The Totally Civil Covid Thread. (Closing 31/05)

Why Doctors Push COVID-19 Vaccination so Hard

Why Doctors Push COVID-19 Vaccination so Hard

Patients commonly ask me why their other doctors push COVID-19 vaccination so hard still to this day, with alarming safety statistics, loss of efficacy, and…

www.trialsitenews.com

Patients commonly ask me why their other doctors push COVID-19 vaccination so hard still to this day, with alarming safety statistics, loss of efficacy, and now, a complete lack of human trial data with the bivalent boosters. The answer may come by following a money trail from HHS and CDC called “COVID-19 Community Corps” that early in 2021, made undisclosed individual payments to hundreds of organizations to promote mass vaccination. There were notable medical groups, including the American Medical Association, American Association of Family Physicians, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Student Association.

More investigation is likely to reveal that federal money received was temporally linked to e-mail blasts, town hall meetings, and many other activities pushing mass vaccination. Could COVID-19 Community Corps money to the AMA have been the reason why the AMA launched its campaign to “abolish” the use of ivermectin in 2021, so the public would be panicked into taking more shots? How could the pediatric associations take federal money before the clinical trials for their patients were completed or the vaccines approved via EUA?

Did they promote the vaccines to pediatricians before clinical trial results were known? Finally, how could federal dollars flow to gynecologists/obstetricians when pregnant women and those of childbearing potential were excluded from randomized trials reported just a few months before the HHS initiative?

These broad acts of public bribery, corruption, and vaccine racketeering worked to put millions of lives in danger as we learned about the risks of COVID-19 vaccination in 2021. As we sit here today, the CDC VAERS system through November 25, 2022, is reporting 15,508 US deaths after COVID-19 vaccination; 22% occurred within 96 hours of the shot.

There have been 15,505 Americans disabled, 9266 with heart damage, and 356,269 office visits, urgent care encounters, or hospitalizations attributed to vaccine side effects. Never again can we allow our public health agencies to use unchecked financial power to promote any medication or vaccine to healthcare providers. Corruption and indoctrination are deadly.

Members of the COVID-19 Community Corps

Check out “Courageous Discourse.”

Why Doctors Push COVID-19 Vaccination so Hard

COVID-19 Community Corps Funneled Billions of Dollars to Medical and Community Groups

petermcculloughmd.substack.com

Quote from Fm1

There have been 15,505 Americans disabled, 9266 with heart damage, and 356,269 office visits, urgent care encounters, or hospitalizations

This is just the 10% tip of the iceberg In Germany 35% of all healthcare workers did miss labor in average for 3 days due to vaccine side effects. 3% of all boostered get heart damage mostly called "mild" what means they will live 20 more years. Among children its 10% with some heart damage. 50% of all patients with severe miocarditis/pericarditis die with 10 years...

50% abort chance due to RNA gene therapy (Cov - vaxxination) in the 4 months of pregnancy.

And the Pifzer phase III study did show > 1000 folks of the vaxxine arm got covid symptoms but no PCR test to confirm it....So Pfizer has a negative protection for CoV-19 of about 10000%.

Even one of my doctors (orthopedic) still believes that miocarditis/pericarditis can be caused by the CoV-19 virus what is an invented lie. miocarditis/pericarditis is a direct consequence of heart endothelium attack by the spike prions.

CoV-19 virus attack the endothelium of the blood vessels (not heart tissue) what can cause some heart symptoms that look like an infarct. So this is a totally different picture. The fake claims have been postulated by cheating echo cardio tests, that just look similar to the ones found in miocarditis/pericarditis victims. But pathology is 100% different.

Pfizer/Moderna paid a lot for faking medical information.... just one sample from the remdesivir crap company Gillead (JF mafia ruled) Gilead sponsored medicine.yale.edu-Pharma and academia partner for better health.pdf

USA: Born to be a victim of the parasites:: https://childrenshealthdefense…lthcare-cd/?itm_term=home

Private equity has become a growing and diversified part of the American healthcare economy. Demonstrated results of private equity ownership include higher patient mortality, higher patient costs, fewer jobs, poorer quality and closed facilities.

Paywalled but the header is enough :: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-02162-x

The results showed that a BA.5-bivalent-booster elicited a high neutralizing titer against BA.4/5 measured at 14- to 32-day post-boost; however, the BA.5-bivalent-booster did not produce robust neutralization against the newly emerged BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, or XBB.1. Previous infection significantly enhanced the magnitude and breadth of BA.5-bivalent-booster-elicited neutralization.

Happy day for Pfizer/Moderna! New boosters needed....

