The Totally Civil Covid Thread. (Closing 31/05)

Offit is optimistic when he said

"“Science is losing its place as a source of truth,” Offit said."

the problem is

how to get it back...

Young boy,18, full of faith dies of cardiac arrest. Of course fully vaccinated as you need it if you are young do sport and are of excellent health...

A Kentucky Athlete's Unexplained and Tragic Death

Mick could tell anyone all about Jesus. According to his friend and pastor, Sheriff Joe Engle, Aaron "Mick" Crawford was not your ordinary 18-year-old high…

www.thedesertreview.com

So a new American dream is born. Kill your kids for the big pigs money...

Long-Term Organ Damage after COVID-19 Vaccines Emerging in Medical Literature

Long-Term Organ Damage after COVID-19 Vaccines Emerging in Medical Literature

Of all the great tension both doctors and patients have faced in the COVID-19 crisis is the lack of any evidence-backed assurances on long-term safety of…

www.trialsitenews.com

Of all the great tension both doctors and patients have faced in the COVID-19 crisis is the lack of any evidence-backed assurances on long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Americans were told these genetic products were brought through testing at “warp speed.” While that may be wonderful for the Starship Enterprise, warp speed should not be viewed as favorable in drug or vaccine development. Observation time in research is very important to evaluate the emergence of problems, particularly for the long-lasting mRNA vaccines and their biologic product, the coronavirus Spike protein. For a typical live-attenuated, killed, or antigen-based vaccine, the minimum period for safety observation in clinical development is 2 years. For genetic products which includes mRNA and adenoviral DNA, the minimum time is 5 years.

Now with mass indiscriminate vaccination, we have roughly two thirds of adult populations who have received a novel vaccine and the progression of their baseline medical problems is the specific aim of research going forward at many centers. Canney et al. studied 1105 patients who had stable glomerular kidney disease in 2020 before mRNA, and then followed them after receiving one or more of the COVID-19 vaccines.[i] Glomerular kidney disease can worsen to complete kidney failure and dialysis, so the consequences are significant if there is a problem with mRNA, Spike protein, and progression of disease. As shown in the table, for the double vaccinated, there was more than a two-fold increase in progression of kidney disease.

That means a loss of renal function which is usually permanent for the vaccinated. Using multivariable adjustment, this effect persisted. The inference is the worsening of kidney disease is attributable to the vaccine and none of the other traditional risk factors (high blood pressure etc.).

The implications are significant. So, if you or a loved one has kidney disease and was pressured into vaccination by a primary care physician or nephrologist, please share this Substack with them and suggest that they never again promote an experimental product without any long-term, evidence-backed assurances on safety. Such a product should only be considered by the patient as one would in a research trial, purely on the basis of personal preference and willingness to be involved in a form of clinical investigation, with full informed consent.

[i] Canney M, Atiquzzaman M, Cunningham AM, Zheng Y, Er L, Hawken S, Zhao Y, Barbour SJ. A Population-Based Analysis of the Risk of Glomerular Disease Relapse after COVID-19 Vaccination. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Nov 4:ASN.2022030258. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022030258. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36332971.

Also check out Dr. Peter McCullough, a member of the TrialSite advisory committee and John Leake at Courageous Discourse™.

References

Long-Term Organ Damage after COVID-19 Vaccines Emerging in Medical Literature

Progression of Glomerular Kidney Disease Reported with More Shots

petermcculloughmd.substack.com

One more "illness" that needs live long treatment - Hypertension. 3 years therapy has no effect after 8 years..

Longer-Term All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality With Intensive Blood Pressure Control

This secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial evaluates the long-term effects of randomization to intensive treatment with the…

jamanetwork.com

US definition of severe hypertension is > 140mm HG Normal hypertension :: > 120 mm HG.

This might be OK for fat people but for normal people 120..130 mm is nothing to worry about. These numbers are average and include sleeping time.

Just to remind you that blood thinner (aspirin cardio) Blood pressure reduction + statins for 10 years = Dialysis.

False and Misleading Efficacy Claims—What is the Motivation?

False and Misleading Efficacy Claims—What is the Motivation?

CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH, for the record, continues to make false claims about the COVID-19 vaccine boosters with the apparent motivation of…

www.trialsitenews.com

CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH, for the record, continues to make false claims about the COVID-19 vaccine boosters with the apparent motivation of getting more Americans “fully vaccinated.” This is in the backdrop of an 8.4% rate of Americans over age 5 taking the “updated” bivalent booster dose.[i]

No matter how hard the internal pressure is at the CDC to get a “needle in every arm,” what would be such a strong motivation for Walensky to blatantly deceive Americans with such obvious counterfactual information? She states, “COVID-19 vaccines may not prevent every infection (as apparent in her personal case), but they do provide us important protection against severe illness, hospitalization, and death…”

In order for that claim to be valid by US regulations, a COVID-19 vaccine would need to reduce the risk of adjudicated COVID-19 hospitalization and death as a primary endpoint in a prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The benefit would need to be meaningful, e.g., ~20% relative risk reduction, and statistically significant, e.g., p<0.05. The conclusive study should have no significant threats to validity such as loss to follow-up. There has been no pivotal randomized trial, and no one can claim COVID-19 vaccines reduce hospitalization and death.

The shortest section on the FDA Pfizer Fact Sheet is the “Benefits” section! This is given with the consent form and makes no claims about severity, hospitalization, and death.[ii]

She goes on to promote a two-month period between the last injection (presumably legacy mRNA) and the new bivalent vaccine. This schedule has never been tested and demonstrated to be safe in human beings.

Even more shocking, the bivalent boosters which failed in animal studies to stop Omicron, have never been tested for safety or efficacy in human RCTs with clinical outcomes. In academic medicine and the pharmaceutical regulatory community, the question is WHY does Walensky cross the line into making false claims, an illegal act for fully FDA-approved and marketed drugs/vaccines? Only Senate or Congressional hearings with direct questions will get the truth out of her.

Here are some possibilities: 1) she is following orders from higher governmental authorities, 2) she knows the claims are false but truly believes the only way for vaccination to work is to keep everyone vaccinated on a continuous basis no matter what the costs, 3) she is in a form of a trance or psychological state driven by fear in herself and for humanity where COVID-19 vaccination has become like a talisman with special powers and cannot be challenged. Indeed, Walensky has never comprehensively discussed safety of COVID-19 vaccination, and she has not disclosed who should NOT take a COVID-19 vaccine. So, the next time someone in your circles claims you or your loved one should take a COVID-19 vaccine to be “safe” or “protected” from serious outcomes, ask them to take a look at the consent fact sheet and read the tiny benefit section.

[i] CDC COVID Tracker, Accessed November 9, 2022

[ii] VACCINE INFORMATION FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS ABOUT COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA), THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE, AND THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE, BIVALENT (ORIGINAL AND OMICRON BA.4/BA.5) TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) FOR USE IN INDIVIDUALS 12 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER, August 22, 2022

Check out Dr. McCullough and John Leake at their Courageous Discourse Substack newsletter as well.

Remember IVM for Christmas Covid season

My two horses need pressies Time to visit the rural store. again

apparently the Activ6 trial showed it to be effective despite official claims the contrary

cost? $38 Australian..

Boehringer .cheaper than any Pfizer crap and without the side effects.

