Quote from Alan Smith

Do they know something we don't?

The big gonzo (The appointed Chinese Führer Xsi) must be 100+% right all day/year. Goods never fail...

FDA Passes on TrialSite’s Invitation to Collaborate with Concerned Physicians & Scientists to Review COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals

FDA Passes on TrialSite’s Invitation to Collaborate with Concerned Physicians & Scientists to Review COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals

Recently, a group of prominent physicians and scientists concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety signals based on emerging real world data and several studies,…

www.trialsitenews.com

Recently, a group of prominent physicians and scientists concerned about COVID-19 vaccine safety signals based on emerging real world data and several studies, including the recently published 90 million-plus population study in Japan reveal that the COVID-19 vaccinated population had a significantly higher probability of reporting myocarditis than the general population. The BMJ published an article by Maryanne Demasi expressing concerns on the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) inaction involving the study and release of data featuring the actual level of myocarditis-related risk to the public. See “FDA urged to publish follow-up studies on covid-19 vaccine safety signals.“ Numerous studies, real world evidence, and even the regulatory bodies such as the FDA acknowledge via the vaccine label a concern for the cardiovascular events associated with the vaccines. The group of physicians and scientists working with TrialSite sought to conduct a joint collaborative framing analysis to better understand the risks and bring people together in a cooperative effort. Daniel O’Connor, TrialSite’s founder, was asked to reach out to Dr. Peter Marks at the FDA to invite him to collaborate with the group. Backing the recent Japan study was the director of the Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance, Rokuro Hama, who was open to working on the matter. Also invited are Florida’s Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, MD, PhD, who recently sponsored a self-controlled case series leading to the conclusion and recommendations that the Sunshine State would formally recommend against COVID-19 vaccination for higher risk cohorts due to an increased threat of myocarditis. Recent data from the UK Office of National Statistics also raised concern amongst this group of concerned physicians and scientists. TrialSite’s O’Connor sent an email communication to the FDA’s Marks, inviting him to consider participation in the collaborative joint analysis of the COVID-19 myocarditis safety question in light of recent studies, real world data and the Florida recommendations.

Dr. Marks asked a public relations professional named Lorrie McNeil to respond at his request. It turns out, McNeil directs the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, a Director in the FDA hierarchy within the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Ms. McNeil communicated that while the FDA appreciated the request, the agency would have to pass on any participation in such a collaborative endeavor due to higher priorities and existing extensive existing vaccine safety monitoring programs.

TrialSite shares the formal email response for all.

The Letter

McNeill, Lorrie <[email protected]>

Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 12:00 PM

To: daniel <[email protected]>

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] TrialSite: Grand Joint Analysis of Vaccine Safety Data Examples

Dear Mr. O’Connor,

This is in response to your email to Dr. Peter Marks, director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), regarding review of COVID-19 vaccine safety data. Dr. Marks forwarded your email and asked that I respond on his behalf.

FDA and CDC place a high priority on vaccine safety and are committed to the integrity and credibility of our vaccine safety monitoring and research efforts. FDA and CDC scientists continuously monitor the safety of all vaccines following approval or authorization using a multi-pronged approach including spontaneous reporting (or passive surveillance) through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), combined with active surveillance, using large population-based healthcare datasets such as FDA’s Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) System and CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). A summary of how these various safety surveillance systems are used to monitor COVID-19 vaccines is posted on FDA’s website. A recent example of this work using near real-time safety monitoring of the COVID-19 vaccines may be found here: Near real-time surveillance of safety outcomes in US COVID-19 vaccine recipients aged 12 to 64 years - ScienceDirect.

Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. More than 632 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through October 19, 2022. During this time, VAERS received 16,990 preliminary reports of death (0.0027%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records. Continued monitoring has identified nine deaths causally associated with J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccination. CDC and FDA continue to review reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination and update information as it becomes available. The agencies posted results of an evaluation of reports to VAERS.