Brains With More Vitamin D Function Better

Quote from Wyttenbach

USA: Born to be a victim of the parasites:: https://childrenshealthdefense…lthcare-cd/?itm_term=home

Private equity has become a growing and diversified part of the American healthcare economy. Demonstrated results of private equity ownership include higher patient mortality, higher patient costs, fewer jobs, poorer quality and closed facilities.

Brains With More Vitamin D Function Better - Neuroscience News

Older adults with cognitive decline who have higher levels of vitamin D in their brains had better cognitive function than their peers with lower levels of…

neurosciencenews.com

Summary: Older adults with cognitive decline who have higher levels of vitamin D in their brains had better cognitive function than their peers with lower levels of vitamin D.

Source: Tufts University

An estimated 55 million people worldwide live with dementia, a number that’s expected to rise as the global population ages. To find treatments that can slow or stop the disease, scientists need to better understand the factors that can cause dementia.

Researchers at Tufts University have completed the first study examining levels of vitamin D in brain tissue, specifically in adults who suffered from varying rates of cognitive decline. They found that members of this group with higher levels of vitamin D in their brains had better cognitive function.

The study was published December 7 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association.

Quote from Wyttenbach

USA: Born to be a victim of the parasites:: https://childrenshealthdefense…lthcare-cd/?itm_term=home

Private equity has become a growing and diversified part of the American healthcare economy. Demonstrated results of private equity ownership include higher patient mortality, higher patient costs, fewer jobs, poorer quality and closed facilities.

the United States has a worldwide healthcare ranking of 37 in the industrial world behind many third world nations. Keep em on the edge of healthy and keep the gravy train rolling.

In a Deposition, Fauci Admits Covid May Have Leaked from the Wuhan Lab

In a Deposition, Fauci Admits Covid May Have Leaked from the Wuhan Lab

This media recently delved into a new book claiming that the Covid-19 virus actually leaked from the Wuhan lab. The Truth About Wuhan is written by Andrew…

www.trialsitenews.com

This media recently delved into a new book claiming that the Covid-19 virus actually leaked from the Wuhan lab. The Truth About Wuhan is written by Andrew Huff, a New York City-based epidemiologist who was employed by EcoHealth Alliance (a Wuhan Institute of Virology partner from time to time) says security in Wuhan was lax, and the gain-of-function experiments conducted in the facility likely caused the SARS-CoV-2 leak, unleashing the deadly pathogen on the world. According to Huff, who was a vice president at EcoHealth, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) financed the gain-of-function experiments by EcoHealth. These allegations were repeatedly denied by Dr. Anthony Fauci in front of a Senate hearing even though his organization, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), was listed as the administrator of the grant given to Wuhan Institute of Virology or Wuhan lab. Now, Fauci appears to be backtracking.

Appeasing China

In a seven-hour deposition last week from a lawsuit brought by the State Attorney Generals of Missouri and Louisiana, Fauci admitted his reluctance to cite the Wuhan lab as the source of the Covid-19 pandemic was because he thought it would “increase tensions” with China. "There was no evidence of that at the time, and that's what I was concerned about," said Fauci.

Now the doctor is claiming he has an “open mind” about the possibility of a Wuhan leak. “I have a completely open mind about that, despite people saying that I don’t. I have a totally open mind about that,” Fauci said on NBC’s Meet the Press. “But if you look at the preponderance of evidence that has been accumulated by international group of highly respected, evolutionary virologists, they feel, and they’ve written peer-reviewed papers on that, that the evidence strongly points to this being a natural occurrence of a jumping of a virus from a bat to an animal species to human, hasn’t been definitively proven. But the evidence on that is pretty strong. Having said that, we still all have to keep an open mind as to what the origin is.”

Fauci also said China’s “opaque behavior” hasn’t helped speculation about the origins of the Covid virus. “We need to have an open dialogue with their scientists and our scientists, keep the politics out of it,” he said. Even though Fauci is retiring, he will likely be called in to testify in front of the House of Representatives now that the Republicans are in the majority and have vowed to conduct an investigation into the origin of the Covid pandemic. Fauci also claims Republicans have “politicized” the virus.

A Consummate Politician

When Fauci was deposed last week from the state AG lawsuit, he repeated, “I don’t recall” 174 times. Fauci has been with the NIH for 54 years and became the head of NIAID in 1984. He is reportedly the richest government employee. Having survived Washington, DC, for so long takes a strong skill set enviable of politicians. It appears Fauci has perfected the political game. But the stakes are getting bigger as the pandemic’s fallout crashes toward politics. A man that declared “he is science” may be called in to testify more frequently.

This is just the beginning for the little lier and denier as congress is next for the troll. Hang him high!!!

Senate Hearing Shows Mainstream Media Has Ignored mRNA Vaccine Injuries and Protection of Big Pharma

Senate Hearing Shows Mainstream Media Has Ignored mRNA Vaccine Injuries and Protection of Big Pharma

From the beginning of the Covid pandemic, the public has been reassured by both Pfizer and Moderna that mRNA vaccines are completely safe. TrialSite News has…

www.trialsitenews.com

From the beginning of the Covid pandemic, the public has been reassured by both Pfizer and Moderna that mRNA vaccines are completely safe. TrialSite News has consistently maintained the vaccines blunted the full force of the pandemic. However, there has been mounting evidence of vaccine injuries that have been ignored by the mainstream media, and Big Pharma is protected by the PREP Act, which shields drug companies from any liability. As reported in TrialSite, “The Public Readiness and Emergency Responsiveness Act, also known as PREPA, was enacted in 2005 by Congress during the tenure of George W. Bush. This new law authorized the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to issue the PREP Act declaration in response to a declared public emergency such as an epidemic, pandemic, or bioterrorism, for example. The law introduced the product liability shield for pharmaceutical companies developing what was classified as ‘countermeasures’ during a declared emergency.”

Safety Concerns on the Hill and Overseas

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson held a hearing on Capitol Hill this past week which featured testimony from people who suffered injuries due to side effects associated with the Covid vaccines. Testimony from participants in the trial stage of the vaccines told the stories of how some of these subjects were injured by the vaccine, and they informed both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as well as asked why the agencies were being so secretive about the anti-Covid jab. The response from both the FDA and the NIH was basically, “There are no secrets here.” One witness said, “There is one word which describes the vaccine injured and that word is ‘ghost’.” Other testimony came from a physician who pointed to an insert in the Covid vaccine package, which was apparently instructions for the shot but was, in fact, just a blank sheet of paper.

Senator Johnson concluded the hearing by saying, “We need to know what the plans are for the mRNA platform because they’re not talking about…just a one-time use here. They’ve got big plans for this.” With the profits, the pharmaceutical companies have been making on the Covid jab, it’s no wonder the corporations have “big plans.” Johnson isn’t the only politician concerned with vaccine injury, and the United States isn’t the only country with this issue.

In Australia, Senator Gerard Rennick made a speech to his parliament in Queensland talking about the amount of injuries suffered by people who had the Covid jab as well as his belief that the vaccine is ineffective. The senator claims there were “140,000 vaccine injuries” in Australia. Rennick also claimed physicians in his country haven’t read the non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine. Yet the vaccines continue to be distributed and administered, apparently, without accountability.

DeSantis Vows to Hold Drug Companies Accountable

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is promising to hold both Pfizer and Moderna accountable for vaccine injuries and the companies’ claims that their jabs have no side effects. DeSantis noted myocarditis, which has occurred in young men after receiving the Covid jab. The possible presidential contender also pointed to the PREP Act. “They’re not allowed to sue or get any sort of recourse when this was something they wanted to do? So, this is something that we’re going to lead on in Florida,” DeSantis said. However, the Florida governor will probably face the wall of Big Pharma and its singular focus on profit.

Sen. Ron Johnson Leads Expert Panel on COVID-19 Vaccines, They ‘Should Have Exercised Caution’

Sen. Ron Johnson Leads Expert Panel on COVID-19 Vaccines, They ‘Should Have Exercised Caution’

By Megan Redshaw U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held an expert panel on Dec. 7 featuring medical experts and doctors specializing in COVID-19 vaccine research…

www.trialsitenews.com

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held an expert panel on Dec. 7 featuring medical experts and doctors specializing in COVID-19 vaccine research and treatment. The roundtable centered around what COVID-19 vaccines are, how they work and how they “could possibly cause injuries.”

Johnson said the event's purpose was to provide withheld information to the American public on COVID-19 vaccines and to prevent future harm.

Speakers on the panel included Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN attorney Aaron Siri, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Josh Sterling, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. David Wiseman, Dr. Jim Thorp, Dr. Jancy Lindsay, Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Kirk Milhoan, Dr. Renata Moon, Dr. Ryan Cole, founders of REACT19 Brianne Dressen and Dr. Joel Wallskog, and Lt. Col. Theresa Long.

According to a media advisory published by Johnson’s office ahead of the event, federal health agency heads, the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, and other individuals who developed, promoted, and played a pivotal role with COVID-19 vaccines were invited but did not attend.

Willner started the discussion by explaining the safety signals she documented in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Willner founded a private organization called OpenVaers that posts publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on injuries reported post-vaccination.

