRY

Under a Z2 transformation the complex scalar Higgs

doublets, Φ1 and Φ2, transform as

Φ1 → Φ1; Φ2 → −Φ2:

This says that the EVO will be the anti Higgs field of the universe.

to be continued...

Quote from Alan Smith

Ed Storms, Russ George, Me and Wyttenbach (and others) have found prompt low-energy gammas, confirmed in one case in my lab by an independent and very skeptical expert from the military, so no need to be sad.

The LENR reaction is the great deceiver. Fusion produces more effects than just low-energy gamma rays. Deuterium fusion produces tritium, Helium 3, Helium 4, high energy protons, high energy neutrons, high energy gamma rays at particular energy levels.

And the gamma rays must conform to specific energy levels as follows:

You cannot explain why you are not seeing all this indicators of DD fusion because fusion is not occurring. This lack of evidence is why science thinks that LENR is pseudoscience.

I say that the low energy gammas that are appearing is due to the production of light speed electron generation from a Bosenova when the EVO ends its lifecycle. The evidence for this is the energy spectrum that the LENR radiation as shown as follows:

Y'll are suffering from the fusion dilution.

This week's blog from Sabine Hossenfelder might lead the way to creating an architecture for a workable quantum computer using EVOs.

The major stumbling block in constructing a quantum computer is the stability of the Qubit (a unit of quantum information) in the entangled state. Qubits so far are highly sensitive to decoherence from effects such as heat that originate from the environment. But from research done on the EVO that exist in a plasma, the EVO is proven to be insensitive to such decoherence effects. Being a false Higgs field, the EVO is sequestered from the environment by a domain wall that partitions off the EVO as a false vacuum from any destructive environmental influence.

An example of this environmental insensitivity of the EVO comes from the SAFIRE project. The anode of SAFIRE supports a polariton Bose condensate that exists in a ionized plasma. That anode would allow that polariton condensate to act as a Qubit in a quantum computer since that condensate is coherent, superconducting and a superfluid.

The anode could be miniaturized and its numbers could be expanded into a matrix array of anodes to support a superconducting Qubit array of any size that would operate at any temperature. This Qubit array would become globally quantum entangled and stable over any timeframe.

Scientists Simulate Early Universe With Quantum State of Matter In Mind-Bending Lab Experiment

What happened immediately after the Big Bang? Scientists used Bose-Einstein condensate and sound waves to try and find an answer.

www.vice.com

Quantum State of Matter In Mind-Bending Lab Experiment

I have believed for awhile now that the EVO is a system that has properties that are similar to the early universe. For one thing, the EVO has hyperbolic curvature which is what is expected to have been present in the first second in the existence of the early universe. Also, the EVO demonstrates electroweak unification. It also produces matter through transmutation as occurred in the expansion of the nascent universe.

Bose–Einstein condensation has been used to simulate black holes, but in addition now, it is being used to simulate the expansion of the early universe and its properties.

If the EVO is a replica of the early universe, it will be beyond most LENR theorist to understand it since early universe cosmology is not well understood. For lack of a better idea, they will continue to fixate on the fusion meme.

Abstract

In most cosmological models, rapid expansion of space marks the First moments of the Universe and leads to the application of quantum fluctuations. The description of subsequent dynamics and related questions in cosmology requires an understanding of the quantum fields of the standard model and dark matter in curved spacetime. Even the reduced problem of a scalar quantum field in an explicitly time-dependent spacetime metric is a theoretical challenge, and thus a quantum field simulator can lead to insights. Here we demonstrate such a quantum field simulator in a two-dimensional Bose–Einstein condensate with a configurable trap and adjustable interaction strength to implement this model system. We explicitly show the realization of spacetimes with positive and negative spatial curvature by wave-packet propagation and observe particle-pair production in controlled power-law expansion of space, using Sakharov oscillations to extract amplitude and phase information of the produced state. We find quantitative agreement with analytical predictions for different curvatures in time and space. This benchmarks and thereby establishes a quantum field simulator of a new class. In the future, straightforward upgrades over the possibility to enter unexplored regimes that give further insight into relativistic quantum field dynamics.

A photographic study of exploding EVOs in the Vega experiment.