As you can see, the agency has dedicated significant resources to vaccine safety surveillance, including for COVID-19 vaccines. We appreciate your request, but at this time, are unable to become involved due to our ongoing work priorities in this area.

Best regards,

Lorrie H. McNeill (she/her/hers)

Director

Office of Communication, Outreach and Development

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The FDA Mission

According to the FDA’s Director of the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, the Gold Standard regulatory agency is doing all it can and more to ensure it strictly adheres to its mandate—meeting its mission to “protect the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices…”

Majority of Australians Regret Getting COVID-19 Vaccinations: All of the Unvaccinated Don’t Regret the Decision

Majority of Australians Regret Getting COVID-19 Vaccinations: All of the Unvaccinated Don’t Regret the Decision

Australians are making their feelings known in a large survey involving tens of thousands of people. Recently, News Corp in Australia featured Nationals Senate…

www.trialsitenews.com

Australians are making their feelings known in a large survey involving tens of thousands of people. Recently, News Corp in Australia featured Nationals Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie who shared the unfortunate, but not surprising news, that Australians will be “living with the consequences” of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns “for a very, very long time.” Australia’s government took a cue from China’s zero-tolerance COVID-19 policy approach, enforcing heretofore not seen rigid pandemic measures for what is usually considered an open, free Western democracy. But the costs are severe, from education of the young to widespread reports of mental health issues to economic implications. The results of Australian government decisions will, unfortunately, linger for a long time. But in this survey, hopefully, Australian politicians, national and regional bureaucrats, and academic medical leaders are listening to what the people are saying.

For example, on a day of voting and associated surveys, some notable sentiments emerged. The politicians are distancing themselves from their decisions during the pandemic, reports Senate Leader McKenzie in the news interview. What did a survey of over 50,000 Australians reveal?

Over 50% of Australians polled regret getting vaccinated or, conversely, remained unvaccinated and were quite happy with the decision

Of the over 45,000 that acknowledged their vaccination status, only 35% would say they would make the decision again.

Not one unvaccinated person regrets remaining unvaccinated

Of the vaccinated surveyed, 20% received two doses (primary series); 26% reported three doses, 16% reported a fourth jab, and 37% reported receiving no vaccination. Again, this later cohort is grateful they didn’t move forward with the jab.

According to the Australian Health Department, over 95% of the population over the age of 16 received at least one COVID-19 jab

The vast majority of the Australian population isn’t concerned about COVID-19 anymore

About 50% of the respondents report catching COVID-19, with 6% reporting they were sick with the novel coronavirus more than once; 40% never did fall ill

Nearly 70% of respondents declared that Australia’s governing leaders became too “heavy-handed” during the pandemic response, while 25% felt that the government did the best possible, and 8% believed they did as well as any other country.

Senator Bridget McKenzie

TrialSite reported early in 2022 that despite the nation’s very high vaccination rate, a striking number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths occurred during 2022. In fact, double the number of persons in the first 90 days of 2022 died as compared to all of 2020 and 2021.

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/covid-poll-a-pulse-check-of-australia-as-we-exit-the-pandemic/news-story/cb910eb5525d0dd24ca38ff5a6240822

Shanghai Residents Access Inhalable COVID-19 Vaccine—Will It Better Control the Pathogen?

Shanghai Residents Access Inhalable COVID-19 Vaccine—Will It Better Control the Pathogen?

The world&rsquo;s first inhalable COVID-19 vaccine produced by CanSino Biologics as a booster was recently made available in Shanghai. Those residents…

