Ed Storms Pre-print on Cold Fusion, Materials and Gaps. Comments Please!

  • 1 biilion $ a year is a huge opportunity cost

    This is dream money for the mafia and the related industry. You can develop new tools like e.g. solenoids (ABB) with open end money. So ITER/CERN are free food for some industries & friends where ITER pays a significant portion of its share to its traditional free mason allies the construction companies.

  • Nickel. Oh yes first try world wide..

    I did a search and asked in laboratories that offered this kind of service, of course worldwide. When I said what the desired range of holes was, and the material, all said it was not possible.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • My way to work at this scale is the simple electrolysis, by an appropriate set up you will be able to manage to manufacturing of some kind of dendrites both with the space between them.

    Another better way is the sputtering if you have access to this mean.

    I did a search and asked in laboratories that offered this kind of service, of course worldwide. When I said what the desired range of holes was, and the material, all said it was not possible.

  • My way to work at this scale is the simple electrolysis, by an appropriate set up you will be able to manage to manufacturing of some kind of dendrites both with the space between them.

    Another better way is the sputtering if you have access to this mean.

    Yes, the idea of making the holes was to have a controlled range of gap sizes, the methods you mention are more random, but in the end a fraction of the material gets active.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Yes, the idea of making the holes was to have a controlled range of gap sizes, the methods you mention are more random, but in the end a fraction of the material gets active.

    Rather than staying sticked with your idea maybe you should try rather to tune the wavelength of things you plan to put inside these gaps, an advice.

  • Rather than staying sticked with your idea maybe you should try rather to tune the wavelength of things you plan to put inside these gaps, an advice.

    I don’t say your method doesn’t work, indeed it does, but the gap formation process is more random so you end with a range of gaps, that you have to characterize, and of course you can tune the process to narrow the gap sizes range, but you won’t be able to get rid of the random aspect.


    The whole point of Storms ideas is to get better knowledge of the process by controlling the gap size and find what works best. Once that is known, you can fine tune your methods to that size gap.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Arata did a lot of work on the optimum size for LENR in nanooparticles and came up wiith (from memory) 11-13nM. But you have to remeber that we are not only talking about particles themselves, byt the spaces between them and according to de Boer writing about the adsorption of of hydrogen on metallic and crystalline surfaces in the 1930's 'cracks, gaps, corners, edges.'. So a highly disordered material may be active even if the particles are larger than the optimum.

  • Well, i think that a metal fully flat without any kind of cracks and gases without any kind of hydrogen could work.

    Either i'm stupid and pretentious either the field is late but surely i'm probably stupid :)

    Arata did a lot of work on the optimum size for LENR in nanooparticles and came up wiith (from memory) 11-13nM. But you have to remeber that we are not only talking about particles themselves, byt the spaces between them and according to de Boer writing about the adsorption of of hydrogen on metallic and crystalline surfaces in the 1930's 'cracks, gaps, corners, edges.'. So a highly disordered material may be active even if the particles are larger than the optimum.

  • I did a search and asked in laboratories that offered this kind of service, of course worldwide. When I said what the desired range of holes was, and the material, all said it was not possible.

    If you like you can join our project. As said we have 20nm holes in a Nickel foil. This was also a pilot for the advanced lab. Even 5..10nm would be possible today. But first I think 20nm is a good starting point. The depth they finally could produce was 15nm.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.