EVO Theory - a new paper from Graham Hubler.

  • Supermassive EVO?


    Bubble of hot electrons seen hurtling around our galaxy’s black hole
    For about two hours, a bubble of extremely hot electrons whirled around the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole at 30 per cent of the speed of light, and then…
    www.newscientist.com




    This shows a still image of the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A*, as seen by the Event Horizon Collaboration (EHT), with an artist???s illustration indicating where the modelling of the ALMA data predicts the hot spot to be and its orbit around the black hole.

    Diagram of the orbit of a bubble of electrons around the Milky Way’s black hole

    EHT Collaboration, ESO/M. Kornmesser

    Astronomers have found what appears to be a bubble of hot electrons circling Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, at extraordinary speeds. This strange bubble could help us learn about how black holes devour the material around them.

    Maciek Wielgus at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Germany and his colleagues used the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile to observe the area surrounding Sagittarius A* as the black hole was emitting a huge flare of X-rays. Minutes after the flare, they saw an enormous “hot spot” of radiation, most likely made up of electrons heated to billions of degrees, circling the black hole on an orbit about the distance that Mercury’s sits from the sun.

    Mercury takes 88 days to orbit the sun, whereas it only took this bubble about 70 minutes to make a loop around Sagittarius A*, meaning that it was travelling at about 30 per cent the speed of light. The researchers were only able to see it for two orbits before it faded from view, either destroyed or no longer emitting light in wavelengths ALMA can see.

    “The bubble cannot be too small, because a small bubble would not disappear that quickly,” says Wielgus. A small bubble would experience less shear force as it travelled around the black hole, so it would live longer. “It’s a huge bubble, it’s not a tiny little guy.”

  • Astronomers have found what appears to be a bubble of hot electrons circling Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, at extraordinary speeds. This strange bubble could help us learn about how black holes devour the material around them.

    Exactly what I try to explain the GR nerds. A B-B merger generate a huge stream of electron as all nuclear fusion reactions do the same. This leads to a toroidal EM pulse that now gets detected by LIGO.

    GR wave cannot exist!

  • Supermassive EVO?

    That’s what the “electric universe” people have postulated since long. They call it plasmoid, tho, but we know that EVOs and plasmoids may be expressions of the same ubderlying phenomena.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Note that the mechanisms behind "stepped leaders", that initiate lightning bolts, are not yet understood. There are descriptions, such as this one, but what they actually are is still a mystery.


    Also note that there have been instances of X-rays being detected from cloud to ground leaders, but none (as yet) detected from ground to air leaders (some documents only refer to upward "streamers").


    "Understanding Lightning Leaders", J. Montanyà, 2016 (PDF)

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

    Edited 3 times, last by Frogfall ().

  • From the Hubler paper:

    So where does this tiny shaped charge come from?

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.



    The Vega experiment is a replication of the SAFIRE system. This experiment generates EVOs on the surface of the cathode that appear as micro explosions called Bosenova. The EVO is a surface phenomena that is produced when electrons and Exciton (or hole) become entangled. The polariton is one of the major fields of study in solid state physics... see below



    What on earth is a polariton?

    What on earth is a polariton? - Mapping Ignorance
    When I first started writing about condensed matter science I found some difficulties with a few purely physical concepts, being myself a chemist by education.…
    mappingignorance.org


    The flow of electrons between the anode and the cathode pump the polaritons causing a condensate to form. In this experiment air, hydrogen, and propane act as a insulator that allows the polaritons to forms. Other gases can also provide this insolation.



    A simplified diagram


    main-qimg-4bf1871dc675a2a984f1b435c8ee8791


    354_aag1992_fa.jpeg

  • Blame it on the Bosenova.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

    Edited 3 times, last by Frogfall ().

  • At least the decried Google team work by Rob has therefore highlighted that charge clusters were not sufficient to trigger a Lenr event, so your model may be relevant but not sufficient.

    On EU side this time, the Czerski team has proven, in a way, that resonances are needed both.
    Also, where could they hide in your model ?

  • Just saw this video on twitter, so hunted out a youtube version. It is a timelapse of a thunderstorm, and is slightly reminiscent of a nuclear explosion...


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

  • At least the decried Google team work by Rob has therefore highlighted that charge clusters were not sufficient to trigger a Lenr event, so your model may be relevant but not sufficient.

    On EU side this time, the Czerski team has proven, in a way, that resonances are needed both.
    Also, where could they hide in your model ?