www.trialsitenews.com

The world’s first inhalable COVID-19 vaccine produced by CanSino Biologics as a booster was recently made available in Shanghai. Those residents interested in accessing the booster went to select vaccination centers—typically, in community hospitals or clinics--which is administered via a device that looks like a take-out coffee cup and a short mouthpiece as can be seen by this video in Chinese. Based on Western and Chinese news sources, it’s apparent that residents of Shanghai [at least, the ones accessing the inhalable booster] continue to believe the COVID-19 vaccines are designed to stop infectious transmission, thus controlling the pandemic. That hasn't been the case, as this media has tracked data since the spring of 2021. The COVID-19 vaccines have helped reduce serious infection and death but haven’t controlled the pandemic by outright stopping the spread in any sustained way. Why? SARS-CoV-2, a dynamic mutating RNA virus, much like influenza or HIV/AIDS, isn’t easily stopped by vaccines at scale. Governments, politicians, and health agencies along with industry haven’t done a very good job communicating this reality. Perhaps, this is partially due to the implementation of vaccine mandates precluding such honesty. Afterall, the ethics behind strict mandates necessitates a countermeasure that can serve to stop the spread of the pathogen over time, not just in small 3-month bursts.

Already heavily vaccinated, the Shanghai population, according to a government WeChat account, declared that 23 million out of the city’s 26 million residents are already fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Almost 50% of this large city’s population have received booster shots as well.

The Chinese news refers to the booster as the “new crown vaccine” and notes that the consumer inhaling the vaccine swears it has a sweet, milky sort of taste—sort of “like drinking milk tea” according to one account. In Shanghai, the vaccine is now administered in community health clinics such as the community health service center in the Jinshan District in this large city of 27 million people.

Mr. Chen was one of the first to access this inhalable vaccine for COVID-19. After taking the take-away coffee cup-looking device then deeply breathing via the mouthpiece, Chen then held his breath for five seconds while the entire vaccine administration process was over in 20 seconds.

How did Mr. Chen feel? According to the Weibo video in a local news source, Chen said, “It’s like sucking a cup of milk tea. It tastes a little sweet. I hope this vaccine can really block the spread of the virus and prevent infection.”

Meanwhile, Casey Hall, writing for Reuters, reported on a discussion with Dr. Zhao Hui, chief medical officer at Shanghai United Family Hospital Pudong, who expressed his hope about this vaccine, sharing, “Our body’s first line of defense is the mucus membrane of our respiratory system, we want to be directly stimulated to improve immunity and using the inhaled vaccine does that.”

The promise of inhaled vaccines have been touted by Scripps Research Institute’s Dr. Eric Topol, as covered by TrialSite and Dr. Erwin Loh, chief medical officer at Australia’s St. Vincent’s Health. “These vaccines can potentially guard not only against infection, but also against vaccine hesitancy,” explained Loh.

The Approved Product

As reported by TrialSite, the world’s first inhalable SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 vector) called Convidecia Air developed by CanSino Biologics Inc. was approved by China’s drug regulator called the National Medical Products Administration of China (NMPA). Utilized as a booster dose, physician-scientists such as Scripps Research’s Eric Topol have been calling for inhalable vaccines. CanSino Biologics leveraged its existing adenovirus vector platform (Ad5-nCoV) as the intramuscular version Convidecia.

Convidecia Air offers a non-invasive option based on a nebulizer to change liquid into an aerosol for inhalation via the mouth. Needle-free, the COVID-19 vaccine, reports CanSino Biologics, “Can effectively induce comprehensive immune protection in response to SARS-CoV-2 after just one breath.”

This company, dedicated to indigenous Chinese vaccine development and commercialization, makes it to the finish line with their inhalable COVID-19 vaccine designed as a booster dose. Will it make progress elsewhere? The Chinese company’s skirmish with the Canadian government, via a hostile Chinese government, didn’t help its brand in the West. TrialSite was one of the few media to cover that skirmish.

The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine platform is the result of a collaboration between the Institute of Biotechnology, the Academy of Military Medical Sciences in China and the company, which began development of the blood-based vaccine at the start of the pandemic.