In my opinion, the deep blue concentrated spherical zone could be the location of the Bosenova explosion of the EVO. The initially white fading to rainbow saucer shaped zone under the blue Bosenova area might be the EMF shockwave (electrons and photons) attracted to and moving down to the surface of the aluminum.

The rainbow colored shock wave might be formed by high energy electrons gradually releasing their energy at gradually lowering frequency breaking radiation to gas atoms as they move toward the surface of the aluminum.

Because the EVO has imaginary mass, it will float at a distance above the surface of the aluminum. The shock wave produced by explosive electron release will cover the distance from the site of the floating bosenova area to the surface of the aluminum. There are instances where multiple bosenova's occur simultaneously in the same spot area where two or more shockwaves are produced concurrently.

If MFMP used a spectrum analyzer to characterize the radiation coming from the Bosenova explosion, they would find that there would be gamma radiation in the MeV range produced by the Bosenova as a few electrons hit the gas atoms directly to and immediate dead stop. This type of electron/atom interaction transfers all the kinetic energy of the electron to the subsequent photon. The other lower frequency light is produced by slight electron path changes at varying deflection angles. It is amazing how we now can see how Bremsstrahlung radiation is produced in LENR.

https://physicsopenlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/B9780323084956000014_f001-015-9780323084956.jpg

In the "signal" all the EVOs that had been produced by the LENR reaction exploded at once in the LENR reactor to produce the MeV level bemsstrahlung we now see revealed in this cathode spot experiment.

I'm going to combined a number of posts about the Vega experiments together to describe in more detail the nature of the LENR reaction based on the polariton. First, I will define terms that place this post onto the proper science track.

A definition of terms - it is useful to try to use accepted science terminology when communicating. If we use appropriate scientific terminology to describe the reaction other than meaningless terms that have been arbitrarily assigned to the mechanisms of the reaction many times over the years as each experimenter has rediscovered the same phenomena over and over again, the LENR technology is more likely to be accepted and understood by science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dressed_particle

Dressed electron

In theoretical physics, the term dressed particle refers to a bare particle together with some excitations of other quantum fields that are physically inseparable from the bare particle.

Polaritons in solid-state physics is a dressed quasiparticles of dipolar excitations in a medium with photons.

The polariton has no charge and has imaginary mass, but retains its Spin. It is an electron that has combined with a photon that can eventually either be released from the electron through dispersion (this is called a bright polariton) or the polariton can keep the photon in superposition(this is called a dark polariton).

In more detail, a polariton can be bright which means that it can give up its photon partner, or it could be dark which means that the polariton keeps its photon coupled to the electron. In this Vega experiment, the reason why the fluidized bed glows, is because the polaritons are bright and the pumping of energy into the polariton aggregation is not strong enough to produce dark polaritons. When the voltage is increased however, then the polaritons become dark and combine to form condensates that will eventually become unstable and explode. When the polaritons are dark, then the fluidized bed does not glow because the polaritons are not releasing their photon partners. The light emitted by the fluidized bed is likely polarized since the polaritons are condensing into a coherent cluster.

The polariton aggregation must be fed energy continuously. The amount of power provided by the pumping controls the bright and dark nature of the polaritons. Dark polaritons will eventually form condensates and release their energy as a Bosenova.

The movement of Polaritons are directed by magnetic force acting on its spin quantum property because the charge of the electron has been removed. All polaritons are attracted to the center of magnetic attraction in the fluidized bed. Polaritons can form clusters because they do not have charge. The polariton has no real mass and can float closely over the metal surface because as an imaginary particle they will be repelled by real matter.

And important property of polaritons to understand is dispersion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispersion_(optics)

A polariton will gradually lose energy over time through resistance. This energy is formatted in the form of photons. This gradual loss of optical energy is why bright polaritons are bright and glow.

When the polariton gains more energy through pumping than it loses through dispersion, then it becomes dark and can form a condensate.

This referenced Henk Jurrien's VEGA experiment describing Fluidized EVOs shows the definitive nature of the polariton and how it behaves as a dressed electron.

The known properties and behaviors of the polariton can inform and explain what is happening in this Vega experiment which is a replication of the fluidize EVO experiment done by Ken Shoulders.

What this fluidized bed experiment shows us is the behavior of the EVO after the Bosenova explosion has occurred. This experiment also shows how polaritons move on the surface of metal and form clusters that form condensates. The Bosenova is the point where the electrons decuple from the photon/electron superposition. Vega shows how and when that this separation occurs.

Because the polariton does not have any charge, after the Bosenova, the polaritons travel downward toward the magnetized surface of the the fluidized bed. If the charge returned to the polariton immediately after the Bosenova, the polaritons would be drawn upward immediately toward the positively charged anode.

After the Bosenova, as the polaritons are moving downward toward the cathode surface, they deposit their kinetic energy gradually into the gas of the atmosphere via breaking radiation.

What is not apparent is if the polariton is disassembled into its constituent electron and photon or that the polariton remains together to reform directly into some new condensate.

What is seen however is that the polariton condensate disintegrates into a number of bright polariton sub-aggregations as they all travel downward toward the cathode whereupon they eventually disappear into darkness.

We have seen that in plasma based LENR reactors the Bosenova produces voltage spikes and excess electrons as seen on scopes of the reaction outputs. It is unclear how those electrons or possibly just the electrons' kinetic energy gets into the reaction circuit or if there is another unrecognized mechanism that excites this voltage spike other than electron arrival at the reaction circuit to occur.

One possibility is that the energy of the Bosenova is carried to the reaction circuit via an excitation in the electron field in the reaction circuit. Or the energy might be carried to the reaction circuit via a magnetic field spike.

For example, in the Papp engine there is a separate set of anodes and cathodes to draw off the feedback current generated by the Bosenova.

Not understanding the details of how output excess power gets into the reaction circuit may be why Rossi has issues with grounding the reaction circuit.

One possible solution to the Rossi grounding problem might be to use a separate pair of electrodes to accept and gather the output power as was done in the Papp engine. That would reduce output spikes on the input/output combined power circuit.

An extreme close-up look by Henk Jurrien at his first VEGA - ALUM experiment in residual air Al anode after the run.

What is producing transmutation on the anode? Where are the Bosenova's on the surface of the anode? Does this mean that a Bosenova is not required to produce transmutation?

At ICCF24, the Army presented an experiment that produced transmutation by just using a laser to illuminate a number of spots on a palladium ingot. It seems that polariton formation on a metal surface is sufficient to produce transmutation.

If the Bosenova is the sole source of power output, and if transmutation can occur without the occurrence of Bosenova, then transmutation does not necessarily produce output power.

The Vega experiment shows that transmutation is produced at lower input power levels than does output power production.

Henk Jurrien investigates if the particles on his VEGA ALUM experiment cathode and anode are magnetic.

It is possible that the polaritons do not require condensation to transmute matter. Most likely, the aluminum is transmuted into iron, but a SEM study of the magnetic material is required to definitively determine what the magnetic material is.

In summary, this Vega experiment is a breakthrough in LENR experimentation. Other experimenters should be excited to duplicate the Vega experiment to better understand the LENR reaction. Henk Jurrien has posted the comprehensive details of how the Vega experiment functions.

2D Material Workshop 2018: Polaritons

@ PhysicsForDummies

Trolling is uncomfortable like constipation, I hope my thread has offered you some relief.

Re: "Is there any work in the LENR field that states that polaritons form macro-clusters with the properties and capabilities observed with EVOs and their variously named equivalents?"

The history of the Polariton theory in LENR theory.

A. Rossi... see theory paper... even if he does not understand the condensation mechanism.

Polaritons are LENR active even when not in the EVO condensed configuration i.e lasers.

See ICCF-24 - US army experiments replicating others.

Dr. Yeong E. Kim - Fellow, the American Physical Society

First use of the term Bosenova in experimentation

First to observe exploding magnetic clusters in the R-5 reactor

First to workout the math of the optical reaction.

Analysis Of Ni-Hydride Thin Film After Surface Plasmons Generation By Laser Technique

V. VIOLANTE

Highly reproducible LENR experiments using dual laser

by D Letts

George Egely

Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part 1 - 3

Widom-Larsen Theory Papers, Tutorial, and Critiqueshttp://newenergytimes.com › WLTheory

Widom and Larsen propose that heavy <i><b>SPP electrons </b></i>can react directly with protons, deuterons, or tritons located in surface patches through an inverse beta

Creation of Heavy Electrons

Electromagnetic radiation in LENR cells, along with collective effects, creates a heavy surface plasmon polariton (SPP) electron from a sea of SPP electrons.

