Alan - that is a logically bankrupt argument you've just made.
What nonsense. you are merely saying because you are right, I must be wrong. That is not only logically bankrupt, it is also ethically questionable.
I have over many posts at various times merely pointed out that the evidence either way is shaky, that the proponents are either dead (MF) or reclusive (SP) and that the practical knowledge you base your arguments on is zero and that the experiments in question demonstrate effects which have been replicated in various ways countless (almost) times.
You might as well argue about whether the statue of Lord Nelson in Trafalgar Square is wearing underpants. Answer- it is too far away to tell.