The Study

The Chinese sponsor, which this media reported on in the context of a scandal with Canada and Chinese customers during the early stages of the pandemic, received approval by NMPA to commence a clinical trial for Convidecia Air in March 2021. The results of this study (NCT05043259) were published in the peer-reviewed The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. The vaccine can induce strong humoral, cellular, and mucosal immunity thus leading to “triple protection” and contribute to the containment of infection and potentially the spread of SARS-CoV-2. See the link to The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunisation with an orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV after two-dose priming with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial

We found that a heterologous booster vaccine with an orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV is safe and highly immunogenic in adults who have previously…

www.thelancet.com

Quote from Fm1

Researchers investigating long COVID might do themselves a favor by...

Accepting it's psychosomatic as UK ONS a year or more ago revealed: over 50% of Long Covid cases had never had Covid

A BBC broadcast in May 2021 strongly suggested same: Covid Jab cures long covid

Two easy read Insightful articles

The Fatal Flaw in the UKHSA’s Inflated Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates

[Will it be the duplicitous definition that "unjabbed" includes those jabbed in previous 14 to 21 days? Read on...]

In last week’s post I mentioned that prior to the vaccines’ release there were calls for there to be rigorous monitoring of the vaccines’ safety and effectiveness

Thus I was pleased to read last Wednesday of the latest attempts by the the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), an independent group of medics, scientists and academics, to get the U.K.’s medical products regulator, the MHRA, to explain why it hasn’t kept its promises to monitor the safety and effectiveness of the Covid vaccines in the time since they were rolled out back in December 2020. I’d add that this situation has been mirrored worldwide, with remarkably little in the way of the type of monitoring that would be expected of a new medical product.

The importance of these post-approval monitoring studies can’t be understated – pre-approval...

The Fatal Flaw in the UKHSA’s Inflated Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates

In last week’s post I mentioned that prior to the vaccines’ release there were calls for there to be rigorous

dailysceptic.org

A key quote

Quote

"The outcomes from prior attempts to make a coronavirus vaccine. Scientists have been trying to make a vaccine to protect against coronavirus infection (‘colds’) for decades. They all failed – not simply because ‘they didn’t work’, but also because some candidate vaccines resulted in increased risk from disease, potentially coming to light some time after the vaccines were given..."

Oxford Study Finds Negative Vaccine Effectiveness Against Covid Hospitalisation and Death

...one of many over last year

In spring 2021 the U.K.’s health agencies were in full swing, trying to get everyone in turn to take their free Covid vaccine

Back then, many people still believed that Covid was a serious threat to all of us, and as a result initial take-up was rapid and even younger age groups eagerly awaited their turn to take the elixir that would offer salvation. Back in those simple days there wasn’t much need to explain the details...

As time went on, however, it appeared that some ‘foolish’ people weren’t in mortal fear of Covid, despite the best efforts of the nudge units to make it appear that Covid was killing a large proportion of healthy individuals. So the agencies changed tactics. If people weren’t going to clamour for the vaccines, they’d use emotional blackmail and appeal for people to take their dose to ‘protect granny’ and to...

Oxford Study Finds Negative Vaccine Effectiveness Against Covid Hospitalisation and Death

Back in spring 2021 the U.K.’s health agencies were in full swing, trying to get everyone in turn to take

dailysceptic.org

BTW: My super fit, 'healthy eating' fully jabbed and boosted brother now has Covid again and bed-ridden again. Fourth / fifth time time this year

I'm so glad, in Dec 2020, I read publicly available safety data and concluded "Dangerous poison snake oil; say NO"

Sadly most responded with 'Gov't, NHS, MSM... Would not lie to us' and/or Coercion "I must take it so I can..."

Now they grudgingly admit they lied, but still best to do as told in case...

Will sheeple ever rebel?

COVID-19 Origins: Investigating a “Complex and Grave Situation” Inside a Wuhan Lab

The Wuhan lab at the center of suspicions about the pandemic’s onset was far more troubled than known, documents unearthed by a Senate team reveal. Tracing the evidence, Vanity Fair and ProPublica give the clearest view yet of a biocomplex in crisis.