ACTIV-6 Trial on Ivermectin: NIH Scientists Behaving Badly

You may have heard that a new NIH-funded Randomized Controlled Trial was published recently. This one most definitely proves ivermectin doesn’t work for…

doyourownresearch.substack.com

Somehow, ACTIV-6 makes me appreciate the attention to detail and loving honesty of the TOGETHER trial team. But even going past that, I think ACTIV-6 may be the strongest evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy, because the people that ran the trial clearly were not intending to arrive at that result. And yet, when we peel back the layers of obfuscation, we see it.

3 out of 100 boostered are victims of heart damage: https://www.myscience.ch/en/ne…r_vaccination-2022-unibas

Of course they have to say its temporary but scarves in heart remain, only the inflammation is temporary.

Who wants to poison himself with Pfizer/Moderna crap???

International Monetary Fund Says “Vaccinate, Calibrate, Accelerate”: Using COVID-19 to Reset the Global Economy and Go Woke

International Monetary Fund Says “Vaccinate, Calibrate, Accelerate”: Using COVID-19 to Reset the Global Economy and Go Woke

The IMF is a powerful global organization, especially in the economic sphere. According to its&nbsp;website, the group &ldquo;works to achieve sustainable…

www.trialsitenews.com

The IMF is a powerful global organization, especially in the economic sphere. According to its website, the group “works to achieve sustainable growth and prosperity for all of its 190 member countries.” It supports policies that promote “financial stability and monetary cooperation” as these are essential to increasing “productivity, job creation, and economic well-being.” The IMF has three key missions: “furthering international monetary cooperation, encouraging the expansion of trade and economic growth, and discouraging policies that would harm prosperity.” To fulfill these missions, IMF member countries work collaboratively with each other and with other international bodies. Critics have noted some problems with this organization. For one, a 2002 study of academic work on the IMF shows, "no consensus on the long-term effects of IMF programs on growth". While some research has found that IMF loans reduce the odds of future banking crises, other studies have determined that these loans “can increase the risk of political crises.” Activist Titus Alexander has argued that the IMF is a pillar of “global apartheid,” with developed nations seen to have a dominant role over less developed countries.

Originally established as part of the Bretton Woods system as World War 2 came to an end, this global institution was established in response to horrendous economic conditions associated with the Great Depression and the wreckage of World War 2. Since then, it’s gained power orchestrating a system of country debt, monetary policy and more.

Does Conditionality Undermine National Institutions?

In 2006, ActionAid’s analyst Akanksha Marphatia said that IMF policies undermine African development goals, “due to imposed restrictions that prevent spending on important sectors, such as education and health.” Economist Jeffrey Sachs has argued that the IMF's "usual prescription is 'budgetary belt tightening to countries who are much too poor to own belts.’” And some argue that “conditionality” undermines national political institutions. “The recipient governments are sacrificing policy autonomy in exchange for funds, which can lead to public resentment of the local leadership for accepting and enforcing the IMF conditions. Political instability can result from more leadership turnover as political leaders are replaced in electoral backlashes. IMF conditions are often criticized for reducing government services, thus increasing unemployment.” Last, the IMF has advocated for “austerity programs” involving cutting public spending and raising taxes even for weak economies.

Enter the Pandemic

Of note, the IMF was ready during the pandemic placing mass vaccination as a fundamental prerequisite for economic recovery out of the pandemic. Want to know why the 70% herd immunity targets were established early on during the pandemic by the World Health Organization and even Dr. Anthony Fauci? Think IMF.

Vaccinate, Calibrate, Accelerate

In the Managing Director’s Global Policy Agenda for 2021, pdf linked here, the globalist financial policy institute announced a program of “Vaccinate, Calibrate, Accelerate.”

They noted that “Urgent policy action is needed to control the pandemic, limit [economic] scarring, and transform the global economy.” (Emphasis added.) Pandemic-induced “divergences" among nations are, “driven by stark differences in access to vaccines and policy space.”

At the time of the 2021 publication, Delta was spreading rapidly and, “the threat of new variants adds further uncertainty to the outlook.” Importantly, already study data in Israel, USA and elsewhere was making it apparent that boosters would be needed due to the confluence of a mutating vaccine evading pathogen and a vaccine with questionable durability. The key here is that by this time the IMF had to have been aware that the vaccine at the time did not control transmission.

Back to the IMF policy—All this in the context of “a climate emergency that demands immediate action, while we also navigate the new opportunities, and risks, of the digital revolution.” IMF priorities are to 1) “vaccinate the world population to stem the spread of the pandemic,” 2) “calibrate policies to limit scarring, support the recovery, and counter growing divergences within and between countries,” and 3) “accelerate the transformation of the global economy to achieve a more inclusive, greener, and digital recovery.” (Emphasis added.)

Focusing first on mass vaccination, IMF offers that, “Global cooperation to expedite universal vaccination is vital to secure the global recovery and limit health and economic divergences.” (Emphasis added.) They complain that while vaccination rates were at about 58% in the advanced economies at the time of the 2021 publication, in low-income nations under 5% were jabbed. “The global goal to vaccinate at least 40 percent of the population in all countries by end-2021 and 70 percent by mid-2022 remains a priority.”

Calibration

What was calibration? Here the IMF emphasized to national decision makers to seize on the moment toward a new global reality declaring:

“Policies should be calibrated to the evolving pandemic conditions and available policy space to support the recovery, counter growing divergences, and limit scarring.”

In terms of monetary policy, inflation risks pose “vexing” challenges for all policymakers, “as fluctuating infection rates translate into unprecedented swings in economic activity.” And rapid food inflation, “poses a particular challenge to economic and political stability in many emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs).” Clearly, the IMF was concerned about what has actually occurred with inflation rates not seen in decades.

The organization further advanced that “timely and tailored surveillance” is vital to its mission in order to avoid “stop-start recoveries” in our time of unprecedented economic uncertainty. This allows IMF decision-makers to receive “well calibrated policy advice.”

For nations mired in structural setbacks based on the pandemic, “our analyses of the pandemic’s impact on labor markets, productivity, and private sector viability will help inform policy advice. To provide a more systematic assessment of the effective policy mix to achieve growth and stability objectives given differing country circumstances, we will continue to work on operationalizing the Integrated Policy Framework and complete the review of the Institutional View on the Liberalization and Management of Capital Flows.”

Accelerate

In addition to embracing national policy market to pivot the IMF argued why not put the pedal to the metal and accelerate the transformations made possible by COVID-19:

“Policymakers should seize the moment to accelerate the transformation of the global economy. The global economy is faced with a sweeping range of disruptive forces—the existential threat posed by climate change, a technological revolution, growing disparities in income and opportunity, demographic shifts, and political polarization, compounding divergences across and within countries. Decisively tackling these issues, to both counter the risks and capitalize on the opportunities, will be essential to strengthening resilience and long-term sustainability.” (Italics added.)

Here we can see most clearly the admission that, in addition to its existence as an illness, COVID-19 is admittedly being used by policy makers as a very real policy tool to achieve pre-existing political and economic goals. Does this mean that the pathogen was somehow contrived, planned? Not necessarily. Conspiracies of this magnitude are extremely difficult but not necessary given a wise person from this author’s past declared “history is a series of coincidences.”

Digitization Rising

The IMF specifies goals around climate change and what they call “digitization,” the former calling for an “International carbon price floor” as well as other initiatives [could the digital vaccine passport merely be a conditioning mechanism]?

Per IMF, “The diffusion of digital technologies and knowledge will create new opportunities for economic advancement, inclusion, and resilience; but also, challenges.” And this requires a “digital transformation agenda” at IMF that, perhaps vaguely said, “matches the needs of [its] members.”

A top priority is to, “continue to deepen [IMF] expertise on digital money and fintech and advance analytical work on the implications of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) on the International Monetary System, including on capital flows, and the Global Financial Safety Net.” IMF also seeks to “promote greater efficiency and transparency of public financial management, improved public service delivery, and enhanced revenue administration, we will support the digital transformation of governments on fiscal operations and policies.”

Through a Gender Lens

The IMF document also shows us that in addition to changes to the economy and technology, COVID-19 should be used to pursue liberal, redistributive, and equitable social goals. Calling for inclusion and good governance they state they, “will expand the breadth and depth of inclusion issues in country work and scale up its distributional impact analysis.”

In language which might have been considered odd a decade ago, they note “We are developing a gender strategy to strengthen our analysis of gender issues and apply a ‘gender lens’ to the core operations of the Fund.”

Last, they note that “to remain representative of our membership and operationally relevant, we will continue our efforts on diversity and inclusion, implement modernization projects to improve efficiency, and reduce our carbon footprint under the new hybrid work model.”

What’s Going On?

What does this all mean? Yet another example of those in power using elite liberal social goals as a cover for greater consolidation of money and power. In any event, the blatant use of COVID-19 to achieve collateral goals should not sit well with the public, already wary of the COVID regime.

UK Man Unable to Work After COVID-19 Vax, but Still Denied Compensation

UK Man Unable to Work After COVID-19 Vax, but Still Denied Compensation

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. As the UK&rsquo;s biggest public service…

www.trialsitenews.com

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. As the UK’s biggest public service department, it administers the State Pension and a range of working age, disability and ill health benefits to around 20 million claimants and customers.

When Paul Turner was questioned by the UK government's Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) about day-to-day life after his injury, he said it's mix of good and bad. Unfortunately, the unpredictability of his flare-ups prevent him from keeping employment and receiving continuing disability benefits. TrialSite News spoke with Turner in email and live interviews to understand more about his story, his ongoing medical struggle, and the denial of his disability claim.

The Paradox of Doctor vs. Government

The problem is there's no “typical day,” for Turner. Sometimes holding a phone or walking around can be agonizing on his joints. Sometimes he is struck with an abrupt and draining fatigue. "I struggle to stay awake. I mean, that's not me. I'm usually high-energy, buzzing, but it can just put me down. My head hits the pillow and I'm gone."

Turner said the DWP evaluated and determined his case without ever consulting his doctors. “They said that because I can walk 200 meters and scratch my head on a good day, that I could go back to work. But my work doesn’t want me back if they cannot be assured that I can come in this week, and next week, and the week after. My doctors say I’m not fit to work. This is where the paradox is: a doctor is stating that I am not fit to work, and the DWP has written a letter that says ‘we’re not going to pay you anymore’ and they have not consulted with my doctor…I’ve been told, if I can’t do my current job, then find another.”

In all fairness to Turner, how many employers would realistically be willing to train a retirement-aged employee who cannot be relied on?

Let’s examine the details and severity of Turner’s reaction.

Turner’s Reaction Story

Prior to his COVID-19 vaccination, Paul Turner was lively, athletic and “in reasonably good health,” aside from a mild heart attack in 2018, and some arthritis that was easily controlled by an anti-inflammatory, naproxen sodium. At that time, the 64-year-old salesman was well-known around the office for bounding up 18 office steps three at a time. He also enjoyed playing football (UK) and cricket regularly.

Turner received his first dose of AZ on 2/23/21. Initially, he experienced typical flu-like symptoms such as chills. He received his second dose on 4/30/21 and had no immediate reaction.

On 5/9/21 he noticed “an itchy spot” on his left rib. The following day he began feeling run-down and developed a fever. His spot became a rash that expanded to his right shoulder “and was itching like chicken pox.” His GP prescribed a cream after viewing photos in a virtual appointment. By 5/11/21 Turner said “the rash was up both arms, across my back to my groin.”

First Theoretical Diagnosis

In a face-to-face consultation with his GP, the charge nurse took photos to submit to dermatology at Rotherham General Hospital. One hypothesis was that the reaction could have been Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS).

The Mayo Clinic explains that SJS is a “rare, serious disorder of the skin and mucous membranes. It's usually a reaction to medication that starts with flu-like symptoms, followed by a painful rash that spreads and blisters. Then the top layer of affected skin dies, sheds and begins to heal after several days.”

—TrialSite recently wrote about a 12-year-old girl in Thailand, who experienced the most extreme version of SJS, known as Toxic Epidemal Necrolysis (TEN), after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.—

Turner was given an appointment to be seen by dermatology on 5/14/21, just three days away, but the following day the rash started to blister. It also continued to travel down his hands, feet, and even into his mouth. In addition to the rapidly spreading rash, Turner explained a peculiar symptom: loss of his voice, without any pain or feeling of irritation in his throat.

Second Diagnosis

The following day, his rash consumed his thighs and “looked raw like liver.” When he sent a picture to his GP, they advised him to get to Rotherham General Hospital for admission.

Turner wrote: “I was there before 10:30 [am] for triage but was not seen by a [triage] Dr. until 3:50. He called dermatology, but they refused to attend as they were leaving at 4pm!” The doctor reported back to his superior and diagnosed Turner with hemorrhagic chicken pox (a.k.a hemorrhagic varicella). Turner was put on a gurney and dressings were applied for some relief. “I got a bed at 10pm. Most of the time, I’d been asleep and running a high temperature.”

The NIH states that “hemorrhagic varicella is a serious complication of a relatively benign disorder and usually occurs in immunocompromised persons and those on immunosuppressive therapy.” Typically, the disease is an epidemic in schoolchildren.

“However, atypical clinical presentations and uncommon complications of this disease can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. There may be development of several unusual complications besides the usual complications of chickenpox, and these may be:

Guillain-Barré syndrome

Acute transverse myelitis

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Optic neuritis

Acute pancreatitis

Acute acalculous cholecystitis

Immune thrombocytopenia

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC),

Hemorrhagic stroke (due to vasculopathy)

Stevens-Johnson syndrome

Myocarditis/pericarditis

Acute nephritic/nephrotic syndrome and rarely orchitis

Synovitis

Tympanic membrane rupture or cerebral thrombophlebitis.”

Let’s consider some issues with this diagnosis from the triage doctor:

Turner has immunity to chickenpox from childhood. Breakthrough infections from natural immunity are extremely rare, according to an article on the NIH website. When there is a case of secondary infection, it is a milder form of the illness, often without fever, and with fewer symptoms.

To the best of his knowledge, no one that Turner was in contact with during that period had the disease when his symptoms began. While his rash initially resembled chicken pox, wouldn’t these mismatching factors about Turner point his doctor elsewhere? Especially given the temporal relation to his second dose? Although this doctor could have a good reason, he is not at liberty to comment on patients.

"Whilst I was hospitalized, the consensus was that the rash was caused by stress. I was asked when I had my 2nd vax, but that was dismissed as having been too long before showing symptoms. It was 8 days."

Overnight, Turner was given intravenous antibiotics. However, the blisters were now bursting and secreting a yellow fluid. Since chickenpox is highly contagious, Turner was isolated.

“As I’d got the appointment that day with dermatology, I asked the nursing staff to tell them I was already on site." Turner said his appointment was inexplicably canceled, and he was never seen by a dermatology doctor.

In the next few days, Turner’s persistent temperature was a major concern for his caretakers. Meanwhile, his knees, ankles and feet swelled up. Turner was becoming increasingly weak and could not walk. The staff aspirated his left knee to drain the fluid build-up.

Still More Diagnoses

Due to the observed inflammation, the staff began to suspect that maybe Turner’s condition was not SJS, or chicken pox, but perhaps gout. The CDC defines gout as “a common form of inflammatory arthritis that is very painful. It usually affects one joint at a time (often the big toe joint). There are times when symptoms get worse, known as flares, and times when there are no symptoms, known as remission. Repeated bouts of gout can lead to gouty arthritis, a worsening form of arthritis.”

His doctors tried treating him with Colchicine, an anti-gout medication. However, it only works by stopping the natural processes that cause swelling and other symptoms of gout. It will only provide pain relief if gout is the true issue. Unfortunately, the common side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach cramps or pain)were too intolerable for Turner who could not walk himself easily to his bathroom.

When they tested the fluid drained from his knee, no uric acid was detected. Gout was out, and the next suspected disease was reactive arthritis. Then his doctors did find the presence of uric acid in his blood, and it was back to gout.

The staff would flip-flop their diagnoses multiple times with Turner throughout his eleven day stay in the hospital. At some point, the diagnosis became exacerbated, infected eczema, then just eczema, and finally, a combination of reactive arthritis, gout and pompholyx eczema.

"I am now on Alopurinol tablets for the gout, a side effect of which could be SJS. I have now gone from pain-free joints to some degree of pain/discomfort daily."

After Discharge

On 5/24/21 Turner was discharged with a walker to supplement his lack of mobility from his swelling knees. “I had to learn to walk again. I’ve got a good pain tolerance, but the pain is so extreme, it’s awful.”

When he arrived home he received a letter inviting him to a phone appointment with a doctor from RDGH. He assumed it was a wellness call because he was turning 65 in a few months. "It wasn't. The consultant in charge of the ward I’d been on was very concerned at what he’d seen and was anxious to know how I was progressing. He said he didn’t normally do this. He wasn’t happy that dermatology had discharged me and would speak to them and rheumatology prior to my follow up with them in December. That hasn’t happened, I presume due to an increase in COVID cases pre Christmas” Turner wrote.

Over the course of the year, Turner experienced several additional flair-ups. Steroids would sometimes alleviate his knee pain. However, new inflammation has migrated to his elbow.

Turner said he was contacted by the national health service, and the consulting doctor investigating Turner's case, claimed he had a medical history of musculoskeletal, dermatological and mental health issues. Turner argued with the clinical assessment doctor that he had no history of mental illness, and was able to confirm that no such diagnosis was written in his medical chart online. The medical center where he had received treatment also confirmed that the mental health issues were false. This caused Turner to question the competency of this public health investigator.

“So if they are incorrect with that information, what else are they incorrect about? This is basic.” He said that the representative acknowledged the discrepancy, but the DWP never removed it from Turner’s file.

Help from Political Leaders?

Turner contacted his local Member of Parliament, Rt Hon John Healey for help. According to his website he is “the Labour MP for Wentworth and Dearne, and has been an MP continuously since May 1, 1997. He currently undertakes the role of Shadow Secretary of State for Defense.”

Healey did listen to Turner’s story and brought his issue to Sir Christopher Chope. Chope, is a conservative MP for Christchurch (Dorset, Southwest Region.) His statements urging more oversight and action from the health organizations in charge of monitoring vaccine side effects have made him a target of accusations from his fellow parliament members and the media.

Chope Under Fire

For instance, “Fact-Checking” from Fullfact.org, attempts to discredit him for referencing reports in the Yellow Card system. Chope used these government metrics to urge parliament to take responsibility for investigating these claims, as well as reforming the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS.)

Here is one such statement from Chope via FullFact.org: “The government has produced quite a lot of information about the extent of vaccine damage. Some of that is set out in the documents that the Government produce on those who have applied for compensation or have notified under the yellow card scheme. Essentially, what the yellow card scheme shows—from the most recent report, which came out on September 9th and covers the period from [December 9, 2020 to September 1, 2021]—is that there have been 435 reports of major blood clots and low platelet counts, including 74 deaths. It shows that there have been 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, a condition that is almost unheard of in medicine on a normal day-to-day basis. It shows that there have been some 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder, and there are all sorts of other effects set out in the comprehensive report. Very worryingly, it says that there are 1,632 reports of deaths having taken place shortly after vaccination.” Read the full parliament transcript here.

Fullfact.org argued that “here, Mr Chope appears to equate ‘vaccine damage’ with the reports of adverse events after Covid-19 vaccinations submitted through the MHRA’s Yellow Card scheme. As we have written many times before, these reports—which can be submitted via members of the public or medics—cannot be used to reliably say whether or not a condition was directly caused by the vaccine.”

In an interview with The Conservative Woman (UK) Chope was given the opportunity to clarify the context of his statements. Here is just one excerpt, but the article provides much more.

“...There is a feeling out there that anyone who is questioning the vaccines is some mad conspiracy theorist, who is part of the 'anti-vax' campaign. I’m not anti-vax. I just believe that vaccine confidence is best promoted by being open and transparent, and not by covering up.”

(TrialSite reminds readers that a majority of legacy media organizations and international journalism schools that train journalists to become “fact-checkers” are funded by Big Pharma and Big Tech.)

Is MHRA Keeping Its Responsibility to Monitor and Investigate?

It is true that Yellow Card reports are preliminary and not determined to be caused by the COVID-19 vaccines until an investigation has been completed. The UK government website assures the public that "given the huge scale of the COVID-19 immunisation programme, with many millions of doses of vaccines administered over a relatively short time period, vigilance needs to be continuous, proactive and as near real-time as is possible."

However, from December 2020, to December 2021, only 12 cases had been investigated. This information was sent to Turner by Chope. It was a copy of correspondence between Chope and MP Sajid Javed (who served as Secretary of State for Health and Social Care from June 2021 to July 2022.)

Turner notes that the VDPS only grants compensation to those who are deemed 60% > injured.

— TrialSite covered the story of 54 year-old Scottish scaffolder, Alex Mitchell, who suffered an unprecedented amount of blood clots and a subsequent leg amputation. Despite his surgeons being in agreement that it was Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia, (VITT) Mitchell was forced to fight with MHRA for over a year for any compensation.—

It’s worth considering that Fullfact.org can attempt to discredit Chope for using "vaccine injury" in the same paragraph as the Yellow Card claims, all while the MHRA drags its heels on actually investigating the mounting claims.

TrialSite wondered just how many of these reports are being investigated as of now (Nov. 2022).

During our search, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) was discovered: “COVID-19 mortality autopsy investigations.”

Here was the question regarding COVID-19 vaccine deaths: “How many of the deaths on MHRA yellow card reporting system which lists adverse reactions to the COVID-19 injections have been investigated by conducting autopsies and full post-mortem test results in order to establish what the actual cause of death was?”

“Also in care homes throughout England and Wales, how many of the residents who have died within 28 days of receiving either shot, have had their deaths investigated by pathologists through autopsy?”

ONS’s response was that their department didn’t have that information. “ONS mortality data include only those where a doctor or coroner has decided that the vaccination did contribute to the cause of death. We do not hold the information you have requested regarding the Yellow Card reporting system. You can find figures published on the Yellow Card Scheme by the MHRA here.”

“ONS mortality data is derived from the death certificate and coded in line with International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10). The number of deaths in England and Wales where adverse reaction to the vaccine was mentioned on the death certificate can be found in Table 12 of our Monthly Mortality Analysis dataset.”

At the time of the FOIA, October 7, 2021, the ONS stated there were 4 confirmed deaths. As of September 2022, there are 47 deaths in England and none in Wales.

Paul Turner said his MP has not had much luck improving the payment scheme for his constituents. “I've had support from my MP in spirit, but not financial support.” Thankfully, Turner’s reports that he has seen gradual improvement in his symptoms over the course of the last 20 months. He has cautiously declined any COVID-19 boosters.

they have sucked governments dry taking your tax money now they want your wallet!!!

Pfizer Plans to Hike the Cost of Its Covid Jab as COVID Represents ‘Billion Dollar Franchise’

Pfizer Plans to Hike the Cost of Its Covid Jab as COVID Represents ‘Billion Dollar Franchise’

Without question, the Covid pandemic has pushed the profit margin for Big Pharma to new heights. Well, at least the winners are embedded in what seems to be an…

www.trialsitenews.com

Without question, the Covid pandemic has pushed the profit margin for Big Pharma to new heights. Well, at least the winners are embedded in what seems to be an increasingly cozy government-medical industry and Big Pharma tripartite order. Now, it appears Pfizer is taking the route of the infamous “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli, who notoriously raised the price of an anti-parasitic drug by over 5000%. Pfizer may not be judged as extreme, audacious, and blatant as Shkreli, but their Chief Financial Officer (CFO) seems to be moving toward maximizing profit based on the Covid crisis. You know what they say—never let a good crisis go to waste, especially when you have Uncle Sam priming the pump, essentially helping to socialize the costs of marketing.

CFO Calls COVID-19 a “Multi-Billion Dollar Franchise”

Who would have thought that given all of our taxpayer money involved that we would get to live with the multibillion-dollar ‘COVID Franchise’ but that’s exactly what Pfizer’s CFO David Denton now calls out for investors.

Mr. Denton had been the CFO of the homecare improvement company Lowe’s, but he also had been the CFO of the pharmacy giant CVS and is responsible for turning the company into a healthcare corporation after CVS bought health insurer Aetna. From home supplies to pharmacy to pharmaceuticals, Denton’s aligned with insatiable investor urges for more.

One of the reasons Pfizer was interested in hiring Denton was because of the $69 billion purchase of Aetna in 2018. This was called a “transformative moment” for the healthcare industry. When Pfizer announced it had hired Denton in April of 2022, the company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Albert Bourla, said in a press release:

“Our company's continued financial strength is essential to Pfizer’s ability to deliver on our purpose and to create long-term value for all our stakeholders. Dave brings with him deep financial experience, a track record of achievement, and true insights into today’s healthcare system. For these reasons, he is the perfect leader to take the helm of our talented finance organization and deliver a comprehensive strategic financial vision that will help drive Pfizer’s future growth and success.” It appears Denton is following through on Bourla’s vision.

Plans to Raise Cost of Vaccine

In an earnings conference, Denton reportedly said Covid will be around for years. Even though Pfizer made around $80 billion in annual revenue from the Covid vaccine and its antiviral drug Paxlovid, the company plans to increase the price of their shot to $130 per jab.

This is a markup of about 10 thousand percent. The vaccine itself reportedly costs about $1.18 to manufacture one dose. Denton reportedly said, “I think if you look out longer term, the franchise is going to be a multibillion-dollar franchise in the respect that this is going to be somewhat like a flu, sustained flu, but actually deadlier than the flu. I think the products, both from a vaccine and the therapy perspective that Pfizer has developed, are going to be quite relevant for many years to come.”

TrialSite has consistently reminded readers while the Pfizer jab blunts the full edge of the pandemic the product’s quality as measured by durability most certainly raises questions when one considers value-based health care. Recent studies published in this media indicate the Pfizer mRNA vaccine wanes in effectiveness faster than ever thought before when looking at viral transmission.

This price hike would not affect people with health insurance or who have Medicaid or Medicare. However, for those paying out of pocket, the cost per shot would be anywhere from $50 to $95. CEO Albert Bourla recently told investors:

“With regard to our COVID-19 products, while their sales may fall from our expected 2022 levels of approximately combined $55 billion, we believe our COVID-19 franchises will remain multibillion-dollar revenue generators for the foreseeable future which should serve as a buffer for any unforeseen challenges with other products in our portfolio.”

Pfizer projects its total revenue this year to be $102 billion. TrialSite News has maintained pharmaceutical companies are for-profit businesses, and the Covid vaccine did help mitigate the full effect of the pandemic. However, the amount of money made by Big Pharma, their CEOs, and CFOs during the pandemic seems to be beyond exploitive and may even border on obscene. But if the American public doesn’t pressure their own representatives, Bourla most certainly won’t do it for them.

kicking the crap to the curb for real working low cost vaccines!!!

Southeast Asia Moves Away from Western Pharma COVID-19 Vaccines: Indonesia Launches IndoVac

Southeast Asia Moves Away from Western Pharma COVID-19 Vaccines: Indonesia Launches IndoVac

Could Indonesia, Southeast Asia&rsquo;s most populous nation, be following Cuba&rsquo;s lead when it comes to COVID-19 vaccination? As this media has reported,…

www.trialsitenews.com

Could Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s most populous nation, be following Cuba’s lead when it comes to COVID-19 vaccination? As this media has reported, Cuba has developed a handful of indigenous COVID-19 vaccines, with one of them looking very effective. The nation with a surprisingly sophisticated medical infrastructure started mass vaccination early on. Nearly 90% of the island nation’s population has been fully vaccinated, and they have put SARS-CoV-2 in control for many months now. For more, see TrialSite’s review of the Abdala vaccination program. Indonesia also pivoted away from dependency on either Chinese, Russian, or Western drugmakers’ COVID-19 vaccines. Last month, the nation rolled out the “halal’ certified IndoVac COVID-19 vaccine produced by state-owned pharma company BioFarma based in West Java. With 270 million, Indonesia is the most populated Muslim nation on Earth, as 90% of the population falls into this religion. Hence halal certification was key for a successful regimen. And last month, President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo attended a vaccination kickoff where Indonesian healthcare workers received the indigenous jabs. But the true origins of IndoVac is America—specifically a brilliant pair of scientists at Baylor College of Medicine. But not Western Big Pharma.

TrialSite reported on the amazing story of the origins of IndoVac—actually made in America at Baylor College of Medicine. In TrialSite’s “Houston, Texas Developed Open Source COVID-19 Vaccine Authorized in Indonesia,” this media shared that at the start of January 2022, TrialSite updated all on the progress of an open source vaccine developed for low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) by Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, a product developed not for profits, but for health equity. By the start of the year, hundreds of millions of doses of this COVID-19 vaccine developed by prominent Texas academic medical centers received little attention from the mainstream press—which focused on what could be considered profiteering by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

Yet this Houston-developed recombinant protein-based vaccine led by Dr. Peter Hotez and Dr. Maria Elena Bottazzi called IndoVac was licensed recently to PT Bio Farma, the holding company or state-owned pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia, the southeast Asian nation with 274 million and the largest Islamic population in the world. PT Bio Farma is ready to produce 20 million doses of IndoVac COVID-19 vaccine in 2023, and another 100 million doses by 2024.

Kudos to the Houston Team

TrialSite sent congratulatory communications to the Texas vaccine duo:

Dear Drs. Bottazzi and Hotez,

TrialSite sends you both kudos for an incredible accomplishment for IndoVac. We have been tracking your effort since the start and find it incredibly impressive that you were able to commercialize in an economically just manner.

In an age of too much economic excess, our reporting of your news today in TrialSite News emphasizes the importance of health equity and access.

The article will be published open access later this AM at http://www.trialsitenews.com

Dr. Botazzi sent a note declaring, “Thanks so much you are very kind sending your message” and she copied the communications team for a possible interview while Dr. Hotez was traveling but shared via email “Many think I’m on a flight to Boston today but will have a look! Best Peter.”

These two Houston-based scientists are to be commemorated for developing an economical, widely available and safe and effective (over 80%) vaccine targeting COVID-19.

Other ‘Second Generation’ SE Asian Vaccines in Works

Recently showcased in Asian-based media, Indonesia and most low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) weren’t first in line for the advanced mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech and they were not necessarily interested in purportedly lower quality vaccines from China or Russia. Indonesia first signed up for vaccines from Russia and China as TrialSite educated the LMICs were carved out for those suppliers while American and Europe’s Big Pharma secured the most lucrative COVID-19 vaccine markets. Yet the mRNA vaccines as well have a growing stigma associated with safety.

However, as the virus mutated, leading to waves driven by new variants of concern, the Russian and Chinese vaccine durability came into question (as they have in the West). With cases surging again by 2021, Indonesia looked at alternatives and, in addition to the Baylor University-developed open-source vaccine, also approved AstraZeneca’s (Oxford) vaccine, which has safety concerns as well.

But as reported recently in Nikkei Asia “Jakarta is putting its weight behind IndoVac” with the president declaring the nation ordered 40 million more doses for next year.

the halal certified recombinant protein-based vaccine approved by the Indonesia Food and Drug Authority called BPOM doesn’t contain alcohol, substances derived from pigs or any other ingredients banned by Islam reports Nikkei Asia.

While Indonesia thus far is the only Southeast Asian nation adopting a “homegrown” shot, Thailand’s state-connected Chulalongkorn University in partnership with University of Pennsylvania biologist Drew Weissman is developing ChulaCOVID-19, a Thai-based COVID-19 vaccine.

They completed a Phase 1 study last summer. ChulaCov19 has demonstrated comparable efficacy or even greater than Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine based on results from Phase 2 trials.

The Phase 3 trial comes next: in fact, the Thai government has allocated 2.3 billion baht ($62 million) to support both the clinical development and manufacturing should the developer secure Thailand Food and Drug Administration approval to proceed.

It was reported by local Thai news in September that a Southeast Asian nation seeks “Second Generation” COVID-19 vaccines not developed in the West, China, or Russia, which is telling. “This is news one doesn’t hear in the United States,” shared TrialSite founder Daniel O’Connor. He continued, “In fact, we start to hear folks in places like Southeast Asia refer to their next localized vaccines for COVID-19 as ‘Second Generation.’ We were known to label the COVID-19 vaccines both out of Russia and China as well as America and Europe as ‘Version 1.0’ vaccines’ for SARS-CoV-2.”

In addition to Chulalongkorn University and Weissman (ChulaCOVID-19) another vaccine involving the same university and a biotech called Baiya Phytopharm is developing a plant-based COVID-19 vaccine called Baiya. Also, the Thai Government Pharmacy Organization recently allocated 435.5 million baht to develop the inactivated vaccine HXP-GPOVac. Now in Phase 2 clinical trials involving 250 participants between the age of 18 and 75, the government is reporting so far so good-the COVID-19 vaccine seems safe while triggering significant immunity.

HXP-GPOVac is actually like the IndoVac vaccine initially developed in the West for private label development. The vaccine was initially developed under the leadership of Peter Palese, Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, and Florian Krammer at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

The Director of the Thailand National Vaccine Institute, Premsri, declared recently that all three homegrown candidates will be available as boosters in 2023.

Even Vietnam jumps into the Southeast Asian vaccine COVID-19 vaccine race, albeit slower. Nikkei Asia reports the “Nanocovax” vaccine entered development by the end of 2020 however its Phase 3 clinical trial is lagging. Another vaccine in Vietnam called Covivac is based on the HXP-GPOVac platform. That vaccine is sponsored by the Institute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals, Vietnam but hasn’t moved fast. The infrastructure to develop vaccines is less robust in Vietnam.

Japan's Covid mafia destructions from building brainless fences like as back to pre 1670 Japan....

Life in Japan: The impact of COVID-19 isolationism - The Mainichi

By David McNeill This summer I returned to my native Ireland with my kids for our first trip out of Japan in over three years. Like many expats aroun

mainichi.jp

Some Japanese facts: Medicine is controlled by rotary as in most parts of western world. Rotary is the liberal branch of Freemasons.

Japanese politicians expect bribes. Its the main reason for going into politics. After the killing of former prime minister Abe it became clear that more than 50% of his fellow party members took bribes from the unification church sect that works with similar methods as the radical evangelist, that employ psycho terror to get donations.

So it is highly obvious Pfizer/Moderna broadly distributed bribes in Japan.

Today's reality is that Japanese natives still walk with masks if they leave the house. This is completely nuts. Switzerland e.g. never had any mask mandate for outdoor. The Japanese government does longer uphold a mask mandate for outdoors but makes no effort to educate the people as they still expect to sell many more boosters at the > 4x world market price.or at 10x the price of an alternative Covid true vaccine.

Such thing are only possible in a totally corrupt plutocracy like Japan.

363'000 long term sick people in UK:: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz6WwJDHeXo

Strong in crease after booster 1 and booster 2!!!

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Led to Multiple Cranial Nerve Palsies: Case Report in Romania

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Led to Multiple Cranial Nerve Palsies: Case Report in Romania

Late last year, physician-scientists associated with the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy and the National Institute of Neurology and…

www.trialsitenews.com

Late last year, physician-scientists associated with the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy and the National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases in Bucharest Romania reported on a post-COVID-19 vaccine injury via a case report involving a 29-year-old white male who had no known history presenting Bell’s palsy and diplopia. Represented by corresponding author Maria Mirabela Manea, the Romanian medical research group reported that his symptoms commenced just 6 days after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. With no disclosed allergic history, the doctors secured a signed patient consent to publish the case report using CARE reporting guidelines.

