need to concern ourselves with engaging the honest skeptic community, and we can leave the pseudo skeptics aside, as they will be proven wrong and become a historic side note, eventually.
LENR FAQ (for Newcomers)
-
-
The sad truth is that, albeit LENR/Cold Fusion belong to this field of study, most CMP reseachers don't have anything to do with LENR / Cold Fusion.
Oddly, one her ( Smitha Vishveshw) specialties is Cold Atomic Physics. Maybe that is a mainstream branch of physics, or maybe a non-controversial way of saying LENR:
"Her work spans a broad range of topics in condensed matter and cold atomic physics, including strongly correlated phases of matter, topological systems and anyons, critical phenomena, and nonequilibrium quantum dynamics."
-
I submit that THHUXLEYNEW comments are off topic on this thread and should be moved
Rob authored the thread, so he decides.
-
Big Thanks for thanking my pertinent post. LENR FAQ for (Studious not Self-proclaimed SKEPTICS ) unlike those of THHuxley or THHuxleynew.
I submit that THHUXLEYNEW comments are off topic on this thread and should be moved
His scholarly observations... Are not scholarly until written up and submitted to APS, or elsewhere, for peer review and possible publication. Perhaps titled
"Foamgate
The Lies and Cover-up of False Cold Fusion Claims of Pons and Fleischmann"
THHuxleynew Publish or Perish
Scientifically Speaking your arguments hold no weight.
Cut our friend THHuxleynew some slack.
I think he does a much better work being a pseudo skeptic than others.
I rarely agree with him, but at least I reckon he attempts to find alternative rational explanations to everything in the LENR field. As I say, I disagree with him on almost everything, but he at least attemts to be reasonable.
-
we need to concern ourselves with engaging the honest skeptic community, and we can leave the pseudo skeptics
Edit suggestion
We need to concern ourselves with engaging the honest skeptic community...
We need to concern ourselves with engaging the Studious Skeptic community .
Doctoral Students in Condensed Matter Physics
-
Oddly, one her ( Smitha Vishveshw) specialties is Cold Atomic Physics. Maybe that is a mainstream branch of physics, or maybe a non-controversial way of saying LENR:
"Her work spans a broad range of topics in condensed matter and cold atomic physics, including strongly correlated phases of matter, topological systems and anyons, critical phenomena, and nonequilibrium quantum dynamics."
Well, I have learnt that even conventional High Energy Nuclear Physics uses the term cold fusion, but in a completely different way than we LENR junkies do.
-
Edit suggestion
We need to concern ourselves with engaging the honest skeptic community...
We need to concern ourselves with engaging the Studious Skeptic community .
Doctoral Students in Condensed Matter Physics
Well, earlier I gave my examples of honest skeptics like Stevenson and magicsound , I guess we can say they are studious, also. But by honest skeptics I meant people that doesn't know, but wants to know and if they don't get involved, at least are very interested in following those who get involved and are willing to help. This is in contrast with my understanding of the Pseudo Skeptic, who are mostly stablished paradigm defenders, and want any advance to be within, and supportive of, their paradigm.
-
High Energy Nuclear Physics uses the term cold fusion, but in a completely different way than we LENR junkies do.
The field of Low Energy Nuclear Physics is not CMNS
https://physics.osu.edu › grad › cold...
Cold Atom Physics | Department of Physics
Cold Atom Physics ... The field of quantum gases or ultracold atoms is the fastest expanding and most interdisciplinary field in physics today. The experimental ...
Low Energy Nuclear Physics Experimental Program - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
The Low Energy Nuclear Physics Group performs world-leading research to determine the structure and decay of exotic and superheavy nuclei.
Counterpoint
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
Pseudo Skeptic, who are mostly stablished paradigm defenders, and want any advance to be within, and supportive of, their paradigm.
Like THHUXLEYNEW or not.
His posts here are off topic.. LENR FAQ for Skeptics
-
Like THHUXLEYNEW or not.
I already said that him, IMHO, is in the pseudo skeptic category, which, I also clarified to him, I do not consider pseudo skeptics to be dishonest, just not much helpful to advance science into new paradigms.
I think he wants science to advance, wholeheartedly, but within the confines of the already stablished paradigm he knows and accepts.
-
Like THHUXLEYNEW or not.
THH is very popular with the staff. We may strongly disagree with him at times, but at the end of the day we respect him. Every one of us.
Little story...a few years back, Alan and I petitioned him to be a LF Moderator. I had my doubts as to how that would be perceived by the LENR community had he accepted, but not that he would be an objective, and unbiased staffer.
He refused, so no harm done.
-
He refused, so no harm done.
Your offer... Why?
Why did he refuse?
He does not have my respect. My opinion is yours is misplaced and unjustified. Perhaps I am clueless as to your logic.
at the end of the day we respect him. Every one of us.
Don't count me in... "Every one of us"
-
Rob authored the thread, so he decides.
I'm not going to police the thread, it moves at a pace that I can't keep up with.
Most of what's posted here doesn't seem to be building toward the suggested outcome. If we want a productive result, someone should start a shared google doc, then people should focus their efforts on building the list of Q's. Once you have all the Q's, then work on the A's.
As it stands now, JedRothwell 's list looks like a strong starting point, along with the LENRGY page I shared. I will probably work from these once I have bandwidth for it. All my available time is allocated for the video development right now.
-
I have a private conversation with THHuxleynew and they've actually shared some useful insight. Sometimes their comments come off like trolling, but it seems that this is not they're intention.
-
I'm not going to police the thread
Why should he?
THHUXLEYNEW purposely downgrades this forum into senseless debates of his agenda...
-
FoamGate?
-
Most of what's posted here doesn't seem to be building toward the suggested outcome
-
Whose posts here?
-
Why should he?
THHUXLEYNEW purposely downgrades this forum into senseless debates of his agenda...
Gregory Byron Goble , as I said, he is, all things considered, a constructive member of the forum, and you just read Rob values his input. Rob is engaged in a deeply serious effort to understand the lack of acceptance of LENR, and having one on the opposite camp willing to help with his point of view, is indeed a valuable help.
-
LENR FAQ for Skeptics
A Doctoral Degree has been granted based on a CMNS thesis. LENR is real... Nuclear Physics.
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.