NASA confirms they are working on Widom Larsen theory ..

The NASA initial patent application is clear about the underlying concept (Larsen’s) and the intentions of NASA. Line [25] from NASA’s patent application says, “Once established, SPP [surface plasmon polariton] resonance will be self-sustaining so that large power output-to-input ratios will be possible from [the] device.” This shows that the art embodied in this patent application is aimed toward securing intellectual property rights on LENR heat production.

NASA

Thanks for the fulsome responses. In reaction, I will give you a fulsome explanation of the American theory (aka western) theory of LENR without getting bogged down with the details.

One key clue to the nature of the LENR reaction that LENR theorists have ignored is the fact that the reaction does not generate unstable isotopes.

This could be explained by the change that the electron undergoes when it becomes able to cluster. The electrons now are transformed into polaritons and become coherent and superconductive. This change of state causes the EVO to revert back to the original vacuum state that first existed in the early universe before the Higgs field came into existence. The EVO now is no longer electromagnetic or projects electromagnetic force. The EVO NOW PROJECTS ELECTROWEAK FORCE at long range. The EVO is now electroweak. This conversion is why the EVO does not generate unstable isotopes in transmutation and stabilizes these unstable isotopes at long distances.

The weak force that is usually carried by the Z and W short range bosons, now reverts back to their original nature when the Higgs field did not exist where the Z and W bosons are massless.

All other LENR theories cannot explain the lack of unstable isotopes in transmutation and how transmutation occurs from a field theory point of view.

The American or western theory is electroweak unification of the EVO. This theory also explains how transmission occurs when the quarks lose their mass.

The Higgs field produces mass, electromagnetism, and enables the strong force. Without the Higgs field, the laws of nature act in a different way.

Here is a video that explains all this. The EVO is the key to understanding the "theory of everything". I hope that you can understand and explain to others how the EVO works in this context and what the EVO does is the proof of the theory of everything.

If you are not familiar with the new developments in the standard model, this simple and easy to understand video will suffice.

It seems like superconductivity is the factor that allows the electron to assume a new character which enables it to form electroweak dominated clusters that we call EVOs.

With this in mind there is super hot activity going on in science these days that is exploring the formation of unexpected superconductivity... low angle Moiré patterns.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341904655/figure/fig1/AS:1093018249637888@1637607266089/Moire-pattern-in-bilayer-graphene-sheet-with-relative-twist-angle-of-20-The-yellow.png

Room temperature superconductivity has been detected in 2 d bilayer lattices forming a Moiré pattern in bilayer graphene sheet with relative twist angle of 2.0°. Because superconductivity predisposes electroweak clustering, the LENR is not far behind.

Surprisingly, both Excitons and plasmon Bose condensates have been found in these bilayers. Polaritons are really close and so is the LENR reaction.

This could explain why a multilayered material like mica is likely to be LENR active.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zhifeng-Shao/publication/265135424/figure/fig3/AS:271610909294605@1441768495879/Structure-of-muscovite-mica-a-Atomic-model-of-mica-showing-two-adjacent-sheets-held.png

The layered structure of mica.

More explicitly, Rossi once used mica in his reactor and other LENR workers: Etiam Inc. has used powdered quartz in their fuel mix.

When Francesco Celani used mica in his reactor, The reaction became more LENR active when constantan was wound around mica supports.

A previous post that lists indicative finding that shows mica to be electroweak active here

Post

The magic of the hexigon.

Hexagonal crystal structures (graphite, quartz, mica,...) has an effect on the strength of the weak force. This pattern might be the key to how microorganisms effect radioactive decay rates.

In an initial example, if mica is placed near a unstable isotope, the rate of decay of that isotope changes.



Reference:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ViQL7Y0Kx28J:pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/246vysotskii.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

A sheet of mica near a radioactive source…

axil

Oct 5th 2016

There are a number of broken links contain within this post, but i fixed One as follows:

A sheet of mica near a radioactive source changes the gamma decay probability

microbial transmutations, cold fusuion, lenr, canr, cmns list

It is important to note that Holmlid uses graphite as a catalyst component in the formation of D(0). Potassium (provides Rydberg blockade) and iron oxide (provides nanocavities) are also part of the catalyst.