Halo nuclei - requiring to rethink what we know about nuclear forces

if your mind wants to be challenged i suggest you to read the nucleus point of view by an LF's great member.

New Atomic Model

subtleatomics.com

Quote from Jarek

Halo nuclei from one side offer a way to verify nuclear models e.g. those used by LENR society - bringing crucial experimental evidence which has to be included while proposing such models, and suggestions how to build them - e.g. to accept crucial 1D topological vortices in nuclear physics, or requiring to propose an alternative explanation (I still haven't seen any).

From the other side, these are intermediate states between free and fused nucleons - could be intermediate states for fusion ...

And generally their binding, looking necessary 1D structures seems exactly what is needed for fusion - mechanism holding in close distance, also overcoming Coulomb repulsion.

Even if i find your topic very interesting unfortunately i can't spend more time.. because very busy..

That implies deep calculations, sketchs.. etc etc

However i just suggest that some things ( neutron, proton, quark, etc etc ) could not be stabilized by an uniform movement as explained for example Simon Brick or Wyttenbach..

Only continual accelerations/decelerations can do that. that remains the main criteria of nucleus stability.

Now why some halo nuclei exist, it should be linked with the EDO point of view.

Roughly of their atom number, nuclei adopt different shapes which won't be how to say.. fully stable..

For example one of your halo nucleus should adop this shape maybe a certain % of time even the main time, but the rest it should appear according to a classic shape.

To summarize that should be only a nucleus under a picture fluctuating.

Quote from Jarek

Cydonia , I think about this kind of stuff for ~15+ years ... let's focus on halo nuclei here - please elaborate if you find its binding mechanism e.g. there.

I believed to have the pleasure to heard your expertise on this topic at last ICCF in your country last year, or else at the centre of our great Europe, this month in Strasbourg ?

But you obviously prefer speaking behind a screen ?

Quote from Jarek

Please let us discuss them in other places, and comment here if in some future you have thoughts on halo nuclei.

E.g. based on studying some articles from https://scholar.google.pl/scholar?q=halo+nucleus

Best

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.12902

The Analogy between Electromagnetics and Hydrodynamics

Kai-Xin Hua,1aZhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center for the Safety of Pressure Vessel

and Pipeline, Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Ningbo University,

Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China

Abstract

The similarity between electromagnetics and hydrodynamics has been noticed for along time. Maxwell developed an analogy, where the magnetic field and the vectorpotential in electromagnetics are compared to the vorticity and velocity in hydrodynamics, respectively. However, this theory cannot make a correspondence of energy between two subjects. In the present work, the electromagnetic fields in a conducting medium are compared to the flow fields of an incompressible Newtonian fluid. The result shows that the magnetic induction intensity, current density, Lorenz force, superconductor boundary, Ohm's law and Ampere force in electromagnetics are analogous to the velocity, vorticity, Lamb vector, solid boundary, Newton's law of viscosity and Kutta-Joukowski theorem of lift force in hydrodynamics, respectively.

The Navier-Stokes equation is derived for the evolution of magnetic field in themedium by using the Maxwell equations, Lorenz force and Ohm's law. The work is useful for a deep understanding of electromagnetics and hydrodynamics

Cavitation protagonists will be happy to read that

To me i see rather analogies between Kepler's laws and what's happen at nuclei size in the case of Lenr reactions.

To remember them:

Quote from Alan Smith

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.12902

The Analogy between Electromagnetics and Hydrodynamics

Kai-Xin Hua,1aZhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center for the Safety of Pressure Vessel

and Pipeline, Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Ningbo University,

Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China

Abstract

The similarity between electromagnetics and hydrodynamics has been noticed for along time. Maxwell developed an analogy, where the magnetic field and the vectorpotential in electromagnetics are compared to the vorticity and velocity in hydrodynamics, respectively. However, this theory cannot make a correspondence of energy between two subjects. In the present work, the electromagnetic fields in a conducting medium are compared to the flow fields of an incompressible Newtonian fluid. The result shows that the magnetic induction intensity, current density, Lorenz force, superconductor boundary, Ohm's law and Ampere force in electromagnetics are analogous to the velocity, vorticity, Lamb vector, solid boundary, Newton's law of viscosity and Kutta-Joukowski theorem of lift force in hydrodynamics, respectively.

The Navier-Stokes equation is derived for the evolution of magnetic field in themedium by using the Maxwell equations, Lorenz force and Ohm's law. The work is useful for a deep understanding of electromagnetics and hydrodynamics

Display More

As above, so below.