I guess you've probably seen this paper, but I think it is quite well written. There are no surprises in it, from my perspective.
Yes, I have seen this one and some other somewhat similar to this. The lower power is known, albeit in this case it seems way lower than in other cases, but the proper air mix has not been fully researched. The higher NOx is also a factor related to air fuel mix.
Another paper from 2013, not really independent (i.e.author Kaidesvily has been accused of being non existent and thus Santilli in disguise, just for the sake of clarity), it also found a heavier than it should be MagneHydrogen.
There's a truly independent Thai paper I haven't been able to translate, the Thai font is unreadable for Google Translate, it seems. The forum software doesn't let me upload it here but it can be downloaded from this link
View of Small-Scale Plasma Arc Flow Gasifier
In spite of the translation issue, it has some tables and equations in English, and it would appear to agree that there's an energetic anomaly, at least it mentions COPs above 1, the lower being 1,845, comparing the electric energy input to create the gas versus the caloric energy that can be released by burning the gas. This figure is roughly the same that was reported by Blaze Labs (1.7). This doesn't consider the heat released by the process, or the light emitted by the arc.
Another paper from 2013, not really independent (i.e.author Kaidesvily has been accused of being non existent and thus Santilli in disguise, just for the sake of clarity), it also found a heavier than it should be MagneHydrogen.
According to this document on the "i-b-r" website, JV Keidesvili died at the tragically young age of 54. Strangely, the exact date of his death seems to have been predicted the year before it happened. Maybe the telescope he had been using also offers the gift of precognition. J-v-Kadeisvili-CV.pdf
The site below carries an account of somebody trying to track down Kadeisvili - with the suspicion that he was a sockpuppet.
This does call into question the editorial policies and legitimacy of the IJHE. The paper reads like a Santilli puff-piece, in his own style, and only references Santilli sources. What level of peer review, and source verification, does (or did) the IJHE carry out?
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier
