The Totally Civil Covid Thread. (Closing 31/05)

Is the public subsidising Big Pharma's 'license to kill'?

Is the public subsidising Big Pharma's 'license to kill'?

n this power-packed interview, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed hosts Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense Fund founder and President. A former Wall Street…

rumble.com

n this power-packed interview, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed hosts Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense Fund founder and President. A former Wall Street executive, and a filmmaker, Manookian works collaboratively to reform what she calls the largest international criminal syndicate: Big Pharma.

In this informative interview, find out about:

a) How the public subsidises Big Pharma, which captured the FDA through exorbitant schemes akin to racketeering

b) Fraud, the WHO, a citizen's petition against the FDA, and the CDC admitting to mistakes to avoid accountability

c) A shocking case of Disney vs a employee harassed for the C19 shot, and a winning mask mandate case exposing 'deep state'

d) Informed consent: Critical battleground for health, environment and democracy vs the inherent dangers of a bio-security state

e) Three clear and achievable reforms towards protecting human rights and restoring public trust in science

Telegram: @TrialSiteNews

Website: http://www.trialsitenews.com

#TrialSiteNews #DefendingFreedom #DefendingScience #Uncensored

British/Australian Weekly Features TrialSite Contributor: Is Graphene Oxide in the COVID-19 Vaccines?

British/Australian Weekly Features TrialSite Contributor: Is Graphene Oxide in the COVID-19 Vaccines?

Online rumors, chatter, and then emerging reports of strange objects found in the COVID-19 vaccine vials have been circulating for over a year now. Some of the…

www.trialsitenews.com

Online rumors, chatter, and then emerging reports of strange objects found in the COVID-19 vaccine vials have been circulating for over a year now. Some of the babble clearly seems questionable, if not the material of what this media considered outlandish conspiratorial rant: the stuff of loons and conspiracy junkies. These include claims that the vaccines consist of self-assembling, disassembling metallic nanobots, part of some sinister covert defense operation masking as medicine to save the world. The sinister Orwellian goal—use the COVID-19 vaccine to control the population, while also paring down the planet’s population so a cadre of elite globalists can monopolize the beauty and bounty of Earth? Of course, such talk is just ridiculous, serving to impede and even sabotage any serious movement to legitimately question and investigate the COVID-19 vaccination program. Yet this media cannot deny that there are reports coming out of various countries now that in fact, do point to inexplicable objects in the mRNA vaccines that manifest in various microscopic examinations. With metallic-looking lustrous squares and various other shapes that do look strangely more like what one would expect when viewing microscopically some kind of advanced nano-technology product rather than the contents of an mRNA vaccine, a consensus of concerned, albeit still predominantly fringe critical thinkers grows for governments to formally investigate.

While alternative media or individual contributors on Substack have been reporting on these strange objects for a while now, purportedly identifiable via microscopic examination--some commentators have suggested that they seem to look like graphene oxide---the topic brought up until lately, by the fringe. This includes alternative media sources seeking to capitalize (and monetize) growing anti-government sentiment due to the pandemic response. By this point, however, it becomes difficult to avoid the accumulation of independent study findings, ones that do point to the apparent veracity of the bizarre microscopic images.

TrialSite monitored these reports by early 2021, tracking the topic but avoiding any actual reporting on the matter. This media had suspicions about some of these reports early on—questioning why they were not subjected to the typical scientific process (e.g., group of scientists, write up findings, upload to preprint server to try to get the output peer-reviewed and published).

Of course, bias in scientific journals, not new, intensified during the pandemic while the growing number of independent, seemingly legitimate individuals and groups showcasing comparable findings prompted this media to take a closer look.

TrialSite reported that the COVID-19 vaccine products (including the vials) were both considered proprietary and government property and could not be easily studied on an independent basis. By the end of 2021, this media did report that one German scientist died just days after uploading a video reporting that the COVID-19 vaccines contained graphene oxide. While some people were certain his death was linked to the video, fact-checkers, not surprisingly summarized, rejected as pure conspiracy talk.

By September of this year, TrialSite surveyed some initial findings out of Germany. Most recently, TrialSite contributor Sasha Latypova, a medical product entrepreneur with deep expertise in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated markets, surveyed the current claims emanating out of Europe and Australia, finding troubling accounts along the way.

For example, Ms. Latypova delved into an independent examination conducted by family physician David Nixon in Australia—the topic of The Spectator piece today. Examining several vials in a frozen state and thereafter, probing the contents while dry on a microscope slide, Latypova reported the findings consistent with those in Europe—strange snowy or “confetti-like” objects appeared. What were these strange items? Could they be impurities due to quality issues associated with a rushed manufacturing process?

TrialSite reported that while the Nixon report nor those in Germany or elsewhere were peer reviewed (hence in traditional scientific circles they wouldn’t be considered evidence), they did, however, appear like credible independent investigations. Put another way, the TrialSite internal consensus emerged by mid-2022 that these doctors and scientists looking into the microscopic contents of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines appeared sincere, authentic, and not involved with some sort of inappropriate anti-vaxx-driven scheme to spook health consumer markets.

Now the Anglosphere weekly The Spectator, albeit definitely conservative leaning, allowed the topic to be covered by Ms. Rebecca Weisser.

Enter The Spectator Piece

Covered by Australian Rebecca Weisser for the Australian edition of the conservative, British online and print magazine focusing on politics, culture, and current affairs, the topic of the bizarre metallic, non-sized objects in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is about to get a lot more attention worldwide.

Founded in 1828, England’s The Spectator remains the oldest surviving weekly magazine in the world, with editorial positions over the last several decades representing an important step on the ladder to the high office in Britain’s Conservative Party. The recent Weisser piece in the Australian edition asks, “What is in the Pfizer vaccines?”

Noteworthy, the investigational work of TrialSite’s Sasha Latypova now influences more serious mainstream media sources, as Weisser shares with the conservative-leaning, yet a mainstream-leaning demographic, that’s it’s not that simple to merely study the COVID-19 vaccine vials from Pfizer of Moderna, as the journalist writes about organizing such a test:

“That’s a more radical decision than it might sound. According to Sasha Latypova, a scientist with 25 years of experience in clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, the contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need.”

The Spectator writer continued, “Are Sasha’s declarations correct?”

Weisser points out that in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did in fact test the vials as did the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pointing out that the mRNA products were authorized after testing for metals such as iron, nickel, cobalt, lithium, etc. or for that matter, other ‘manufactured products such as micro-electronics, electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and nanowire semiconductors. But one particular substance was precluded from testing: Graphene oxide.

What about Graphene?

A substance touted for its benefits in biomedical solutions, this allotrope of carbon is made up of a single layer of atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice nanostructure according to entries in established scientific media such as the New Journal of Physics. As touted by the University of Manchester, “No other material has the breadth of superlatives that graphene boasts, making it ideal for countless applications. It is many times stronger than steel, yet incredibly lightweight and flexible. It electrically and thermally conductive but also transparent.” All sorts of use cases exist in biomedical products development.

The Spectator’s Weisser summarizes benefits for biomedical use including, “its ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area” as well as its “exceptional chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity, and excellent biocompatibility.” But the writer also points out the potential “toxic effect on living and organs” limiting current use.

Weisser again revealed that the aforementioned agencies didn’t include graphene oxide on the list for COVID-19 vaccine testing.

She confirms in The Spectator what Latypova also reports in TrialSite opinion piece:

“So, is there graphene oxide in the Pfizer shots? What Nixon found, and filmed, is bizarre to say the least. Inside a droplet of vaccine are strange mechanical structures. They seem motionless at first but when Nixon used time-lapse photography to condense 48 hours of footage into two minutes, it showed what appear to be mechanical arms assembling and disassembling glowing rectangular structures that look like circuitry and microchips. These are not ‘manufactured products’ in the CDC’s words because they construct and deconstruct themselves, but the formation of the crystals seems to be stimulated by electromagnetic radiation and stops when the slide with the vaccine is shielded by a Faraday bag. Nixon’s findings are similar to those of teams in New Zealand, Germany, Spain, and South Korea.”

Italian Hypothesis based on Blood Samples

One group of Italian scientists led by Riccardo Benzi Cipelli are front and center in the graphene oxide theory. That is, the objects identified by several groups now examining the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine vials and blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated under the microscope demonstrate anomalies.

The Spectator reports that the Italian study involved blood derived from over 1,000 vaccinated persons who experienced side effects. Benzi Cipelli and colleagues’ findings were certainly disturbing:

“Over 94% of the tests featured abnormal readings, deformed red blood cells, reduced in counts and clumped around luminescent foreign objects which also attracted clusters of fibrins. Some of the foreign objects dotted the blood like a starry night, some self-assembled into crystalline structures and others into spindly branches and tubes.”

The Italian group’s hypothesis: these objects in the COVID-19 vaccines are some kinds of metallic particles that “resemble graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds.”

Could it be that this damaged blood possibly due to these strange nano-sized objects contribute to post-COVID-19 vaccine injury phenomena such as coagulation disorders?

Enter Dr. Wendy Hoy

Dr. Nixon shared his findings with prominent physician-scientist Dr. Wendy Hoy, professor of medicine at the University of Queensland. Hoy is known globally for her multidisciplinary research into kidney and related chronic disease, emphasizing investigation of high-risk populations. She was among the first to describe kidney disease, independent of diabetes, in Native Americans, in studies of Zuni, Rio Grande Pueblo, Navajo, and Apache Indians in the Southwest of the USA.

Interviewed by TrialSite in the past, Dr. Wendy Hoy, contributed to Ms. Weisser’s piece in The Spectator, commenting on the objects—what are described as an “apparent spontaneous formation of chips and circuitry in mRNA vaccines when left at room temperature, and the abnormal objects that can be seen in the blood of vaccinated people.”

Dr. Hoy passed along the story to TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor, and the two spoke on the phone for this article.

Hoy contributed much to clinical trials in the United States: she developed decades ago at Lovelace Medical Foundation in New Mexico a clinical/epidemiologic database from administrative datasets of the affiliating hospital and clinic bringing real-world data to clinical trials before it was commonplace.

Hoy said to Daniel O’Connor, “Dr. Nixon’s findings are most certainly disturbing and seem to confirm other comparable observations from scientists and doctors studying both the mRNA vaccine vial contents as well as the blood of COVID-19 vaccinated persons in other parts of the world.”

Dr. Hoy continued, emphasizing to TrialSite:

“We cannot rush to any conclusions here, but rather, governments should initiate a proper, well-designed testing program to investigate, examine, and validate, or not, these independent findings. Given the magnitude and scale of the vaccination programs, including legal mandates, people around the world need to know what’s in the vaccines.”

As far as the observations in the blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated from Italy and elsewhere, Dr. Hoy suggested to The Spectrum reporter that if accurate, they are “undoubtedly contributing to poor oxygen delivery to tissues and clotting events, including heart attacks and strokes.” Hoy mentioned in both The Spectator piece as well as in her discussion with TrialSite’s O’Connor that there is an urgent need for investigation, not only into post-COVID-19 vaccine injuries but also any potential role for the emergency countermeasures in what has become a disturbing rise in mortality in Australia.

TrialSite was perhaps the only media worldwide reporting earlier in 2022 that a disturbing number of deaths were occurring in heavily vaccinated Australia. More than double the number of Australians died in the first three-and-a-half months of 2022 than in all of 2020 and 2021 combined. That article can be found here.

We here at TrialSite sincerely hope the accumulating number of COVID-19 vaccine-related bizarre microscopic images turn out to be something harmless and not material.

References

Wot’s in the shots? | The Spectator Australia

What is in the Pfizer vaccines? Recently, Dr David Nixon, a Brisbane GP, decided to find out, putting droplets of vaccine and the blood of vaccinated patients…

spectator.com.au

Quote from Fm1

Manipulation of the law for personal gain

China paid the local chiefs a bottle of whisky to trade in a whole settlements agriculture area....

