The Totally Civil Covid Thread. (Closing 31/05)

    More Evidence Connecting Microbiome-Related Issues to COVID-19 Patients

    More Evidence Connecting Microbiome-Related Issues to COVID-19 Patients
    A large, prominent team of researchers represented by corresponding authors Jonas Schluter and Ken Cadwell, both affiliated with New York University Grossman…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    A large, prominent team of researchers represented by corresponding authors Jonas Schluter and Ken Cadwell, both affiliated with New York University Grossman School of Medicine, recently offered more confirmation as to the importance of the microbiome with conditions such as SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. As this media has tracked investigators from Malibu, California (Progenabiome) to Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) have detected a connection between the gut microbiome and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on this latest study result based on experimentation with mice as well as 96 COVID-19 patients at two different trial site locations revealing substantial gut microbiome dysbiosis, or a disruption to the microbiome resulting in an imbalance in the microbiota, change in functional composition and metabolic activities for example. In this study, the scientists found blooms of opportunistic pathogenic bacterial genera called antimicrobial-resistant species. The team also tested for secondary microbial bloodstream infections, analyzing blood culture results with paired microbiome data suggesting that bacteria may translocate from the gut into the “systemic circulation of COVID-19.” Schluter, Cadwell, et al share, “These results are consistent with a direct role for gut microbiome dysbiosis in enabling dangerous secondary infections during COVID-19.”


    The team summarizes that their results suggest “an unappreciated link between SARS-CoV-2 infection, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and a severe complication of COVID-19, BSIs.” What’s more, the study authors verified a disturbing loss of diversity and immune-supportive Faecalibacterium in patients with BSIs to a comparable loss of diversity in the sickest mice deliberately infected with SARS-CoV-2 verifying other labs and reports.


    What are some of these supportive studies?

    According to the authors, one recent study reproduced comparable changes in the microbiome in an antibiotics naïve cohort, indicating that viral infection causes gut dysbiosis, for example. This may occur either via gastrointestinal infection or a systemic inflammatory response.


    The authors also observed a boost in Akkermansiaceae in mice can also be seen in patient samples as well as previously in patients and in K18h-ACE2 mice. But it would appear the dysbiosis is worse in patients than mice—in humans, the microbiome can be dominated by single taxa, which isn’t observed in the mice samples. Although there are several factors that may impact these outcomes associated with mouse model limitation.


    Does SARS-CoV-2 infection lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial cells with established roles in intestinal homeostasis and gastrointestinal disease?

    Yes. They are likely the result of microbiome ecosystem shifts associated with these epithelial cell alterations.


    Does the study data here suggest that dynamics in COVID-19 patients in this context compared to those observed in cancer patients?

    Yes.


    So, in summary, the research group showcased evidence that microorganisms from the dysbiosis gut microbiome translocate into the blood of COVID-19 patients, plausibly due to a combination of the immunocompromising effects of the viral infection and antibiotic-driven depletion of commensal gut microbes?

    Yes.


    What’s their summary statement?

    This prominent study team’s finding back a hypothesis that gut-to-blood translocation of microorganisms following microbiome dysbiosis suggests a path to dangerous BSIs during COVID-19, a complication seen in other immunocompromised patients, including patients with cancer, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and in ICU patients receiving probiotics.


    What are the limitations of this research?

    A series of limitations impact this work. They include:


    Many patients infected with SARS-CoV- are exposed to other possible sources predisposing them to bacteremia, including immunosuppressive drugs, lengthy hospital stays, and catheters—the study couldn’t differentiate these factors

    Few available whole genome sequences of blood isolates are available because of discarded blood cultures associated with several BSIs, and the temporal ordering of samples—this impacts access to data

    Occasionally, stool samples were collected after observation of BSI, and this mismatch in temporal ordering is counterintuitive for gut-to-blood translocation and a causal interpretation of our associations

    Importantly the authors note that contrary to above, blood infections can populate and transform gut communities, and this is not likely the organisms identified in the blood, and the authors point out if the associations in this study write-up were not causal, they would expect no match between BSI organisms and compositions.


    Lead Research/investigator

    Jonas Schluter, Ph.D. Institute for Systems Genetics, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Corresponding Author


    Ken Cadwell, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Medicine, Recant Family Professor of Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Corresponding Author


    Call to Action: The study team thinks future investigation into the underlying mechanism behind their current observations could inform the judicious application of antibiotics and immunosuppressives in patients with respiratory viral infections and increase our resilience to pandemics.

    Did RT-PCR Testing Lead to Fatally Flawed Vaccine Results? Dr. James-Weiler & Colleagues Think So but is This Really True?

    Did RT-PCR Testing Lead to Fatally Flawed Vaccine Results? Dr. James-Weiler & Colleagues Think So but is This Really True?
    Various scientific arguments strongly emphasize that recent peer-reviewed studies point to “fatal flaws” in RT-PCR testing—that is the common…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    Various scientific arguments strongly emphasize that recent peer-reviewed studies point to “fatal flaws” in RT-PCR testing—that is the common molecular test used to identify persons that are infected and ill with SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Published recently in his Substack group, “Popular Rationalism,” scientist-researcher James-Lyons-Weiler argues that sponsors for COVID-19 vaccine studies employed the use of nonQ-RT-PCR to evaluate case status, leading to fatally flawed results.


    This declaration was quickly picked up by other figures in the anti-COVID-19 vaccine movement (also referred to as anti-vaxxers), such as Dr. Simone Gold, recently tweeting the same study finding, declaring:


    “Breaking: A peer-reviewed study shows a 42% false positive rate for COVID-19 from the nonQ-RT-PCR Test. All COVID-19 jab studies used nonQ-RT-PCR to determine case status, which means COVID-19 jab outbreak data is unreliable and flawed. This is shocking.”


    Lyons-Weiler, a PhD who earned his degree at University of Nevada Reno in Ecology Evolution and Conservation Biology, and who according to one journal’s profile has been affiliated with University of Pittsburgh (at least in the past) as a Senior Research Scientist and Director of the Bioinformatics Analysis Core, has been concerned about the use of this diagnostic technology and the risk of false positives associated with SARS-CoV-2 testing. According to Lyons-Weiler’s blog, he and Dr. Sin Han Lee early in the pandemic tried to alert the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as to their interpretation of the risks leading to the creation of NAATEC-the Nucleic Acid Assay Technology Evaluation Consortium. The group is described as an “international collaboration of scientists and doctors conducting research on the evaluation of qRT-PCR testing and other nucleic acid detection techniques used in the diagnosis of pathogens such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” Via NAATEC, Lyons-Weiler and his colleagues investigate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of PCR-testing as implemented in the diagnosis of COVID-19.


    First before summarizing Lyons-Weiler and colleagues’ argument and introducing some counter perspectives, a brief overview of this testing technology and technique used during the pandemic.


    The RT-qPCR Cycle Test Technique

    Laboratory testing has been a primary means of testing to determine who is positive with COVID-19 versus who is not, who are asymptomatic yet have the potential to transmit the virus. In fact, testing became a vital element in the three-pronged approach to reduce or even eliminate viral transmission during the pandemic including A) identification of cases, B) contact tracing, and C) quarantine and isolation of those persons deemed positive with SARS-CoV-2.


    Of course, the actual results from this strategy have been questioned. Most countries that adopted various versions of the three-track effort—and more severe places such as the countries following the so-called zero-tolerance COVID-19 policy model favored by China and chronicled by this media—experience a viral spread.


    Molecular tests are the way that SARS-CoV-2 has been identified in persons to date. Specifically, from clinical trials to real world care scenarios health agencies and health systems overwhelmingly are dependent on transcriptase—quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), also known in short as PCR testing.


    Many Americans can attest to the process, one in which first, an individual is tested via a swab sampling of the nasal or throat area. That sample is sent to a laboratory employing the PCR technique for evaluation and assessment. In the lab, the analysts review the sample for specific sequences of genetic matter evidencing characteristics of SARS-CoV-2. The challenge is that the molecular bits of genetic matter tend to be miniscule, hence the use of this diagnostic technique and the ability to break down a series of cycles to magnify the genetic matter. This magnification process repeats over and over till sufficient matter is detectable. The more cycles the less viable that eventual viral load for purposes of infectiousness.


    The point here is that using RT-qPCR in scenarios with high viral loads, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 will occur in only a few cycles, magnifying the targeted viral bits. Yet in scenarios where there are miniscule amounts of SARS-CoV-2 viral bits, it can take many RT-qPCR cycles for magnification to detect the virus. Labs set different thresholds. The cycle threshold or “Ct” refers to the actual number of RT-qPCR cycles it takes to produce a detectable amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral bits. Either way the results, whether lots of viral load or trace amounts, the result is positive. This is how viral load is determined albeit we acknowledge here in a summarized version.


    How is this approach criticized?

    Early on during the pandemic critics came forth (including Lyons-Weiler and his colleagues at NAATEC) arguing that the current process could lead the scientific community down a wrong path. Critics argue that health authorities and health systems need to know not only what individuals test positive for SARS-CoV-2 but also their level of infectiousness. The problem, critics argue, with the particular way RT-qPCR is employed is that individuals are deemed positive regardless of the amount of matter detected, meaning that it doesn’t differentiate who can actually spread the virus. Thus, critics argue perverse results occur associated with a gross misallocation of scarce public health resources, capital, and talent.


    As it turns out neither result may be in reality correct, according to a critical view. That’s because an individual can be deemed positive according to a RT-qPCR test yet are they actually infectious (remember the mass isolation in nations such as Australia and Austria)? In the real world, to become infectious an individual must first and foremost actually shed the virus. That means when someone with a large SARS-CoV-2 viral load sneezes those associated viral bits are found in the tiny droplets associated with that particular sneeze. This is true as well when that same person coughs or breathes. If an individual is sick with COVID-19, viral bits may be present in all body fluids. That’s why health authorities around the world adopted mask mandates in places with lots of people inside and close to each other. The idea was that the masks would reduce the probability of those viral fragments transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to other persons adjacent to the infected person.


    In fact, health authorities led by the United States but also Europe, China, and Russia sought an eradication of the pathogen via mass vaccination. For this to have been successful, the vaccines would need to control or stop the vast majority of viral transmissions. Of course, due to the confluence of a mutating RNA virus and durability issues, with the current class of COVID-19 vaccines this strategy failed to control the spread of the pathogen. But they did serve to induce antibodies that helped individuals, especially those at risk (elderly, comorbidity presentation) reduce the likelihood of severe infection, however, booster doses were required. But because of the lack of vaccine-driven pathogen control, mandates represented an unethical overreach by governments according to this media’s point of view.


    Back to the main topic. PCR testing does a good job of informing the health provider if the person tested is actually shedding the SARS-CoV-2 virus. But there is more to the story of COVID-19 related infectiousness. The individual must be actually positive, and the shedding must represent a viable viral presence. It turns out in many cases, an individual can be assessed as positive, yet the associated viral shedding excludes viable viral presence. SARS-CoV-2 cannot thrive and succeed in propagating itself in these scenarios.


    Samples are isolated, cultured, and analyzed in a lab setting for the ability to replicate for the actual determination of viral viability so in this way, according to critics, RT-qPCR fails to measure comprehensive infectiousness.


    But what about the relationships between Ct and infectiousness?

    Several studies during the pandemic suggest a link between cycle threshold (Ct) and infectiousness. Scientists interpret these findings to make the presumption that Ct represents a solid marker for evaluating infectiousness.


    For example, scenarios with lots of SARS-CoV-2 bits in the swab sample (low Ct values say between 10 and 20) means that most of the viral bits shed in fact are also likely infectious. As the Ct value multiplies however (remember this must be done often to detect the molecular presence of the SARS-CoV-2 viral bits), say to over 35 while the SARS-CoV-2 is detected, again implying the individual is sick with COVID-19 (or asymptomatic), there just isn’t enough genetic material to accomplish any successful culture tests in the lab. In these cases, the person’s viral shedding isn’t so-called in a viable state, and they are, in fact, not a threat to anyone. Critics will call attention to this point—imagine the waste of precious health-related assets, capital, and talent to care for people that aren’t infectious. That’s because regardless of viral viability or not goes the critics’ logic, the provider receives a positive, meaning the individual is sick and should be quarantined.


    This process, according to such a critique, is not nearly specific and granular enough for a more accurate understanding of the situation both at the individual and population levels.


    What’s the Summary?

    It turns out that advancements in molecular testing offer providers a firehose outflow of information that may help the recipient misinterpret the situation. RT-qPCR casts a wide and deep molecular net, collecting SARS-CoV-2 viral bits, even fragments of viral bits, and any detection of the matter means the person is positive.


    So, what’s wrong with this—isn’t this a good thing? According to critics, the technique should be calibrated more tightly because even though an individual can be deemed positive based on numerous Cts, these identified viral fragments could be the result of a past bout with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This means that while the individual was infected at point in time, the body can still shed the virus yet there is absolutely no viral viability—and hence no infectiousness—this goes back to the wasted health care resource argument.


    Multiple studies revealed the virus can continue to shed well after recovery. Of course, evidence is turning up cases where the actual infectious form of the virus persists in the microbiome (gut or stools) for example, suggesting long COVID may be associated with such a phenomenon. Multiple studies are revealing emerging evidence at least, in some individuals for the persistence of the infection in stools. See the work of Sabine Hazan, who heads up the microbiome testing lab Progenabiome, for such studies. A team at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) have published similar findings.


    In some cases, the virus seems dormant, but the individual continues to be sick, as possibly viral fragments exist as part of the process of the pathogen’s ongoing effort of human immune system evasion. TrialSite has chronicled this topic, particularly in the context of immunocompromised patients.


    In most cases, the person’s immune system should sufficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2, yet RT-qPCR can still detect unviable viral fragmented bits, and in line with current practice that person would be classified as positive. But perhaps, this is why many health agencies have stopped testing.


    Because of these challenges in many cases, it’s not clear if an individual’s positive test is due to a reinfection, a reactivation of the same infectious incidence, or frankly, just an artifact associated with this particular molecular testing technique.


    Critics argue that this improper use of PCR produces lots of negative side effects. For example, the decision to discharge a person from the hospital may hinge on two consecutive RT-qPCR tests, yet critics suggest this reading may be incorrect.


    Conclusion

    As Lyons-Weiler communicates, the use of this diagnostic to test COVID-19 from 20020 to the present introduces a fatal flaw that as a consequence, making purported vaccine results unreliable.


    Lyons-Weiler points to output in the journal of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law for Sing Hang Lee’s “Evidence-Based Evaluation of PCR Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron Variants by Sanger Sequencing.” See the link.


    This perspective also clashes with what has become an established approach based on a mounting body of research and real-world knowledge. Regardless of imperfections, RT-PCR diagnostics have been in place well prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and they have, according to other studies, proven exceptionally accurate. For example, an established study from 2019 that tested RT-PCR testing for Influenza A/B revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 99%. These are similar results to what's been seen in the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays. See the link.


    Summarizing the discussion above, critics shout that PCR tests are too sensitive when higher cycle thresholds are used. However, the mainstream argument suggests in these cases, the patients are all infected with SARS-CoV-2 (whether viable or not again is a different matter). The test doesn't yield false positives from other antigens. As discussed above, it does yield a positive from RNA remnants after the symptoms are resolved in many cases and probably after the patient is no longer infectious.


    As for the vaccine trials, one point of view to consider was that the design was to test symptomatic subjects. Remember, that all of those who tested positive with the extremely accurate RT-PCR were also symptomatic. Therefore, using this logic, they were likely all infected with SARS-CoV-2 and presented symptoms. It's possible that some of the subjects' symptoms were the result of other antigens i.e., RSV, bacterial, etc. However, it's overwhelmingly likely that they were the result of the infection that was confirmed and known to cause the symptoms.


    Following the logic of the Lyons-Weiler blog, would we not need to consider why the vaccinated arm didn't become symptomatic from other infection? If this was the case, then wouldn't that be a great result to find that the Covid-19 vaccines stimulate the innate immune arm and reduce the occurrence of all respiratory infections by 95% as measured by Relative Risk Reduction (RRR).


    Importantly, this media early on was one of the first to critically vet vaccine quality evidence (via review of preclinical biodistribution and other regulatory artifacts), as well as performance in the form of durability—as the RNA-based virus mutated that impacted vaccine durability meaning the high RRR didn’t last as long as anyone would like--but that’s another matter. This media was also the first industry-focused clinical trials channel to discuss safety risks associated with the vaccine. TrialSite is possibly the only media across America, and perhaps worldwide, that consistently reports on both study results evidencing positive attributes of the COVID-19 vaccines as well as issues and concerns, from durability challenges to side effects and injuries to the seemingly cozy relationship between government and industry during the pandemic. Don’t forget objective, unbiased media becomes absolutely essential for a functioning democracy.


    Call to Action: TrialSite refers to an analysis from the College of American Pathologists explaining both the strengths and weaknesses of RT-PCR. See the link.


    This media recommends for those interested to study the different points of view and perspectives—bodies of evidence, and determine as objectively as possible the situation. What’s your thoughts on the topic?


    Paul Elkins helped contribute to this piece.


    References


    Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Fatal Flaw in PCR Testing: 42% False Discovery Rate for SARS-CoV-2 nonQ-RT-PCR Test. This means COVID-19 Vaccine Outcomes Rate Data are Unreliable and Invalid
    All COVID-19 Vaccine Studies Used nonQ-RT-PCR to determine case status. All of the estimates of outcome are unreliable. This is the most important study we…
    popularrationalism.substack.com

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Forget amnesty and apologies for COVID oppression and fascism

    Forget amnesty and apologies for COVID oppression and fascism
    Now that Republicans seem likely to get control of the House, calls are coming for forgiveness of those that did everything wrong, but they should lose their…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    Now that Republicans seem likely to get control of the House, calls are coming for forgiveness of those that did everything wrong, but they should lose their jobs and be prosecuted. It is not a question of revenge or vindictiveness. For all those who are genuinely well informed about the pandemic and COVID, it should be crystal clear that all the senior people in the key federal agencies (CDC, FDA, and NIH) who did everything wrong should be punished. They should lose their jobs and be criminally prosecuted. From the very beginning of the pandemic in early 2020, there were physicians and scientists who were doing and saying the correct things to prevent and cure COVID. Moreover, there was an unending stream of publications that used solid research to show that all the public health and government actions were ineffective and, in the case of COVID vaccines, very harmful.


    But now, fear seems to be settling in among the many in and outside the government. So, they are making ludicrous cases for accepting their apologies and getting forgiveness.


    But when you accept the ugly truth that many millions of people have suffered medical harm and death from the lockdowns, covid mandates, school closings, ineffective hospital protocols, and blockage of safe and effective generic medicines that were proven alternatives to vaccines, then you should be angry and demand justice.


    Let’s be clear. No one in power, especially Fauci, ever really followed the science. All their actions have done incredible harm to public trust in science. All their malfeasance had to do with power, control, and helping big drug companies make billions of dollars from vaccines and ineffective drugs like remdesivir.