COVID-19 Origins: Investigating a “Complex and Grave Situation” Inside a Wuhan Lab

The Wuhan lab at the center of suspicions about the pandemic’s onset was far more troubled than known, documents unearthed by a Senate team reveal. Tracing the…

www.propublica.org

Given advance access to hundreds of pages of the Senate researchers’ findings and analysis, Vanity Fair, in partnership with ProPublica, spent five months investigating their underlying evidence. We analyzed WIV documents, consulted with experts in CCP communications, asked biocontainment experts to help analyze documents and reviewed with independent scientists the possible evidence that certain vaccine research may have begun far earlier than acknowledged.

We also traced the hazards that arose as the WIV built a lab to research the world’s most dangerous pathogens. Taken together, our reporting provides critical context that is not included in the pared-down 35-page interim report. It offers the most detailed picture to date of the months leading up to the COVID-19 outbreak, including new details on the intense pressure the lab faced to produce breakthrough research, its struggles to grapple with mounting safety issues and a previously unreported series of references to a mysterious incident shortly before the virus began infecting its first victims.

The Problem With Our Boost-Boost-Boost COVID Strategy

We need to explore more options for fighting the disease, but our leaders lack moral imagination.

The Problem With Our Boost-Boost-Boost COVID Strategy

We need to explore more options for fighting the disease, but our leaders lack moral imagination.

www.theatlantic.com

The United States has defaulted to treating life with the coronavirus as the new normal, but this normal, sadly, is anything but new. Americans have always lived with deadly inequities in our society, and we can’t seem to imagine doing better. For the past six months, the U.S. has averaged 300 to 500 COVID deaths a day. Living with COVID has become a euphemism for accepting perhaps 150,000 additional deaths a year. Is this how many deaths Americans are willing to tolerate? The question hasn’t been explicitly debated, because the truth is too ugly to acknowledge.

Our leaders need the moral imagination to help society envision other alternatives. The American people have been presented with a false dichotomy: the diligent promotion of masks and vaccines, or a kind of resignation—saying “you do you,” vowing to “meet people where they are,” even claiming that the pandemic is over.

Quote from PSK

A BBC broadcast in May 2021 strongly suggested same: Covid Jab cures long covid

Unluckily its the other way round. LongCov/Vaxx is more severe in vaxxinated....There are only very few unvaxx that have longCov. The high "%" number come from the fear mongers that just did look at ICU drop outs...

Quote from PSK

The Fatal Flaw in the UKHSA’s Inflated Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates

The fatal flaw was to allow Pfizer to run a private phase III study with a substance that never cleared any early checks. >1200 suspected CoV-19 cases in the vaxxine group have been preempted from a PCR test becuase teh study was fully unblinded to the supervision medical team.

So the reality was:: The Pfizer vaxxine had a protection rate of minus = "-" 10'000%

Quote from Fm1

Our leaders need the moral imagination to help society envision other alternatives. The American people have been presented with a false dichotomy: the diligent promotion of masks and vaccines, or a kind of resignation—saying “you do you,” vowing to “meet people where they are,” even claiming that the pandemic is over.

The money greedy members of the FM/R/JF mafia are immune against empathy (Except for family member like Göbbels was). Just ask a dog/lion to stop eating meat...

https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdf

"

Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that
the COVID-19 pandemic

was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident

In May 2019, the Director of the WIV Wuhan Institute of Virology

BSL4 laboratory warned

that in high-containment laboratories in China:
Maintenance cost[s] [are] generally neglected; several high-level BSLs
have insufficient operational funds for routine yet vital processes.

Due to the limited resources, some BSL-3 laboratories run on extremely minimal

operational costs or in some cases none at all…

The fish stinks from the head. CDC publishes studies to support their fake vaxxine claims.

COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Adults 18 Years or Older in 13 US States

This cross-sectional study examines characteristics of COVID-19–associated hospitalizations among vaccinated persons and comparative hospitalization rates in…

jamanetwork.com

We know from Swiss data that vaxxinated latest since march 2022 have a higher hospitalization risk than unvaxx. So the CDC claim that it is 10x lower is very ugly disinformation of the public.