You can buy Afrikan's for a burger....

Quote from Fm1

British/Australian Weekly Features TrialSite Contributor: Is Graphene Oxide in the COVID-19 Vaccines?

https://www.trialsitenews.com/…ovid-19-vaccines-c3fb09f6

Online rumors, chatter, and then emerging reports of strange objects found in the COVID-19 vaccine vials have been circulating for over a year now. Some of the babble clearly seems questionable, if not the material of what this media considered outlandish conspiratorial rant: the stuff of loons and conspiracy junkies. These include claims that the vaccines consist of self-assembling, disassembling metallic nanobots, part of some sinister covert defense operation masking as medicine to save the world. The sinister Orwellian goal—use the COVID-19 vaccine to control the population, while also paring down the planet’s population so a cadre of elite globalists can monopolize the beauty and bounty of Earth? Of course, such talk is just ridiculous, serving to impede and even sabotage any serious movement to legitimately question and investigate the COVID-19 vaccination program. Yet this media cannot deny that there are reports coming out of various countries now that in fact, do point to inexplicable objects in the mRNA vaccines that manifest in various microscopic examinations. With metallic-looking lustrous squares and various other shapes that do look strangely more like what one would expect when viewing microscopically some kind of advanced nano-technology product rather than the contents of an mRNA vaccine, a consensus of concerned, albeit still predominantly fringe critical thinkers grows for governments to formally investigate.

While alternative media or individual contributors on Substack have been reporting on these strange objects for a while now, purportedly identifiable via microscopic examination--some commentators have suggested that they seem to look like graphene oxide---the topic brought up until lately, by the fringe. This includes alternative media sources seeking to capitalize (and monetize) growing anti-government sentiment due to the pandemic response. By this point, however, it becomes difficult to avoid the accumulation of independent study findings, ones that do point to the apparent veracity of the bizarre microscopic images.

TrialSite monitored these reports by early 2021, tracking the topic but avoiding any actual reporting on the matter. This media had suspicions about some of these reports early on—questioning why they were not subjected to the typical scientific process (e.g., group of scientists, write up findings, upload to preprint server to try to get the output peer-reviewed and published).

Of course, bias in scientific journals, not new, intensified during the pandemic while the growing number of independent, seemingly legitimate individuals and groups showcasing comparable findings prompted this media to take a closer look.

TrialSite reported that the COVID-19 vaccine products (including the vials) were both considered proprietary and government property and could not be easily studied on an independent basis. By the end of 2021, this media did report that one German scientist died just days after uploading a video reporting that the COVID-19 vaccines contained graphene oxide. While some people were certain his death was linked to the video, fact-checkers, not surprisingly summarized, rejected as pure conspiracy talk.

By September of this year, TrialSite surveyed some initial findings out of Germany. Most recently, TrialSite contributor Sasha Latypova, a medical product entrepreneur with deep expertise in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated markets, surveyed the current claims emanating out of Europe and Australia, finding troubling accounts along the way.

For example, Ms. Latypova delved into an independent examination conducted by family physician David Nixon in Australia—the topic of The Spectator piece today. Examining several vials in a frozen state and thereafter, probing the contents while dry on a microscope slide, Latypova reported the findings consistent with those in Europe—strange snowy or “confetti-like” objects appeared. What were these strange items? Could they be impurities due to quality issues associated with a rushed manufacturing process?

TrialSite reported that while the Nixon report nor those in Germany or elsewhere were peer reviewed (hence in traditional scientific circles they wouldn’t be considered evidence), they did, however, appear like credible independent investigations. Put another way, the TrialSite internal consensus emerged by mid-2022 that these doctors and scientists looking into the microscopic contents of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines appeared sincere, authentic, and not involved with some sort of inappropriate anti-vaxx-driven scheme to spook health consumer markets.

Now the Anglosphere weekly The Spectator, albeit definitely conservative leaning, allowed the topic to be covered by Ms. Rebecca Weisser.

Enter The Spectator Piece

Covered by Australian Rebecca Weisser for the Australian edition of the conservative, British online and print magazine focusing on politics, culture, and current affairs, the topic of the bizarre metallic, non-sized objects in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is about to get a lot more attention worldwide.

Founded in 1828, England’s The Spectator remains the oldest surviving weekly magazine in the world, with editorial positions over the last several decades representing an important step on the ladder to the high office in Britain’s Conservative Party. The recent Weisser piece in the Australian edition asks, “What is in the Pfizer vaccines?”

Noteworthy, the investigational work of TrialSite’s Sasha Latypova now influences more serious mainstream media sources, as Weisser shares with the conservative-leaning, yet a mainstream-leaning demographic, that’s it’s not that simple to merely study the COVID-19 vaccine vials from Pfizer of Moderna, as the journalist writes about organizing such a test:

“That’s a more radical decision than it might sound. According to Sasha Latypova, a scientist with 25 years of experience in clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, the contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need.”

The Spectator writer continued, “Are Sasha’s declarations correct?”

Weisser points out that in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did in fact test the vials as did the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pointing out that the mRNA products were authorized after testing for metals such as iron, nickel, cobalt, lithium, etc. or for that matter, other ‘manufactured products such as micro-electronics, electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and nanowire semiconductors. But one particular substance was precluded from testing: Graphene oxide.

What about Graphene?

A substance touted for its benefits in biomedical solutions, this allotrope of carbon is made up of a single layer of atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice nanostructure according to entries in established scientific media such as the New Journal of Physics. As touted by the University of Manchester, “No other material has the breadth of superlatives that graphene boasts, making it ideal for countless applications. It is many times stronger than steel, yet incredibly lightweight and flexible. It electrically and thermally conductive but also transparent.” All sorts of use cases exist in biomedical products development.

The Spectator’s Weisser summarizes benefits for biomedical use including, “its ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area” as well as its “exceptional chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity, and excellent biocompatibility.” But the writer also points out the potential “toxic effect on living and organs” limiting current use.