    Perhaps, the best example of wrong-headed thinking is the article: “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty.” Here is a key example of very bad thinking: “Given the amount of uncertainty, almost every position was taken on every topic. And on every topic, someone was eventually proved right, and someone else was proved wrong.” A wise physician noted: “The author is demanding to receive forgiveness for their conduct, but in their apology, is refusing to admit they did anything wrong. …In reading this analysis, it is important to remember that many people make their decisions based on what their peers or the media tells them to do (which is likely the audience this article was written for) rather than being self-directed and using critical thinking to discern which decision makes the most sense to them. As a result, we almost certainly interpreted this article dramatically differently from its intended audience which is receptive to this style of persuasion.”


    “Thinking about this article more, I believe the fundamental logical error in this article is that leaders should be absolved of their responsibility for making incorrect decisions if there was a degree of uncertainty with the information at hand. This is not the standard we have held our leaders to, as their job is always to make the best decision they can with the information that is available, and in most eras, if the decision was correct, they were praised for their leadership, whereas if the decision was incorrect they were blamed for their mistakes. The ‘but I couldn’t have known!’ excuse has never been deemed an acceptable way for leaders to justify their mistakes.”


    And there is this wise view: “I think the degree to which the vaccines were a scam is going to red-pill a lot of people who had previously been subservient to media propaganda, and if we patiently wait, much more genuine apologies will be forthcoming.”


    The point is that there were always terrific medical experts, such as Dr. Peter McCullough, who from the beginning, knew what was correct and used every means to inform the public. But the mainstream media was and remains a co-conspirator in supporting official incorrect and harmful policies and strategies. There is no doubt that now, they will make an effort to protect all the guilty government and public health officials before House Republicans get the power to reveal all the criminal behaviors that have caused the death of over one million Americans and medical harm to over 30 million.


    Just today, as an example of media disinformation, the Washington Post said an NIH official “pointed out that both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine target human proteins but have yet to show any value in fighting covid-19.” That is contrary to mountains of medical studies and clinical practice that have found both to be effective for COVID.


    I am not impressed by the mea culpa of the head of CDC: “For 75 years,” Walensky told a press gathering on August 15, “CDC and public health have been preparing for Covid-19, and in our big moment, our performance did not reliably meet expectations.”


    Sorry, not good enough. She, Fauci, and many others deserve punishment for pandemic mismanagement and COVID malpractice. For example, a New York Post article noted: “Rochelle Walensky at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, allowed Weingarten [school teachers union official] to craft absurd, unscientific policies that kept kids out of school.” Further: “Consider that, just four days before Walensky’s statement, the CDC undid much of the guidance it had spent more than two years inventing, justifying, and enforcing. On August 11, the CDC substantially relaxed its Covid guidance by dropping social distancing, suggesting that masking is needed only around sick people or those with an active case, and dropping the need to quarantine for unvaccinated individuals, suggesting instead a five-day period of self-imposed isolation. Routine testing by employers and schools is no longer part of CDC guidance. The CDC largely removed schools, businesses, and institutions from an enforcement role on social distancing, masking, and quarantining and reduced its suggested booster frequency to once a year.”


    Sorry, not enough. CDC has been both a disgrace and failure. All its senior officials should be fired.


    Forget apologies and forgiveness. If we are ever to get better pandemic management in the future, then all the incompetent, corrupt, and guilty officials and doctors must be given justice and punishment. Reject their apologies. It is just a tactic to avoid genuine justice.


    LET’S DECLARE A PANDEMIC AMNESTY

    Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty
    We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID.
    www.theatlantic.com


    Dissecting the Deceptive Plea for COVID-19 Amnesty

    Dissecting the Deceptive Plea for COVID-19 Amnesty
    One of the challenges I find with most forms of media is that the creators of it are continually seeking to manipulate you into adopting their position. For…
    amidwesterndoctor.substack.com

    IMO, there should be some accountability, but I doubt we will see much of that. The bureaucrats running the US Federal agencies (Fauci for example), will be investigated, but doubtful they will face any kind of punishment, even if found to have lied (which he clearly did), and were negligent. Politicians made many dumb mistakes, while some were outright dictatorial, but the only way to hold them accountable is via elections, not US House committees.


    Too bad, because if anything, the past 3 years has shown us how corrupt the US Federal bureaucracy (in this case the FDA/CDC/NIH) has become. They are literally in bed with those they regulate. That is not a matter in dispute, as it has been revealed they have a revolving door jobs program with big pharma, and are allowed to invest in their stock. There is definitely something wrong with that.

    Quote from Shane D.

    but the only way to hold them accountable is via elections, not US House committees.

    This does not work in the USA. Since about 20 years only FM/R/JF members get the money to run for senate/congress. So you can only choose between a red or a blue pig.


    Pigs just want to eat as much money as they can. Almost all of them will cheat you.


    Only way out found a new explicitly pig free party!

    A silent killer’ - COVID-19 shown to trigger inflammation in the brain

    ‘A silent killer’ - COVID-19 shown to trigger inflammation in the brain
    Research led by UQ has found COVID-19 activates the same inflammatory response in the brain as Parkinson’s disease.
    www.uq.edu.au


    Research led by The University of Queensland has found COVID-19 activates the same inflammatory response in the brain as Parkinson’s disease.


    The discovery identified a potential future risk for neurodegenerative conditions in people who’ve had COVID-19, but also a possible treatment.


    The UQ team was led by Professor Trent Woodruff and Dr Eduardo Albornoz Balmaceda from UQ’s School of Biomedical Sciences, and virologists from the School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences.


    “We studied the effect of the virus on the brain’s immune cells, ‘microglia’ which are the key cells involved in the progression of brain diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s,” Professor Woodruff said.


    “Our team grew human microglia in the laboratory and infected the cells with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.


    “We found the cells effectively became ‘angry’, activating the same pathway that Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s proteins can activate in disease, the inflammasomes.”


    Dr Albornoz Balmaceda said triggering the inflammasome pathway sparked a ‘fire’ in the brain, which begins a chronic and sustained process of killing off neurons.


    “It’s kind of a silent killer, because you don’t see any outward symptoms for many years,” Dr Albornoz Balmaceda said.


    “It may explain why some people who’ve had COVID-19 are more vulnerable to developing neurological symptoms similar to Parkinson’s disease.”