According to Willner’s data, there has been a 4800% increase in U.S. deaths, a 2,876% increase in hospitalizations, a 2050% increase in permanent disabilities, and a 2108% increase in life-threatening events since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines on Dec. 14, 2020.

Siri explained what he discovered through a Freedom of Information Act request that disclosed information kept from the American public from the CDC’s V-safe system.

Siri said before the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC knew these vaccines could potentially cause a host of injuries, including myocarditis. Yet, the “list” of “check the box options” users could choose from to report to V-safe excludes these adverse events.

According to V-safe data, about 800,000 people (7.7% or 1 in 13 people) out of a database of about 10 million people reported needing medical care after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Approximately 25% of those people required ER care or were hospitalized, and another 40% sought urgent care. In addition, about 25% of the 7.7% reported not being able to perform everyday activities or could not attend school. Siri says it took a year and a half to obtain the information and two lawsuits in federal court to force the agency to disclose its data.

Dowd, a former BlackRock analyst, presented data from the Society of Actuaries 2021 Group Life Insurance survey showing a jump in excess mortality among young and middle-aged adults beginning when COVID-19 vaccines were authorized.

Dowd said the only thing that changed at that time was “vaccines and mandates.”

Sterling, a former top-ranked insurance analyst on Wall Street, assessed CDC data for all-cause mortality by age cohort. He told the panel that people who took their first COVID-19 vaccine dose in the U.S. but then stopped taking additional doses were disproportionately harmed.

Sterling said the best statistics show “you’re going to have 145% higher mortality,” which ends up being some “600,000 excess deaths per year” from “this higher vaccine-induced mortality.”

Numerous physicians spoke on the history of mRNA development, how the vaccine works, its composition and toxicology, and how U.S. regulatory agencies failed to meet their own regulatory standards. Dr. Cole, a pathologist, and Dr. Risch, a professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, explained how the SARS-CoV-2 virus works and who’s most likely to be affected.

Risch presented CDC data showing young people face little risk from COVID-19. Only 0.01% of deaths through Sept. 2021 were attributable to children 0 to 17, and only 0.05% of COVID-19 deaths occurred among those 18 to 29, he said.

“When you have such low or nonexistent mortality in these low age groups, the potential severe adverse effects of the vaccine will surmount the nonexistent mortality of these age groups and therefore, what we’ve been told, that everybody has to be vaccinated … had no reason to be there in the first place, because there was no mortality they were trying to prevent,” Risch said.

Although U.S. regulatory agencies, vaccine makers, and health officials claim COVID-19 vaccines prevent hospitalization and death, McCullough pointed out that no randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial supports that assertion.

Physicians explain how COVID-19 vaccines are causing injuries

COVID-19 vaccines are linked to numerous adverse events, including myocarditis and blood clotting disorders, but physicians testified during the panel they’ve also seen an increase in inflammation, myocarditis and cardiac events in both adults and children, blood clotting disorders, and fetal deaths.

Dr. Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist, said studies show the spike protein COVID-19 vaccines cause the body to produce is “cardiotoxic and cause[s] the heart to be inflamed,”

“Let that sink in,” Milhoan said. “The current public health plan is asking our own body to make a cardiotoxin.”

Dr. Thorp, an obstetrician and maternal-fetal medicine specialist, said he noticed an alarming increase in stillbirths timed with the authorization of COVID-19 vaccines. He expressed concern over the disturbing number of adverse events occurring in his vaccinated patients.

Dr. Moon, a pediatrician, says we are “being asked to inject this product into our nation’s kids who have essentially a 0% risk of harm.”

“When I bring up with families that other reputable countries have banned this, they’re stunned. They haven’t heard this from our mainstream media,” Moon said. “I do think we need to pause for a second and stress how relevant this is. Other nations have banned this product because it’s too dangerous for younger people. What are we doing?”

You can view the full video of the panel here.

COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work and Possible Causes of Injuries

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson will lead a roundtable discussion, COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries, to shed light on the…

rumble.com

TriaSite News was also present and helped organize the roundtable event.

My Bible On the C-19 Mass Vaccination Experiment. Nobody Can Conceal a Scourge That Nature Is Now Desperate to Unveil

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Aj4aIq18jyXu7FGWZHvSOdrIDY2zGRQJ/view

My study which I entitled: ‘My bible on the C-19 mass vaccination experiment. Nobody can conceal a scourge that Nature is now desperate to unveil’ takes one on an amazing journey of sophisticated virus – immune system interactions that basically provide science-based answers to the many allegedly ‘open’ questions.

