The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

You don't know anything, just speculating.

Darden blackmailed Fabiani, in order to keep only him on the boat, thinking that he was the only interesting masterpiece and therefore ejecting Rossi in order to save money and keeping technology both.

Now agree, some guys more informed than you as Carl Page also are thinking like you.

Darden remains a big vicious in my mind, moreover to have Dewey Weaver as a partner, it could not be otherwise.

Btw and to come to your highly scientific calculations for years, have always made me laugh.

Not because your reasoning wasn't good, your calculation skills were, btw, better than mine, but your input data was that from a guy who wasn't well informed, that's all.

Your home made investigations have their limits.

However as you like speculating i will offer you a Black Friday gift, a paper very close in mind with the beginning of the Rossi's technology.. As you could continue to investigate.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344312908_Physical_Model_for_Lattice_Assisted_Nuclear_Reactions

Quote from Paradigmnoia

The reason the IH test failed is because Rossi faked the customer, the heat, the steam, the numbers he wrote down, the invoices, the requests for billing, and the contraption pipes could not physically move any volume of steam, if he made any more than by accident, especially since there was no pressure to guide the steam in any direction. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg of pure bullshit that whole Doral escapade was. And he is still in court over discovery fees from that.

Well if you are interested by a kind of technology you should give money for that but do you have enough means for your ambition ?

Quote from axil

Please don't begin a Rossi argument in this thread. Such political behavior is counterproductive and a distraction. What I am interesting in is Rossi's technology and how that IP might advance our understanding of the LENR reaction. I am interested in how a wide range of LENR systems preform with Rossi's systems among them.

Quote from axil

Please don't begin a Rossi argument in this thread.

Why not? His fuel worked for about 7 hours. So there was LENR just never productive one...

But Brillouin works at COP 3 certified. They produce stable transmutations from 58Ni --> 60Ni --> 62 Ni --> 64Ni and from 61Ni up 67Zn. All verifies by an independent lab. The same has been seen in Parkhomov and Rossi and others fuels.

Evologic reactors so far produce nothing else than some transmutations what is expected from basic physics (n on SM) laws.

Again, you talk a lot but did you ever seen an Egely device working by your own eyes?

Below you will see that and the guy who played with it.

Quote from axil

Please don't begin a Rossi argument in this thread. Such political behavior is counterproductive and a distraction. What I am interesting in is Rossi's technology and how that IP might advance our understanding of the LENR reaction. I am interested in how a wide range of LENR systems preform with Rossi's systems among them.

Anyway a week ago Biberian was still alive at the last French RNBE, I can testify

Quote from axil

I heard that the fellow who built that device died most likely caused by that device.

Quote from axil

I heard that the fellow who built that device died most likely caused by that device

I had an email from the builder (not J-P Biberian) last week, He's very grumpy but very much alive and well.

Exactly Biberian was a replicator, it was a dusty plasma device with pure carbon i found from ArcelorMittal.

Quote from Alan Smith

I had an email from the builder (not J-P Biberian) last week, He's very grumpy but very much alive and well.

Quote from Cydonia

it was a dusty plasma device with pure carbon i found from ArcelorMittal.

I "tried" once the same with a dry piece of Sellerie from the fridge heated in the micro wave. Got a nice flame and a lot of carbon.

Quote from axil

He is back to the stupid movie ploy, PFD is a one trick pony, no imagination and originality.

It's a TV show. Saturday Night Live. I'm at least a 2 trick pony, because I do movies AND tv.

Quote from axil

There is a major difference between ITER type hot fusion and the Cold fusion reaction in terms of the generation of radiation and neutrons. The LENR reaction does not produce neutrons like hot fusion, so the neutrons from hot fusion will produce a broad spectrum gamma profile as the neutrons thermalize through cascade collisions with reactor plasma and structure. In hot DD fusion, there will appear sharp peaks in gamma radiation at the following peaks:

In the cold fusion reaction there is no neutron production and only electrons and photons with high kinetic energy are produced. The gamma and lower level radiation are produced from these electrons that will not exceed 1.5 MeV. From past LENR systems like the Papp engine(proven) if these electrons are captured before they are thermalized by specialized electrodes to form electrical current and no secondary heat and production of gamma radiation from electron breaking.

LENR active systems that have shown electron capture so far are as follows: George Egely's Magic Wand, Papp engine, Rohner replication of Papp engine, Rossi reactor (clamed), Rossi QuarkX (as seen on oscilloscope) as demoed, Ed Storms experimental observation of the LENR reaction producing electrical current also LION pencil sized experiment that produced stored electrical current that powered a 20 watt auto light for 1/2 hours.

In many LENR experiments, the heat after death observation is most likely produced by the continued production of over-unity electric power for a time after the input electrical power was terminated

In all these observed LENR reaction cases where electrical current was produced, fusion related excess heat, neutron or gamma and lower level radiation was not detected.

In a related musing, it is counter productive and detrimental to the future prospects of LENR to claim a nuclear energy origin to the LENR reaction since all such nuclear driven systems are regulated and licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the USA and the The International Nuclear Regulators Association (INRA) world wide.

A theory of LENR without nuclear connections should be embraced to avoid any nuclear energy govenment regulation.