    Vitamin D Receptor Inhibits NLRP3 Activation by Impeding Its BRCC3-Mediated Deubiquitination

    Vitamin D Receptor Inhibits NLRP3 Activation by Impeding Its BRCC3-Mediated Deubiquitination
    The NLRP3 inflammasome is a multiprotein oligomer responsible for activation of the inflammatory response by promoting the maturation and secretion of the…
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


    Vitamin D and Parkinson's Disease

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go…ly%20twenty%20years%20ago.


    Vitamin D and its' role in Parkinson's disease patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A review article

    Vitamin D and its' role in Parkinson's disease patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A review article
    A novel coronavirus reportedly called 2019-nCoV started to spread around the world at the end of 2019. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2…
    www.sciencedirect.com


    The relationships of vitamin D, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and vitamin D supplementation with Parkinson’s disease

    The relationships of vitamin D, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and vitamin D supplementation with Parkinson’s disease - Translational Neurodegeneration
    In recent years, many studies have investigated the correlations between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and vitamin D status, but the conclusion remains elusive. The…
    translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com

    Campaign to free Dr. Jackie Stone grows as Zimbabwean president spotlighted

    Campaign to free Dr. Jackie Stone grows as Zimbabwean president spotlighted
    Dr Jackie Stone, MD is a globally respected medical figure known for saving lives and pioneering treatment options during the Covid era. Rather than being…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    Dr Jackie Stone, MD is a globally respected medical figure known for saving lives and pioneering treatment options during the Covid era. Rather than being respected for saving lives at great personal and professional expense, Dr Stone is currently being threatened with trumped up charges and a custodial sentence in Zimbabwe, for upholding her Oath.


    At a time when fear was gripping the world, Dr Stone did not sit by the sidelines. Instead, she sprang into action, ultimately reducing suffering and death in Zimbabwe by using widely available, innovative, and safe tools like ivermectin and colloidal silver. Dr Stone then worked tirelessly to share her findings with healthcare professionals around the world.


    Despite her success, medical institutions the world over have neglected the opportunity to learn from Dr Stone and honor her noble work. Instead, the Medicines Council Authority of Zimbabwe is attempting to punish her despite a lack of lawful charges or evidence.


    Read World Council for Health’s statement in support of Dr Jackie Stone


    Unsubstantiated charges against Dr Jackie Stone

    Dr Stone is being persecuted with a plethora of unsubstantiated charges, and intends to lay criminal charges against various parties. Charges against her include:


    Contravening section 135 2 (a) of the Health Professions Act (Pertaining to Advertising)

    Contravening section 92 of the Health Professions Act (Practicing without a license)

    Contravening section 99 of the Health Professions Act (Practicing from an Unlicensed Health Institution)

    Contravening section 29 of the Medicines and Allied Substances Control Act (Use of specified [banned] substances)

    Counter charges and claims by Dr Jackie Stone and her team


    Impersonating an inspector

    Unlawful inspection of property

    Theft and production of a fraudulent report

    False testimony under oath

    Defamation (crimen injuria)

    Illegal procedures and processes

    Manipulation of the law for personal gain

    Council misled the state and the magistrate

    Undeclared conflicts of interest

    Collusion with the complainants

    Criminal abuse of office

    URGENT CALL TO ACTION


    During C19, Dr Jackie Stone saved lives in Zimbabwe, Africa and around the world. Now she faces jail time in Zimbabwe for daring to uphold her Hippocratic Oath.


    AFRICA ASKS FOR YOUR SUPPORT


    Dr Stone is back in Harare court Thursday 3 November 2022. Magistrates Court 6 or 10 or 14 (near the Sheraton). Please be there to support Dr Jackie Stone.


    SOUTH AFRICA’S PEACEFUL DEMO


    If you can, join the peaceful demo in South Africa


    Date: 6:30am, Thursday 3 November 2022


    Place: 798 Merton Drive, Tshwane PTA (Zimbabwe Embassy)


    TAKE FURTHER URGENT ACTION


    Email your support for Dr Jackie to:

    [email protected](Justice Dept)

    [email protected](Medicines Council)

    Tweet the President: @edmnangagwa (President)

    Facebook: Emmerson Dambudzo Mnangagwa

    PREVIOUS ARTICLE SUPPORTING DR STONE


    Jailed for saving lives? Free Dr Jackie Stone (substack.com)

    COMMENTS SUPPORTING DR JACKIE STONE


    Hi Shabnam,


    This is very disturbing. Dr Stone worked tirelessly through the pandemic, she risked her own health and life to help many people. My questions is ,why then did MCAZ allow Ivermectin to be imported into the country for the aid in fighting COVID-19? The Government approved it. Ivermectin is known to be used in other countries as far as Australia. Why is Dr Stone being persecuted, yet Pharmacys had pre-made packs for COVID-19 - One for Treatment and the other for Prevention, and in those packs was Ivermectin? I myself and my family took Ivermectin - these were not prescribed by Dr Stone, we got them from the pharmacy. What is going on here? Gratitude for Dr Stone's tireless work is seriously lacking.


    We pray our President can intervene.


    Regards, Manuella



    Thank heavens the government of Zimbabwe approved the import and use of Ivermectin.


    I myself needed treatment by Dr Jackie Stone who saved my life from COVID when I caught it at the end of 2020 and again end of 2021. I had Double Bronchial Pneumonia and a collapsed lung many years ago, so she certainly saved my life with all her treatments. My blood count contained raised D-Dimers and was told I was about to have a pulmonary embolism so I can thank her and her treatment for being alive today, when so many people around the world lost theirs.


    Stella Ward



    Doctor Stone who did the utmost to save lives during the worst of the pandemic ...and now faces prosecution …to all those who benefited from her services over all the years...please stand up for her. For a good person to be silent at a time like now...is as bad as prosecuting her yourself... Stand up as one or divided you will fall..


    Concerned Citizen



    Conclusion

    The case of Dr Jackie Stone is a test for anyone who believes in access to health care and free speech. Given attempts in several countries to silence health care workers, it is incumbent on civil society to stand with them, and in doing so, for ourselves.

    Quote from Fm1

    Vitamin D and its' role in Parkinson's disease patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A review article

    This is not enough: You must add V-B50 or VB100 = highly concentrated V-B complex. And key is to take Ivermectin as it protects the myelin sheath of the nerves and can regenerate them!!!!

    Quote from Fm1

    Conclusion

    The case of Dr Jackie Stone is a test for anyone who believes in access to health care and free speech.

    The real test is to find out who (Pfizer/Moderna) bribed the government and did force the vaxx induced killing of countless humans.