An evolving body of work, the study result will be updated with new material information. The most difficult scientific topic this author has tackled yet, it addresses the huge chunk of the iceberg that rests under the water.

the corruption is imbedded!

Revealed: group shaping US nutrition receives millions from big food industry

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics has a record of quid pro quos with a range of food giants, documents show

Revealed: group shaping US nutrition receives millions from big food industry | Nutrition | The Guardian

Newly released documents show an influential group that helps shape US food policy and steers consumers toward nutritional products has financial ties to the world’s largest processed food companies and has been controlled by former industry employees who have worked for companies like Monsanto.

The documents reveal the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics has a record of quid pro quos with a range of food giants, owns stock in ultra-processed food companies and has received millions in contributions from producers of pop, candy, and processed foods linked to diabetes, heart disease, obesity and other health problems.

FDA’s Peter Marks Starts Recognizing the Failures of the COVID-19 Vaccines

FDA’s Peter Marks Starts Recognizing the Failures of the COVID-19 Vaccines

A controversial figure of late, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the Food and Drug Administration…

www.trialsitenews.com

A controversial figure of late, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been front and center in the regulatory agency’s aggressive greenlights associated with the COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. Among other things, the agency has been criticized for dropping its rigorous standards during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency at least, when applied to the mRNA vaccines targeting SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, Dr. Marks has now gone on the record in a piece published in JAMA Network titled “Urgent Need for Next Generation COVID-19 Vaccines” in a clear recognition that the current “version 1.0”, first generation COVID-19 vaccines are no longer viable to protect the American public. This media has labeled the COVID-19 vaccines as novel, version 1.0 since the late spring of 2021, when it became very apparent that vaccine durability challenges coupled with a mutating virus (which was called out by critical scientists from the start) represented a challenge for vaccine durability. While TrialSite maintains the COVID-19 vaccines partially blunted the sharp edge of the pandemic, initially they did so at a severe cost. The vaccines were bundled in a program precluding any serious embrace of early care with repurposed drugs, orchestrated government censorship of media and social tech, and harassment of doctors that dared question any moves by Washington DC or industry all representing perhaps, one of the greatest public health failures in modern history. More people died in America from SARS-CoV-2 than any other nation despite the vast trillions, sophisticated technologies and supposed state-of-the-art vaccines. From the start influencers such as the Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, not to mention academic medicine, big hospital administration, and industry all bought in hook, line, and sinker into the scheme that mass COVID-19 vaccination would control and eradicate SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) specifically established the 70% vaccination rate as a target threshold to achieve herd immunity. But from near the start this media, and a minority of independent, critical scientists questioned aloud that logic. Could a dynamic RNA virus that mutates like say, HIV or influenza, be controlled by a novel mass vaccination scheme? Has the flu been controlled out of existence? This seemed a crap shoot at best, yet the U.S. federal government and its health agencies along with other of the world’s richest most sophisticated economies bet the proverbial farm on novel technology in a way that was guaranteed to not work as intended. Was this a totally desperate move or part of some orchestrated response to advance a biomedical platform? While the vaccines worked to induce antibodies for short bursts, they did save lives, especially earlier on. But within months (Delta appeared by spring of 2021) of the mass vaccination program it was apparent that they failed to control the spread of the pathogen, exhibited poor durability, and were associated with a disturbing safety signal in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. While by the summer of 2021 the whole program should have been under investigation President Biden ordered mandates across the board by September 2021. Now two years later since they were first released on the market Peter Marks initiates a dialogue paving the way to sunset these products, thinking ahead for a next generation of more effective, safety COVID-19 vaccine. But that’s not enough.

Now on the record, that while issues of “vaccines access and hesitancy present throughout the pandemic are partially responsible,” the relentless, or in his words “ceaseless progression of increasingly transmissible variants, recently including BF.7 and BQ.1.1 presents a major challenge to medical interventions, particularly vaccines.”

TrialSite recently showcased a couple studies that indicate real trouble when it comes to the recently authorized bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5 vaccine booster effectiveness against subvariants such as BQ.1.1. Put simply, these vaccines don’t work very well against a continuously evolving virus.

To date, the original primary series (2 dose) regimen (mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) was introduced by December 2020, followed by two additional booster doses due to waning effectiveness. Then by September, the FDA cleared on an emergency basis without clinical data the bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA/5 booster vaccine in a response to mutated subvariants that evade vaccine-induced antibodies with ease. The FDA sought to respond to the ongoing genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 seemingly, the best way it could with the latest booster doses from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

The market demand has been very weak for the bivalent booster products and yet the FDA has continued to evidence questionable behavior, such as ongoing promotional campaigns that attempt to create tension among family members who aren’t yet boosted. See “FDA Uses Little Girl to Market Moderna and Pfizer Bivalent Jabs—Crosses a Line Yet Again.”