The Case Report

The doctors conducted a gadolinium-enhanced MRI which presented enhancement in the left facial, trigeminal and oculomotor nerves—this observation only persisted upon repeated examination. While cerebrospinal fluid analysis was done initially and one month after the start of the patient’s symptoms, the study authors found no signs of inflammation. Reviewing a list of possible causes, the team eliminated one after the other while treating the patient with high doses of corticosteroids with an improvement in symptoms.

Conclusion

The BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine the researchers determined was the cause of the enhancement observed in the left facial, trigeminal, and oculomotor nerves.

Relevance

Part of the nervous system responsible for sending pain, touch and temperature sensations from one’s face to the brain, this large three-part nerve in the head powers significant neurological function. The mandibular nerve, a section, helps motor function to help chew and swallow.

The third cranial nerve (CN III), the oculomotor nerve supports the movement of the eye muscles, constriction of the pupil, eye focus as well as positioning of the upper eyelid. This nerve works with others to control eye movements while supporting sensory functioning.

Importantly when this case report was published in the journal Activa Neurological Scandinavica, the Romania authors cited four cases of Bell’s palsy occurring 3, 9, 37 and 48 days post the vaccine as reported by the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, December 10, 2020 Meeting Briefing Document—FDA 2020.

Additionally, the authors pointed out:

“Several cases are reported of peripheral facial palsy after immunization with PBV [Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine]: a patient with two episodes of contralateral Bell's palsies arising shortly after inoculation with the first and second dose of the PBV and other cases of unilateral facial palsy occurring 36 h after the second dose. Another published case involved abducens nerve palsy 2 day after PBV.”

The study authors reported on “the strength of this study” based on the “thorough work-up performed which enabled the exclusion of other potential causes.” They do acknowledge how this was a first of its kind involving multiple cranial neuropathies after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Caution

The doctors overseeing this case report acknowledge the “efficacy and safety of these novel vaccines…” but emphasize the importance of “the monitoring period for the appearance of post-vaccine complications” currently limited to just “a few months.” Their point: “neurological side effects require close observation.”

TrialSite Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Injury

TrialSite has been supporting post-COVID-19 vaccine injury groups such as React19 and recently also launched as part of its TrialSite Groups, the COVID Vaccine Injury Support Group.

An open and free group with no censorship, TrialSite continues to report on various post-COVID-19 vaccine injury case reports, case series, and other studies since the release of the vaccines. The goal is to build a large repository of content tracking the various injuries for the benefit of healthcare professionals as well as post-COVID-19 vaccine-injured persons.

TrialSite’s committed to transparent, accessible, unbiased, and objective medical research and represents one of the few media platforms in the United States that reports consistently on both studies producing positive evidence associated with COVID-19 vaccines as well as challenges from durability issues to serious side effects and injuries.

About Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Based in Bucharest, Romania, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy is known as UMFCD and serves as a vital public health sciences university in this major city of Romania. UMFCD represents one of the largest and oldest institutions in Romania.

Lead Research/Investigator

Maria Mirabela Manea, MD, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Corresponding Author.

Other authors can be viewed at the source.

Call to Action: Check out the TrialSite COVID Vaccine Injury Support Group. https://www.trialsitenews.com/…cine-injury-support-group

Vaccine Expert Skeptical About Bivalent Booster

Vaccine Expert Skeptical About Bivalent Booster

Paul Offit is a well-known pediatrician and researcher often seen on network television for his expertise on vaccines. TrialSite News has&nbsp;cited Offit for…

www.trialsitenews.com

Paul Offit is a well-known pediatrician and researcher often seen on network television for his expertise on vaccines. TrialSite News has cited Offit for his know expertise specifically on vaccines as he started to question the push for the bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5 COVID-19 vaccine booster. Increasingly outspoken, it’s not too surprising that mainstream media such as The Philadelphia Inquirer features his increasingly restless point of view on the COVID-19 vaccination program, not to mention his skepticism of the new bivalent Covid vaccine and the government’s increasingly questionable response. Offit understands that the government’s obsession with vaccine hesitancy, and avoiding it, may lead to even more resistance.

Oversold

According to Offit, who is on the independent Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) advisory board regarding which vaccines the public should receive, the bivalent shot is unnecessary. “This product was grossly oversold,” says Offit, who was in the minority when the FDA Vaccine and Related Biologics Committee (VBRAC) recommended the booster in June with a 19-2 vote.

Recently, on the record, Offit declared :

“We have to be careful when we get in front of the American public and try to sell this vaccine as something that’s significantly better when all the evidence we have so far doesn’t support that.”

The Philadelphia-based physician-scientists grow increasingly frustrated with governments’ handling of the pandemic. Offit believes a person who’s been fully vaccinated and boosted gets little benefit from additional Covid jabs. And Offit isn’t only a vaccine advocate, he’s also developed them. He was part of a team that developed a vaccine for rotavirus which is now given to every infant in the United States and has been accepted worldwide.

He’s also a founder and co-director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Keeping this in mind Offit isn’t completely against the bivalent jab, he thinks it should be given to vaccinated people 75 and older and those who are immunocompromised, but not to children ages 5 and above.

Really, he seems to be moving away from the pandemic stage one-size-fits-all approach that government, academia, health systems, and industry are all aligned to promote. For example, Offit emphasizes now a risk-based approach focusing on higher-risk individuals:

“The take home lesson is the people who were in high-risk groups and benefit from booster doses as we enter this late fall and early winter – those who are immunocompromised, who have high risk medical conditions, who are elderly — they should get this booster dose,” says Offit.

Concerned Decision Not Backed by Science

As reported by TrialSite, there were no clinical trials of the bivalent booster [at the time of release to the public] a fact not missed by Offit. He’s also concerned about the federal government making a decision about the vaccine when it’s not backed by what Offit calls “robust science”.

Why would the government authorize the booster without input from the FDA advisory committee—asks Offit. Comparing the approval of the bivalent vaccine with the Trump administration’s pressure on health agencies to approve the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for Covid—essentially stating the Biden administration is politicizing the pandemic as much as the previous Trump Offit declares, “It isn’t different.”

Importantly, Offit is concerned about losing the trust of the majority of the American public. After all, he is aware that even up until now less than 9% of all persons across America eligible for the bivalent booster have stepped forward to get it.

Offit says…

“If you’re advocating for a position where the science doesn’t really support that position, then what happens is you lose trust.”

In an April 2022 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, Offit points to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as the main government body which must educate the public about Covid vaccines and boosters. In the article Offit says people are now confused about what it means to be “fully vaccinated” and also asserts boosters are not “risk free.”

Vaccines, Money…Power

This may be difficult considering the relationship between the government and Big Pharma. And, given the fact pharmaceutical companies are seeing nothing but profit from the pandemic convincing the public may be a tall order.

But according to Offit, “It is now incumbent on the CDC to determine who most benefits from booster dosing and to educate the public about the limits of mucosal vaccines.”

But money is power and influence in America. As long as Big Pharma is generating unprecedented revenues from Covid, that may prove to be very difficult

Activating the Enemy Within: COVID Jabs Might Reactivate Virus and Diseases in Your Body

Activating the Enemy Within: COVID Jabs Might Reactivate Virus and Diseases in Your Body

New evidence in the scientific community indicates that there is a strong correlation between COVID-19, its related vaccines, ...

www.theepochtimes.com

New evidence in the scientific community indicates that there is a strong correlation between COVID-19, its related vaccines, and the reactivation of other viruses which have previously infected the host. This article will dive deeper into the nuances.

