Nasa Watch don't like data

Just a story for memory.

I posted on Nasa watch article agains E-cat
http://nasawatch.com/archives/…falls-for-l.html#comments

I was a bit negative but not so much, and at the end I put that summary on cold Fusion myth.

Quote

you parrot the myth.

it is massively replicated (153+ peer reviewed papers showing excess heat, 4 refuted critics on F&P that are broke)

for the description of the four, the only four critis, read Beaudette book

http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr home page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf#page=35

for the peer review papers start with this tally

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf#page=6

add recent paper by takahashi and iwamura in JJAP

for a synthesis you may simply read

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEcoldfusiond.pdf

for know the report was strongly attacked but no critic have survived.

electrical critics don't hold for someone knowing power meter...
for IR cam and alumina transparency, the question is solved and alumina is opaque for IR longer than 7um, as the IR cam read, confirmed by the fact that the optical brightness of the zones don't change the temperature the IR cam observe

the Pomp critic on isotopic challenge are absurd as a fraudsters would at least find an explanation for the result he manufacture.

moreover this is in a long list of heavily attacked but never positively debunked test, with previous on enough convincing for honest observers ( it was enough for cherokee fund to invest and now to manufacture that reactor themselves).

this is a desperate reaction of groupthink that make some people unable to admit they were fooled by the academic parrot (even if some academic did their job, and often lose their job for that).

Display More

previous answer were more factual.

Quote

Elforsk boss launche LENR initiative...
another one...

who is deluded?

those who accept evidence or those who have no argument but are sure to be right because they have a theory that don't work on the observations.

Quote

this is why edmund Stirms propose another theory,
p-e-p fusion, with a quantum coherent big object (hydroton, a chain of p-e-p-... insulated from chemical environment in a crack) that dissipate energy as x-rays transition...
anyway theory have never been a good reason to deny an observation.
it is common however.

and then I received that warning

Quote

You have made your point. If you repost the same material again and again as you have done on other sites you will be banned. No second warning.

the police of truth is watching...