Weisser again revealed that the aforementioned agencies didn’t include graphene oxide on the list for COVID-19 vaccine testing.

She confirms in The Spectator what Latypova also reports in TrialSite opinion piece:

“So, is there graphene oxide in the Pfizer shots? What Nixon found, and filmed, is bizarre to say the least. Inside a droplet of vaccine are strange mechanical structures. They seem motionless at first but when Nixon used time-lapse photography to condense 48 hours of footage into two minutes, it showed what appear to be mechanical arms assembling and disassembling glowing rectangular structures that look like circuitry and microchips. These are not ‘manufactured products’ in the CDC’s words because they construct and deconstruct themselves, but the formation of the crystals seems to be stimulated by electromagnetic radiation and stops when the slide with the vaccine is shielded by a Faraday bag. Nixon’s findings are similar to those of teams in New Zealand, Germany, Spain, and South Korea.”

Italian Hypothesis based on Blood Samples

One group of Italian scientists led by Riccardo Benzi Cipelli are front and center in the graphene oxide theory. That is, the objects identified by several groups now examining the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine vials and blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated under the microscope demonstrate anomalies.

The Spectator reports that the Italian study involved blood derived from over 1,000 vaccinated persons who experienced side effects. Benzi Cipelli and colleagues’ findings were certainly disturbing:

“Over 94% of the tests featured abnormal readings, deformed red blood cells, reduced in counts and clumped around luminescent foreign objects which also attracted clusters of fibrins. Some of the foreign objects dotted the blood like a starry night, some self-assembled into crystalline structures and others into spindly branches and tubes.”

The Italian group’s hypothesis: these objects in the COVID-19 vaccines are some kinds of metallic particles that “resemble graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds.”

Could it be that this damaged blood possibly due to these strange nano-sized objects contribute to post-COVID-19 vaccine injury phenomena such as coagulation disorders?

Enter Dr. Wendy Hoy

Dr. Nixon shared his findings with prominent physician-scientist Dr. Wendy Hoy, professor of medicine at the University of Queensland. Hoy is known globally for her multidisciplinary research into kidney and related chronic disease, emphasizing investigation of high-risk populations. She was among the first to describe kidney disease, independent of diabetes, in Native Americans, in studies of Zuni, Rio Grande Pueblo, Navajo, and Apache Indians in the Southwest of the USA.

Interviewed by TrialSite in the past, Dr. Wendy Hoy, contributed to Ms. Weisser’s piece in The Spectator, commenting on the objects—what are described as an “apparent spontaneous formation of chips and circuitry in mRNA vaccines when left at room temperature, and the abnormal objects that can be seen in the blood of vaccinated people.”

Dr. Hoy passed along the story to TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor, and the two spoke on the phone for this article.

Hoy contributed much to clinical trials in the United States: she developed decades ago at Lovelace Medical Foundation in New Mexico a clinical/epidemiologic database from administrative datasets of the affiliating hospital and clinic bringing real-world data to clinical trials before it was commonplace.

Hoy said to Daniel O’Connor, “Dr. Nixon’s findings are most certainly disturbing and seem to confirm other comparable observations from scientists and doctors studying both the mRNA vaccine vial contents as well as the blood of COVID-19 vaccinated persons in other parts of the world.”

Dr. Hoy continued, emphasizing to TrialSite:

“We cannot rush to any conclusions here, but rather, governments should initiate a proper, well-designed testing program to investigate, examine, and validate, or not, these independent findings. Given the magnitude and scale of the vaccination programs, including legal mandates, people around the world need to know what’s in the vaccines.”

As far as the observations in the blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated from Italy and elsewhere, Dr. Hoy suggested to The Spectrum reporter that if accurate, they are “undoubtedly contributing to poor oxygen delivery to tissues and clotting events, including heart attacks and strokes.” Hoy mentioned in both The Spectator piece as well as in her discussion with TrialSite’s O’Connor that there is an urgent need for investigation, not only into post-COVID-19 vaccine injuries but also any potential role for the emergency countermeasures in what has become a disturbing rise in mortality in Australia.

TrialSite was perhaps the only media worldwide reporting earlier in 2022 that a disturbing number of deaths were occurring in heavily vaccinated Australia. More than double the number of Australians died in the first three-and-a-half months of 2022 than in all of 2020 and 2021 combined. That article can be found here.

We here at TrialSite sincerely hope the accumulating number of COVID-19 vaccine-related bizarre microscopic images turn out to be something harmless and not material.

References

https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/wots-in-the-shots/

Display More

PEGylated reduced graphene oxide as a superior ssRNA delivery system

Single stranded ribonucleic acid (ssRNA) acts as a probe, antisense (AS), miRNA analog and inhibitor, and is promising for gene therapy and molecular…

pubs.rsc.org

This matches the claims from Dr. Pablo Campra from Spain. Enough said.

Quote from Curbina

This matches the claims from Dr. Pablo Campra from Spain. Enough said.

https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC6472920&blobtype=pdf

Subsequently,

other researchers attempted to improve the mRNA-

based reprogramming technology by optimizing the

transcript factor cocktails [209] or employing graphene

oxide-polyethylenimine as the mRNA deliver

Also :

Choi, H. Y.; Lee, T. J.; Yang, G. M.; Oh, J.; Won, J.; Han, J.;

Jeong, G. J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. H.; Kim, B. S. et al. Efficient

mRNA delivery with graphene oxide-polyethylenimine

for generation of footprint-free human induced pluripotent

stem cells. J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 222−235

See also :: https://www.researchgate.net/p…mRNA-vaccine_technologies

Qatar Study Reveals Immune Imprinting: 3rd Booster May Introduce More Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Select Scenarios

Qatar Study Reveals Immune Imprinting: 3rd Booster May Introduce More Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Select Scenarios

What if a third vaccine booster dose touted, no pushed, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as…

www.trialsitenews.com

What if a third vaccine booster dose touted, no pushed, by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as well as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and just about every major health system, affords actually less protection against getting infected with the Omicron variant for at least some people? That would counter all logic emanating out of the federal government. Yet that’s exactly what the conclusion is based on the results of a couple recent studies. Want maximum protection? According to one of the studies led by Qatar researchers, get the primary series vaccine (two shots) and then get infected with the Omicron strain because this scenario provides superior protection against a second Omicron infection than the extra boost. Published in medRxiv, the Qatar team represented by corresponding author Hiam Chemaitelly, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, identified specific immune systems reactions leading to this outcome. It turns out if this study is truly accurate (it’s still not peer reviewed), persons that succumb to an Omicron infection face higher risk—double the risk—of reinfection if they are boosted as compared to simply receiving the primary series. But this seems counter to what everything the masses are told. The immune imprinting observed by the Qatari team implies that the booster dose lessens vaccine-induced protection as compared to the primary series alone.