    Dr. John Campbell: Excess deaths continue

    "I must be very careful what I say" - or banned


    ---and Deaths should be Lower as dry tinder and brought forward eliminated tens of thousands - but this is ignored as is jab


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    The Amnesty Trope


    Like all other Lockdown and Poison Jab Excuses : The "We Didn't Know" Lie


    We (I) knew everything we needed to know about SARS-2 already in February 2020 (Diamond Princess being glaring example). The pandemicists and their supporters crossed many bright red lines in their eradicationist zeal and ruined untold millions of lives. That doesn’t all just go away now


    Some recent exposes of Emily Oster's promotion test



    Emily Oster proposes “a pandemic amnesty,” suggests that “we need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID”


    I don’t know much about the American pandemic pundits, but I gather that Brown University economist and “parenting guru” Emily Oster is far from the worst of them...


    ...Emily " But the thing is: We didn’t know"


    The thing is, Emily Oster, that we did know...


    Emily Oster proposes “a pandemic amnesty,” suggests that “we need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID”
    I don’t know much about the American pandemic pundits, but I gather that Brown University economist and “parenting guru” Emily Oster is far from the worst of…
    www.eugyppius.com


    Oops, sorry - PJW

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    They didn't just smear us, they censored us, sacked us, denied us services, denied us the right to travel and assemble, destroyed our businesses, left our loved ones to die alone, then denied our attendance at their funerals


    Once More on Renowned Fool Emily Oster, and the Malign Influence of Head Girls More Generally


    Our governing elite are increasingly selected not for intelligence or ability, but for conscientiousness, agreeability and conformity. The consequence is a new kind of midwit tyranny


    Once More on Renowned Fool Emily Oster, and the Malign Influence of Head Girls More Generally
    Our governing elite are increasingly selected not for intelligence or ability, but for conscientiousness, agreeability and conformity. The consequence is a new…
    www.eugyppius.com


    eg Pixie Balls Cooper, Emily Thornberry MP Lab; Caroline Nokes, Theresa May, MP Con; Sturgeon, SNP; Amber Rudd, Soubry ex Con MP


    Comments "Our governing elite are increasingly selected not for intelligence or ability, but for conscientious, agreeability and conformity. The consequence is a new kind of midwit tyranny."

    - Exactly. Perfectly expressed


    Igor Chudov, Writes Igor’s Newsletter; Liked by eugyppius

    "I disagree with Prof. Oster and want Covid criminals punished for poisoning millions of people and taking away our civil liberties.


    That said, Emily is not the thought leader here -- she was selected to launch this amnesty "trial balloon" as a pleasantly appearing individual who was not implicated in the nastiest of behaviors.


    There was a reason why "they" selected Emily and not Dr Leana Wen or Monica Gandhi.


    Emily here is not the mastermind of the amnesty idea -- she is a figurehead. She is not exactly dumb, but being "data driven" without realizing that data is supplied by crooks shows lack of thinking, possibly intentional"



    Lockdown Proponent Calls for Amnesty – But Where’s the Apology?

    [Look at photo - looks like Sturgeon, BBC, C4 "Head Girl" Devi Srindar]


    I’ll admit, I nearly spat out my coffee when I saw Brown Professor Emily Oster’s new headline in the Atlantic on Monday morning: “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty: We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about Covid.”


    It’s the headline we’ve been waiting to see – and, in the revisionist, gaslighting style that’s become the journalistic norm on the response to Covid – it’s about the closest thing to an outright admission of guilt that we’ve seen since Covid began...


    ...On the contrary, studies have long shown that it was the mandates themselves that caused the public to panic, making them believe their chances of dying of Covid – which never had an overall infection fatality rate much higher than 0.2% – were hundreds of times greater than they really were


    Further, there’s a growing mountain of evidence that the handful of key officials who led the initial push for unprecedented lockdowns and mandates did not, in fact, do so in good faith....



    Lockdown Proponent Calls for Amnesty – But Where’s the Apology?
    I’ll admit, I nearly spat out my coffee when I saw Brown Professor Emily Oster’s new headline in the Atlantic on Monday
    dailysceptic.org

    Good News



    “Finland Refuses to Recommend Bivalent Boosters for Working-Age People”


    The Finnish health authority outright refused to recommend bivalent boosters for working-age people and children and acknowledged vaccines cause damage to immune systems, writes Igor Chudov


    Compare this to the US, where the Biden administration demands five-year-olds to take their useless bivalent booster two months after these 5-year-olds get their previous useless monovalent booster

    Finland REFUSES to Recommend Bivalent Boosters for Working-Age People
    THL: Boosters Weaken Immunological Response!
    igorchudov.substack.com


    Comment

    "shibumi; Liked by Igor Chudov

    I guess the question is.... at the start of the C0VID con, how many nations knew this was a depop program?


    It seems to me that right now, a number of places are dialing down the depop, which suggests to me they might not have been fully aware what what going on.


    Interesting that the Five Eyes nations-- US, UK, Canada, AU and NZ-- are all still fully vested in k*lling as many legal citizens-- preferably white -- as they can"

    Quote from PSK

    Interesting that the Five Eyes nations-- US, UK, Canada, AU and NZ-- are all still fully vested in k*lling as many legal citizens-- preferably white -- as they can"

    This relaxes most big companies social welfare programs by billions. The group age >65 is now dying with about 50% excess. Remember the UK 17% excess deaths include all people. But age >64 is at most 1/5 and they deliver at least 90% of the excess deaths.

    The first year benefit is about 15'000* 30'000& but each year ads a new junk so the benefit will grow over time and best case the excess death rate will grow too....

    Quote from Wyttenbach

    This relaxes most big companies social welfare programs by billions. The group age >65 is now dying with about 50% excess. Remember the UK 17% excess deaths include all people. But age >64 is at most 1/5 and they deliver at least 90% of the excess deaths.

    The first year benefit is about 15'000* 30'000& but each year ads a new junk so the benefit will grow over time and best case the excess death rate will grow too....


    One might as well get the politically incorrect idea that this was all about reducing P, S, C and E in this equation.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

    Nucleus 1 Like 1
    Quote from Curbina

    One might as well get the politically incorrect idea that this was all about reducing P, S, C and E in this equation.

    NO! It was the first information war against the western population. Shutdown of all control functions has been achieved. Some 10..20'000'000'000'000 $$$$$ have been stolen by be FM/R/JF/B mafia each of the last two years.

    Charges for mostly useless PCR test were up to 40x above cost (real is 7$ including benefits!). Crap like Remdesivir has been use to actively kill people:: Cost 50'000..500'000 in USA (here far less).