With no definitive clinical data, Marks continues to promote the current products, declaring in his piece that the bivalent boosters may not only reduce morbidity and mortality but also “may also reduce the amount of symptomatic disease and associated health care use.” But he conveys throughout the article that the time has come to move on from these current products.

An ‘Inadequate’ Long Term Strategy: The Call for Next Generation

Mark's thinking clearly looks forward away from the current COVID-19 vaccines and the unsustainable continuous booster regimen, declaring, “However, introduction of these bivalent boosters likely only represents a temporizing measure until variants emerge that necessitate additional booster vaccination or modification of the current generation of vaccines.”

What he is really saying here is that we are coming to the end of the road with the current set of products on the market.

Marks continues with strong language:

“Continuing along the current path of the generation and administration of variant-specific vaccine boosters is inadequate as a long-term strategy for addressing COVID-19 in populations globally.”

And then the call for what we all know is the reality:

“Serious consideration therefore needs to be given to the development of a distinctly improved generation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offering longer protection with greater scope.”

Recognizing that this effort will “require more than simply making incremental modifications on the current generation of vaccines”, what Marks delves into next becomes the heart of controversy.

FDA Tightening Back Up

The FDA has been authorizing boosters with no limit or no clinical trials data. Why? Because the agency is employing a risk-based approach to evaluating the mRNA vaccine products, it looks at them holistically from a platform point of view. So, when a minor to moderate change is made in the form of a booster, they haven’t necessarily required a retesting or revalidation of the entire platform. And they continuously defer to the Public Health Emergency associated with SARS-CoV-2. Yet the death rate has declined to approximately 1%. While this is more than double the flu mortality rate, is it a deadly enough situation to justify the ongoing material disruption to government and all associated costs (such as no liability for pharmaceutical companies for example)?

The FDA director continues:

“Although experience with the mRNA vaccine platforms has enabled authorization of updated versions of vaccines without large clinical trials,” pivoting to recognize a tighter regulatory regime moving forward, Marks emphasizes: “…When more modifications are made to the vaccine, the clinical effects are often unexpected. Biological properties that may plausibly have beneficial effects often have unanticipated consequences.”

This represents a key admission, signaling to the rest of the medical research community that the FDA will tighten up its regulatory scrutiny of the mRNA vaccines as the developers move to advance next generation products.

What does this mean? Marks makes his point clear indicating that “unless correlates of protection that are strongly associated with duration of protection against COVID-19 can be identified, it is likely that rather than relying on immunobridging to infer vaccine effectiveness, large randomized clinical trials similar to the initial trials of the currently authorized or licensed vaccines for COVID-19 will be required to ascertain the effectiveness of these new vaccines.”

In a direct message to vaccine developers such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, Marks again signals a change in the protocol moving forward. A change that won’t be as industry friendly by any stretch, declaring, “Simply updating the existing vaccine constructs with new variant sequences or even making trivalent orquadrivalent vaccines covering several variants is not likely to provide the depth and breadth of protection needed to interrupt viral transmission during a prolonged period.”

What about Safety?

The issue of vaccine safety becomes one of the major elephants in the room. The safety signals associated with the COVID-19 vaccines cannot be ignored any more. The U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) introduced the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in 1990 as a “national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines.”

Co-managed by both the CDC and the FDA, the massive surge of reported safety incidents in VAERS have been evaded as a topic of concern among the governing public health class of America. According to that system, over 15,000 people died shortly after receiving the COVID-19 vaccines. The government is always quick to retort that there is no proof that those deaths are causally linked to the jabs. And yes no one can claim with certainty that these deaths are all related to the vaccination program.

Yet isn’t that why the system was put in place in the first place? To investigate just such signals? The largest COVID-19 vaccine injury group React19 reports of missing data in VAERS, while no real investigation goes on into injuries. The entire push has been to vaccinate as many people as possible in what has been a relentless vaccine-Athlon. As the White House COVID Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha has been clear: “God gave us two arms, one for the COVID-19 shot and one for the flu shot!”

The arrogance, hubris, and true ignorance emanating out of Washington DC, regardless of Party, has been just appalling.

Time to Face the Mirror

While Marks highlights some positive data points in the COVID-19 vaccine story moving forward, such as progress in possibly achieving ‘mucosal immunity with or without intranasal administration’ via the “targeting S protein viral sequences that are immutable, immunogenic, and accessible to neutralizing antibodies…”the question inevitably comes down to how can one even define success based on what we all collectively went through.