As TrialSite has chronicled, mainstream media starts to pick up on these nuances as society starts to wake up from what appeared to be a medical-industry complex-induced stupor. TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor shared, “We are picking up out there that mainstream media journalists are getting sharper, more focused on the real unfolding science rather than any propaganda promulgated from politically biased interpretations.” The latest example is Julia Marnin, writing for the Miami Herald.

From introducing a definition of immune imprinting Ms. Marnin does a fine job of breaking down the study results for the public explaining that “the study found that when looking at participants who had received three vaccine doses and had also been previously infected with an omicron subvariant, they experienced more reinfections than participants who had only gotten two doses.”

Mainstream journalist such as Julia Marnin sharpen their critical views, tracking the science regardless of where it leads them. This is a marked changed from half a year ago.

Source: Miami Herald

TrialSite’s O’Connor declared, “Reporters such as Ms. Marnin have clearly been given the greenlight to pick up on the other side of the vaccine story—at least performance issues in the context of real-world issues such as immune imprinting.” O’Connor continued, “They haven’t been given a greenlight, nor will they probably for a while, to write about post-COVID-19 vaccine injury.”

The Study

Uploaded to the preprint server, the Qatar-based team’s “COVID-19 primary series and booster vaccination and immune imprinting” involved matched, retrospective, observational cohort studies, conducted to investigate epidemiological evidence for immune imprinting in individuals who had a documented primary omicron infection, but different prior vaccination histories.

The large study team found that based on adjusted hazard ratios evaluating the comparison of incidence of reinfection in the two-dose cohort to that in the unvaccinated cohort was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.38-0.48). What about the three-dose cohort compared to the two-course cohort? The adjusted hazard ratio comparing incidence of reinfection equaled 1.38 (95% CI: 1.16-1.65).

When comparing the three-dose study cohort to the unvaccinated cohort applying hazard ratios comparing incidence of reinfection, the study team reported 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44-0.63). The study team found that after 6 months of follow up all the adjusted hazard ratios appeared stable.

Interestingly, with BA.4/BA.5 and BA.2.75, the study team reports divergence in cumulative incidence curves in all comparison grew substantially when cases were dominated by the latest Omicron subvariant called BA.4/BA.5 as well as BA.2.75. Reinfections didn’t progress to severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19.

Hiam Chemaitelly and team concluded:

“History of primary-series vaccination enhanced immune protection against omicron reinfection, but history of booster vaccination compromised protection against omicron reinfection. These findings do not undermine the short-term public health utility of booster vaccination.”

Study Limitations

The study team excluded undocumented reinfections. The authors report that the unvaccinated are a minority in Qatar and may not be truly immune-naïve due to undocumented prior infections or undocumented vaccinations, possibly outside of the country. Various bias may be involved including unequal depletion of the unvaccinated versus a vaccinated susceptible population, underestimating vaccine protection. The authors list other study limitations.

Contributions

The following institutions helped contribute to this study:

Hamad Medical Corporation

Ministry of Public Health

Primary Health Care Corporation

Qatar Biobank

Sidra Medicine

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar

The authors are also grateful for the Qatar Genome Programme and Qatar University Biomedical Research Center for institutional support for the reagents needed for the viral genome sequencing. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the article. Statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Lead Research/Investigator

Hiam Chemaitelly, PhD Corresponding Author

Hiam Chemaitelly is an Assistant Professor of Research in Population Health Sciences at the Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q). Her research has been focused on promoting an in-depth understanding of the epidemiology of infectious diseases using epidemiological research methods, advanced statistical techniques, and mathematical modeling, with a primary focus on COVID-19, viral hepatitis, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections. Her research work has been key in informing infectious disease epidemiology and policy programming and resource allocation in the Middle East and North Africa and internationally. Her research work has concentrated recently on building an in-depth understanding of COVID-19 epidemiology and informing the Qatar National COVID-19 Response.

Dr. Chemaitelly is an accomplished scientist with a distinguished publication record including close to 100 publications, several of which appeared in leading high impact journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Nature Medicine, Nature Communications, Lancet Global Health, Lancet HIV, PLOS Medicine, Clinical Infectious Diseases, BMC Medicine, and Emerging infectious Diseases. Her research work has been covered widely in international press and media such as at the New York Times, Washington Post, and CNN. She is a reviewer for different prominent scientific journals and a member of the World Health Organization Strategic Information and Analysis Advisory Group.

Dr. Chemaitelly holds a Ph.D. in Epidemiology and Population Health from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in the UK.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article268224827.html

Quote from Fm1

Contributions

The following institutions helped contribute to this study:

Here the original link:: https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…10.31.22281756v1.full.pdf

Germany, Sweden See a Drop in Fertility. Perhaps a Trend in Europe

Germany, Sweden See a Drop in Fertility. Perhaps a Trend in Europe

From the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic and the introduction of vaccines to counter the disease, there have been questions regarding the effect of the shot…

www.trialsitenews.com

From the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic and the introduction of vaccines to counter the disease, there have been questions regarding the effect of the shot on women, menstrual cycles, fertility, and pregnancy. Earlier this fall, TrialSite News reported on the dramatic decline of births in Zurich, Switzerland. The TrialSite article highlighted the fact that “new baby births have dramatically fallen in Switzerland’s largest city of Zurich. According to a new analysis, the number of newborns is ‘collapsing’ by an ‘incredible 31% compared to the average for the years 2015 to 2019.’ The cause is not known according to the reports, and ‘media specialists’ in this wealthy Swiss German-speaking city downplay the COVID-19 vaccines.” The report goes on to credit journalist Lukas Hassig, who was the first to identify the trend. According to Hassig: “Specialists in the media said that the Covid vaccination could be ruled out as a reason. Why vaccination is ruled out by the experts as a possible reason is not convincing. Vaccination picked up speed over the course of 2021.” But a new study may shed lighter on Covid vaccines and fertility.

