I've often wondered how some journalists found their "experts" to quote on particular topics. I didn't realise that there are agencies that they can go to in order to find a relevant "expert", and that it has become a normal chargeable service. But it looks like some of these agencies have been rumbled, as they have been supplying non-existent experts, giving (mostly) AI sourced information. Even mainstream news outlets have been quoting these experts without verifying the sources - as the agencies are supposed to be doing that as part of their fee.
Read this article, and weep.
I've been noticing, recently, that some live human "expert interviewees", that have popped up on the BBC Radio 4 PM Programme, seemed to have less knowledge on their supposed specialist topic than the interviewer. I wondered how the programme producers found them. So are these interviewees posing as experts, having quickly read an AI summary of the topic?