How Can Viruses Be Reactivated?

In the number of years I spent in the military as a microbiologist, I’ve always been quite impressed with how shrewd viruses can get.

During viral infections, viruses have to deal with the defense of the immune systems. If the immune system has the upper hand and defeats the viruses, viruses might develop mechanisms to stay dormant and become inactivated.

One such mechanism is to insert their viral DNA into cells’ chromosomes, staying in latency without active replication. Other mechanisms might involve promoting epigenetic silencing of the viral genome, meaning they stay “muted” in activity, but present and lying in wait.

Host cells will then reproduce cells still carrying the viral genetic information. Then, viruses might come back years, or even decades later, reactivating the viral replication when the immune system degrades. This prudent strategy where viruses turn into a latent enemy within the host is quite an effective strategy against the enemy, whether in the military or the human body.

The scientific community is very familiar with five types of viruses that are able to “hibernate” and reactivate given suitable conditions:

Herpes simplex virus, which causes blisters in the mouth and genital herpes. It is extremely common;

Varicella zoster virus (VZV), more commonly known as chickenpox;

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which causes mononucleosis or “mono,” the “kissing disease,” as it can be transmitted when people kiss each other;

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), which usually causes a great deal of trouble for immunocompromised people but not really otherwise;

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes AIDS; this virus can stay in your body for more than a decade before becoming activated.

Let’s take VZV, or chickenpox, as an example. In the usual sense, everybody gets chickenpox in their life. This usually happens early on and is quite itchy for the patient but doesn’t have a lot of other severe complications.

After the patient initially overcomes VZV, it never truly goes away. It has the possibility of coming back, especially with the weakening of the immune system. It can attack again in a more severe form called shingles or Herpes Zoster. Shingles is a very painful rash that develops on one side of the body. In some cases, it may also cause chronic nerve pain or other serious complications, including blindness.

Shingles can also be caused by advanced age, stress, diseases (chronic or acute), cancer, or various other sources. In fact, the aforementioned factors usually also lead to the reactivation of other viruses. Chronic fatigue might lead to reactivating EBV, herpes might be reawoken with surgery, and HIV might be kickstarted by tumors.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Found in the Human Nucleus

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Found in the Human Nucleus

In a recent paper by Sattar et al in collaboration with scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the authors report that both mRNA and Spike…

www.trialsitenews.com

In a recent paper by Sattar et al in collaboration with scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the authors report that both mRNA and Spike protein colocalized within the nucleus of human cells.[i]

Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pathophysiology in vulnerable older populations and appears to be highly pathogenic…

www.biorxiv.org

Colocalization of mRNA and Spike protein within the human nucleus. Sattar S, Kabat J, Jerome K, Feldmann F, Bailey K, Mehedi M. Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Sep 27:2022.09.27.509633. doi: 10.1101/2022.09.27.509633. PMID: 36203551; PMCID: PMC9536038.

The authors note this is unusual and appears to not rely upon the furin cleavage site which is necessary for Spike protein entry into the cell. It is important to note the context and the methods of this paper utilized SARS-CoV-2 and not mRNA or adenoviral DNA vaccines. However, the ramifications of this finding cannot be understated. Having both one of the most pathogenic and lethal proteins ever discovered found within the nucleus of human cells with its genetic code is a hair-raising discovery. The paper was uploaded to the preprint server bioRxiv and still needs to be subjected to the peer review process.

A prior paper by Singh and Singh demonstrated Spike protein models anticipate an interaction with tumor suppressor genes P53 and BRCA1.[ii] Sattar now says this could indeed happen! Thus, Spike protein is at the scene of a potential crime—oncogenesis or the failure of immune surveillance against nascent cancer cells. Seneff et al have predicted that the Spike protein may be related to cell senescence and autophagy.[iii]

This means more rapid aging of cells and then programmed cell death. I have had many patients ask me why they lose muscle mass and have hair loss after COVID-19 illness, these observations provide perhaps some explanatory basis for discussion at the cellular level.

Finally and most disturbing, Nunez-Castilla et al of demonstrated homology of the Spike protein with about three dozen other human proteins.[iv] This explains why in the first place would the human nucleus allow entry of mRNA and Spike into the control center of the cell. Could the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 have been intentionally “humanized” as by design?

While Senator Rand Paul is doing a wonderful job staying focused on the possibility of U.S. government involvement in engineering of SARS-CoV-2 via the funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology for example; more in-depth lines of inquiry are needed with preclinical-scientists and officials from Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the NIH to reveal how much they knew about mRNA, the Spike protein, and any risks to human cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection and over the longer term.

[i] Sattar S, Kabat J, Jerome K, Feldmann F, Bailey K, Mehedi M. Nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and protein is a novel pathogenic feature of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Sep 27:2022.09.27.509633. doi: 10.1101/2022.09.27.509633. PMID: 36203551; PMCID: PMC9536038.

[ii] Singh N, Bharara Singh A. S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study. Transl Oncol. 2020 Oct;13(10):100814. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100814. Epub 2020 Jun 30. PMID: 32619819; PMCID: PMC7324311.

[iii] Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Jun;164:113008. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. Epub 2022 Apr 15. PMID: 35436552; PMCID: PMC9012513.

[iv] Nunez-Castilla J, Stebliankin V, Baral P, et al. Potential Autoimmunity Resulting from Molecular Mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Human Proteins. Viruses. 2022;14(7):1415. Published 2022 Jun 28. doi:10.3390/v14071415

Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake also write at Courageous Discourse.

References

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Found in the Human Nucleus

Designer Protein Breaks into Cellular Control Center and Poised to Wreak Havoc

petermcculloughmd.substack.com

Quote from Fm1

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Found in the Human Nucleus

This spike inside nucleus has already been reported one year ago! ....

SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro

Hui Jiang 1,2,* and Ya–Fang Mei 2,*

Lawsuit against Swissmedic for the authorization of a highly damaging drug (CoV-19 gene tech chemo).

Folgen der Covid-Impfung? - Darum geht es bei der Strafanzeige gegen Swissmedic

Ein impfskeptischer Anwalt und mutmasslich Geschädigte wollen eine Strafuntersuchung. Fragen und Antworten zur Klage.

www.srf.ch

On behalf of 6 heavily damaged/killed people....

It looks like there still are some independent layers around, that are not yet a member of the FM/R/JF/B mafia and second do not fear the court majority of the FM/R/JF/B mafia....

Needless to say that the FM/R/JF/B mafia will delay such a suit and certainly will white wash all the corrupt the FM/R/JF/B mafia members that have been involved into the big pharma money corruption.

The Swiss court systems knows no Jury! So it is a FM/R/JF/B mafia totalitarian system.

How long did your child take antibiotics against a lung infection??

WHO recommends 3-5 days. Pharma mafia 5..10 days.

Short-Course vs Long-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Children With Nonsevere Community-Acquired Pneumonia

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates whether a shorter course of antibiotics is noninferior to a longer course for the treatment of nonsevere…

jamanetwork.com

Newest study tell:: 5 days is superior to 10 days as it leads to way less unwanted side effects.

Just to remind you that countless "masked to death" children did end up in hospital (with different lung infections) as a free gift offered by the big pharma Covid terror.