Display More

I have been silently watching for several days how a man with a strange name "Axil" convinces site users with the help of quotes from various sources that LENR is by no means a fusion reaction... I don't have the strength to sort out all the nonsense that he quotes ... And there is no time ... I will simply answer - this person is simply behind the times and uses data and knowledge that are not correct for fundamental reasons ... I persuaded him to familiarize himself with new knowledge ... But he is so sure that that the old physics is good and beautiful that I have no other choice but to answer him like this - "You rely on false physics and therefore you are not able to analyze What is LENR and how LENR reactions flow. For the rest of the community, my trivial advice is -" Just ignore everything that a person with the name "Axil" writes. I try not to offend him, but reading his numerous comments every time is unbearable...

This highly skilled guy had found neutrons however.

Even he suggested a Boron/water/lead shielding... in this way.

Sergio Focardi (1932 – 22 June 2013) was an Italian physicist and professor emeritus at the University of Bologna.^[

Sergio Focardi - Wikipedia

Quote from Cherepanov2020

I have been silently watching for several days how a man with a strange name "Axil" convinces site users with the help of quotes from various sources that LENR is by no means a fusion reaction... I don't have the strength to sort out all the nonsense that he quotes ... And there is no time ... I will simply answer - this person is simply behind the times and uses data and knowledge that are not correct for fundamental reasons ... I persuaded him to familiarize himself with new knowledge ... But he is so sure that that the old physics is good and beautiful that I have no other choice but to answer him like this - "You rely on false physics and therefore you are not able to analyze What is LENR and how LENR reactions flow. For the rest of the community, my trivial advice is -" Just ignore everything that a person with the name "Axil" writes. I try not to offend him, but reading his numerous comments every time is unbearable...

Quote from Cydonia

You don't know anything, just speculating.

Darden blackmailed Fabiani, in order to keep only him on the boat, thinking that he was the only interesting masterpiece and therefore ejecting Rossi in order to save money and keeping technology both.

Now agree, some guys more informed than you as Carl Page also are thinking like you.

Darden remains a big vicious in my mind, moreover to have Dewey Weaver as a partner, it could not be otherwise.

Btw and to come to your highly scientific calculations for years, have always made me laugh.

Not because your reasoning wasn't good, your calculation skills were, btw, better than mine, but your input data was that from a guy who wasn't well informed, that's all.

Your home made investigations have their limits.

However as you like speculating i will offer you a Black Friday gift, a paper very close in mind with the beginning of the Rossi's technology.. As you could continue to investigate.

https://www.researchgate.net/p…ssisted_Nuclear_Reactions

Display More

I only investigate where the rubber hits the road. I am not concerned with theory of LENR. But anything that makes heat has to have heat that acts like heat, which is not so complex to measure if taking measures is accounted for when constructing a device or experiment.

Quote from LDM

I was serious about the picture.

It has been taken in Tennessee.

Oh yes, the building that vents all heat immediately to the atmosphere, to never become heated. Tin walls and roof. That does goes a long way to making it happen…

The tower for the parking lot lamp looked more Latin Americas or Mediterranean than Tennessee, to me.

The Doral mW Plant would have to make 700 L of fully expanded steam per second, and magically move it all through first 2 cm ID pipes, joined to 4 cm ID pipes, and finally to a 8 cm ID pipe without any increase in pressure over atmospheric. At supersonic speeds.

Then recondense it all and put it back into the machine at the same rate, more or less.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

This is the one thing EVERYONE on LF can agree on. Axil is either a faker, charlatan, crackpot, delusional, etc. Pick your favorite category. I try not to care so much but it is these types of fakers that cause serious problems in LENR. And this is from my perspective where I disdain your "Maxwell Sucks and there is no charge" agenda.

Your remark about Maxwell hurt my vanity... What do I see? I see that you inadequately perceived my analysis of Maxwell's mistakes ... I am really outraged by the fact that Maxwell perverted the teachings of Charles Coulomb and Maxwell discredited the good name of Charles Coulomb. Maxwell treacherously and impudently called his law -

law named after Charles Coulomb ...

Why am I posting about this in this thread? It would seem that the topic is different ... But no, it is IMPORTANT to understand Maxwell's mistakes in order to correctly argue on the topic "Exotic vacuum object (EVO) as the cause of a vacuum reaction." If you understand what I am writing to you about, then you will begin to correctly understand those experiments in which supposedly there are (and they are definitely not there) - "Exotic vacuum object (EVO)".

Now let's laugh together at Maxwell's mistakes. Here is an excerpt from the text of Maxwell's treatise -

In Maxwell's text, I inserted the designation of force.

Carefully analyze what dimensions can be left and right in Maxwell's formula.

It was these fatal errors of Maxwell that I tried to point out to the man named "Axil".

Have you analyzed the dimensions on the left and on the right? Do you now understand Maxwell's absurd mistakes? Question - "Why didn't anyone notice them for 150 years?

Quote from Cherepanov2020

I have been silently watching for several days how a man with a strange name "Axil" convinces site users with the help of quotes from various sources that LENR is by no means a fusion reaction... I don't have the strength to sort out all the nonsense that he quotes ...

See Does Brilliant Light Power Reactor’s Run on Overunity Too?