Actually, Marks does just that. In the JAMA Network piece, he delineates a simple, straightforward definition for COVID-19 vaccine success that clearly should have been applied to the current crop of version 1.0 COVID-19 vaccines.

Marks suggests:

“To truly represent a significant advance in this area, the protection provided by vaccination would need to apply across a wide range of potential variants that might emerge. In terms of the actual level of effectiveness, the minimum expectations for such a vaccine might be adopted from the criteria used in the search for an acceptable universal influenza vaccine.”

This means, following the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases definition, “At least 75% effectiveness in preventing influenza-like illness, achieving protection that lasts at least 1 year, and suitable for use in all age groups.”

Ok. So, this kind of clean, simple, and straightforward definition of course, should have been in place from the very start-- a very minimal threshold meant for the first generation of COVID-19 vaccines.

Yes, a basic success criterion should have been a must, applied to the NIH, FDA, and CDC. Given the hundreds of billions of public funds allocated to companies, a waiver of any real pharmaceutical company liability or accountability, onerous pharma contracts with health systems (remember the ICAN protocol in Florida--and the fact that Pfizer contracts preclude health systems from coming up with their own repurposed regimens in parallel) and what has essentially been a disgraceful support of corporate profiteering---support by the very agencies that are supposed to regulate these companies—equals a disastrous pandemic response failure.

Applying NIAID definition of success to the COVID-19 vaccines

Success Criteria

Summary

Are the vaccines 75% or more effective?

No. For a brief snapshot of time they are effective at inhibiting or slowing down morbidity and mortality but within a few months the benefits start to seriously wane; by half a year they are all but gone. Hence the constant push for the next booster dose.

Were the vaccines durable, lasting a year?

No. Due to a confluence of factors from a mutating virus to the early state of the vaccine’s durability has been a big problem. They have failed on that front.

Reduction in transmission

No. While some early studies covered by TrialSite demonstrated some success, these vaccines failed miserably when it came to their ability to stop viral transmission—which used to be at the center of vaccine definition. Marks himself suggests using criteria for moderate success at 40% to 60% in blocking transmission. We were far away from that target.

Suitable for all age groups?

No. With the mRNA vaccines a clear safety signal emerged for young people, especially males.

Are these vaccines really safe?

No. While they are safe for most people, there is a clear rare cohort that experiences significant, often debilitating and sometimes deadly side effects. While this media estimates an incidence rate of about .005 which equals about 1.3 million people. What are tradeoffs. The death rate of COVID-19 at this point approached about 1% while about 95% of cases are mild to moderate. Intelligent, targeted risk-based approaches may be in order moving forward.

So many mistakes were made with COVID-19 pandemic that it's beyond the scope of this communication. Of troubling concern is Mark's total lack of accountability for his agency’s part in this failed pandemic-driven experiment. One that used the entire country as ongoing subjects.

While he embraces the learnings and challenges ahead, from virology and immunology to the “accompanying advances in technology and manufacturing that will come from developing the next generation of vaccines,” what is needed now is first, a time-out and an investigation into the federal government’s response to this health-related crisis. It’s not business as usual, Mr. Marks. A serious review of what went wrong coupled with independent investigations into why things went wrong followed with measures to ensure accountability in government are of the highest priority now. The decent thing to do for those in charge is to take responsibility, work to bring on new cross-disciplinary teams with more objective, fresh ideas, and importantly, have less industry or political ties. Crucial at this point is that accountable leadership in the federal health agencies must step down to let new leadership move forward.

References

Urgent Need for Next-Generation COVID-19 Vaccines

This Viewpoint argues that the development of a distinctly improved generation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is paramount to offering a greater breadth and depth of…

jamanetwork.com

Apparent risks of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnoses after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-Cov-2 Infection

Apparent risks of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnoses after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-Cov-2 Infection - Nature Cardiovascular Research

Through analysis of the electronic medical records of 284,592 vaccinated patients, using a sequence–symmetry analysis, Kwan et al. show that the risk of…

www.nature.com

Abstract

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) was previously described after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, limited data are available on the relation of POTS with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Here we show, in a cohort of 284,592 COVID-19-vaccinated individuals, using a sequence–symmetry analysis, that the odds of POTS are higher 90 days after vaccine exposure than 90 days before exposure; we also show that the odds for POTS are higher than referent conventional primary care diagnoses but lower than the odds of new POTS diagnosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results identify a possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and incidence of POTS. Notwithstanding the probable low incidence of POTS after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly when compared to SARS-Cov-2 post-infection odds, which were five times higher, our results suggest that further studies are needed to investigate the incidence and etiology of POTS occurring after COVID-19 vaccination.