    The ill-informed opinion that charge clusters (aka EVOs) were not sufficient to trigger a Lenr event should consider both the SAFIRE system and Chukanov ball lightning work. SAFIRE produces megawatt level power when the anode activity is terminated. The same is true in Chukanov's large ball lightning systems. The EVO is scalable into the megawatt power reangle. Rob needs to evaluate the nature of the EVO in more detail.

  • Did the SAFIRE results already been validated by an independent team, to my knowledge no.

    Did they come to the last ICCF to present an update ?

    So in that way your assumptions seem bold.

    The ill-informed opinion that charge clusters (aka EVOs) were not sufficient to trigger a Lenr event should consider both the SAFIRE system and Chukanov ball lightning work. SAFIRE produces megawatt level power when the anode activity is terminated. The same is true in Chukanov's large ball lightning systems. The EVO is scalable into the megawatt power reangle. Rob needs to evaluate the nature of the EVO in more detail.

  • New high speed camera techniques have revealed data that implies that lightning "branch" leaders are able to form in free air, away from the main branch - with which they later connect.

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330268385_Development_of_Side_Bidirectional_Leader_and_Its_Effect_on_Channel_Branching_of_the_Progressing_Positive_Leader_of_Lightning


    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

    Edited once, last by Frogfall: Adding relevant GIF ().

  • Did the SAFIRE results already been validated by an independent team, to my knowledge no.

    Did they come to the last ICCF to present an update ?

    So in that way your assumptions seem bold.

    The results from the SAFIRE project matches the expected results that are expected from a polariton condensate origen of the reaction, namely: power production that occurs at the termination of the EVO lifecycle, the production of double layers as predicted by theory, the Vega replication of the SAFIRE experiment, the appearance of transmutation in the form of micron sized hollow spheres.

  • Well, a lot of sterile speculations. So many P&F replications were done to prove the effect, for example.

    Even Rossi, good or bad, done an independent test at Doral.

    So without certified evidence for the SAFIRE project it's like talking about aliens.

    The results from the SAFIRE project matches the expected results that are expected from a polariton condensate origen of the reaction, namely: power production that occurs at the termination of the EVO lifecycle, the production of double layers as predicted by theory, the Vega replication of the SAFIRE experiment, the appearance of transmutation in the form of micron sized hollow spheres.

  • Did the SAFIRE results already been validated by an independent team, to my knowledge no.

    Did they come to the last ICCF to present an update ?

    As far as I know there have been no publicly acknowledged replications of the Safire experiment. Which is not surprising, since they have spent (possibly/probably) $25M to get where they are right now. Not going to ICCF-24 was a company decision, they are 'running dark' at the moment due to pressure from funders. Not Monty Child's first choice to do that, as anyone who watches the video interview (below) we made with him will realise, but 'needs must when the Devil drives you.'


    COLD TALKS/MEET THE EXPERIMENTERS VIDEO INTERVIEWS THREAD

  • Well, a lot of sterile speculations. So many P&F replications were done to prove the effect, for example.

    Even Rossi, good or bad, done an independent test at Doral.

    So without certified evidence for the SAFIRE project it's like talking about aliens.

    How does one become a LENR certification authority?

  • The Safire chamber patent shows something fairly simple.

    Ion generator apparatus

    It looks a little like a plasma nitriding chamber, but with the chamber walls supposedly neutral, two adjustable "cheek" cathodes, and a central "ball" anode. (In plasma nitriding, the chamber walls would form the anode, and the components would be cathodic, with an amonia atmosphere)


    It isn't exactly clear how this thing is being used. The high momentary powers quoted suggest something like a simple Marx Bank DC discharge, but a few of the ball photos suggest some kind of low current corona.

    "The most misleading assumptions are the ones you don't even know you're making" - Douglas Adams

  • i didn't wanted to underestimate their work and in parallel i'm not personally a certification reference.

    Now they spent $25M but Brillouin spent also a lot of money probably...

    Now, linking full time their work with EVO's or plasmon polaritrons could not yet well proven.

    As far as I know there have been no publicly acknowledged replications of the Safire experiment. Which is not surprising, since they have spent (possibly/probably) $25M to get where they are right now. Not going to ICCF-24 was a company decision, they are 'running dark' at the moment due to pressure from funders. Not Monty Child's first choice to do that, as anyone who watches the video interview (below) we made with him will realise, but 'needs must when the Devil drives you.'


    COLD TALKS/MEET THE EXPERIMENTERS VIDEO INTERVIEWS THREAD

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.