Display MoreLENR FAQ for Studious Skeptics
LENR is real. People insisting it isn't real because of errors in Pons and Fleischmann's experiments have no place here. To engage in arguments with them gives SKEPTICS undue weight and distracts from useful study of LENR FAQ Circa 2022
Nuclear reactions occur in condensed matter systems of LENR, in both the 'wet cell' experiments of 1989 and the contemporary 'dry cell' solid state systems found in the Google/DOE/LLNL patent, NASA LCF, the Fusion Diode... Etc.
Post from GBG with libellous content removed.
Hardly a statement that would be helpful in an FAQ for skeptics?
I also suggest you leave off fraudulent data. You need very strong reasons in science to allege fraud rather than mistake. You do F&P a great disservice in alleging fraud, and you bring emotion into the issue, which poisons objective appraisal. No-one else here has called F&P experiments fraudulent.
I have tagged your post for the mods as being potentially libellous.
Fraud WAS committed in the aftermath of F&P!
Eugene Mallove (chief editor of MIT at the time) has shown that and became a whistleblower. In short MIT forged their replication efforts and was untruthful in their findings. So yes, fraud is a thing in this field.
Just saying