Quote from Alan Smith

Thank you axil . Why should we accept a simple explanation when we could have a complicated and probably un-provable one?

The reaction is very complicated. Preconceived expectations in experimentation can lead to misleading analysis. As I said up-thread, both fusion and vacuum decay might be happening concurrently. Such multiple causality is why sometimes a LENR researcher will see radiation, and neutrons, and sometimes no energy production is seen. I am certain this situation has occurred in your research. You just brush it off as a distraction.

The vacuum decay theory is provable because of the presence of the evidence of the electroweak unification associated with the vacuum reaction. When iron and rare earths are found as products of transmutation and no neutrons and gamma radiation or energy is detected, that is proof that fusion is not the cause of such transmutation. The researcher thinks that something went wrong with the experiment then he starts over from the beginning and looks for what he expects to see. What he doesn't expects to see is ignored as a failed experiment..

Unjustified expectations has lead to the failure of Holmild's company. Holmlid expected to see subatomic particles generated in his H(1) experimentation. But what he was actually producing was EVOs. Sveinn Ólafsson reports that no subatomic particles are produce in his Holmlid replication, but what he is actually producing is EVOs. When Sveinn understands that EVOs are produced by a superconductor, then his research and that of Holmlid will make sense.

Re: researchers listening to Axil

The Vacuum reaction is a certain show stopper for LENR reactor development. Unless the LENR developer understands what he is up against, the developer will sorely fail.

The case that exemplifies this situation is the work of Garett Moddel who claims that energy can be directly harvested from the vacuum using specially designed diodes that employs the Casimir effect.

Garett Moddel recently confirmed that the primary thing holding up the mass production of this device is reliability. The devices work great when they are first produced, but quickly break down and become useless. Moddel believes that until he gets more research money to analyze how and why the cells break down over time there will not be a wide-spread industrial roll out of this technology. Finding a rich backer who would take a strong interest in this device might invest in this project so that this reliability hurdle might be defeated and bring this great technology to a useful marketable product. But unless the vacuum reaction is understood in detail, all R&D money will be wasted.

The Vacuum reaction part of the LENR reaction make LENR unreliable. Any LENR reactor will fail after a period of energy production. Nobody has produced a LENR reactor that will last for an extended period of time.

This mode of reactor failure is seen in every type of LENR energy extraction device, and nobody has figured out how to build a reliable long lasting LENR reactor. In more detail, any reactor that includes extracting energy from the vacuum will eventually destroy the device that performs this energy extraction through transmutation. This is what will hold back any LENR product from the marketplace unless the deleterious effects of vacuum reaction is overcome.

For example, one idea that might work is the development of a self charging lithium ion battery using an onboard downsized Moddel device. After a acceptable lifecycle timeframe, say a 1000 recharge cycles, the battery will fail either from the the failure of the vacuum recharge device or the lithium battery chemistry itself

Garret Moddel, SSE Special Session, Jan 22, 2022, Advanced Propulsion & Energy IV

Session co-chair Professor Garret Moddel of UC Boulder presents "Extracting zero-point energy: does it violate the second law?"

www.youtube.com

Garett Moddel has patented (it actually works) a device that extracts energy from the vacuum.

An experiment that show energy extraction from the vacuum

MODDEL STYLE QUANTUM ENERGY CONVERTER WITH NANOCAVITIES

prof. garret moddel of the university of colorado in boulder used a USAF grant to make a special diode with optical nanocavities it converts infinite #quantu...

www.youtube.com

In his product development, Moddel has found that extracting energy from the vacuum causes unavoidable decay of the matter that his device is constructed from. This decay is called vacuum decay and is seen in all LENR devices that produce energy. This decay is a significant issue that must be overcome before LENR can be used as a reliable power source.

There appears to be a connection between LENR, negative energy, coherence, quantum entanglement, and lack of energy production in the vacuum reaction.

The Quest to Use Quantum Mechanics to Pull Energy out of Nothing

The Quest to Use Quantum Mechanics to Pull Energy Out of Nothing

The quantum energy teleportation protocol was proposed in 2008 and largely ignored. Now two independent experiments have shown that it works.

www.wired.com

In LENR experimentation, we have seen cases where both matter and energy seem to disappear from cavities that are totally enclosed inside crystals. This matter and energy might be teleported to other areas of the vacuum remote from the site of the reaction.

Energy teleportation and possibly even matter teleportation shows why coherence and superconductivity is a necessary foundational underpinning of the vacuum reaction component of the LENR reaction.

Negative energy which most of science beleives is impossible to produce is in fact real and caused by a imbalance between the vacuum expectation values (VEV) of two or more separate areas of the vacuum.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

No, we have never seen this demonstrated in any experiments ever.

Negative energy is not "in fact" real. Only in your universe of alternative "facts".

being a clown, you have never interested yourself in experimentation. I doubt that you even know what an experiment is.

If you read the Wired article, you would have seen that that the experiment by Masahiro Hotta and his replicators show that negative energy is produced by entanglement and quantum teleportation.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

No Axil. If you read the article you would realize the experiment was simulated on a quantum computer. It was not real experiment. There was no discussion of negative energy being "in fact real". You live in a fantasy

world.

I know its hard for a clown to understand these concepts, so here is a video that discusses the ideas and research of Masahiro Hotta and other experimentation in this field. The video also references a number of associated articles that cover research in this area.

It is my contention that the EVO is a structure which is oftentimes generated within the LENR reaction that generates coherence and associated vacuum based negative energy. As such, the EVO steals energy from a LENR system, teleports it to the far field, and leases only transmutation and matter disappearance in its wake. The energy that the LENR reaction produces is teleported to to other entangled locations in the vacuum. The takeaway is that the resultant indicators of the LENR reaction are problematic to resolve. Where energy production is expected, it is not found. What appears is only transmutation and/or missing matter.