German Study Shows Decline in Germany and Sweden

A new study from the German Federal Institute for Population Research tracks fertility declines near the end of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The study claims:

“Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several countries faced short-term fertility declines in 2020 and 2021, a development which did not materialize in Scandinavian and German-speaking countries. However, more recent birth statistics show a steep fertility decline in the aftermath of the pandemic in 2022. We aim to provide data on the unexpected birth decline in 2022 in Germany and Sweden and relate these data to pandemic-related contextual developments which could have influenced the post-pandemic fertility development.”

The study demonstrates a fertility decline during the first months of 2022 after two years of societal lockdowns. The authors shared : “The number of live births dropped by some 15 % in Germany and close to 10 % in Sweden, as compared to the fertility levels in previous years. The fertility decline was very different from the slower pace of change that usually characterizes fertility developments.”

The German study “provides valuable data and insight on a new and entirely unanticipated fertility development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains to be seen whether these developments are of a short-term nature and how fast fertility trends in Germany and Sweden will return to their pre-pandemic patterns, which for Germany was running in an upward direction, and for Sweden with a downward trend.”

Decline in Fertility Rates Not Unique to Germany and Sweden

The decline in fertility rates appear to be a ‘trend” in other countries besides Germany and Sweden. Lithuania, Romania, England, Wales and France all saw a drop in birth rates. These findings were published in another study published in the journal Human Reproduction.

This study attributes the decline in births specifically to the lockdowns throughout Europe. It seems Europe is beginning to see the consequences of lockdowns and vaccinations in the post Covid world.

Hypotheses as to what’s behind these declines varies, from masses putting off health visits, to literally changing human reproduction patterns due to the pandemic. Rarely mentioned in mainstream media: the uncomfortable timing of these fertility declines with the COVID-19 mass vaccination programs.

Mainstream media is on the record that the vaccines do nothing to materially change fertility. For example, often cited are various medical boards such as the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists in the UK that strongly emphasizes the point.

On the other hand, in many cases during the pandemic the medical establishment seemed convincing as to some set truth only to have the unfolding science show a slightly to materially different reality. The fertility problem along with widespread excess deaths most certainly has many of us on the edge.

Reports of ‘Bubbles’ in Vials Leads to Swiss Regulator’s Inspection of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine Batch

Reports of ‘Bubbles’ in Vials Leads to Swiss Regulator’s Inspection of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine Batch

The governmental authority responsible for the surveillance of medicines and medical devices in Switzerland based in Bern in an inspection of Pfizer-BioNTech…

www.trialsitenews.com

The governmental authority responsible for the surveillance of medicines and medical devices in Switzerland based in Bern in an inspection of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine vials report other than identifying “bubbles” the examination revealed no specific problems with Comirnaty (BNT162b2). A unit from the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products or “Swissmedic” discovered the bubbles in an examination of vials containing Comirnaty Bivalent Original/Omicron BA.1 in its OMCL laboratory. The explanation for the bubbles? According to the Swiss drug regulators news release they (the bubbles) likely had to do with differences in pressure or temperature when preparing the doses. TrialSite praises this action—with other reports of anomalous findings in the vials based on independent examinations more of these verry public inspections should be undertaken.

The Inspection

The findings were based on an audit, part of a risk assessment targeting the bivalent vaccine targeting the spike protein associated with the original Wuhan variant as well as Omicron BA.1. This particular audit focused on batch GE8297 which is and will continue to be used for vaccinations the agency reports. They further calmed any frayed nerves declaring that no risks exist to persons who have already been vaccinated. Other than bubbles nothing else was found. The report is silent about any strange objects that other independent doctors and scientists have been reporting from Germany and Australia for example.

Details

In a supplementary report the Swiss regulator mentions its’ laboratory examination was in response to reports of bubbles in the vials.

According to the agency report:

“…the phenomenon seems to be accentuated when the syringes are prepared several hours in advance. Some vials already contain bubbles when they are removed from the fridge. As a precautionary measure, Swissmedic has informed the cantons and vaccination centers. Swissmedic will issue updates on the situation and measures to be taken through this communication channel as soon as further findings are available.”

Its Mandate

TrialSite praises Swissmedic for performing this audit. Given reports of strange anomalies in the vaccines in other parts of the world it can help build trust to perform such functions. The agency shared in its press entry that they are “interested in any reports of anomalies affecting medicinal products.”

The regulator emphasized the importance of following manufacturer’s instructions when preparing the mRNA vaccine doses. Additionally the agency notes “it is recommended that syringes for the vaccine should not be drawn up more than 15 minutes before use (injection).” The agency declared they stand ready to launch investigations into any other “phenomena reported.”

Due Diligence

Recently TrialSite reported that an independent physician in Australia performed his own analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, identifying what are most certainly anomalies. Strange nano-sized metallic looking objects raise concerns and also become fuel for conspiratorial chatter online. Even Anglosphere mainstream weeklies now report on the topic—albeit the conservative-leaning media. See “British/Australian Weekly Features TrialSite Contributor: Is Graphene Oxide in the COVID-19 Vaccines?”

Reports of these microscopic-sized anomalies in the vials of mRNA vaccines emanated from several countries and should be investigated by federal and/state/provincial health authorities upon such reports. That’s the way that public health authorities can build back more trust that in many cases during the pandemic has been lessened in the public’s eye.