Somebody has to shutdown this agency.

Divide (blue, red) et impera as already Caesar said. To many fools live in the united states.

Authorities still in Denial over a year after this Depopulation started

Update: CoronaVax safety in the Netherlands

Dr. Robert Malone with an update of Dr. Theo Schetters´ survey of public data from the Netherlands showing a correlation of excess deaths with the booster campaigns.

Update: CoronaVax safety in the Netherlands

An update of Theo Schetters' survey of public data from the NL

rwmalonemd.substack.com

Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional - Office for National Statistics

UK:: Excess deaths strongly increase! Going up to 17% again. Just to remind you that death with Covid are most of the time not deaths from Covid except post booster deaths...

Truth for Health Foundation Teaches COVID-19 Protocol Victims How to Sue Suspected Hospitals

Truth for Health Foundation Teaches COVID-19 Protocol Victims How to Sue Suspected Hospitals

A nonprofit organization, part of the mounting &ldquo;medical freedom movement&rdquo; that gained substantial momentum during the pandemic, represents a…

www.trialsitenews.com

A nonprofit organization, part of the mounting “medical freedom movement” that gained substantial momentum during the pandemic, represents a perspective and point of view that cannot simply be ignored by the medical establishment as unscientific, conservative propaganda but rather looked at as an unfolding cause representing tens of millions of people across America. The Truth for Health Foundation is a 501(c)(3) public charity human rights organization defending life and medical freedom. Their mission is “to provide truthful, balanced, medically sound, research-based information, and cutting-edge updates on prevention and treatment of common medical conditions, including COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, that affect health, quality of life and longevity.” What is most likely to cause some tension with broader society, this mission includes the integration of “faith-based” approaches to medical treatment, as well as advocacy and legal defense “of basic human and civil rights” related to medical freedom and bodily autonomy.

The title of this forthcoming web conference on November 1 exhibits what appears to be a growing radicalism in response to how the COVID-19 pandemic was handled by the U.S. government and medical establishment including the pharmaceutical industry.

The “STOP White Coat Killers: Holding Hospitals Accountable for Deaths” campaign sounds very serious, with the purpose of the conference to inform attendees about forthcoming legal actions persons can use if they suspect a loved one died unnecessarily from COVID-19 protocols in the hospital.

The Context for a Growing Resistance to the Status Quo in Healthcare

Importantly, a growing chasm exists between sizable facets of American society, only intensified, and magnified by the pandemic. On the one hand, there has been an increasing concentration in the medical industry, more dependent than ever on federal reimbursement—for instance, nearly 60 million Americans access their healthcare via the federal Medicare program, while Medicaid rolls approach 90 million—totaling about 150 million on these two nationally funded approaches alone (of course Medicaid is administered by the states). The same consolidation of payers becomes evident in the commercial health insurance space.

A market-driven American health care health system, while offering a dynamic pathway to wealth and innovation, also stimulates ever-increasing concentration of health-related power and money as fewer health systems in most markets hold enormous sway—even near monopolistic presence while prices increase across payer, provider, and of course drugs, diagnostics, and medical devices.

This concentrated wealth and power becomes evident in the grand facilities of the economic winners in healthcare—grand, technologically sophisticated, gleaming skyrises and sprawling complexes of “digitized” granite, steel, and glass—healthcare corporate temples reflecting vast accumulations of money. Yet does overall American health improve or worsen? Population health numbers unfortunately reveal the latter answer.

Americans pay far more for pharmaceutical products than any other nation, for example, leading to enormous cost burdens for what is generally a shrinking middle class. Yet the outcomes are not necessarily better. Yes, this media tracks absolutely astounding breakthroughs in biomedical research that are to be celebrated and rewarded for those taking the risk.

