Quote from axil

That high temperature produces black body light that is of the proper frequency to combine with electrons.

Can you explain the term 'black body light'?

Carol, and Ed Storms, Bill Collis and me at Starbucks near the conference venue. Photo - David Nagel.

A good Arabica always good to maintain a warm blood

Quote from Cydonia

Here the funny Daniel_G with a cat in hands. However noone knows if this cat is hot or not ?

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

they pulled that cat photo off the internet somewhere! Next time we can try catabration instead of calibration to hopefully please our critics!

Quote from Daniel_G

Next time we can try catabration

Could be puurrfect. Could be catastrophic!

Quote from Alan Smith

Can you explain the term 'black body light'?

Black-body radiation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I was impressed by Daniels presentation of Mizuno derived work and very pleased with the discussion of the control of it. I'm really glad also that this has gone this

far and as I have no reason to believe that they are lying, just needing to control the heat is massive actually.

Roundtable exchanges...Once again amazing organization..

However the next Polish team should rise the challenge, they are rigorous too

Interesting presentation here..

David Nagel - Summary + Thank you + Closing Comments

Carl Page - Thank You

A comment on the Nicola Galvanetto, PhD presentation, and in general on the assumptions that support the fusion meme that has been accepted by ALL of the presenters at ICCF24.

When the elements that are produced by the transmutation reaction are analyzed, you don't see any neutrons or gamma rays, or energy. For production of elements heavier than iron, you need neutron capture: the r-process, and the s-process. What that means is that he reaction products would need the action of a supernova to form and that formation would take some considerable time inside the heat, pressure, and shock of a supernova to property cook the elements in a torrent of neutrons.

But we have seen in experiments that these reaction products are produced INSTANTLY as a strange radiation particle flies over a surface. All is done with very little if any power.

It actually looks like a change of state is going on; a change of state much like when water freezes to ice and then back to water again where matter enters some other form and then bounces back again and returns to its usual state but always into some other types of elements but all the change of state happens instantly.

If you can accept the evidence of transmutation as reality, how can you still beleive in the assumptions about fusion in LENR?

Quote from axil

A comment on the Nicola Galvanetto, PhD presentation, and in general on the assumptions that support the fusion meme that has been accepted by ALL of the presenters at ICCF24.

When the elements that are produced by the transmutation reaction are analyzed, you don't see any neutrons or gamma rays, or energy. For production of elements heavier than iron, you need neutron capture: the r-process, and the s-process. What that means is that he reaction products would need the action of a supernova to form and that formation would take some considerable time inside the heat, pressure, and shock of a supernova to property cook the elements in a torrent of neutrons.

But we have seen in experiments that these reaction products are produced INSTANTLY as a strange radiation particle flies over a surface. All is done with very little if any power.

It actually looks like a change of state is going on; a change of state much like when water freezes to ice and then back to water again where matter enters some other form and then bounces back again and returns to its usual state but always into some other types of elements but all the change of state happens instantly.

If you can accept the evidence of transmutation as reality, how can you still beleive in the assumptions about fusion in LENR?

Display More

Hmm I have an idea. As I think that the assumption that all EM radiation is consisting of an aggregate of photons might be wrong and in reality it is a mix of photons and traditional EM fields. Could it be that strange radiation is just the field part without the photon? Anything that counts photons would not detect it.

Quote from axil

Black-body radiation - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

Ah - so you mean thermal radiation approximating to that of a black body. Light does not really come into it in all cases.