Unluckily this has never been shown for any of the standard models used in physics for modelling mass and particles. So nothing of what you are referencing is valid today. If you don't have the basic math/physics education to understand why e.g. the Driac equation simply is crap (= not basic physics) or why classic gradient fields are nonsense close to any particle, then I can't help you.
What CERN does as in a so called verification is just repeating the old experiment using the same fake Lagrangian with some 1000 fudge constants they claim in agreement with a fake model. So reproducing crap is what you call consistency...
You have to hand it to Holmlid. He produced papers that showed what he believed was correct for peer review and that paper failed and was eventually retracted. It turns out that Holmlid is producing EVOs and he thought those EVOs were kaons, IMHO. Holmlid pushed all his chip to the center of the table and he lost, but at least he is still in the game and better for it..