The Agency

Commencing operations by January 1, 2002, Swissmedic is the successor regulatory agency of Interkantonale Kontrollstelle für Heilmittel (IKS), which was itself the successor of Schweizerische Arzneimittelnebenwirkungszentrale (SANZ). Swissmedic is affiliated to the Federal Department of Home Affairs.

References

Rejection of Emily Oster's Amnesty plea hits msm

Daily Telegraph: Pro-lockdown fanatics don’t deserve an amnesty

Camilla Tominey, deputy editor, writes that “it’s not just in retrospect that we know the Covid measures were a disaster – we were vilified for pointing it out at the time”.

archive.ph

telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/11/04/pro-lockdown-fanatics-dont-deserve-amnesty/

Covid amnesty? Why we must never forgive or forget

I remember how nervous I was attending my first anti-Covid-lockdown protest.

It was early autumn 2020. A friend had invited me to the demonstration in Hyde Park as her brother, a statistician and data scientist, had crunched the numbers and figured out the Government was lying to us. He stood on a stump and made a speech with a megaphone, followed by others

"We didn't know" [A Lie] There is a Latin maxim all first-year criminal law students learn, ignorantia juris non excusat. It means ignorance is not a justifiable excuse for breaking the law

Covid amnesty? Why we must never forgive or forget - The Conservative Woman

Covid amnesty? Why we must never forgive or forget

www.conservativewoman.co.uk

‘Pandemic Amnesty’? It’s just more narrative reinforcement

Kit Knightly tears into the suggestion of an amnesty

Rather than asking for amnesty they are offering one…to those covid skeptics who have found two and a half years of being on the outside looking in too exhausting to carry on

If you pretend we didn’t mean any harm, we’ll forgive you for telling truth about us

“Pandemic Amnesty”? It’s just more narrative reinforcement

Kit Knightly A few days ago, on Halloween, the Atlantic ran this opinion piece by economist Emily Oster, headlined: LET’S DECLARE A PANDEMIC AMNESTY This,…

off-guardian.org

Right Said Fred

To much fake news on the market.

Some UK news sources do claim that the two short heat waves caused a lot of excess mortality....

But fact is that statistics does not confirm it :: https://www.ons.gov.uk/visuali…21/fig1/datadownload.xlsx

from:: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep…l/weekending21october2022

Reality :: currently the excess mortality is much (2x) higher than during the very short heat waves. OF course UK still counts all vaxx victims that die with CoV-19 as CoV-19 deaths....

Quote from PSK

Rejection of Emily Oster's Amnesty plea hits msm

Daily Telegraph: Pro-lockdown fanatics don’t deserve an amnesty

Camilla Tominey, deputy editor, writes that “it’s not just in retrospect that we know the Covid measures were a disaster – we were vilified for pointing it out at the time”.

https://archive.ph/acSz6

telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/11/04/pro-lockdown-fanatics-dont-deserve-amnesty/

Covid amnesty? Why we must never forgive or forget

I remember how nervous I was attending my first anti-Covid-lockdown protest.

It was early autumn 2020. A friend had invited me to the demonstration in Hyde Park as her brother, a statistician and data scientist, had crunched the numbers and figured out the Government was lying to us. He stood on a stump and made a speech with a megaphone, followed by others

"We didn't know" [A Lie] There is a Latin maxim all first-year criminal law students learn, ignorantia juris non excusat. It means ignorance is not a justifiable excuse for breaking the law

https://www.conservativewoman.…-never-forgive-or-forget/

‘Pandemic Amnesty’? It’s just more narrative reinforcement

Kit Knightly tears into the suggestion of an amnesty

Rather than asking for amnesty they are offering one…to those covid skeptics who have found two and a half years of being on the outside looking in too exhausting to carry on

If you pretend we didn’t mean any harm, we’ll forgive you for telling truth about us

https://off-guardian.org/2022/…-narrative-reinforcement/

Right Said Fred

External Content twitter.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Display More

As the article says, you and I were not given amnesty if we broke Covid protocols. I'm all for lining them all up in front of a firing squad!

Combining COVID-19 BA4/5 and Influenza mRNA

Combining COVID-19 BA4/5 and Influenza mRNA

Recently, both Pfizer and Moderna announced they were developing a combination injection utilizing mRNA coding for the BA4/BA5 Omicron subvariant and new mRNA…

www.trialsitenews.com

Recently, both Pfizer and Moderna announced they were developing a combination injection utilizing mRNA coding for the BA4/BA5 Omicron subvariant and new mRNA coding for antigens contained in the influenza virus.[i] Because the COVID-19 component is under Emergency Use Authorization plus questionable unorthodox licensure meant to provide the legal basis for a system of vast mandates, limited animal studies plus no completed human trial data to date, that component should be off the table from the start.

A recent paper from Chemaitelly and colleagues demonstrated in the Omicron era, COVID-19 boosters had unacceptably low protection against acquiring the infection, and no valid study has ever demonstrated reductions in hospitalizations and deaths.[ii] To make matters worse, any theoretical benefit from a COVID-19 vaccine would last < 6 months, so additional shots would be out of phase with the other component of the combination product. mRNA coding for influenza would be a new biological product not under EUA, so it should have to go through the full 5-year regulatory development cycle for genetic biologicals. It looks like the vaccine companies are trying to shortcut this development cycle by combining the non-emergency flu shot with the EUA COVID-19 vaccine. Influenza A and B are the cause of seasonal epidemics, and the segmented RNA genome enables frequent antigenic changes. For this reason, the seasonal vaccines are developed annually based on the expected circulating strains of two influenza A viruses– H1N1 and H3N2, and two influenza B viruses– Victoria and Yamagata lineages.[iii] Because of the strain mismatches, the effectiveness has been abysmal. Last year, Chung and colleagues reported the influenza vaccine had 16% vaccine efficacy which was statistically insignificant from zero.[iv]

Combining the genetic code for both the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and conserved proteins of influenza A and B would mean the installation of the long-lasting genetic code for multiple foreign proteins in the human body. Production of these proteins will induce an ongoing multi-pronged immune response which is likely to create amplified side effects, above and beyond each component alone, rendering even greater incapacitation than we have seen with the COVID-19 vaccine alone. Dr. David Wiseman, Ph.D., former JNJ scientist, and vaccine developer commented on the combined vaccine product for NTD news. He made the case that safety signals would be confused and impossible to sort out.