    Quicktests cost 30.50 cents are sold up to 20..40$... Ivermectin is overpriced by 100..1000x compare to India = 10 cents a tablet of 12mg.

    Masks have been sold for > 50$ 100 pieces real price with large benefit 5$.

    Additional 50.100'000 hart attacks have been generated with a price tag of up to 500'000$


    As vaccines give no protection for others most states did introduce terror rules (certificates) to forcefully control/damage people. Vaxxinated got a free pass albeit they have been the only source of troubles. Recovered/tested were always safe.


    Even most human rights (e.g. for labor) have been killed by the FM/R/JF fascists.

    The fish stinks from the head! When so called top of US science (Harvard,Yale) forces students to take 10000% useless - because not protecting anybody! - boosters then there is no more hope for USA!

    U.S. Court Split in Challenge to COVID Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers + More
    The Defender’s Big Brother NewsWatch brings you the latest headlines related to governments’ abuse of power, including attacks on democracy, civil liberties…
    childrenshealthdefense.org


    As the U.S. braces for the possibility of a winter surge in COVID-19 cases, some colleges and universities are requiring their students to receive the new bivalent booster shot.

    Among those schools are Harvard University, Tufts University, and Wellesley College in Massachusetts; Yale University in Connecticut; and Fordham University in New York City.


    Bivalent boosters are the most criminal try so far to kill people as these lead to severe immunological consequences. ("destroy" CoV-19 immune memory)

    How the Pfizer/Moderna FM/R/F terror unfolded::


    https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11024-022-09479-4.pdf


    Abstract The emergence of COVID-19 has led to numerous controversies over

    COVID-related knowledge and policy. To counter the perceived threat from doctors

    and scientists who challenge the official position of governmental and intergovern-

    mental health authorities, some supporters of this orthodoxy have moved to censor

    those who promote dissenting views. The aim of the present study is to explore the

    experiences and responses of highly accomplished doctors and research scientists

    from different countries who have been targets of suppression and/or censorship

    following their publications and statements in relation to COVID-19 that challenge

    official views. Our findings point to the central role played by media organizations,

    and especially by information technology companies,....

    Zimbabwe Court Sentences Dr. Jackie Stone on 2 Charges; Drops 2 Charges & No Jail Time: But the Physician Plans on Hitting Back

    Zimbabwe Court Sentences Dr. Jackie Stone on 2 Charges; Drops 2 Charges & No Jail Time: But the Physician Plans on Hitting Back
    Recently, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed reported that Dr. Jackie Stone of Zimbabwe, a globally respected medical figure known for saving lives and pioneering…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    Recently, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed reported that Dr. Jackie Stone of Zimbabwe, a globally respected medical figure known for saving lives and pioneering treatment options during the Covid era, faced criminal charges—considered trumped up by many—for daring to follow the Hippocratic Oath as opposed to a rigid, top down protocol that offered no care at the time for COVID-19 patients. It was earlier in the pandemic, and Dr. Jackie Stone was one of a network of physicians using off-label repurposed drugs to treat COVID-19 patients early in the infection lifecycle. The results appeared quite good, and in fact, this media reported that because of Stone’s work, the Zimbabwe regulator—the Medicines and Control Authority of Zimbabwe or “MCAZ” actually lifted important restrictions on ivermectin, allowing the drug to come into the country for COVID-19 research purposes, including real world case series. This media chronicled this carefully and links that action to Stone’s positive impact. An advocate and supporter of the Zimbabwe government, Stone was concerned about the nation’s Medical Council and their bias against repurposed drugs despite the fact that earlier on during the pandemic there were no treatments nor vaccines. TrialSite sources suggest various medical establishment forces in that country seek to punish Dr. Stone for actually helping patients, including elite members of the military and government. Dr. Stone was sentenced today. Two of the four charges against her were dropped. She was fined on the other two and thankfully, there was no jail sentence.


    Stone has interviewed on more than one occasion with TrialSite. A passionate, intelligent, and directed physician-researcher, Stone has serious concerns about pharmaceutical industry bias permeating through the Zimbabwean government.


    Stone told TrialSite, “While I was sentenced, giving me a criminal record, I can certainly tell you that doctors and scientists all over the world will be questioning the Zimbabwean judicial system.”


    As with other nations around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic, Zimbabwe is no exception. Doctors are being persecuted simply for using their judgment, expertise, and knowledge to treat ill patients and save lives.


    According to Stone, like many other places, “The Zimbabwe Government’s reliance on an ‘Expert Advisory Committee’ who comes out with guidelines to stop affordable treatments and threatens pharmacists and doctors with police action if we prescribe Vitamin C, D, and Zinc.”


    Unfortunately, this has been a trend around the world, as during COVID-19, a confluence of forces—either national government or even supranational entities, pharmaceutical industry, and well-financed non-government agencies (NGOs) were dedicated to mass vaccination as an eradication scheme targeting SARS-CoV-2 influence national regulators, research institutes, and public health agencies to align with a regimen that favors branded vaccines and pharmaceuticals.


    TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor wondered aloud, “While we all know big corporate money somewhat runs the world, why can’t doctors be doctors—and be allowed to help patients in the field at the local level especially earlier on in the crisis when Dr. Stone had nothing else to work with? TrialSite closely tracked the considerable turnaround of cases based on her protocols at a time when there was no vaccine or therapies. She should be celebrated as a positive Zimbabwe national figure.”


    Stone’s concerns about so-called experts in various committees, such as the COVID-19 Expert Advisory Committee, include the allegation of a heavy bias toward an industry and government entanglements—with Chinese vaccine producers and global agencies such as Unitaid led by at least, some persons that don’t even practice in the clinic on a daily basis.


    According to Stone, “Some of them have never even seen a sick COVID-19 patient.” She emphasized,

    “I am afraid that this whole process has been subverted by persons with profound conflict of interest and biases.”


    Concerns of corruption are real in this country. According to a report by Transparency International, at the start of the pandemic, thousands of citizens reported concerns involving the interplay of the pandemic and outright governmental corruption.


    Could Stone be caught up in a much bigger geopolitical game, as China has claimed Zimbabwe as a market for its vaccine and medicinal products, while both that Communist nation and the World health Organization have praised the Zimbabwe response to the pandemic, as expressed in African news sources. Yet WHO and China were nowhere to be found when surges of COVID-19 at the end of 2020 and early 2021 claimed many lives (5,606 deaths were lost due to COVID-19).