But the growing centralization associated with material entanglements between government, health systems, and drug and device producers and their supplier ecosystems further the concentration of corporate power in medicine—one that during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced media and social networks, leading to widespread censorship while many doctors that sought an independent pathway based on their practice, experience, and real-world evidence became a target for not only censorship but even delicensing: for daring to not strictly adhering to top-down, federal medical protocols.

This media provided examples of this trend early on, such as an Adventist Health, Ocala pharmacist that came up with the ICAM protocol during the early stages of the pandemic—before there were any emergency vaccines or therapies. A cause for celebration, this media highlighted that indigenous Florida effort led by an African American pharmacist named Carlette Norwood-Williams, PharmD.

The results of Ms. Norwood-Williams's protocol were stunning, saving many lives. Yet that very action endangered her job, as TrialSIte learned from inside sources that the health system inked a deal with Pfizer to test vaccines and therapies, and apparently, from this inside source, the contract precluded any repurposing of existing approved therapies. This media cannot absolutely verify this claim but it most certainly comes from a valid source.

We do know for certain that Ms. Norwood-Williams got in a lot of hot water once this media published the protocol for international audiences. This kind of stunning, outrageous response to progressive, positive action in medicine exemplifies how crony capitalism leads to adverse outcomes for most of society. And this is why countervailing social movements emerge, whether they are “right” or “wrong,” it doesn’t matter. There are legitimate concerns of systemized, legalized corruption in the system that needs redress.

Whether conspiratorial, real—or somewhere in between-- growing numbers of people report that established hospital protocols involving therapies such as Remdesivir are sought to be dangerous, at least in some situations. What rights do patients or their family members have to opt out of such a protocol? What about requesting another one? In today’s healthcare world, unless a family has substantial wealth and influence the answer appears to be few, if any rights.

The Issue and Allegations

Back to the Truth for Health Foundation’s campaign. Yes, the title selected is not only provocative, but it’s foreboding—even radical. One needs to consider the forces discussed above; the unfolding conditions described actually lead to polarization and associated radicalization of activism targeting what has become a medical-industrial complex.

These forces have led to medical freedom movement groups such as the one organizing the event. The group’s web conference this week seeks to inform attendees about forthcoming legal actions persons can use if they suspect a loved one died unnecessarily from COVID-19 protocols in the hospital—those protocols representing the medical policies and procedures promulgated by a confluence of the federal government, large health systems, and industry.

In the group’s recent press release they allege, “Hospitals across America are killing as many as 1000 patients a day using ‘COVID’ protocols with a deadly cocktail of toxic drugs, ventilators, withholding fluids and nutrition, physical restraints, and other measures to weaken patients.”

From Johns Hopkins University, Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) data, the foundation states that it shows “over 1.1 million COVID-19 patients have died in US hospitals under these practices.” These are very serious allegations that would be considered absolutely reckless by the medical establishment. In fact, they may be, as they will only serve to foster and facilitate more intensive division between the conflicting factions—much like a modern-day Jacobins calling for outright revolution against the current healthcare regime.

The allegations continue, as the foundation gives their presumed motive as to why hospitals would intentionally harm their own patients:

“Shockingly, hospitals are paid incentives that can reach $500,000 or more per COVID patient by the US government, according to analysis by attorneys who recently filed three lawsuits against hospitals and doctors in Fresno, California, and have similar suits underway in six other states.”

The foundation President and CEO, Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD, stated:

“This is a call to action to stop the white coat killers and hold them accountable. If you have a loved one who died in the hospital after receiving government mandated COVID treatments or who were refused their patient rights, or were knowingly euthanized, there are actions you can file to hold that hospital accountable.”

Who Will Be Speaking?

The online conference will include medical and legal team members who claim to be revealing “shocking details from families who lost loved ones to these hospital death protocols and provide details on the tools for citizen action aimed at stopping these deaths of vulnerable COVID and disabled patients.”