The question: How can a EVO (aka polariton condensate) generate anti spacetime, a condition of the vacuum that can convert spacetime into energy.

The ability to produce anti-spacetime is a characteristic of superconductivity. To set the stage, the Higgs field is a superconductor. It gives mass and charge to electrons and does not give mass to photons. Superconductivity preforms the opposite function for electrons within the superconductor by removing mass and charge from the electrons within the superconductor and gives mass to the photon. So superconductivity undoes what the Higgs field does for electrons and photons.

The mechanism that applies these properties to electrons and photons is the vacuum energy potential or value(VEV).

So the VEV of superconductivity is the negative of the VEV of the Higgs field.

A polariton condensate is a superconductor and has negative vacuum energy. This energy is the opposite vacuum energy of the Higgs field which has positive vacuum energy,

Everything remain stable because the EVO is partitioned off from the VEV of the universe by a domain wall. The EVO can exist at any temperature no matter how high because of the domain wall. For example, the SAFIRE system is a macro EVO ate temperatures of hundreds of thousands of C. The vacuum inside the EVO does not interact with the universe while it is stable except through its vortexes. Only when the EVO becomes unstable and explodes will its negative vacuum interact with the positive vacuum of the universe. This interaction which takes the form of a Bosenova will results in a dissolution of both the EVO and the spacetime that the EVO was occupying into energy.

This process was first experimentally observed in a Bosenova of a condensate of ultra cold rubidium atoms which is a superconductor (https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/76).

Bosenova

Bosenova - Wikipedia

Quote

In the particular experiment when a bosenova was first detected, transitioning the self-interaction from repulsive to attractive caused the BEC to implode and shrink to a size smaller than the optical detector's minimum resolution limit, and then suddenly "explode." In this explosion, about half of the atoms in the condensate superficially seemed to have "disappeared" from the experiment altogether, i.e., they were not detected in either the cold particle remnants nor in the expanding gas cloud produced.

The 'missing' atoms are almost certainly still around in some form, but just not in a form that we can detect them in our current experiment, the two likely possibilities are that they have formed into molecules of two rubidium atoms stuck together.[2] or they have gotten enough energy from somewhere to fly away fast enough that they are out of our observation region before we look for them,"[3]

— Carl Wieman, Space.com

Display More

The Higgs field is what defines how the universe presents itself.

When a polariton is formed, an electron becomes dressed in the quantum properties of the boson that the electrons becomes entangled with. The mass, charge, and spin of the electron takes on the nature of the boson.

For example, when an electron becomes entangled with a photon, the electron behaves like a photon. The spinor property of the electron is lost and the spin of the polariton becomes that of the photon. This process is the basis of the science of spintronics.

What is the spinor property of the electron?

A discussion of spinors by Peter Woit. The spinor is the process that generates the 1/2 spin of all fermions including the neutrino.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

The spinor is not a "process". A spinor is a mathematical construct which can describe the spins. A spinor doesn't "generate" anything.

A spinor is the physical representation of the electron and other particles. By general convention, the terms "fermion" and "spinor" are often used interchangeably in physics, as synonyms of one-another.

Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray

Whether pondering black holes or predicting discoveries at CERN, physicists believe the best theories are beautiful, natural, and elegant, and this standard separates popular theories from disposable ones. This is why, Sabine Hossenfelder argues, we have not seen a major breakthrough in the foundations of physics for more than four decades.

To its disadvantage, physics wants reality to obey the mathematical laws they invent rather than confining math to the guardrails of what is real. Dirac invented the spinor concept to describe the angular momentum of the electron. That is how the spinor came into existence even though mathematicians may now use these concepts for their own purposes.

I would now like to explain how the polariton is formed and apply that understanding to explain the polariton LENR reaction causality can function in explaining Ed Storms crack theory of the NAE (nuclear active environments).

The type of polariton most likely in the LENR reaction is a superposition (mix) of the electron and photon. This type of polariton is a strong matter light coupling. This coupling occurs when the quantum energy level of the electron and the photon are equal. In order for this energy level to be reached, electron and photon must be confined in the same voluum of space until this energy mixing can take place. That voluum of space where mixing occurs is called an optical cavity or resonator. Free electrons are also confined inside the optical cavity so now the photon and electron have time to come into a state of energy equilibrium that result in the entanglement of the photon and the electron.

An optical cavity is a voluum that is walled by mirrored surfaces that cause photons to be confined for a substantial time period long enough for the photon trapped in it to be reduced to a point that equals the energy level of the free electron. This quantum entanglement process is shown in this video:

This method of light/matter quantum mixing also occurs on metal surfaces that are rough (spiked and pitted). This is why LENR reactors that use surface reactions will require roughen surfaces. Piantilli and Mizono type reactors come to mind.

What cracks in a metal surface provide is an optical cavity in which polaritons can form. When sufficient numbers of polaritons accumulate, they will come into energy equivalence and become entangled thus forming a condensate that action a NAE where EVOs generate energy production and transmutation.

The properties of the polariton comprize a mix of those of the photon and the electron. The polariton like of photon has little or no mass, like the electron it is right or left handed and exists at sub light speeds, like the photon It has no charge and is a boson which allows for condensation to occur, it circulates in an interlaced fashion inside the EVO like a photon, but creates north and south pole magnetic vortexes like an electron.

When the polariton condensate destabilizes, a Bosenova disentangles the photon and electron which results in explosion of high energy electrons to emerge from the Bosenova as well as EUV level light as both the photons and electrons are released from entanglement.

What is being missed in the LENR theories that center on the roll of electrons as the active agent in the LENR reaction (Rossi and Ken Shoulders) is the need to dress the electron as a polariton to enable the electron to form clusters (aka condensates).