In the history of drug development, when a technology goes bad and delivers side effects and fails to stop or ameliorate an illness, that line of development should be dropped. In the case of mRNA, the bio-pharmaceutical complex is hell-bent on forcing these new products into large populations no matter what adverse health consequences emerge. So, the next time you are in the clinic and about to take another vaccine, ask the nurse: “Does this vaccine have mRNA in it?” If the answer is yes, then consider deferring or seeking an alternative. Thus far, in this author’s opinion, there is no mRNA vaccine that is either safe or effective. The Food and Drug Administration implemented first an emergency use authorization then an unorthodox licensure executed to legitimate mass mandates at the federal state and local levels. Links to both Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty and Moderna’s mRNA -1273 are offered here and here respectively.

[i] Reuters: Pfizer, BioNTech start COVID-flu combination vaccine study

[ii] Chemaitelly H, AlMukdad S, Ayoub HH, Altarawneh HN, Coyle P, Tang P, Yassine HM, Al-Khatib HA, Smatti MK, Hasan MR, Al-Kanaani Z, Al-Kuwari E, Jeremijenko A, Kaleeckal AH, Latif AN, Shaik RM, Abdul-Rahim HF, Nasrallah GK, Al-Kuwari MG, Al-Romaihi HE, Butt AA, Al-Thani MH, Al-Khal A, Bertollini R, Abu-Raddad LJ. Covid-19 Vaccine Protection among Children and Adolescents in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2210058. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36322837.

[iii] Rcheulishvili N, Papukashvili D, Liu C, Ji Y, He Y, Wang PG. Promising strategy for developing mRNA-based universal influenza virus vaccine for human population, poultry, and pigs- focus on the bigger picture. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1025884. Published 2022 Oct 17. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025884

[iv] Chung JR, Kim SS, Kondor RJ, Smith C, Budd AP, Tartof SY, Florea A, Talbot HK, Grijalva CG, Wernli KJ, Phillips CH, Monto AS, Martin ET, Belongia EA, McLean HQ, Gaglani M, Reis M, Geffel KM, Nowalk MP, DaSilva J, Keong LM, Stark TJ, Barnes JR, Wentworth DE, Brammer L, Burns E, Fry AM, Patel MM, Flannery B. Interim Estimates of 2021-22 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness - United States, February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 11;71(10):365-370. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7110a1. PMID: 35271561; PMCID: PMC8911998.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a TrialSite advisory committee member, writes on a joint Substack with John Leake. Check that site out here

Combining COVID-19 BA4/5 and Influenza mRNA

Recipe for Disaster

petermcculloughmd.substack.com

Quote from Wyttenbach

To much fake news on the market.

Some UK news sources do claim that the two short heat waves caused a lot of excess mortality....

But fact is that statistics does not confirm it :: https://www.ons.gov.uk/visuali…21/fig1/datadownload.xlsx

from:: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep…l/weekending21october2022

Reality :: currently the excess mortality is much (2x) higher than during the very short heat waves. OF course UK still counts all vaxx victims that die with CoV-19 as CoV-19 deaths....

Display More

More fake news and opinions from the LA Times

Are the unvaccinated still a danger to the rest of us?

Are the unvaccinated still a danger to the rest of us?

Americans who still aren't fully vaccinated against COVID-19 probably have some immunity from a past infection. They may not be so dangerous anymore.

www.latimes.com

For almost two years, COVID-19 vaccine holdouts have been the objects of earnest pleading and financial inducements, of social-media shaming and truth campaigns. They’ve missed weddings, birthday celebrations and recitals, and even forfeited high-stakes athletic competitions. Until last month, they were barred from entering the United States and more than 100 other countries.

Now the unvaccinated are suddenly back in the mix. They’re dining in restaurants, rocking out at music festivals and filling the stands at sporting venues. They mingle freely in places where they used to be shunned for fear they’d seed superspreader events.

It’s as if they’re no longer hazardous to the rest of us. Or are they?

“Clearly, the unvaccinated are a threat to themselves,” said Dr. Jeffrey Shaman, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University. As recently as August, their risk of dying of COVID-19 was six times higher than for people who were fully vaccinated and eight times higher than for people who were vaccinated and boosted, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But, Shaman acknowledged, “the danger to the rest of us is a more debatable issue.”

Quote from Fm1

As recently as August, their risk of dying of COVID-19 was six times higher than for people who were fully vaccinated and eight times higher than for people who were vaccinated and boosted, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Pure FM/R/F fantasy direct from Moderna/Pfizer marketing office... The risk of dying from a vaxxine is much higer than from CoV-19 for most.

All studies did at best show just a delay of death and never did count the vaxx induce CoV-19 immune suppressed deaths...

Quote from Wyttenbach

Pure FM/R/JF fantasy direct from Moderna/Pfizer marketing office... The risk of dying from a vaxxine is much higer than from CoV-19 for most.

All studies did at best show just a delay of death and never did count the vaxx induce CoV-19 immune suppressed deaths...

Mainstream media is completely into it, too. How many mainstream outlets have even mentioned the European Congress hearings and the ongoing investigation of corruption? Not even in a deriding or mocking fashion. Zero. Zip. Nada. People that only get their information from mainstream media have zero chance of even having the slightest idea of how deep the con runs.

Quote from Curbina

Mainstream media is completely into it, too. How many mainstream outlets have even mentioned the European Congress hearings and the ongoing investigation of corruption? Not even in a deriding or mocking fashion. Zero. Zip. Nada. People that only get their information from mainstream media have zero chance of even having the slightest idea of how deep the con runs.

Exactly why we can not allow amnesty to the corrupt bought and paid media, who, nih, FDA and politicians who fully backed these Covid mandates!!!!