Attorneys Warner Mendenhall, Todd Callender, Dan Watkins, and Jennifer Lester will speak on legal matters and provide “legal tools that families can use to take action without having to hire an attorney. These include directions on specific regulatory complaints, pro se litigation, and other grassroots action steps to empower citizens who have lost loved ones. Families can generate pressure to hold hospitals accountable for these wrongful deaths without having to wait for lengthy and costly lawsuits to go forward.”

Mendenhall, an Ohio-based attorney (specializing in cases of government abuses, corporate fraud, and bank malfeasance,) spoke with TrialSite about the key points to the overall message. There are attorneys around the country who are willing to look into the hospital abuses mentioned above. Mendenhall said that instances of alleged hospital malfeasance regarding COVID-19 countermeasures are not hopeless legal cases. While the PREP was put in place to shield hospitals from liability when treating COVID-19 patients, it doesn’t mean the hospital has absolute impunity from legal recourse. There are opportunities to utilize laws at the state level where negligence claims can still be upheld by attorneys representing the victims. “In other words,” said Mendenhall, “just because you have COVID doesn’t mean you lose your rights.”

Additionally, there will be whistleblowers who have testified about hospital abuses—Deb Conrad, hospitalist PA, and nurse, Nicole Landers. According to the press release, these informants have provided documentation that hospitals are “euthanizing” patients with “deadly” drug combinations and “coercing use of toxic drugs like Remdesivir.” Other major offenses include hospital violations of patients’ rights, such as informed consent, having an advocate present, failure to follow advance directives, and failure to treat other medical conditions.

Finally, the zoom conference will also feature family members who lost loved ones: Dr. Bryan Ardis—associated with some outlandish claims involving the vaccines that he later retracted--Scott Schara, Tracy Bird, and Attorney Lori Volkman.

One Speaker's Story

TrialSite News published the story of one of these speakers, Scott Schara, whose 19-year-old daughter, Grace, died at a local Wisconsin hospital after COVID-19 infection in October 2021.

Schara claims the hospital discriminated against his daughter and family for being unvaccinated, as well as for their religious beliefs, and because his daughter had Down Syndrome. The father explained that he believes the hospital intentionally killed his daughter by prescribing unnecessary sedatives and narcotics. Furthermore, Schara shared evidence from Grace’s medical chart that her doctor placed her on “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) status, without the parents’ consent or written agreement.

In the state of Wisconsin, a DNR can be immediately revoked by the patient, family, or other medical advocate at any time. When Grace’s vitals began to crash, her family begged the nurses to intervene, but their pleas were ignored, and she died.

TrialSite made contact with Schara again via email and he stated, “Truth for Health has created a method to get things rolling that takes less than 30 minutes – which is the purpose of the news conference. We’ll be walking people through a tutorial to take action now, while various claims (including Grace’s) work their way through the legal system.”

The Meeting

For those interested in this event, they can virtually attend the conference by registering here.

ABOUT US - Truth for Health Foundation

To provide truthful, balanced, medically sound, research-based information and cutting edge updates on prevention and treatment of common medical conditions,…

www.truthforhealth.org

Covid could have started earlier than thought

was it circulating in China July/August 2019?

Excess mortality among age >64 soars to 20..35% in Switzerland - depending on region. :: https://www.experimental.bfs.a…assetdetail.23605327.html

Data lag is about 4-6 weeks.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Excess mortality among age >64 soars to 20..35% in Switzerland - depending on region. :: https://www.experimental.bfs.a…assetdetail.23605327.html

Data lag is about 4-6 weeks.

It’s so sad. Someone close to me has developed Raynaud’s and Sjögren’s Syndroms (both immune related and completely absent in the family medical history). She got two pfizer boosters and these syndroms developped within 90 days of the last booster.

Quote from Curbina

She got two pfizer boosters and these syndroms developped within 90 days of the last booster.

All studies I did see did show that one dose of RNA vaxxine works best!!! Boosters are euthanasia for the older/oldest. OR as I said heritage promotion.

I think one finally should bring the Pfizer/biontec folks into gas chamber... what would be very human...