    TrialSite documented how Stone and a front-line group of physicians used ivermectin and other repurposed regimens to reduce morbidity and mortality in the country. A year later, they were even able to document some of the real-world clinical interventions. See the link.


    While the bigger story for ivermectin doesn’t look promising in the rich economies where the pharma lobby rules, numerous low-and-middle-country (LMIC) markets embraced ivermectin, at least, for a time during the pandemic. In addition to MCAZ authoring the use for research (and indirectly for off label care if documented, India, and several other countries allowed the use of ivermectin on an emergency or provisional basis for a period of time during pandemic surges.


    Fast forward to today and about 31% of this poor yet up and coming African nation have been vaccinated with Chinese vaccines. At the start of the year, China announced the donation of 10 million vaccine doses from Sinovac and Sinopharm, as reported in Reuters.


    The nation’s current president, Emmerson Dambudzo Mnangagwa faces a big forthcoming election, and according to Dr. Stone, this current judicial system climate—one that highlights what she considers an illicit prosecution against updating doctors trying to save local folks’ lives--doesn’t show the African nation in the best light. A big advocate of a strong Zimbabwe, Stone told TrialSite she hopes for a mutually beneficial outcome—one that betters the health of Zimbabwean people, improves the government standing, and ensures that doctors and patients have choices.


    Stone’s concerned that so-called experts making up the nation’s COVID-19 Expert Advisory Committee such as Professor Rashida Ferrand, a British citizen, and other so-called objective and neutral experts be called out for what she believes they are—biased persons that are part of an agenda that isn’t necessarily helping the health care of everyday Zimbabweans.


    Zimbabwe responded well to the pandemic, and ivermectin combinations much like in Uttar Pradesh, Mexico City, and other places was absolutely part of the regimen that appeared to be quite successful.


    Remember, the World Health Organization praised the state of Uttar Pradesh for their aggressive state public agency outreach program that included home medicine kits. While fact-checkers deny the role of ivermectin, that drug along with doxycycline, zinc, and other supplements was extensively used to successfully fight back and overcome the delta surge in the world’s second most populous nation. When the WHO issued their praises in the form of a press release, the global health agency mentioned everything, even the use of home medicine kits, but conveniently forgot to mention that ivermectin tablets were in those kits.


    Dr. Stone has a legal team and will appeal the decisions today, already a legal battle representing a fight of her life. Yet she takes solace knowing that she did everything possible to save lives during the pandemic. And in fact, real-world data suggests that’s exactly what she accomplished.


    What was Stone charged with?

    Considered unsubstantiated by Stone and her defense team, she will appeal the prosecution; one that she claims is based on a plethora of unsubstantiated charge includes:


    Contravening section 135 2 (a) of the Health Professions Act (Pertaining to Advertising)

    Contravening section 92 of the Health Professions Act (Practicing without a license)

    Contravening section 99 of the Health Professions Act (Practicing from an Unlicensed Health Institution)

    Contravening section 29 of the Medicines and Allied Substances Control Act (Use of specified [banned] substances)

    Dr. Stone’s appeal will include counter charges and claims:

    Impersonating an inspector

    Unlawful inspection of property

    Theft and production of a fraudulent report

    False testimony under oath

    Defamation (crimen injuria)

    Illegal procedures and processes

    Manipulation of the law for personal gain

    Council misled the state and the magistrate

    Undeclared conflicts of interest

    Collusion with the complainants

    Criminal abuse of office

    What’s next?

    In addition to planned legal appeals, a protest occurred today in South Africa starting at 6:30AM at the Zimbabwe Embassy in Pretoria.


    Also, for those that want to express further support:


    Email your support for Dr Jackie to:

    [email protected] (Justice Dept)

    [email protected]

    Tweet the President: @edmnangagwa (President)

    Facebook: Emmerson Dambudzo Mnangagwa

    Kansas Bans TV Ads for Covid Vaccine

    Kansas Bans TV Ads for Covid Vaccine
    Kansas appears to be following Florida with their recommendation against the Covid-19 vaccine. However, it looks like the Sunflower State may go even further…
    www.trialsitenews.com


    Kansas appears to be following Florida with their recommendation against the Covid-19 vaccine. However, it looks like the Sunflower State may go even further than the Sunshine State. Kansas lawmakers have pulled television advertising from broadcast focused on the COVID-19 vacicnes. The ads claim the Covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective, and Kansas lawmakers object to that claim. How things are changing in America during COVID-19.


    Decision Made During Health Agency Hearing

    The decision to pull the ads came during a confirmation hearing for Janet Stanek, the acting secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE). Stanek affirmed the state is pulling ads for the Covid vaccine, and that health officials were obtaining “informed consent” for the vaccination. "One thing we've done is revisited the ads, which were brought up by many of you, and we have removed the TV ads," Stanek said. "We are making sure that in reviewing all of our ads that if we do have an advertisement or something that might mention getting the vaccine, that there is a link, and we are encouraging people to follow up with their doctor."


    Stanek was questioned by Kansas State Senator Mark Steffen, who has been interviewed by TrialSite News. Steffen is also a physician. During the hearing Steffen remarked, "When it comes to the COVID shot ... we talked about the problem that KDHE was basically saying 'safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective,' when we have a CDC VAERS reporting system that ties 20,000-plus deaths, and more complications, to these shots than all the other vaccines combined." While VAERS reports are not necessarily linked to the vaccination program, the number of entries are far higher than at any time before.


    Stanek Appointed by the Governor

    Stanek was appointed by Kansas Governor Laura Kelly in November of 2021 after firing the previous health secretary. Senator Steffen has promoted ivermectin as a remedy for Covid and has issues with the Federal Government dictating treatment. Steffen questioned Stanek about educating the Kansas public. “You've been in this interim position while cases skyrocketed. Did you do anything to help people understand what their early treatment options were ... any educating, any public service announcements in regard to early treatments?"


    Stanek said she had followed guidelines set by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the American Medical Association (AMA). Steffen’s response was, “Are you comfortable with the concept that individuals have to be sacrificed for the well-being of society? Like pushing vaccines so hard. You knew people were going to be injured, you knew people were being injured, and yet we didn't hear anything about that." Stanek said people should read the CDC publications about the vaccines and speak with their doctors. Steffen has previously advocated for alternative treatment for the Covid-19 virus. In this case, the state senator made his point.


    Kansas, much like Florida, represent states making moves to protect their populations from the COVID-19 vaccines. Undoubtedly other announcements are coming soon.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.