1-α hydroxylation defect in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: remission with calcitriol supplementation

Unusual association of diseases/symptoms: 1-α hydroxylation defect in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: remission with calcitriol supplementation

A 37-year-old woman presented with a history of reactive hypoglycaemia, non-classic adrenal hyperplasia (NCAH), osteopenia and fibromyalgia. After several…

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Abstract 121: Vitamin D Deficiency Study in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

A letter to my Covid Vaccine Injured self

A letter to my Covid Vaccine Injured self

Dear MN Team Humanity, Why do some people and groups refuse to see or acknowledge us — the Covid 19 vaccine injured? Some of us are nearing two years of…

www.trialsitenews.com

Dear MN Team Humanity,

Why do some people and groups refuse to see or acknowledge us — the Covid 19 vaccine injured? Some of us are nearing two years of pain and disability with no end in sight. We are not receiving any outside help and our numbers continue to increase. It’s disheartening especially during the holidays to not only live with our diminished selves but to see other vaccine injured who are extremely disabled and meet families who have lost vaccinated loved ones.

Me

Dear Me,

There is hope that humanity will awaken and recognize our existence. It has been a long long battle for us.

When someone says they have never met someone with a vaccine injury, consider it a challenge. That person may believe that all Covid vaccines were safe and effective for everyone. That is certainly not the case.

We are fortunate to have recently received the assistance of some very kind, brave and committed allies who are helping us spread the word and find needed resources. These innovative leaders are covering more ground and helping us gain more attention than we could ever do on our own. These dynamic and perseverant helpers are making the difference. They are bringing the vaccine injured out of the shadows and into the light.

It is truly important that we spread our message and try to bring other vaccine injured into a safe space where there is kindness and support. Some of the vaccine injured have been alone and without much of a support system. They have been denied getting recognized as vaccine injured and may have a reluctance to tell their story.

Is it any wonder? Government, health agencies, big pharma and mainstream media have ignored and minimized vaccine injuries and have literally persecuted us and those who speak out in our favor.

Watch for the helpers, keep speaking out and believe that kindness and truth will prevail.

You may never again regain the strength, capacity and endurance of your pre-vaccinated self but never give up. Other vaccine injured and your courageous supporters are helping in the effort. The Covid vaccine injured can no longer be ignored and everyone has a vaccine injured friend. They just may not realize it— yet.

The Enlightened Me of MN Team Humanity

PS Here is a movie that filmmaker Jennifer Sharp has made about vaccine injuries. It has just been made available online.

Just a little something for the liers and deniers.

Sweet: Honey reduces cardiometabolic risks, study shows

Sweet: Honey reduces cardiometabolic risks, study shows

Researchers have found that honey improves key measures of cardiometabolic health, including blood sugar and cholesterol levels -- especially if the honey is…

www.sciencedaily.com

Researchers at the University of Toronto have found that honey improves key measures of cardiometabolic health, including blood sugar and cholesterol levels -- especially if the honey is raw and from a single floral source.

The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on honey, and found that it lowered fasting blood glucose, total and LDL or 'bad' cholesterol, triglycerides, and a marker of fatty liver disease; it also increased HDL or 'good' cholesterol, and some markers of inflammation.

"These results are surprising, because honey is about 80 per cent sugar," said Tauseef Khan, a senior researcher on the study and a research associate in nutritional sciences at U of T's Temerty Faculty of Medicine. "But honey is also a complex composition of common and rare sugars, proteins, organic acids and other bioactive compounds that very likely have health benefits

Quote from Fm1

- especially if the honey is raw and from a single floral source.

That’s the key part. Is the 20% that’s not sugar, plus the mixture of different kinds of sugars, what makes raw honey beneficial.

Quote from Curbina

That’s the key part. Is the 20% that’s not sugar, plus the mixture of different kinds of sugars, what makes raw honey beneficial.

I ditched sugar years ago and switched to honey. Along with l arginine I lost weight, lowered BP and help maintain body homeostasis. Some here call it quackery , they are the ones running to the doctor with every sniffle or for the latest vaccine.

Switzerland : No new wave except the vaccine insured age > 65 going to hospital in large numbers https://www.covid19.admin.ch/d…accineBreakthroughRel=abs

Final proof of extensive vaxxine damage :: https://www.infosperber.ch/ges…sfaelle-seit-anfang-2021/

Exceptional deaths did raise by up to 250% in average in Germany. So its much worse than we did believe so far.

Excess mortality EU :: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/…ss_mortality_-_statistics

still > 10% in many places.

In UK its luckily lower again: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep…l/weekending2december2022