Mind you - I don't believe the Ni-H work
That's an odd thing to say. Science is not about beliefs. I would expect you to say "I don't think the experiments done in Ni-H systems are properly designed to affirm that they are evidence of excess heat". That would be more in line with the THHuxleynew we know.
That's an odd thing to say. Science is not about beliefs. I would expect you to say "I don't think the experiments done in Ni-H systems are properly designed to affirm that they are evidence of excess heat". That would be more in line with the THHuxleynew we know.
I am happy to say it the PC way:
"My understanding, based on the way the Ni-H results have scaled with reactor insulation, the clamed temperature dependence, and the types of calorimetry, is that they can on balance be best described as systems in which nuclear reactions do not play an important part"
I feel so much better now!
I am happy to say it the PC way:
"My understanding, based on the way the Ni-H results have scaled with reactor insulation, the clamed temperature dependence, and the types of calorimetry, is that they can on balance be best described as systems in which nuclear reactions do not play an important part"
I feel so much better now!
Good that you feel much better now.
How about the Ni-H experiments where the output had nothing to do with electrolysis, as this one recently brough to my attention by Mark U ?
